The social function of clinical equipoise

Freedman B . Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 141–45.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council Policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans, 2010. Available at: http://www.neac.health.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexcm/neac-resources-publications-ethicalresearchguidelines (accessed 12 July 2012).

National Ethics Advisory Committee. Ethical Guidelines for Intervention Studies. Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand, 2009.

National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants. National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Bethesda, MD, 2001.

International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). ICH harmonised tripartite guideline: Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials E10, 2000. Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E10/Step4/E10_Guideline.pdf (accessed 12 July 2012).

London AJ Kimmelman J Emborg ME . Research ethics. Beyond access vs. protection in trials of innovative therapies. Science 2010; 328: 829–30.

Djulbegovic B . The paradox of equipoise: The principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research. Cancer Control 2009; 16: 342–47.

Miller FG Joffe S . Limits to research risks. J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 445–49.