Establishing an innovative school requires a great deal of planning effort, human power and resources. Nevertheless, many innovative schools suffer a process of regression toward the mean and lose their innovative zeal. Based on the life cycle approach, which claims that part of this trend of regression is embodied in the planning phase, and on the institutional theory that asserts that innovation has to negotiate institutional constraints, this instrumental case study examines the negotiation of institutional regulations while planning an innovative school. This article reports on a study of three years' planning of an Israeli innovative school, which in 2006 celebrated 10 years of successful innovation. The findings suggest three ways of handling the regulation constraints: setting an exception; reallocation of resources; and adoption of alternative standards. Further research directions and implications on educational policy and planning are discussed.
Bell, L. (2002) `Strategic Planning and School Management: Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing?', Journal of Education Administration40(5): 407-24.
3.
Ben-Dror, G. (1994) Innovative Approach for School Planning. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, the Education System Development Administration (in Hebrew).
4.
Bennett, N., Crawford, M., Earley, P., Glover, D. and Levacic, R. (2000) `The Reality of School Development Planning in the Effective Primary School: Techniques or Guiding Plan?', School Leadership and Management20(3): 333-51.
5.
Bennis, W. and Nanus, B. (1985) Leaders-The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row.
6.
Bennis, W. and Townsend, R. (1995) Reinventing Leadership-Strategies to Empower the Organization. New York: Quill.
7.
Bosetti, L., Foulkes, E., O'Reilly, R. and Sande, D. (2000) Canadian Charter Schools at the Crossroads, SAEE (Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education), Research Series No. 5: Canada. Available at: http://www.saee.ca/publications/A_003_AAB_MID.php. Accessed 30 June 2006.
8.
Bulkley, K. and Fisler, J. (2003) `A Decade of Charter Schools: From Theory to Practice' , Educational Policy17(3): 317-42.
9.
Chen, D. (1995) The School of the Future: A Design for a Working Model-'Cramim' School in Rishon Le Zion. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, School of Education.
10.
Chen, D. (1999) `Cramim'-the School of the Future: Between Theory and Practice. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).
11.
Chen, D., Tubin, T., Chen, N. and Ben-Ami, Y. (2005) `R and D in Education-the Case of the Laboratory School', The Iberoamerican E-journal About Effectiveness, Improvement and Quality on Education (REICE)3(1): 200-03. Available at: http://www.ice.deusto.es/rinace/reice/ .
12.
Conger, J.A. and Kanungo, R.N. (1998) Charismatic Leadership in Organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W., eds (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Drucker, F.P. (1985) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper-Business.
15.
Eyal, O. and Inbar, D. (2003) `Developing a Public School Entrepreneurship Inventory: Theoretical Conceptualization and Empirical Examination', International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research9(6): 221-44.
16.
Fidler, B. (1998) `How can a Successful School Avoid Failure? Strategic Management in Schools', School Leadership and Management18(4): 497-509.
17.
Fink, D. (1999) `Deadwood didn't Kill Itself: A Pathology of Failing Schools', Educational Management Administration & Leadership27(2): 131-41.
18.
Giles, C. (1995) `School-Based Planning: Are UK Schools Grasping the Strategic Initiative?', International Journal of Educational Management9(4): 4-7.
19.
Giles, C. and Hargreaves, A. (2006) `The Sustainability of Innovative Schools as Learning Organizations and Professional Learning Communities During Standardized Reform' , Educational Administration Quarterly42(1): 124-56.
20.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Alsine.
21.
Glatter, R., Castle, F., Cooper, D. and Evans, J. (2005) `What's New? Identifying Innovation Arising from School Collaboration Initiatives', Educational Management Administration & Leadership33(4): 381-99.
22.
Glor, E.D. (ed.) (1997) Policy Innovation in the Saskatchewan Public Sector. 3-4. Toronto: Captus Press.
23.
Hatton, E. (2001) `School Development Planning in Small Primary Schools' , Journal of Educational Administration39(2): 118-33.
24.
Hepburn, R.C. (1999) The Case for School Choice: Models from the United States, New Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden. Canada: Critical Issues Bulletins, Fraser Institute .
25.
Hopkins, D. and MacGilchrist, B. (1998) `Development Planning for Pupil Achievement', School Leadership and Management18(3): 409-24.
26.
Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (2001) Educational Administration Theory, Research, and Practice, 6th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Inbar, D.E. (1996) Planning for Educational Innovation, Planning Series, vol. 53. Paris: UNESCO International Institute of Educational Planning.
28.
Jackson, W.P. (1990) Introduction to John Dewey `the School and Society and the Child and the Curriculum'. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Kimberly, R.J. (1979) `Issues in the Creation of Organizations: Initiation, Innovation, and Institutionalization', Academy of Management Journal22(3): 437-57.
30.
Kondra, A.Z. and Hinings, C.R. (1998) `Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory', Organization Studies19(5): 743-67.
31.
Leggate, P.M.C. and Thompson, J.J. (1997) `The Management of Development Planning in International Schools', International Journal of Educational Management11(6): 268-73.
32.
Loveless, T. and Jasin, C. (1998) `Starting from Scratch: Political and Organizational Challenges Facing Charter Schools', Educational Administration Quarterly34(1): 9-30.
33.
McGhee, M.V. (2001) `A Principal's Role in Opening a New School', dissertation , University of Georgia.
34.
MacGilchrist, B., Mortimore, P., Savage, J. and Beresford, C. (1995) Planning Matters: The Impact of Development Planning on Primary Schools. London: Paul Chapman.
35.
Mason, J. (1996) Qualitative Research. London : SAGE.
36.
Meyer, J.W. (1992) `Innovation and Knowledge use in American Public Education', in J.W. Meyer and W.R. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments Ritual and Rationality, pp. 233-60. London: SAGE.
37.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) `Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340-63.
38.
Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1992) `The Structure of Educational Organizations', in J. Meyer, and R.W. Scott (eds) Organizational Environments, pp. 71-98. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
39.
Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. London: Prentice Hall.
40.
Montessori, M.M. (1992) Education for Human Development: Understanding Montessori. Oxford: Clio Press.
41.
Rowan, B. and Miskel, C.G. (1999) `Institutional Theory and the Study of Educational Organizations', in J. Murphy and K.S. Lewis (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, pp. 359-83. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Scott, W.R. (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
Sinkinson, A. (2005) `Going for Specialist School Status: Perspectives from a Front Line Head of Department', School Leadership and Management25(2): 191-208.
44.
Slavin, R.E. and Fashola, O.S. (1998) Show Me the Evidence. CA: Corwin Press.
45.
Some Thoughts on Definitions of Innovation ( 1999) The Editorial Board of The Innovation Journal, 20 November 1999. Available at: http://www.innovation.cc/discussion-papers/thoughts-innovation.htm. Accessed 16 February 2006.
46.
Stake, R.E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
48.
Summerhill School (2003) Available at: http://www.summerhillschool.co.uk/pages/index.html. Accessed 26 November 2003.
49.
The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools (2003) Available at: http://www.ucls. uchicago.edu/About/index.html. Accessed 26 November 2003.
50.
Tubin, D. and Chen, D. (2002) `School-based Staff Development for Teaching within Computerized Learning Environments', Journal of Research on Technology in Education34(4): 517-28.
51.
Tubin, D., Likritz, R. and Chen, D. (2004) `Educational Achievements of Graduates from an Experimental Elementary School', Educational Research46(2): 151-62.
52.
Tubin, D. (2006) `Typology of ICT Implementation and Technology Applications', Computers in the Schools23(1/2): 85-98.
53.
Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. (1995) Tinkering Toward Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Tyack, D. and Tobin, W. (1994) `The Grammar of Schooling: Why has it been so Hard to Change?', American Educational Research Journal31(3): 453-80.
55.
Van de Ven, A.H(1980) `Early Planning, Implementation, and Performance of new Organizations', in J.R. Kimberly and R.H. Miles (eds) The Organizational Life Cycle, pp. 83-134. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Woodbury, S. and Gess-Newsome, J. (2002) `Overcoming the Paradox of Change without Difference: A Model of Change in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform', Educational Policy16(5): 763-82.
