This study aims to develop and validate the Principal Competency Inventory (PCI), an instrument used to assess a principal’s leadership competencies that promote student learning in South Korea. An extensive review of prior work was conducted to understand the theoretical foundation related to school leadership and the competency construct of the PCI derived from the Behavioural Event Interview of principals. Then, the psychometric procedures used in developing and validating the PCI were followed. The significance of this study and its practical implications for the use of this new instrument was discussed. From a theoretical and practical standpoint, this study contributes to the school leadership field by describing development and validation procedures, identifying where evidence of the reliable assessment instrument is lacking, and utilising the advantage of the competency-based framework. Also, the analysis of this study provides international perspectives about school leadership practices, thus supplementing the prior Western-focused literature in this field. In addition, this study offers useful information for policymakers and principal leadership development program designers who want to assess and evaluate principal leadership competency.
AndersonCS (1982) The search for school climate: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research52(3): 368–420.
2.
AravenaF (2016) Preparing school principals in the Chilean scenario: lessons from Australia, England and the United States. Journal of Educational Administration and History48(4): 342–357.
3.
BamburgJDAndrewsRL (1990) Instructional Leadership, School Goals, and Student Achievement: Exploring the Relationship between Means and Ends. In: Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, Massachusetts.
4.
BarthRS (1986) On sheep and goats and school reform. The Phi Delta Kappan68(4): 293–296.
5.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: The Free Press.
6.
BentlerPM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238.
7.
BerkowitzRMooreHAstorRABenbenishtyR (2017) A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research87(2): 425–469.
8.
Bethell-FoxC (1992) Identifying and Assessing Managerial Competences. London: Hay Management Consultants.
9.
BlazarDKraftMA (2017) Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis39(1): 146–170.
10.
BluntPJonesML (1997) Exploring the limits of Western leadership theory in East Asia and Africa. Personnel Review26(1/2): 6–23.
11.
BoyatzisRE (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York: Wiley.
12.
BoyatzisRE (1998) Thematic Analysis and Code Development: Transforming Qualitative Information. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
13.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
14.
BusbyE (2019) Number of schools failing to recruit senior leaders rises to record high, survey suggests. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/teacher-shortage-school-head-staff-recruit-retention-naht-headteacher-a8896751.html (accessed 10 November 2021).
15.
ByrneB M (2013) Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
16.
CamburnEMSpillaneJPSebastianJ (2010) Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly46(5): 707–737.
ChoDParkYKimBKimH (2010) A need analysis on principal's job competency. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education27(4): 293–315.
19.
ChungPJCheaH (2016) South Korea’s accountability policy system and national achievement test In: SmithWC (ed) The Global Testing Culture: Shaping Education Policy, Perceptions, and Practice, Ed.Oxford: Symposium Books, pp.249–260.
20.
CiraDJBenjaminE (1998) Competency-based pay: a concept in evolution. Compensation and Benefits Review30(5) 1998: 21–28.
21.
CliffordMMenonRGangiTCondonCHornungK (2012) Measuring School Climate for Gauging Principal Performance: A Review of the Validity and Reliability of Publicly Accessible Measures. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/e572172012-001
22.
ConleyDTGoldmanP (1994) Facilitative leadership: how principals lead without dominating. OSSC Bulletin37(9): n9.
23.
Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) (1996) Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards for School Leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
24.
CowieMCrawfordM (2007) Principal preparation–still an act of faith?School Leadership and Management27(2): 129–146.
25.
CroningerRGRiceJKRathbunANishioM (2007) Teacher qualifications and early learning: effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement. Economics of Education Review26(3): 312–324.
DayCGuQ (2018) How successful secondary school principals in England respond to policy reforms: the influence of biography. Leadership and Policy in Schools17(3): 332–344.
28.
DayCHarrisAHadfieldMTolleyHBeresfordJ (2000) Leading Schools in Times of Change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
DesimoneLSmithTPhillipsK (2013) Linking student achievement growth to professional development participation and changes in instruction: a longitudinal study of elementary students and teachers in Title I schools. Teachers College Record115(5): 1–46.
33.
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (Vol 26). Sage publications.
34.
DorfmanPWHowellJPHibinoSLeeJKTateUBautistaA (1997) Leadership in Western and Asian countries: commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The Leadership Quarterly8(3): 233–274.
35.
Eddy-SpicerDBubbSEarleyPCrawfordMJamesC (2019) Headteacher performance management in England: balancing internal and external accountability through performance leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership47(2): 170–188.
36.
EdmondsR (1979) Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership37(1): 15–24.
37.
GinsbergRBerryB (1990) The folklore of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education3(3): 205–230.
38.
GlatterR (1999) From struggling to juggling: towards a redenition of the field of educational leadership and management. Educational Management & Administration27(3): 253–266.
39.
GlatterRKyddL (2003) ‘Best practice' in educational leadership and management: Can we identify it and learn from it?Educational Management & Administration31(3): 231–243.
40.
GoldringEPorterAMurphyJElliottSNCravensX (2009) Assessing learning-centered leadership: connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools8(1): 1–36.
41.
GoncziAHagerPOliverL (1990) Establishing Competency-Based Standards in the Professions. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
GreenwaldRHedgesLVLaineRD (1996) The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research66(3): 361–396.
44.
GuQSammonsPChenJ (2018) How principals of successful schools enact education policy: perceptions and accounts from senior and middle leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools17(3): 373–390.
45.
HallingerP. (2015). Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Springer.
46.
HallingerP (2003) Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 329–352.
47.
HallingerP (2010) Developing instructional leadership. In Davies B & Brundrett M (Eds.), Developing successful leadershipLondon: Springer.
48.
HallingerP (2011) Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2): 125–142.
49.
HallingerP (2018) Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership46(1): 5–24.
50.
HallingerPBickmanLDavisK (1996) School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal96(5): 527–549.
51.
HallingerPHeckRH (1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: a review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly32(1): 5–44.
52.
HallingerPMurphyJ (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal86(2): 217–247.
53.
HallingerPWalkerA (2015) A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration53(4): 554–570.
54.
HalversonRKelleyCShawJ (2014) A CALL for improved school leadership. Phi Delta Kappan95(6): 57–60.
55.
HawkinsREWelcherCMHolmboeESKirkLMNorciniJJSimonsKBSkochelakSE (2015) Implementation of competency-based medical education: Are we addressing the concerns and challenges?Medical Education49(11): 1086–1102.
56.
HeckRH (2009) Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Educational Administration47(2): 227–249.
57.
HeckRHLarsenTJMarcoulidesGA (1990) Instructional leadership and school achievement: validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly26(2): 94–125.
58.
IngvarsonLAndersonMGronnPJacksonA (2006) Standards for School Leadership: A Critical Review of Literature. Canberra: Teaching Australia.
59.
JungHJChoYH (2020) Does democratic school management bring innovations into Hyukshin school in Seoul?Korean Journal of Educational Administration38(1): 79–108. (KOREAN).
60.
KimDMoonYKwonSMoonY (2016) Tasks of educating for educational administration contents in principal qualification training program. The Journal of Educational Administration34(1): 47–71.
61.
KimDH (2020) The effect of principal's democratic leadership on school climate, teacher cooperation, teacher morale, and teacher exhaustion. Journal of Education & Culture26(4): 79–92. (KOREAN).
62.
LambertL (2002) A framework for shared leadership. Educational Leadership59(8): 37–40.
63.
LambertMBouchammaY (2019) Leadership requirements for school principals: similarities and differences between four competency standards. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy188: 53–68.
64.
LeeJParkD (2014) Do American and Korean education systems converge? Tracking school reform policies and outcomes in Korea and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review15(3): 391–399.
65.
LeithwoodK (1994) Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly30(4): 498–518.
66.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2008) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management28(1): 27–42.
67.
LeithwoodKHarrisAHopkinsD (2020) Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership and Management40(1): 5–22.
68.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000) The effects of transformational leadership on organisational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration38(2): 112–129.
69.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2005) A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools4(3): 177–199.
70.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2008) Linking leadership to student learning: the contribution of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly44(4): 496–528.
71.
LeithwoodKAMontgomeryDJ (1982) The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research52(3): 309–339.
72.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonSWahlstromK, and others. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/2035
73.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.PollockK. (2017). How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success: The Four Paths Framework (Vol 23). Springer.
74.
LimSBYangMS (2020) The exploration on the relationship among teachers’ perceived principal transformational leadership, school climate, school-PD, and teacher self-efficacy. Korean Journal of Educational Administration38(1): 199–222. (KOREAN).
75.
LouisSKDretzkeBWahlstromK (2010) How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement21(3): 315–336.
76.
LouisSKRobinsonVM (2012) External mandates and instructional leadership: school leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration50(5): 629–665.
77.
MarksHMLouisKS (1997) Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19(3): 245–275.
78.
MarksHMNanceJP (2007) Contexts of accountability under systemic reform: implications for principal influence on instruction and supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly43(1): 3–37.
79.
MarksHMPrintySM (2003) Principal leadership and school performance: an integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly39(3): 370–397.
80.
MarshHW (1994) Using the national longitudinal study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: the self-description questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology86(3): 439.
81.
MarshHWHauK-T& GraysonD (2005) Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In: Maydeu-OlivaresAMcArdleJJ (eds) Contemporary Psychometrics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.275–340.
82.
MarzanoRJWatersTMcNultyBA (2001) School Leadership That Works: From Research to Results. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
83.
MatthewsPReaSHillRGuQ (2014) Freedom to Lead: A Study of Outstanding Primary School Leadership in England. London: Department for Education.
84.
McCaffreyDFHamiltonLSStecherBMKleinSPBugliariDRobynA(2001) Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: the case of standards-based high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education32(5): 493–517.
85.
McClellandD (1973) Testing for competence rather than for ‘intelligence’. American Psychologist28(1): 1–14.
86.
MurphyJ. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In LottoRSThurstonPW (Eds.), Advances in Educational Administration: Changing Perspectives on the School (Vol.1, Pt. B, pp. 163–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
87.
MurphyJ (2005) Unpacking the foundations of ISLLC standards and addressing concerns in the academic community. Educational Administration Quarterly41(1): 154–191.
88.
MurphyJHallingerP (1988) Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. The Journal of Educational Research81(3): 175–181.
89.
NancarrowCBraceI (2000) Saying the “right thing”: coping with social desirability bias in marketing research. Bristol Business School Teaching and Research Review3(11): 1–11.
90.
O’DonnellRJWhiteGP (2005) Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin89(645): 56–71.
91.
PaulhusDL (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJPShaverPRWrightsmanLS (eds) Measures of social psychological attitudes, Vol. 1. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (p. 17–59). Academic Press.
92.
PorterACPolikoffMSGoldringEMurphyJElliottSNMayH(2010) Developing a psychometrically sound assessment of school leadership: The VAL-ED as a case study. Educational Administration Quarterly46(2): 135–173.
93.
ReysRReysBLapanRHollidayGWasmanD (2003) Assessing the impact of" standards"-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education34(1): 74–95.
94.
RossSHauerKEvan MelleE (2018) Outcomes are what matter: Competency-based medical education gets us to our goal. MedEdPublish7: 2.
95.
SandbergJ (2000) Understanding human competence at work: an interpretative approach. Academy of Management Journal43(1): 9–25.
96.
Schermelleh-EngelKMoosbruggerHMüllerH (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online8(2): 23–74.
97.
SoKKangJ (2014) Curriculum reform in Korea: issues and challenges for twenty-first century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher23(4): 795–803.
98.
SpencerLMSpencerSM (1993) Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
SpillaneJPDiamondJBBurchPHallettTJitaLZoltnersJ (2002) Managing in the middle: school leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy16(5): 731–762.
101.
SteenkampJ-BEBaumgartnerH (1998) Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research25(1): 78–90.
102.
StevensJ (1992) Applied Statistics for the Social Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
103.
SungYKLeeY (2018) Politics and the practice of school change: the Hyukshin School movement in South Korea. Curriculum Inquiry48(2): 238–252.
104.
TabachnickBGFidellLS (2001) Principal components and factor analysis. Using Multivariate Statistics4(1): 582–633.
105.
VandenbergRJLanceCE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organisational research. Organisational Research Methods3(1): 4–70.
106.
WallaceMR (2009) Making sense of the links: professional development, teacher practices, and student achievement. Teachers College Record111(2): 573–596.
107.
WorthingtonRLWhittakerTA (2006) Scale development research: a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist34(6): 806–883.
