This study considers the rhetoric and practice of self-assessment by governing bodies of schools and colleges. The context expects governing bodies to reflect on their performance and this is supported by theoretical approaches to self-assessment of ‘boards’. However, there are both general notes of caution and interview evidence of the complexities and limitations of self-assessment by governing bodies. The article includes advice on the basic conditions necessary for undertaking self-assessment by school and college governing bodies. In the light of the evidence and case presented, the authors urge care and sophistication when practising or considering the outcome of self-assessment by school and college governing bodies.
BaronRKerrNMillerN (1993) Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press.
2.
BlackburnS (2014) Mirror, Mirror: The Uses and Abuses of Self-Love. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
3.
CongerJFinegoldDLawlerE (1998) Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 1998.
4.
CornforthCHarrisonYMurrayV (2010) What makes chairs of governing bodies effective?Report prepared for the National Council for Voluntary Organisations and the Charity Trustee Network. Guildford, UK: The National Council for Voluntary Organisations and the Charity Trustee Network.
5.
DunningDHeathCSulsJ (2004) Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest5(3): 69–106.
6.
EpleyNDunningD (2000) Feeling ‘holier than thou’: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(6): 861–875.
7.
EpsteinMRoyM-J (2005) Evaluating and monitoring CEO performance. Corporate Governance5(4): 75–87.
8.
GillMFlynnRReissingE (2005) The governance self assessment checklist: An instrument for assessing board effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership15(3): 271–294.
9.
GleesonDAbbottIHillR (2009) Creative governance: The art of the possible?University of Warwick: LSIS.
10.
Governance and Compliance: The ICSA Magazine (September 2013). In EmmaS. (ed), Ignorance is not bliss, (pp. 20–21).
11.
JamesC. (2012) A review of the Literature on the Role of the Board Chair: What are the Messages for Chairs of School Governing Bodies?Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust.
KeepE (2014) What Does Skills Policy Look Like Now the Money Has Run Out?University of Oxford: Association of Colleges.
14.
KielGNicolsonG (2005) Evaluating Boards and Directors. Corporate Governance13(5): 613–631.
15.
LencioniP (2002) The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
16.
LorschJ (1995) Empowering the board. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 107–117.
17.
LSIS (2009) Learning to Balance Support and Challenge: A Brief Guide for Governors and Clerks of Colleges. Coventry, UK: Learning and Skills Improvement Service.
18.
LSIS (2013) The Effective College Board: Keeping Fit for Purpose. Coventry, UK: Learning and Skills Improvement Service.
19.
MacaroA (2013) Should we live in hope?FT Weekend Magazine, 4/5 May.
