The quality of school principals is of paramount importance for quality education. This article examines the leadership capacities of a group of 228 aspiring principals who participated in a training programme for the principalship in four cohorts. A questionnaire consisting of 24 questions in six core areas of leadership was constructed and distributed to the aspirants one month before the commencement of the training programme. The purpose of the study can contribute to a better understanding of the aspirants’ leadership capacities in general and the refinement of the training programme for aspirants in particular. The findings indicate that the aspirants seemed to feel more competent in the leadership area of ‘teacher professional growth and development’ than they did with regard to ‘quality assurance and accountability’, ‘learning, teaching and curriculum’, ‘strategic direction and policy environment’, ‘external communication and connection to the outside world’, and finally ‘staff and resources management’.
Advisory Committee on School Based Management (2000) Transforming Schools into Dynamic and Accountable Professional Communities: School-based Management Consultation Document. Hong Kong: The Printing Department.
2.
AllanHKYuenMWLawN (2009) School leadership and teachers’ pedagogical orientations in Hong Kong: a comparative perspective. Education and Information Technologies14: 381–396.
3.
BellLChanWD (2005) Principals’ leadership and strategic planning in primary schools in Hong Kong and England: a comparison. International Studies of Educational Administration33(3): 2–21.
4.
BlaséJBlaséJ (1998) Handbook of Instructional Leadership: How Really Good Principals Promote Teaching and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
BolmanLGDealTE (1997) Reframing Organization: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CaldwellBJ (2003) A blueprint for leadership for the successful transformation of schools in the 21st century. Invited keynote address presented at international conference on the theme Educational Leadership in the New Millennium, Hong Kong, 7 November.
7.
CaldwellBJSpinksJM (1992) Leading and Self-Managing School. London: Falmer Press.
8.
ChanDTanJ (2008) Privatization and the rise of direct subsidy scheme schools and independent schools in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management22(6): 464–487.
9.
ChanTCWebbLBowenC (2003) Are assistant principals prepared for principalship?How do assistant principals perceive? ERIC #ED481543
10.
ChengYC (1994) Principal's leadership as a critical indicator of school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement5(3): 299–317.
CranstonN (2000) The impact of school-based management on primary school principals in Queensland. Leading & Managing5(2): 100–133.
13.
CranstonN (2002) School-based management, leaders and leadership: change and challenges for principals. International Studies in Educational Administration30(1): 2–12.
14.
CubanL (1988) The Managerial Imperative and the Practice of Leadership in Schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15.
DareshJMaleT (2000) Crossing the border into leadership: experiences of newly appointed British head-teachers and American principals. Educational Management & Administration28(1): 89–101.
16.
DimmockCWalkerA (2005) Educational Leadership: Culture and Diversity. London: Sage.
17.
DowsonCBodycottPWalkerAConiamD (2000) Education reform in Hong Kong: Issues of consistency, connectedness and culture. Education Policy Analysis Archives8(24): 1–16.
18.
Education Bureau (2008) Reference Documents on Management and Administration of Direct Subsidy Scheme Schools. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Education Bureau.
19.
Education Department (2002) Continuing Professional Development for School Excellence-Consultation Paper on Continuing Professional Development of Principals. Hong Kong: The Printing Department.
20.
EpsteinJL (2010) School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
GamageDT (2001) British reforms in school management: a decade of experience with LMS. Studies in International Relations22(2): 23–54.
22.
GuptonySL (2003) The Instructional Leadership Toolbox: A Handbook for Improving Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
23.
HallingerP (2005) Instructional leadership and the school principal: a passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in School4(3): 221–240.
24.
HartzellGN (1993) The assistant principal: neglected actor in practitioner leadership literature. Journal of School Leadership3(6): 707–723.
25.
HarrisA (2007) Distributed leadership: leading or misleading. Education Management & Administration32(1): 11–24.
26.
HarrisA (2008) Distributed Leadership in Schools: Developing the Leaders of Tomorrow. London: Routledge and Falmer Press.
27.
HarrisASpillaneJ (2008) Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education22(1): 31–34.
28.
HarrisABrownDAbbortI (2006) Executive leadership: another lever in the system?School Leadership and Management26(4): 397–409.
29.
HillPW (2002) What principals need to know about teaching and learning. In: TuckerMSCoddingJB (eds) The Principal Challenge: Leading and Managing Schools in an Era of Accountability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 43–75.
30.
HookerKO (2000) Superintendents’ perspectives on the recruitment and selection of building level administrators. Planning and Changing31(3/4): 182–205.
31.
KwanP (2009) The vice-principal experience as a preparation for the principalship. Journal of Educational Administration47(2): 191–205.
32.
KwanP (2010) Assessing candidates for the post of principal of a school. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences9:1855–1859.
33.
LankfordHConnellRWyckoffJ (2003) Identifying the Next Generation of School Leaders. Albany, NY: University at Albany.
34.
LeithwoodKJantziD (2000) Principal and teacher leadership effects: a replication. School Leadership & Management20(4): 415–434.
35.
LeithwoodKDayCSammonsPHarrisAHopkinsD (2006) Successful school leadership: what is and how it influences pupil learning. Research Report No. 800. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
36.
MokKHCheungABL (2011) Global aspirations and strategizing for world-class status: new form of politics in higher education governance in Hong Kong. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management33(3): 231–251.
37.
MorrisPScottI (2005) Education Reform and the Quest for Excellence: The Hong Kong Story. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
38.
NgSW (2003) Are parents and teachers psychologically prepared for cooperation?Pacific Asian Education15(1): 60–76.
39.
NgSW (2004) Teacher’s value orientations toward parental involvement in school-based management in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Reform13(4): 28–39.
40.
NgSW (2007) Development of parent-school partnerships in times of educational reform in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Reform16(4): 321–345.
41.
NgSW (2011) Can Hong Kong export its higher education services to the Asian markets?Educational Research for Policy and Practice10(2): 115–131.
42.
NgSWWangIF (2009) A study on the training needs of middle managers in primary schools in Hong Kong (in Chinese). Journal of Basic Education18(2): 130–151.
43.
PangSK (2007) The continuing professional development of principals in Hong Kong. Frontiers of Education in China2(4): 605–619.
44.
ResickCJHangesPJDicksonMWMitchelsonJK (2006) A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics63: 345–359.
45.
RibbinsP (1997) Heads on deputy headship: impossible roles for invisible role holders?Educational Management & Administration16(40): 456–481.
46.
SachsJ (2004) The problem of the principalship: attracting people to difficult jobs. In: AhmadRJHeeTH (eds) Principalship and School Management. Kuala Lumpur: Principals’ Institute, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, 86–101.
47.
SergiovanniTJ (1984) Leadership and excellence in schooling. Educational Leadership41(5): 4–13.
48.
SpillaneJPHalversonRDiamondJB (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies36(1): 3–34.
49.
TsangDYK (2009) Breaking New Ground Together, the 2009–10 Policy Address. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
50.
WalkerADimmockC (2006) Preparing leaders, preparing learners: the Hong Kong experience. School Leadership and Management26(2): 125–147.
51.
WalkerAKwanP (2009) Seeking a principalship: specific position attractors. School Leadership and Policy8(3): 287–306.
52.
WongKCNgHM (2003) On Hong Kong: the making of secondary school principals. International Studies in Educational Administration31(2): 35–53.
53.
WongPM (2004) The professional development of school principals: insights from evaluating a programme in Hong Kong. School Leadership and Management. 24(2):140–162.
54.
WongPM (2009) A conceptual framework for understanding the working relationship between school principals and vice-principals. School Leadership and Management29(2): 157–179.
55.
WongPMWongCS (2005) Promotion criteria and satisfaction of school teachers in Hong Kong. Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(4): 423–447.
56.
YuklG (1994) Leadership in Organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
