Senior leadership positions in Jordanian Ministry of Education are held predominantly by men. Women are teachers and/or school principals. This under-representation of women is primarily due to culturally derived stereotypes that see women as teachers or school principals, but not as superintendents. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in practice, the difference between Jordanian men and women in their effectiveness as leaders as rated by themselves and their direct reports in Jordanian educational institutions. In other words, this study came to examine empirically the stereotypical assumption that women are rated by themselves and others to be less effective leaders than their male counterparts. This quantitative investigation employed the survey method as its research design. A variety of statistical techniques were utilized in this research. One-way analysis of variance, t-test, means, and standard deviations were used as the main statistical techniques. Results of the study revealed that female leaders in Jordanian educational institutions, their female direct reports, and their male direct reports underrated their leadership effectiveness compared to male leaders, their male direct reports, and their female direct reports. However, this difference in rating is very slight and not statistically significant.
Abu-TinehMAl-QassimN (2011) The degree to which female educational leaders in Zarqa governorate practice managerial and leadership styles in their schools. Dirasat, Educational Sciences, University of Jordan38(1): 100–114.
2.
Alimo-MetcalfB (1995) An investigation of female and male constructs of leadership and empowerment. Women in Management Review, 10(2): 3–6.
3.
Alimo-MetcalfeB (1998) 360-degree feedback and leadership development. International Journal of Selection and Assessment6(1): 35–44.
4.
AppelbaumSAudetLMillerJ (2002) Gender and leadership? Leadership and gender? A journey through the landscape of theories. Leadership and Organization Development Journal24(1): 43–51.
5.
BanuelosMV (2008) Gender bias experienced by women superintendents in California. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of La Verne: USA.
6.
BassBM (1998) Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military, and Educational Impact. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
BeyerS (Nov 1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59(5): 960–970.
8.
BrownSM (1979) Male versus female leaders: a comparison of empirical studies. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research5(5): 595–611.
9.
BurnsJM (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
10.
ClaesM-T (1999) Women, men and management styles. International Labour Review138(4): 431–446.
11.
ClarkTSalamanG (1998) Telling tales: management guru’s narratives and constructions of managerial identity. Journal of Management Studies35(2): 137–161.
12.
ColwillJTownsendJ (1999) Women, leadership and information technology: the impact of women leaders in organizations and their role in integrating information technology with corporate strategy. Journal of Management Development, 18(3): 207–216.
13.
CubilloLBrownM (2003) Women into educational leadership and management: international differences?Journal of Educational Administration41(2): 278–291.
14.
DavidsonMJBurkeRJ (eds) (1994) Women in Management: Current Research Issues. Paul Chapman Publishing, London.
15.
DealJJStevensonMA (1998) Perceptions of female and male managers in the 1990s. Sex Roles38(3/4): 287–301.
16.
DeemR (2003) Gender, organizational cultures and the practices of manager academics in UK universities. Gender, Work and Organization10(2): 239–259.
17.
EaglyAH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
18.
EdgehouseMA (2008) Characteristics and career path barriers of women superintendents in Ohio. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Ohio: USA.
19.
FiermanJ (1990) Do women manage differently?Fortune17 December: 115–118.
20.
GardinerMTiggemanM (1999) Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male- and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology72(3): 301–315.
21.
GlassTEBjorkLBrunnerCC (2000) The study of the American school superintendency, 2000: a look at the superintendency of education in the new millennium. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED440475).
22.
GroganM (2010) Conclusion: women around the world reshaping leadership for education. Journal of Educational Administration48(6): 782–86.
23.
HelgesinS (1990) The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership. Doubleday: New York.
24.
HusseiniR (2009–2010) Media Monitoring Initiative: Fourth Quarterly Report. Funded by Gender and Social Fund-Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)- Jordan.
25.
Jeanquart-BaroneSSekaranU (1994) Effects of supervisor’s gender on American women’s trust. The Journal of Social Psychology134: 253–254.
26.
JoasilL (2008) A study into the relationship between observed and model values of men and women leaders in higher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University, USA.
27.
JoguluUDWoodGJ (2008) A cross- culture study into peer evaluations of women’s leadership effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal29(7): 600–616.
28.
KolbJA (1999) The effect of gender role, attitude toward leadership, and self confidence on leader emergence: implications for leadership development. Human Resource Development Quarterly (10)4: 305–320.
29.
KrugerJDunningD (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(6): 1121–1134.
30.
KruseLWintermantelM (1986) Leadership Ms-qualified: the gender bias in everyday and scientific thinking. In: GraumannEGMoscoviS (eds) Changing Conceptions of Leadership. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
31.
LafleurC (1999) The meaning of time: revisiting values and educational administration. In: BegleyPLeonardP (eds) The Values of Educational Administration. Falmer Press, London, 309–330.
Linkage Incorporated (2003) Leadership Assessment Profile Report: The High Impact Leadership Model™ and The Leadership Assessment Instrument™ (LAI). Burlington, MA: Inkage Incorporated.
34.
LipseyRGSteinerPOPurvisDDCourantPN (1990) Economics. Harper & Row, New York: NY.
35.
LukeC (1997) Women in higher education management in Thailand. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies31(3): 98–104.
36.
MaddenM (2005) 2004 division 35 presidential address: gender and leadership in higher education. Psychology of Women Quarterly29: 3–14.
37.
MaupinRJ (1993) How can women’s lack of upward mobility in accounting organizations be explained?Group and Organization Management18(2): 123–152.
38.
McWhinneyW (1997) Paths of Change: Strategic Choices for Organizations and Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
MossJJensrudQ (1995) Gender, leadership and vocational education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education33(1): 6–23.
40.
NaholiG (2008) A study of current and former women in faculty and administrative leadership positions at east Tennessee state university. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, East Tennessee State University: USA.
41.
NilsenDCampbellDP (Summer 1993) Self-observer rating discrepancies: once an overrater, always an overrater?Human Resource Management (1986–1998)32(2–3): 265–281.
42.
NormoreAHTrinidadC (2005) Leadership and gender: a dangerous liaison?Leadership and Organizational Development Journal26(7): 574–590.
43.
NorthousPG (2004) Leadership: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. California: Sage publication.
44.
OakleyJG (2000). Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: understanding the scarcity of female CEO’s. Journal of Business Ethics27(4): 321–334.
45.
OlssonS (2002). Gendered heroes: male and female self representations of executive identity. Women in Management Review17(3/4): 142–150.
46.
OplatkaI (2006) Women in educational administration within developing countries; towards a new international research agenda. Journal of Educational Administration44(6): 604–624.
47.
OslandJSSynderMMHunterL (1998) A comparative study of managerial styles among female executives in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. International Studies of Management and Organization28(2): 54–73.
48.
PounderJSColemanM (2002) Women-better leaders than men? in general and educational management it still ‘all depends’. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal23(3): 122–133.
49.
PowellGNButterfieldDA (1979) The ‘good manager’: masculine or androgynous?Academy of Management Journal22: 395–403.
RosenerJB (1990) Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review68(6): 119–125.
52.
ScheinVEDavidsonMJ (1993) Think manager, think male. Management Development Review6: 8–24.
53.
SchwartzFN (1989) Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review67(1): 65–76.
54.
SengeP (1994) The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
55.
ShakeshaftC (1993) Gender equity in schools. In: CapperCA (ed.) Educational Administration in a Pluralistic Society. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 87–109.
56.
ShakeshaftC (1989). Women in Educational Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57.
ShimanoffSBJenkinsMM (1991) Leadership and gender: challenging assumptions and recognizing resources. In: CathcartRSSamovarLA (eds) Small Group Communication: A Reader, 6th edn. Dubuque, IA: W.C. Brown, 504–522.
58.
ShteiwiMAl- lawziS (2004) Labour and human resource development issues. In: Jordan Country Profile.
59.
ShteiwiM (1999) Gender Role Stereotyping in Primary School Textbooks in Jordan. Amman, Jordan: UNICEF, UNESCO (in Arabic).
60.
Social and Economic Development Group (2005) The Economic Advancement of Women in Jordan: A Country Gender Assessment. Document of the World Bank.
61.
TateR (1998) An introduction to modeling outcomes in the behavioral and social sciences, 2nd edn. Minnesota: Burgess International Group.
62.
TornowWW (Summer 1993) Perception or reality: is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end?Human Resource Management (1986–1998), 32(2–3): 221–29.
63.
Van VelsorETaylorSLeslieJB (1993) An examination of the relationship among self-perception accuracy, self-awareness, gender, and leader effectiveness. Human Resource Management (1986–1989)32(2&3): 249–263.
64.
VailK (1999) Women at the top. American School Board Journal186(12): 20–24.
65.
WohlersAJLondonM (1989) Ratings of managerial characteristics – evaluation difficulty, co-worker agreement and self-awareness. Personnel Psychology42(2): 235–261.
66.
YoungMDKochanFK (2004) Supporting Leadership for America’s Schools. Better Leaders for America’s Schools: Perspectives on the Manifesto. A Monograph Series for University Council for Educational Administration, Arlington, VA: University of Missouri-Columbia, pp. 115–29.
67.
YuklGGordonATaberT (2002) A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies9(1): 15–32.
