University of Pennsylvania 7th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Current issues regarding the use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials (morning panel discussion)
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online August, 2015
University of Pennsylvania 7th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Current issues regarding the use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials (morning panel discussion)
HsuJYKennedyEHRoyJA. Surrogate markers for time-varying treatments and outcomes. Clin Trials2015; 12; 309–316.
5.
ByarDCorleDK. Selecting optimal treatment in clinical trials using covariate information. J Chronic Dis1977; 30: 445–459.
6.
CaiTTianLWongPH. Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections. Biostat2011; 12: 270–282.
7.
PorsteinssonAPDryeLTPollockBG. Effect of citalopram on agitation in Alzheimer disease: the CitAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA2014; 311: 682–691.
8.
ReinL. Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in the Citalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Disease clinical trial: a subgroup analysis to guide personalized treatment selections. Master of Science Thesis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 2014.
9.
ZhangBTsiatisAALaberE. A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes. Biometrics2012; 68: 1010–1018.
10.
PearlJ. Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika1995; 82: 669–710.
11.
JoBWangCPIalongoNS. Using latent outcome trajectory classes in causal inference. Stat Interface2009; 2: 403–412.
12.
RobinsJMGreenlandS. Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology1992; 3: 143–155.
13.
PearlJBareinboimE. External validity and transportability: A formal approach. 2011 JSM Proceedings, Miami Beach FL, July 30–August 4, 2011, pp. 157–171.
14.
PearlJBareinboimE. Transportability of causal and statistical relations: a formal approach. In: BurgardWRothD (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-fifth national conference on artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2011, pp. 247–254.
15.
BareinboimEPearlJ. Transportability of causal effects: completeness results. In: HoffmannJSelmanB (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-sixth national conference on artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2012, pp. 698–704.
16.
BareinboimEPearlJ. A general algorithm for deciding transportability of experimental results. J Causal Inference2013; 1: 107–134.
17.
BareinboimEPearlJ. Causal transportability with limited experiments. In: DesJardinsMLittmanM (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-seventh national conference on artificial intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2013, pp. 95–101.
18.
BareinboimEPearlJ. Transportability from multiple environments with limited experiments: completeness results. In: WellingMGhahramaniZCortesC. (eds) Advances of neural information processing 27 (NIPS Proceedings). La Jolla, CA: NIPS, 2014, pp. 280–288.
19.
GruberSVan der LaanMJ. Consistent causal effect estimation under dual misspecification and implications for confounder selection procedures. Stat Methods Med Res. Epub ahead of print 23 February 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0962280212437451.
20.
PrenticeRL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med1989; 8: 431–440.