Teacher collaboration and collective teacher efficacy are key factors in a school's capacity for improvement. Based on assumptions drawn from social capital theory, we posit that principals play a pivotal role in shaping teachers’ work environments, thereby enhancing collaboration and collective efficacy. However, evidence on the determinants of these factors and their dynamics as aspects of a school's social capital remains limited. Using longitudinal survey data from teachers in Germany collected over three measurement occasions (n1 = 619, n2 = 674, n3 = 263), this study provides evidence of a temporal relationship between principal leadership to promote within-school collaboration and collective teacher efficacy, mediated by teacher collaboration. Additionally, we find a reciprocal temporal relationship between teacher collaboration and collective efficacy. Our findings contribute to understanding the causal relationship between these factors and underscore the critical role of principal leadership in fostering this interplay.
AdlerPSKwonS-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review27(1): 17–40.
2.
BanduraA (1993) Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist28(2): 117–148.
3.
BanduraA (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science9(3): 75–78.
4.
BerkovichI (2018) Will it sink or will it float. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(6): 888–907.
5.
BliesePD (1998) Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods1(4): 355–373.
6.
ÇobanÖÖzdemirNBellibaşMŞ (2023) Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: Testing a multilevel mediation model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(1): 95–115.
7.
ColeDAMaxwellSE (2003) Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology112(4): 558–577.
8.
CubanL (2020) Reforming the grammar of schooling again and again. American Journal of Education126(4): 665–672.
9.
DeciELRyanRM (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227–268.
10.
DonaldsonJPAllen-HandyA (2023) What is learning? A complex conceptual systems analysis of conceptualizations of learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open4: 100254.
11.
DrosselK (2015) Motivationale Bedingungen von Lehrerkooperation: Eine empirische Analyse der Zusammenarbeit im Projekt „Ganz In“ [Motivational Conditions of Teacher Collaboration: An Empirical Analysis of Collaboration in the “Ganz In” Project]. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
12.
EndersCK (2010) Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
13.
García-MartínezIMontenegro-RuedaMMolina-FernándezE andFernandéz-Batanero JM (2021) Mapping teacher collaboration for school success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement32(4): 631–649.
14.
García TorresD (2019) Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in U.S. Schools. Teaching and Teacher Education79: 111–123.
15.
GoddardRGoddardYKimES andMiller R (2015) A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education121(4): 501–530.
16.
GoddardRKimM (2018) Examining connections between teacher perceptions of collaboration, differentiated instruction and teacher efficacy. Teachers College Record120(1): 1–24.
17.
GrayJKruseSTarterCJ (2016) Enabling school structures, collegial trust and academic emphasis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership44(6): 875–891.
18.
HallingerP (2003) Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329–352.
19.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
20.
HamakerELKuiperRMGrasmanRPPP (2015) A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods20(1): 102–116.
21.
HargreavesAO'ConnorMT (2018) Leading collaborative professionalism. Victoria: Centre for Strategic Education.
22.
HoninghMHoogeE (2014) The effect of school-leader support and participation in decision making on teacher collaboration in Dutch primary and secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership42(1): 75–98.
23.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
24.
JonesMHarrisA (2014) Principals leading successful organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management27(3): 473–485.
25.
KalinowskiEJurczokAWestphalA andVock M (2022) Welche individuellen und institutionellen Faktoren begünstigen die Kooperation von Grundschullehrkräften? [Which individual and institutional factors facilitate collaboration between teachers in primary school?]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft25(4): 999–1029.
26.
Kemper PatrickS (2022) Organizing schools for collaborative learning: School leadership and Teachers’ engagement in collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly58(4): 638–673.
27.
KlassenRMUsherELBongM (2010) Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education78(4): 464–486.
28.
KwanP (2020) Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly56(2): 321–349.
29.
LeithwoodKSunJSchumackerR (2020) How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly56(4): 570–599.
30.
LittleRJA (1988) A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association83(404): 1198–1202.
31.
LiuPLiLWangJ (2020) Understanding the relationship between transformational leadership and collective teacher efficacy in Chinese primary schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education23(5): 604–617.
32.
LiuSKeeleyJWSuiY, et al. (2021a) Impact of distributed leadership on teacher job satisfaction in China: The mediating roles of teacher autonomy and teacher collaboration. Studies in Educational Evaluation71: 101099.
33.
LiuSYinH (2024) Opening the black box: How professional learning communities, collective teacher efficacy, and cognitive activation affect students’ mathematics achievement in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education139: 104443.
34.
LiuYBellibaşMŞGümüşS (2021b) The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership49(3): 430–453.
35.
MaXMarionR (2024) How does leadership affect teacher collaboration? Evidence from teachers in US schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement35(2): 116–141.
36.
MeadeAWJohnsonECBraddyPW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology93(3): 568–592.
37.
MeyerAHartung-BeckVGronostajAKrügerSRichterD (2023) How can principal leadership practices promote teacher collaboration and organizational change? A longitudinal multiple case study of three school improvement initiatives. Journal of Educational Change24(3): 425–455.
38.
MeyerARichterD (2024) Longitudinal effects of a professional development program on principals’ leadership practices: results of a baseline latent change score model. Professional Development in Education: 1–18. https:///doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2413119.
39.
MeyerARichterDHartung-BeckV (2022) The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration: Investigating the mediating effect of teachers’ collective efficacy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership50(4): 593–612.
40.
MeyerARichterDMarxAHartung-BeckV (2019) Welche Aufgaben haben Schulleitungen heute? Eine Analyse von Schulleitungsaufgaben im innerdeutschen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Bildungsverwaltung35(2): 23–44.
41.
MoolenaarNMSleegersPJDalyAJ (2012) Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education28(2): 251–262.
42.
MuckenthalerMTillmannTWeißS andKiel E (2020) Teacher collaboration as a core objective of school development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement31(3): 486–504.
43.
MulderJDHamakerEL (2021) Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal28(4): 638–648.
44.
Nájera CatalánHE (2019) Reliability, population classification and weighting in multidimensional poverty measurement: A monte carlo study. Social Indicators Research142(3): 887–910.
OrthUMeierLLBühlerJL, Dapp LC, Krauss S, Messerli D and Robins RW (2022) Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods29(2): 421–433.
47.
PenuelWRielMKrauseA andFrank K (2009) Analyzing Teachers’ professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record111(1): 124–163.
48.
PutnickDLBornsteinMH (2016) Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review DR41: 71–90.
49.
RonfeldtMFarmerSOMcQueenK andGrissom JA (2015) Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal52(3): 475–514.
50.
RossJAGrayP (2006) Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement17(2): 179–199.
51.
SchwarzerRJerusalemM (1999) Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen [Scales for measuring variables on the teacher and student level. Documentation of the psychometric measurement as part of the scientific evaluation of the project self-efficacious schools]. Berlin.
52.
SebastianJCamburnEMSpillaneJP (2018) Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and school principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly54(1): 47–84.
53.
SpillaneJPSunJM (2022) The school principal and the development of social capital in primary schools: The formative years. School Leadership & Management42(1): 4–23.
54.
TanCYDimmockCWalkerA (2024) How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership52(1): 6–27.
55.
TetlockPELeviA (1982) Attribution bias: On the inconclusiveness of the cognition-motivation debate. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology18: 68–88.
56.
TickleELBrownleeJNailonD (2005) Personal epistemological beliefs and transformational leadership behaviours. Journal of Management Development24(8): 706–719.
57.
TruijenKSleegersPMeelissenM andNiueuwenhuis AFM (2013) What makes teacher teams in a vocational education context effective?Journal of Workplace Learning25(1): 58–73.
58.
Tschannen-MoranMBarrM (2004) Fostering student learning: The relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools3(3): 189–209.
59.
Tschannen-MoranMWoolfolk HoyA (2007) The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education23(6): 944–956.
60.
TulowitzkiPHinzenIRollerM (2019) Die Qualifizierung von Schulleiter*innen in Deutschland - ein bundesweiter Überblick [The qualification of school leaders in Germany: A national overview]. Die Deutsche Schule111(2): 149–170.
61.
van DyckCFreseMBaerM andSonnentag S (2005) Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology90(6): 1228–1240.
62.
VangriekenKDochyFRaesE andKyndt E (2015) Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review15: 17–40.
63.
VoelkelRH (2019) Causal relationship among transformational leadership, professional learning communities, and teacher collective efficacy. International Journal of Leadership in Education25(3): 345–366.
64.
VoelkelRHChrispeelsJH (2017) Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement28(4): 505–526.
65.
WigfieldAEcclesJS (2000) Expectancy-Value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 68–81.
66.
YadaALeskinenMSavolainenHSchwabS (2022) Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education109: 103521.
67.
YadaTRäikkönenEImai-MatsumuraKShimadaHKoikeRJäppinenA-K (2019) Prosociality as a mediator between teacher collaboration and turnover intention. International Journal of Educational Management34(3): 535–548.
68.
YadaTSavolainenH (2023) Principal self-efficacy and school climate as antecedents of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement34(2): 209–225.
69.
YoungsPKingMB (2002) Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly38(5): 643–670.
70.
ZimmermanBJ (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice41(2): 64–70.
