This article reports on a study that explores collaborative structures of shared
decision-making in an urban secondary school in the USA. The data in the study came
from unstructured interviews with 20 teachers, the principal, the assistant
principal, a counsellor and 10 students. The interviews took place over a three-week
period in June of 2001 and revealed tensions across significant areas of the school.
Tensions such as making collective agreements within norms of equal status, or the
public exposure of decision-making by teacher leadership, correlate closely with
Little’s findings in restructured schools. Teachers negotiated these
tensions at a very personal level. Exploring these tensions helped define a complex
collective reality of the school site. They also highlighted possibilities and
problems in using collaborative structures.
Apple, M.W.
and
Beane, J.A.
(1999) Lessons from the Chalk Face.
London: Open University Press
.
2.
Aspinwall, K.
(1998) Leading the Learning School; Developing Your School
and Its People.
London: Lemos & Crane
.
3.
Aspinwall, K.
and
Pedler, M.
(1996) ‘Schools as Learning
Organisations’, in
B. Fidler
(ed.) Choices For Self-Managing Schools, pp.
226-224.
London: PCP
.
4.
Ball, S.
(1987) The Micro-Politics of the School, Towards a Theory of
School Organization.
London: Methuen
.
5.
Bassey, M.
(1999) Case Study Research in Educational Settings.
Buckingham, UK: Open University Press
.
6.
Bird, T.
and
Little, J.W.
(1986)
‘How Schools Organize the Teaching Occupation’
, The Elementary School Journal86(4):
493-511
.
7.
Blase, J.
(1991) ‘The Micropolitical
Perspective’, in
J. Blase
(ed.) The Politics of Life in Schools, Power, Conflict, and
Cooperation, pp. 1-18.
London: SAGE
.
8.
Blase, J.
and
Anderson, G.
(1995) The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership, From
Control to Empowerment.
London: Cassell
.
9.
Callahan, R.
(1962) Education and the Cult of Efficiency: a Study of the
Social Forces that Have Shaped the Administration of the Public Schools.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
10.
Carnell, E.
(2000)
‘Developing Learning-centered Professional Practice’
, Practice and PolicySummer:
21-32
.
11.
Carnell, E.
(2001) Increasing the Complexity of Teachers Professional
Learning through Action Research.
London: Institute of Education, University of London
.
12.
Corbett, H.D.
(1991) ‘Community Influence and School
Micropolitics: A Case Study’, in
J. Blase
(ed.) The Politics of Life in Schools, Power, Conflict, and
Cooperation, pp. 73-95.
London: SAGE
.
13.
Cusick, P.A.
(1983) The Egalitarian Ideal and The American High School:
Studies of Three Schools.
New York, NY: Longman
.
14.
Dunham, J.
(1992) Stress In Teaching.
London: Routledge
.
15.
Evans, L.
(1998)
‘The Effects of Senior Management Teams on Teacher Morale and Job
Satisfaction: A Case Study of Rockville County Primary School’
, Educational Management and Administration26(6):
417-428
.
16.
Evans, L.
(1999) Managing to Motivate: A Guide for School
Leaders.
London: Cassell
.
17.
Everard, K.
and
Morris, G.
(1996) Effective School Management Third Edition.
London: Paul Chapman
.
18.
Fidler, B.
(1996) Strategic Planning For School Improvement.
London: Pearson
.
19.
Fullan, M.
(1999) Change Forces The Sequel.
London: Falmer
.
20.
Frost, D.
and
Durrant, J.
(2002) Teacher-led Development Work: Guidance and
Support.
London: David Fulton Publishers
.
21.
Greenfield, W.D., Jr
(1991) ‘The Micropolitics of Leadership in an
Urban Elementary School’, in
J. Blase
(ed) The Politics of Life in Schools, Power, Conflict, and
Cooperation, pp. 161-184.
London: SAGE
.
22.
Hargreaves, A.
(1991) ‘Contrived Collegiality: The
Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration’, in
J. Blase
(ed.) The Politics of Life in Schools, Power, Conflict, and
Cooperation, pp. 46-72.
London: SAGE
.
23.
Hargreaves, A.
(1993)
‘Individualism and Individuality: Reinterpreting the Teacher Culture’
, International Journal of Educational Research19(3):
51-76
.
24.
Hargreaves, A.
(1994) Changing Teachers, Changing Times, Teacher’s
Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age.
London: Cassell
.
25.
Huberman, M.
(1989)
‘The Professional Life Cycle of Teachers’
, Teachers College Record91(1):
31-56
.
26.
Hutchinson, S.
(1988) ‘Education and Grounded
Theory’, in
R.R. Sherman
and
R.B. Webb
(eds) Qualitative Research in Education: Focus and Methods, pp.
123-140.
London: Falmer
.
27.
Little, J.W.
(1982)
‘Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions
of School Success’
, American Educational Research Journal19(3):
325-340
.
28.
Little, J.W.
(1990)
‘The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in
Teachers’ Professional Relations’
, Teachers College Record91(4):
509-536
.
29.
Little, J.W.
(1995)
‘Contested Ground: The Basis of Teacher Leadership in Two
Restructuring High Schools’
, The Elementary School Journal96(1):
47-63
.
30.
Little, J.W.
(1996)
‘The Emotional Contours and Career Trajectories of (Disappointed)
Reform Enthusiasts’
, Cambridge Journal of Education26(3):
345-359
.
31.
Louis, K.
and
Miles, M.
(1990) Improving the Urban High School.
New York: Teachers College Press
.
32.
Lumby, J.
(1997) ‘The Learning
Organisation’, in
T. Bush
and
D. Middlewood
(eds) Managing People in Education, pp.
31-42.
London: Paul Chapman
.
33.
Measor, L.
(1985) ‘Interviewing: A Strategy in Qualitative
Research’, in
R.G. Burgess
(ed.) Strategies of Educational Research: Qualitative Methods.
London: Falmer Press
.
34.
Middlewood, D.
,
Coleman, M.
and
Lumby, J.
(1999) Practitioner Research in Education.
London: Paul Chapman
.
35.
Mishler, E.G.
(1991) Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
36.
Schon, D.
(1983) The Reflective Practitioner.
New York: Basic Books
.
37.
Strauss, A.L.
(1987) Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
38.
Wallace, M.
(1999) ‘Combining Cultural and Political
Perspectives: The Best of Both Conceptual Worlds’, in
T. Bush
,
L. Bell
,
R. Bolam
,
R. Glatter
and
P. Ribbins
(eds) Educational Management Redefining Theory, Policy, and
Practice, pp. 129-141.
London: Paul Chapman
.
39.
Weick, K.
(1976)
‘Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems’
, Administrative Science Quarterly21:
1-19
.
