This paper presents the leadership implications from a study that explored how to increase the quality of teaching in a university thereby presenting data from the bottom up – the academic perspective – to inform leadership, policies, and academic development which generally flows from the top down. We report academics’ perceptions of and motivations to engage with teaching and learning, as well as their opinions of the university’s recognition and rewards for quality teaching. Pedagogical professional development needs of academics were also examined. Tensions existed between teaching and research in this research-intensive university; even so, academics valued teaching, were committed to students, but were resentful that institutional values and rewards remained focused on research. A common perception was that having a doctorate was all that was required to be an effective teacher. Administrators were reported as privileging research-oriented professoriate activities over the work of teaching-focused lecturers. We present a model of leadership considerations that can inform leadership decision-making and priorities that findings indicated influence academic engagement.
AdelmanC (2009) The Bologna process for U.S. eyes: Re-learning higher education in the age of convergence. Institute for Higher Education Policy.
2.
Australian Universities Quality Agency (2006) Quality Frameworks Reflections from Australian Universities. In: BairdJ (ed) Report, Melbourne VIC: Australian Universities Quality Agency.
3.
AhmadAStockleyDMooreR (2012) 3M Fellows making a mark in Canadian higher education, In SalterDJ (ed) Cases on Quality Teaching Practices in Higher Education. Hershey, PM: IGI Global, pp. 182–190) doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-3661-3.ch011
4.
BrewABoudD (1995) Teaching and research: Establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education29: 261–273.
5.
BrysonCBlackwellR (2006) Managing temporary workers in higher education: Still at the margin?Personnel Review35(2): 207–225.
6.
BurnettSHuismanJ (2010) Universities responses to globalisation: The influence of organisational culture. Journal of Studies in International Education14(2): 117–142.
7.
ChattertonPGoddardJ (2000) The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education35(4): 475–496.
8.
ChickeringAWGamsonZF (1987) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin3–7.
9.
ChickeringAWGamsonZF (1991) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In: ChickeringAWGamsonZF (eds) Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 63–69.
10.
ChickeringAWGamsonZF (1999) Development and adaptations of the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning80(Winter): 75–81.
11.
CoatesH (2009) What’s the difference? A model for measuring the value added by Higher Education in Australia. Higher Education Management & Policy21(1): 1–19.
12.
ColemanKFloodA (2013) Marking Time. Leading and Managing the Development of Assessment in Higher Education. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing LLC.
13.
CôtéJEAllaharAL (2007) Ivory Tower Blues: A University System in Crisis. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Inc.
14.
Council for Higher Education (2008) New Leadership for Student Learning and Accountability. A Statement of Principles Commitments to Action. Report. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
15.
CroskyAAllenB (2013) A collaborative approach to successful assessment review. In: ColemanKFloodA (eds) Marking Time. Leading and Managing the Development of Assessment in Higher Education. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing LLC.
16.
CudmoreG (2005) Globalization internationalization and the recruitment of international students in higher education and in the Ontario colleges of applied Arts and Technology. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education35: 37–60.
17.
de JongheAM (2005) Reorganising the teaching-research tension. Higher Education Management & Policy17(2): 61–74.
18.
de la HarpeBRadloffA (2008) Institutional support for quality learning and teaching. In: ScottSDixonK (eds) The Globalised University: Trends and Development in Teaching and Learning. Perth, Western Australia: Black Swan Press, pp. 19–50.
19.
DenmanBD (2005) What is a university in the 21st century?Higher Education Management & Policy17(2): 1–20.
20.
DewarK (2002) On being a good teacher. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism Education1(1): 61–67. DOI: 103794/johlste1114.
21.
DixonKCScottS (2008) Faculty perceptions of learning and teaching at an Australian technology university: Challenges in maintaining quality. In: ScottSDixonK (eds) The Globalised University: Trends and Development in Teaching and Learning. Perth, Western Australia: Black Swan Press, pp. 51–82.
22.
DoyleWRDelaneyJA (2009) Higher education funding: The new normal. Change41(4): 60–62.
23.
DunnLWallaceM (2004) Australian academics teaching in Singapore: Striving for cultural empathy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International41(3): 291–304.
24.
DunnRGriggsS A (2000) Practical Approaches to Using Learning Styles in Higher Education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
25.
EastmanJA (2006) Revenue generation and organisational change in higher education: Insights from Canada. Higher Education Management & Policy18(3): 1–27.
26.
EvansL (2011) The “Shape” of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal37(5): 851–870.
27.
EvansL (2008) Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies56(1): 20–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
28.
FindlowS (2008) Accountability and innovation in higher education: A disabling tension?Studies in Higher Education33(3): 313–329.
29.
GardnerH (1999) Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
30.
GreenbergM (2004) A university is not a business (and other fantasies). EDUCAUSE Review39: 10–16.
31.
HagerPHollandSBeckettD (2003) Enhancing the learning and employability of graduates: The role of generic skills. Business/Higher Education Round Table: n.p.
HoltD (2010) Strategic Leadership for Institutional Teaching and Learning Centres: Developing a Model for the 21st Century. Strawberry Hills, NSW Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
34.
HornM (1999) Tenure and the Canadian professoriate. Journal of Canadian Studies34(3): 261–281.
35.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRTSmithKA (1998) Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works?Change30(4): 26–35.
36.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRTSmithKA (2007) The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychological Review19: 15–29.
37.
KaiJ (2009) A critical analysis of accountability in higher education: Its relevance to evaluation of higher education. Chinese Education and Society42(2): 39–51.
38.
KnapperC (2010) Changing teaching practice: Barriers and strategies. In: Christensen HughesJMightyJ (eds) Taking Stock. Research on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Kingston, ON: School of Policy Studies Queens University, pp. 229–242.
39.
KnowlesMSHoltonIII EFSwansonRA (2005) The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (6th ed). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
40.
KouzesJMPosnerBZ (2003) Academic Administrators Guide to Exemplary Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
LaoTGonzalesC (2005) Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education13(3): 459–474.
42.
LevineASunJC (2002) Barriers to Distance Education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
43.
MarginsonS (2006) Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education52: 1–39. DOI: 101007/s10734-004-7649-x.
44.
MarginsonS (2009) The knowledge economy and Higher Education: A system for regulating the value of knowledge. Higher Education Management & Policy21(1): 1–15.
45.
MényY (2008) Higher Education in Europe: National systems European programmes global issues Can they be reconciled?European Political Science7(3): 324–334. DOI: 101057/eps200826.
46.
MerriamSBGraceAP (2011) The Jossey-Bass Reader on Contemporary Issues in Adult Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
MerriamSB (2006) Learning in Adulthood. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
MillsGE (2000) Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
49.
MysykA (2001) The sessional lecturer as migrant labourer. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education31(3): 73–92.
50.
PaewaiSRMeyerLHHoustonDJ (2007) Problem solving academic workloads management: A university response. Higher Education Quarterly61(3): 375–390.
51.
PriceLKirkwoodA (2008) Learning and teaching and technology. In: ScottSDixonK (eds) The Globalised University: Trends and Development in Teaching and Learning. Perth, Western Australia: Black Swan Press, pp.83–113.
52.
ProsserMTrigwellK (1999a) Understanding Learning and Teaching, on Deep and Surface Learning. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
53.
ProsserMTrigwellK (1999b) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
54.
ProsserMMartinETrigwellK. (2008) University academics experience of research and its relationship to their experience of teaching. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences36(1): 3–16.
55.
RamsdenPMartinE (1996) Recognition of good university teaching: Policies from an Australian study. Studies in Higher Education21(3): 299–315.
56.
RamsdenPMosesI (1992) Associations between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education23: 273–295.
57.
RamsdenP (1998) Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
58.
RamsdenP (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. (2nd ed) London UK: Routledge Falmer.
59.
RamsdenPMargetsonDMartinEClarkeS (1995) Recognising and rewarding good teaching in Australian higher education. Report for the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching. Canberra, Australia.
60.
SchonD (1987) The Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61.
ScottDEScottS (2011) Multi-faceted professional development models designed to enhance teaching and learning within universities. In: LindbergJOOlofssonAD (eds) Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp.412–437.
62.
ScottDE (2009) Effective online learning experiences: Exploring potential relationships between Voice-over-Internet-Protocol (VoIP) learning environments and adult learners’ motivation multiple intelligences and learning styles. PhD Thesis. Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.
63.
ScottSGuthrieR (2003) Exploring the role of leadership in creating and fostering learning communities within Business Law higher education. The International Journal of Learning10, n.p.
64.
ScottS (200210) Is anyone out there? The negotiation and development of a systematic approach to building learning communities in a Business higher education setting. In: the 16th Australian International Education Conference, Hobart, Tasmania.
65.
ScottS (2003) Professional development: A study of secondary teachers’ experiences and perspectivesThe International Journal of Learning10, n.p.
66.
ScottSIssaT (2006) Team work skills do not come naturally even for adult learners! Embedding structure and scaffolding into the university program are essential for optimal results. In: the British Educational Research Association conference, Warwick University, UK.
67.
ScottSIssaTIssaT (2008) Closing the loop. The relationship between instructor-reflective practice and students’ satisfaction and quality outcomes. International Journal of Learning15(3): 109–120.
68.
SerowRC (2000) Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education40(4): 449–463. DOI: 101023/a:1004154512833.
69.
SmithPLRaganTJ (2005) Instructional Design. New York, NY: Wiley Publishing Inc.
70.
SummerleeAJSChristensen HughesJ (2010) Pressures for change and the future of university education. In: Christensen HughesJMightyJ (eds) Taking Stock: Research on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Montreal, QC: School of Policy Studies Queens University, pp.243–260.
71.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2012) The UK quality code for higher education: A brief guide. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (ed) Gloucester UK Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
72.
UhibaiS (2013) Reflection on the development of Chinese higher education in the post-industrial area. In Eurasian Higher Education Leaders Forum Conference Proceedings, eds ReaganTSagintayevaA. Astana, Kazakhstan.
73.
van VughtF (2009) The EU innovation agenda: Challenges for European Higher Education and research. Higher Education Management & Policy21(2): 1–19.
74.
WalkerJ (2008) Social/corporate accountability: A university's “trek” towards excellence. Canadian Journal of Higher Education38(2): 45–71.
75.
WatsonC (2011) Accountability, transparency, redundancy: Academic identities in an era of “excellence”. British Educational Research Journal37(6): 955–971.
76.
WongJK (2004) Are the learning styles of Asian international students culturally or contextually based?International Education Journal4: 154–166.
