This research examines the work of middle managers in English further education
colleges holding a range of responsibilities. Case study research at four colleges
drew on data from senior managers, middle managers and their teams, college
documents and observation of meetings. The enquiry focused upon the aspects of role
performed by the managers, the environment for management within which they carry
out their role, and features of the college environment which enable and impede them
in their work. Five aspects of role were identified and discussed, those of
corporate agent, implementer, staff manager, liaison and leader. Factors within the
college environment which impact positively and negatively upon the role were
modelled in order to locate the key influences upon the effectiveness of the manager
role, and thereby the effectiveness of the college.
Adelman, C.
,
Kemmis, S.
and
Jenkins, D.
(1980) ‘Rethinking Case Study: Notes from the
Second Cambridge Conference’, in
H. Simon
(ed.) Towards a Science of the Singular.
Norwich: Centre for Applied Research in
Education, University of East Anglia
.
2.
Alexiadou, N.
(2001)
‘Management Identities in Transition: A Case Study from Further Education’
, Sociological Review49(3):
412–435
.
3.
Bass, B.M.
and
Avolio, B.J.
, eds (1994) Improving Organizational Effectiveness through
Transformational Leadership.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
.
4.
Bassey, M.
(1999) Case Study Research in Educational Settings.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
5.
Bennett, N.
(1995) Managing Professional Teachers: Middle Managers in
Primary and Secondary Schools.
London: Paul Chapman
.
6.
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive
Sociology, tr. M. Adamson.
Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell
.
7.
Briggs, A.R.J. (2003a) ‘Modelling Aspects of Role among Middle
Managers in English Further Education Colleges’, unpublished PhD thesis,
University of Leicester.
8.
Briggs, A.R.J.
(2003b)
‘Finding the Balance: Exploring the Organic and Mechanical
Dimensions of Middle Manager Roles in English Further Education Colleges’
, Educational Management & Administration31(4):
421–436
.
9.
Brown, M.
and
Rutherford, D.
(1998)
‘Changing Roles and Raising Standards: New Challenges for Heads
of Department’
, School Leadership and Management18(1):
75–88
.
10.
Brown, M.
,
Boyle, B.
and
Boyle, T.
(1999)
‘Commonalities between Perception and Practice in Models of
School Decision-Making in Secondary Schools’
, School Leadership and Management19(3):
319–330
.
11.
Burns, T.
and
Stalker, G.M.
(1961) The Management of Innovation.
London: Social Science Paperbacks/Tavistock Publications
.
12.
Busher, H.
and
Harris, A.
(1999)
‘Leadership of School Subject Areas: Tensions and Dimensions of
Managing in the Middle’
, School Leadership and Management19(3):
305–317
.
13.
David, A.
(2001)
‘Models Implementation: A State of the Art’
, European Journal of Operational Research134:
459–480
.
14.
Drodge, S.
(2002)
‘Managing under Pressure: The Management of Vocational Education
in the British, Dutch and French Systems’
, Research in Post-Compulsory Education7(1):
27–43
.
15.
Earley, P.
(1998) ‘Middle Management: The Key to
Organisational Success?’, in
D. Middlewood
and
J. Lumby
(eds) Strategic Management in Schools and Colleges.
London: Paul Chapman
.
16.
Earley, P.
and
Fletcher-Campbell, F.
(1989)
‘Managing School Departments and Faculties: Towards Better Practice’
, Educational Research31(2):
98–112
.
17.
Eisenhardt, K.M.
(2002) ‘Building Theories from Case Study
Research’, in
A.M. Huberman
and
M.B. Miles
(eds) A Qualitative Researcher’s Companion.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
.
18.
Fowler, A.
(2003)
‘Systems Modelling, Simulation, and the Dynamics of Strategy’
, Journal of Business Research56:
135–144
.
19.
Fullan, M.
(1991) The New Meaning of Educational Change.
London: Cassell
.
20.
Further Education National Training Organization
(2001) National Occupational Standards for Management in
Further Education.
London: FENTO
.
21.
Gass, S.I.
and
Harris, C.M.
(1996) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science.
Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
22.
Gillett-Karam, R.
(1999) ‘Midlevel Management in the Community
College: A Rose Garden?’, in
R. Gillett-Karam
(ed.) Preparing Departmental Chairs for their Leadership Roles.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
.
23.
Glaser, B.
and
Strauss, A.
(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of
Qualitative Research.
London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson
.
24.
Gleeson, D.
and
Shain, F.
(1999)
‘Managing Ambiguity: Between Markets and
Managerialism—A Case Study of “Middle”
Managers in Further Education’
, Sociological Review47(3):
461–490
.
25.
Glover, D.
,
Gleeson, D.
,
Gough, G.
and
Johnson, M.
(1998)
‘The Meaning of Management: The Developmental Needs of Middle
Managers in Secondary Schools’
, Educational Management & Administration26(3):
279–292
.
26.
Leithwood, K.
,
Jantzi, D.
and
Steinbach, R.
(1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
27.
Lumby, J.
(1999)
‘Strategic Planning in Further Education: The Business of Values’
, Educational Management & Administration27(1):
71–83
.
28.
Lumby, J.
(2001) Managing Further Education Colleges: Learning
Enterprise.
London: Paul Chapman
.
29.
Lumby, J.
and
Tomlinson, H.
(2000)
‘Principals Speaking: Managerialism and Leadership in Further Education’
, Research in Post-Compulsory Education5(2):
139–151
.
30.
Peeke, G. (1997) ‘Role of Middle Managers in FE’,
personal communication to P. Earley, quoted in Earley (1998).
31.
Pollitt, C.
(1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: Cuts or
Cultural Change in the 1990s?,2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell
.
32.
Powell, L.
(2001) ‘“It All Goes Wrong in the
Middle”: A Reassessment of the Influence of College Structures on
Middle Managers’, in
C. Horsfall
(ed.) Leadership Issues: Raising Achievement.
London: Learning and Skills Development Agency
.
33.
Randle, K.
and
Brady, N.
(1997)
‘Managerialism and Professionalism in the “Cinderella
Service” ’
, Journal of Vocational Education and Training49(1):
121–139
.
34.
Rivett, P.
(1994) The Craft of Decision Modelling.
Chichester: John Wiley
.
35.
Schneider, M.
(2002)
‘A Stakeholder Model of Organizational Leadership’
, Organization Science13(2):
209–220
36.
Schwandt, T.A.
(1998) ‘Constructivist, Interpretivist
Approaches to Human Inquiry’, in
N.K. Denzin
and
Y.S. Lincoln
(eds) The Landscape of Qualitative Research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
.
37.
Smith, R.E.
(2002)
‘The Role of the University Head of Department’
, Educational Management & Administration30(3):
293–312
.
38.
Tesch, R.
(1990) Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools.
New York: Falmer
.
39.
Turner, C.
and
Bolam, R.
(1998)
‘Analysing the Role of the Subject Head of Department in
Secondary Schools in England and Wales: Towards a Theoretical Framework’
, School Leadership and Management18(3):
373–388
.
