The inclusion of self-directed projects as an element within a New Zealand principal development programme was designed to reflect increasing support internationally for such a context-specific ‘inquiry’ approach. The results reported in this article suggest that considerable clarity is required for such projects if they are to realize the transformative potential that is touted. A mixed methods design employing electronic questionnaires, observation, interviews, focus groups and documentary analysis was used for the evaluation of the effectiveness of projects in the development programme. Data collected early in the programme indicated considerable concern about administration and clarity of expectations. Although the results revealed increasing appreciation of, and engagement with, the leadership projects through to the presentation phase near the end of the programme, this positivity subsided somewhat later with stakeholders providing a balanced view of recognition of worth of the projects alongside reiteration of concern over poor administration and clarity of expectations. The results suggest that the rationale, expectations, quality criteria, scope and presentation requirements must be explicitly and continuously outlined throughout projects. Further, in terms of the evaluation approach, it is suggested that future nationally funded evaluations of such programmes should be extended to include a longitudinal, deeper, impact study of such elements as projects on teaching and learning, and transformed practice of participants.
Begley PT ( 2008) The nature and specialized purposes of educational leadership . In: Lumby J, Crow G and Pashiardis P (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders . Abingdon: Routledge, 21-42.
2.
Bereiter C. and Scardamalia M. ( 1999) Process and Product in PBL Research. Toronto: Ontario Institutes for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
3.
Browne-Ferrigno T. ( 2003) Becoming a principal: role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement. Educational Administration Quarterly39(4): 468-503.
4.
Brundrett M. ( 2008) Educational leadership development in England. In: Brundrett M and Crawford M (eds) Developing School Leaders: An International Perspective. London: Routledge, 7-22.
5.
Bush T. and Glover D. ( 2004) Leadership development: evidence and beliefs. Summary report for National College for School Leadership, Nottingham.
6.
Cardno C. and Fitzgerald T. ( 2005) Leadership learning: a development initiative for experienced New Zealand principals. Journal of Educational Administration43(3): 316-329.
7.
Cohen L., Manion L. and Morrison K. ( 2000) Research Methods in Education, 5th edn. London: Routledge.
8.
Coles MJ and Southworth G. ( 2005) Developing Leadership: Creating the Schools of Tomorrow . Bucking-ham: Open University Press .
9.
Crow G., Lumby J. and Pashiardis P. ( 2008) Introduction: why an international handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders? In: Lumby J, Crow G and Pashiardis P (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders. Abingdon: Routledge, 1-20.
10.
Crowther F., Kaagan S., Ferguson M. and Hann L. ( 2002) Developing Teacher Leaders: How Teacher Leadership Enhances School Success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
11.
Denzin N. ( 1997) Triangulation in educational research. In: Keeves JP (ed.) Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon, 318-322.
12.
Elmuti D. ( 2004) Can management be taught? If so, what should management education curricula include and how should the process be approached. Management Decision42(3/4): 439-453.
13.
Fletcher MA ( 2003) Reflections on reciprocity in professional development: learning partners as professional learning teams. Learning partners in action . Proceedings of the ALARPM World Congress, Pretoria, South Africa, 21-24 September.
Guskey TR ( 2002) Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development . Educational Leadership59(6): 9-27.
16.
Hallinger P. ( 2003) Reshaping the Landscape of School Leadership Development: A Global Perspective. Lissie: Swets and Zeitlinger.
17.
Hallinger P. and Heck R. ( 1999) Can school leadership enhance school effectiveness? In: Bush T, Bell L, Bolam R, Glatter R and Ribbins P (eds) Educational Management: Redefining Theory, Policy and Practice. London: Paul Chapman, 178-190.
18.
Honold L. ( 2003) Developing effective employee learning experiences . Development and Learning in Organizations17(6): 6-8.
19.
Huber SG ( 2008) School development and school leader development: new learning opportunities for school leaders and their schools. In: Lumby J, Crow G and Pashiardis P (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders. Abingdon: Routledge, 163-175.
20.
Ivankova NV, Creswell JW and Stick SL ( 2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods18(3): 3-20.
21.
Knowles MS, Holton EF and Swanson RA ( 1998). The Adult Learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
22.
Lashway L. ( 2002) Trends in school leadership, ERIC Digest . Available: http://www.digests/digest162.html
23.
Lashway L. ( 2003) Transforming principal preparation. ERIC Digest. Available at: http://www.digests/digest165.html
24.
Leithwood K. and Jantzi D. ( 2000) The Transformational School Leadership Survey. Toronto, ON: OISE/ University of Toronto.
25.
Leithwood K. and Levin B. ( 2008) Understanding and assessing the impact of leadership development . In: Lumby J, Crow G and Pashiardis P (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders . Abingdon: Routledge, 280-302.
26.
Leithwood K. and Riehl C. ( 2003) What We Know About Successful School Leadership . Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
27.
Levine A. ( 2005) Educating School Leaders. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
28.
Ministry of Education (2008) Kiwi Leadership for Principals. Wellington: Learning Media.
29.
Murphy J. and Vriesenga M. ( 2004) Research on Preparation Programs in Educational Administration: An Analysis. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
30.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) , Pont B. , Nusche D. and Moorman H. (2008) Improving School Leadership Policy and Practice. Paris : OECD .
31.
Peterson K. ( 2002) The professional development of principals: innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly38(2): 213-232.
32.
Piggot-Irvine E. ( 2006) Establishing criteria for effective professional development and use in evaluating an action research programme. Journal of In-service Education32(4): 477-496.
33.
Piggot-Irvine E. ( 2008) An action research based leadership professional development with depth: hidden challenges for organisations and facilitators . Australasian Journal of Business and Social Inquiry6(1): 30-49. Available at: http://www.academicglobalpublications.com/ajbsi/
34.
Piggot-Irvine E. and Bartlett B. ( 2008) Evaluating Action Research. Wellington : NZCER.
35.
Raelin JA and Coghlan D. ( 2006) Developing managers as learners and researchers: using action learning and action research. Journal of Management Education30(5): 670-689.
36.
Ribbins P. ( 2008) A life and career based framework for the study of leaders in education: problems, possibilities and prescriptions. In: Lumby J, Crow G and Pashiardis P (eds) International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders . Abingdon: Routledge, 61-80.
37.
Southworth G. ( 2004) Primary School Leadership in Context: Leading Small, Medium and Large Sized Schools. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
38.
Teddlie C. and Stringfield S. ( 1993) Schools Make a Difference: Lessons Learned from a 10-year Study of School Effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
Thomas JW ( 2000) A review of research on project-based learning . Available at: http://www.autodesk.com/foundation
40.
Timperley H., Wilson A., Barrar H. and Fung I. ( 2007) Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
41.
Woodall J and Winstanley D (eds) (1998) Management Development: Strategy and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell .
42.
Zuber-Skerritt O. ( 2009) Action Learning and Action Research: Songlines through Interviews. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers .
