The use of coaching as a developmental methodology has been instituted as a way to develop leadership in schools in Scotland as elsewhere in the UK. While there are studies that examine the skills and impact of coaching, there is only limited discussion of the process of coaching and the role and experiences of the coaches. This article examines the role of coach in a development programme for aspirant headteachers, ‘The Flexible Routes to Headship’ (FRH), piloted in Scotland, UK in 2007–2009. Coaching was as the core learning process and consequently the quality of coaching is a major consideration in the success of this programme. This development programme is intended to enable candidates to demonstrate their achievement of a professional standard, The Standard for Headship and, as a consequence, the coaches have to undertake a number of different tasks including coaching, mentoring, facilitating, tutoring and assessing. This article draws from the data gathered from coaches and candidates in the evaluation of the FRH Pilot Project which suggests that while there are potential benefits for the coach as well as for candidates, there are some inherent tensions. The question of a model of leadership development based predominantly on coaching is explored.
BarnettBGO’MahonyGR (2008) Mentoring and coaching programmes for the professional development of school leaders. In: LumbyJCrowGPashiardisP (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders. Oxford and New York: Routledge.
2.
BerglasS (2002) Dangers of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review80(6): 87–92.
3.
BlackmanA (2010) Coaching as a leadership development tool for teachers. Professional Development in Education36(3): 421–441.
4.
BloomGCastagnaCMoirEWarrenB (2005) Blended Coaching: Skills and Strategies to Support Principal Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
BushTColemanM (1995) Professional development for heads: The role of mentoring. Journal of Educational Administration33(5): 60–73.
6.
BushTGloverDHarrisA (2007) Review of School Leadership Development. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
7.
ClutterbuckD (1985) Everyone Needs a Mentor. London: Institute of Personnel Management.
8.
CreasyJPattersonF (2005) Leading Coaching in Schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
9.
DavidsonJFordeCGronnPMacBeathJMartinMMcMahonM (2008) Towards a “Mixed Economy” of head Teacher Development: Evaluation Report to the Scottish Government on the Flexible Routes to Headship Pilot, Glasgow, Universities of Glasgow and Cambridge.
10.
EarleyPWeindlingDBubbSEvansJGlennM (2008) Evaluation of the FUTURE LEADERS Pilot Programme Final Report. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
11.
GrayDE (2006) Executive coaching: Towards a dynamic alliance of psychotherapy and transformative learning processes. Managerial Learning37(4): 475–497.
12.
HanburyM (2009) Leadership Coaching: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Leadership Coaching as a Strategy to Support Succession Planning. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
13.
HarveyGLoftus-HillsARycroft-MaloneJTitchenAKitsonAMcCormackBSeersK (2002) Getting evidence into practice: The role and function of facilitation. Journal of Advanced Nursing37(6): 577–588.
14.
HobsonA (2003) Mentoring and Coaching for New Leaders Summary Report. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
15.
HolroydC (2000) Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics. Active Learning in Higher Education1(1): 28–44.
MacbeathJGronnPOpherDLowdenKFordeCCowieMO’BrienJ (2009) The Recruitment and Retention of Headteachers in Scotland: Report to the Scottish Government. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Fund.
18.
McLeanM (2003) What can we learn from facilitator and student perceptions of facilitation skills and roles in the first year of a problem-based learning curriculum?BMC Medical Education3(9). Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472–6920/3/9(accessed 11 February 2011).
PaskRJoyB (2007) Mentoring – Coaching: A Handbook for Educational Professionals. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
21.
PoglincoSMBachAJ (2004) The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan85(5): 398–400.
22.
PopperMLipshitzR (1992) Coaching on leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal13(7): 15–18.
23.
ReevesJ (2008) Planning what you don’t yet know: Personal learning planning. Paper 2, Symposium on Preparing for Headship: Developing flexible routes to the ‘Standard for Headship’, Scottish Education Research Association Conference, Perth, Scotland, 27–29 November.
Scottish Executive (SE) (2005b) Ambitious, Excellent Schools: The Standard for Headship. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
28.
Scottish Executive Education Department (SEED) (2006a) Achieving the Standard for Headship: Providing Choice and Alternatives: A Consultation Document. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
29.
Scottish Executive Education Department (SEED) (2006b) Achieving the Standard for Headship: Providing Choice and Opportunity. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive (unnumbered).
30.
SilverMLochmillerCRCoplandMTrippsAM (2010) Supporting new school leaders: Findings from a university-based leadership coaching program for new administrators. Mentoring and Coaching: Partnership in Learning17(3): 215–232.
31.
SimkinsTColdwellMCaillauIFinlaysonHMorganA (2006) Coaching as an in-school leadership development strategy: Experience from leading from the middle. Professional Development in Education32(3): 321–340.
32.
TorranceD (2008) Flexibility to meet a standard. Paper 1, Symposium on Preparing for Headship: Developing flexible routes to the ‘Standard for Headship’, Scottish Education Research Association Conference, Perth, Scotland, 27–29 November.
33.
WhitmoreJ (2002) Coaching for Performance, 3rd edn. London: Nicholas Brealey.
