This study views school as a platform for leading social change in the local community, with a particular emphasis on the school’s parents as a part of that community. As such, taking the case of a green school, we examined the relative effects of three means –outreach, communication and attentiveness to the local community’s needs – that can instill new norms and behavior among parents. A sample of 95 parents of fifth and sixth grade students answered a questionnaire. It was found that the school’s means for leading change had different impacts on parents’ attitudes and behavior. However, the findings supported that educators could be regarded as institutional carriers of social change through a relational system.
AckleyCR (2009) Leadership in green schools: school principals as agents of social responsibility. PhD Dissertation. Pennsylvania State University, USA.
2.
Addi-RaccahAGavishY (2010) The LEA’s role in a decentralized school system: The school principals’ view. Educational Management Administration & Leadership38(2): 184–201.
3.
Addi-RaccahA (2015) School principals' role in the interplay between the superintendents and local education authorities: The case of Israel. Journal of Educational Administration53(2): 287–306.
4.
AuerbachS (2007) From moral supporters to struggling advocates: re-conceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education42(3): 250–283.
5.
AuerbachS (2010) Beyond coffee with the principal: Toward leadership for authentic school–family partnerships. Journal of School Leadership20(6): 728–757.
6.
BarrJSaltmarshS (2014) “It all comes down to the leadership”: The role of the school principal in fostering parent–school engagement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(4): 491–505.
7.
BattilanaJLecaBBoxenbaumE (2009) How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals3(1): 65–107.
8.
BattilanaJ (2011) The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: evidence from the UK NHS. Organization Science22(4): 817–834.
9.
BirneyAReedJ (2009) Sustainability and Renewal: Findings from the Leading Sustainable Schools Research Project. Nottingham, UK: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Services, pp.1–56.
10.
ColdronJCrawfordMJonesS. (2014) The restructuring of schooling in England. The responses of well-positioned headteachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(3): 387–403.
11.
CouldryN (2012) Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
12.
CrowGHausmanCSScribnerJP (2002) Reshaping the principalship. In: MurphyJ (ed.) The Educational Leadership Challenge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.189–210.
13.
DeweyJ (1902) The school as social center. The Elementary School Teacher3(2): 73–86.
14.
DeweyJ (2001) Education and social change. In: SchultzF (ed.) SOURCES: Notable selections in education. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Dushkin, pp.333–341.
15.
DiMaggioP (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory In: ZuckerLG (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.3–21.
16.
DrakeTAGoldringEB (2014) The politics of school-level community engagement and decision making. In: LindleJC (ed.) Political Contexts of Educational Leadership: ISLLC Standard Six, Vol. 37. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.37–60.
17.
EilamETropT (2012a) Factors influencing adults’ environmental attitudes and behaviors and the role of environmental schools in influencing their communities. Education and Urban Society46(2): 234–263.
18.
EilamETropT (2012b) Environmental attitudes and environmental behavior – which is the horse and which is the cart?Sustainability4(9): 2210–2246.
19.
EilamETropT (2013) Evaluating school–community participation in developing a local sustainability agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education8(2): 359–380.
20.
EpsteinJL (2001) School, Family, And Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
EisenstadtSN (1980) Cultural orientations, institutional entrepreneurs, and social-change - comparative-analysis of traditional civilizations. American Journal of Sociology85(4): 840–869.
22.
GarudRHardyCMaguireS (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: an introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies28(7): 957–969.
GreenTLGoodenMA (2014) Transforming out-of-school challenges into opportunities. community schools reform in the urban midwest. Urban Education49(8): 930–954.
25.
GrolnickWSRaftery-HelmerJN (2015) Core components of family-school connections: toward a model of need satisfying partnerships. In: SheridanSMKimEM (eds) Foundational Aspects of Family-School Partnership Research. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 15–34.
26.
Hoover-DempseyKVSandlerHM (1997) Why do parents become involved in their children’s education?Review of Educational Research67(1): 3–42.
27.
HouenSDanbySFarrellAThorpeT (2016) Creating spaces for children’s agency: ‘I wonder…’formulations in teacher–child interactions. International Journal of Early Childhood48(3): 259–276.
28.
HoyWKMiskelCG (2001) Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
29.
JacksonL (2008) Leading Sustainable Schools: What the Research Tells Us. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership, pp.5–52.
30.
JacksonLPangMFBrownECainSDingleCBonebrakeT (2016) Environmental attitudes and behaviors among secondary students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development18(2): 70–80.
31.
JeynesWH (2007) The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement a meta-analysis. Urban Education42(1): 82–110.
32.
JeynesW (2010) Parental Involvement and Academic Success. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
JohnsonJAMusialDHallGE. (2008) Foundations of American Education: Perspectives on Education in a Changing World. 14th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Educational .
34.
KingBGFelinTWhettenDA (2010) Perspective-finding the organization in organizational theory: a meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science21(1): 290–305.
35.
KraftMADoughertySM (2013) The effect of teacher-family communication on student engagement: evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness6(3): 199–222.
36.
KraftMARogersT (2015) The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review47(3): 49–63.
37.
LavendaO (2011) Parental involvement in school: A test of Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler’s model among Jewish and Arab parents in Israel. Children and Youth Services Review 33(6): 927–935.
38.
MappKL (2003) Having their say: parents describe why and how they are engaged in their children’s learning. School Community Journal13(1): 35–64.
39.
MappKHongS (2010) Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach parent. In: ChristensonSLReschlyAL (eds) Handbook of School–Family Partnerships. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.246–265.
40.
McGrathWH (2007) Ambivalent partners: Power, trust, and partnership in relationships between mothers and teachers in a full-time childcare center. Teachers College Record109(6): 1401–1422.
41.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
42.
MeyerJWScottWRDealTE (1992) Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In: MeyerJWScottRW (eds) Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Newbury Park, UK: SAGE Publications, pp.45–70.
43.
NegevMSagyGGarbYSalzbergATalA (2008) Evaluating the environmental literacy of Israeli elementary and high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education39(2): 3–20.
44.
NirA (2009) Centralization and School Empowerment: From Rhetoric to Practice. New York, NY: Nova Biomedical Books.
45.
NirABen-DavidABoglerRInbarDEZoharA (2016) School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system: Discrepancies between the declarative and operational levels. International Journal of Educational Management30(7): 1231–1246.
46.
OECD (2010) PISA 2009 results: what makes a school successful? – Resources, policies and practices (volume IV). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091559-en (accessed 10 October 2013).
47.
PorrittJHopkinsDBirneyAReedJ (2009) Every child’s future: Leading the way. Nottingham: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children’s Service, 2–32. Available at: www.nationalcollege.org.uk/index/docinfo.htm (accessed 20 July 2015).
48.
PoveyJCampbellAWillisLHaynesMWesternMBennettSAntrobusEPeddeC (2016) Engaging Parents in schools and building parent-school partnerships: the role of school and parent organization leadership. International Journal of Educational Research79: 128–141.
49.
RansonS (2012) Schools and civil society: Corporate or community governance. Critical Studies in Education53(1): 29–45.
50.
ReschlyALChristensonSL (2012) Moving from “context matters” to engaged partnerships with families. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation22(1–2): 62–78.
51.
RimacTMairJBattilanaJ (2012) Social entrepreneurs, socialization processes, and social change: The case of SEKEM. In: Golden-BiddleKDuttonJE (eds) Using a Positive Lens to Explore Social Change and Organizations. New York, NY: Routledge,pp. 71–89.
52.
RothenbergS (2007) Environmental managers as institutional entrepreneurs: The influence of institutional and technical pressures on waste management. Journal of Business Research60(7): 749–757.
53.
SagyGTalA (2015) Greening the curriculum: Current trends in environmental education in israel’s public schools. Israel Studies20(1): 57–85.
54.
SchelleyCCrossJEFranzenW. (2012) How to go green: Creating a conservation culture in a public high school through education, modeling, and communication. The Journal of Environmental Education43(3): 143–161.
55.
ScottWR (2003) Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change12(4): 879–894.
56.
ScottWR (2008) Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies29(2): 219–238.
57.
ScottWR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Los-Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington: SAGE Publications.
58.
Shay-MargalitBRubinOD (2016) Effect of the Israeli “green schools” reform on pupils’ environmental attitudes and behavior. Society & Natural Resources30(1): 112–128.
SimkinsT (1997) Autonomy and accountability. In: FidlerBRussellSSimkinsT (eds) Choices for Self-Managing Schools: Autonomy and Accountability. London, UK: Paul Chapman, pp.20–234.
61.
SivekDJ (2002) Environmental sensitivity among Wisconsin high school students. Environmental Education Research8(2): 155–170.
62.
SmithAB (2007) Children as social actors: An introduction. International Journal of Children’s Rights15(1): 1–4.
63.
SmithAB (2011) Respecting children’s rights and agency. In: DeborahHBobPTimW (eds) Researching Young Children’s Perspectives. Debating the Ethics and Dilemmas of Educational Research with Children. London, UK: Routledge, pp.11–25.
64.
SpillaneJPGomezLMMeslerL (2009) Notes on reframing the role of organizations in policy implementation. In: SykesGSchneiderBPlankDN (eds) Handbook of Education Policy Research. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, pp.409–425.
65.
StakeRE (2005) Qualitative case studies. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp.443–466.
66.
TushmanML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Administrative Science Quarterly22(4): 587–605.
67.
UzzellD (1999) Education for environmental action in the community: New roles and relationships. Cambridge Journal of Education29(3): 397–413.
68.
ValliLStefanskiAJacobsonR (2014) Typologizing school–community partnerships: A framework for analysis and action. Urban Education51(7): 719–747.
69.
VecianaJMUrbanoD (2008) The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research: Introduction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal4(4): 365–379.
70.
WallaceDSPaulsonRMLordCGBondCFJr (2005) Which behaviors do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Review of General Psychology9(3): 214–227.
71.
WangT (2013) Chinese school principals’ behavioral intentions in relation to green school practices. PhD Dissertation, Auburn University, ii–195.
72.
WilderS (2014) Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review66(3): 377–397.
73.
WilliamsP (2002) The competent boundary spanner. Public Administration80(1): 103–124.
74.
WilliamsP (2010) Special agents: the nature and role of boundary spanners. In: ESRC Research Seminar Series - ‘Collaborative Futures: New Insights from Intra and Inter-Sectoral Collaborations’, February 2010, University of Birmingham, UK.
75.
WilliamsP (2013) We are all boundary spanners now?International Journal of Public Sector Management26(1): 17–32.
76.
YeminiMAddi-RaccahAKatarivasK (2015) I have a dream School principals as entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(4): 526–540.
