Abdominal aortic aneurysm neck dilatation and sac remodeling in fenestrated compared to standard endovascular aortic repair

Abstract

Objective

Contemporary commercially available endovascular devices for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) include standard endovascular aortic repair (sEVAR) or fenestrated EVAR (fEVAR) endografts. However, aortic neck dilatation (AND) can occur in nearly 25% of patients following EVAR, resulting in loss of proximal seal with risk of aortic rupture. AND has not been well characterized in fEVAR, and direct comparisons studying AND between fEVAR and sEVAR have not been performed. This study aims to analyze AND in the infrarenal and suprarenal aortic segments, including seal zone, and quantify sac regression following fEVAR implantation compared to sEVAR.

Method

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 20 consecutive fEVAR patients (Cook Zenith® Fenestrated) and 20 sEVAR (Cook Zenith®) patients was performed. Demographic data, anatomic characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcome were analyzed. Pre-operative, post-operative (1 month), and longest follow-up CT scan at an average of 29.3 months for fEVAR and 29.8 months for sEVAR were analyzed using a dedicated 3D workstation (iNtuition, TeraRecon Inc, Foster City, California). Abdominal aortic aneurysm neck diameter was measured in 5 mm increments, ranging from 20 mm above to 20 mm below the lowest renal artery. Sub-analysis comparing the fEVAR to the sEVAR group at 12 months and at greater than 30 months was performed. Standard statistical analysis was done.

Results

Demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the two cohorts. The fEVAR group had a larger mean aortic diameter at the lowest renal artery, shorter infrarenal aortic neck length, increased prevalence of nonparallel neck shape, and longer AAA length. On follow-up imaging, the suprarenal aortic segment dilated significantly more at all locations in the fEVAR cohort, whereas the infrarenal aortic neck segment dilated significantly less compared to the sEVAR group. Compared to the sEVAR cohort, the fEVAR patients demonstrated significantly greater positive sac remodeling as evident by more sac diameter regression, and elongation of distance measured from the celiac axis to the most cephalad margin of the sac. Device migration, endoleak occurrence, re-intervention rate, and mortalities were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Compared to sEVAR, patients undergoing fEVAR had greater extent of suprarenal AND, consistent with a more diseased native proximal aorta. However, the infrarenal neck, which is shorter and also more diseased in fEVAR patients, appears more stable in the post-operative period as compared to sEVAR. Moreover, the fEVAR cohort had significantly greater sac shrinkage and improved aortic remodeling. The suprarenal seal zone in fEVAR may result in a previously undescribed increased level of protection against infrarenal neck dilatation. We hypothesize that the resultant decreased endotension conferred by better seal zone may be responsible for a more dramatic sac shrinkage in fEVAR.

Keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular aortic repair fenestrated aortic neck sac remodeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population--a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e81260.

Schanzer

Greenberg

Hevelone

, et al. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation 2011; 123: 2848–2855.

Leurs

Kievit

Dagnelie

EUROSTAR Collaborators , et al. Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 640–648.

Kouvelos

Oikonomou

Antoniou

, et al. A systematic review of proximal neck dilatation after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2017 Feb; 24(1): 59–67.

Pintoux

Chaillou

Azema

, et al. Long-term influence of suprarenal or infrarenal fixation on proximal neck dilatation and stentgraft migration after EVAR. Ann Vasc Surg 2011 Nov; 25(8): 1012–1019.

Oberhuber

Schwarz

Hoffmann

, et al. Influence of fixation mechanism on changes of the supra- and infrarenal segment of the aorta after endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Zentralbl Chir 2010; 135: 433–437.

Brewster

Jones

Chung

, et al. Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 426–438.

Oberhuber

Buecken

Hoffmann

, et al. Comparison of aortic neck dilatation after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2012 Apr; 55(4): 929–934.

Oliveira

NFG

Oliveira-Pinto

van Rijn

, et al. Risk factors, dynamics, and clinical consequences of aortic neck dilatation after standard endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021 Jun 2; 62(1): 26–35.

10.

De Donato

Setacci

Bresadola

, et al. Aortic neck evolution after endovascular repair with TriVascular Ovation stent graft. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63: 8–15.

11.

Kret

Tran

Lee

. Change in aortic neck diameter after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg 2017 Aug; 43: 115–120.

12.

Monahan

T.S.

Chuter

T.A.

Reilly

L.M.

, et al. Long-term follow-up of neck expansion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 303–307.

13.

Napoli

Sardella

Bargellini

, et al. Evaluation of the proximal aortic neck enlargement following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: 3-years experience. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 1962–1971.

14.

Cao

Verzini

Parlani

, et al. Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable stent-grafts. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 1200–1205.

15.

Dillavou

Muluk

Makaroun

. Is neck dilatation after endovascular aneurysm repair graft dependent? Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 39: 47–54.

16.

Qaderi

Tran

Tatum

, et al. Aortic neck dilation is not associated with adverse outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair: Midterm results from an investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2018 Oct 6 69(4): 1059–1065.

17.

Tran

Deslarzes-Dubuis

Lee

. Quantification of suprarenal aortic neck dilation after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021 Jan; 73(1): 31–38.

18.

Verhoeven

Katsargyris

Oikonomou

, et al. Fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair as a first line treatment option to treat short necked, juxtarenal, and suprarenal aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016 Jun; 51(6): 775–781.

19.

Kotelis

Schleimer

Foldenauer

, et al. Operative and midterm outcomes of the fenestrated Anaconda stent-graft in the endovascular treatment of juxtarenal, suprarenal, and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther 2016 Dec; 23(6): 930–935.

20.

Stern

Tran

, et al. Predictors of sac regression and mortality after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2020 Sept; 72(3): e323–e324.

21.

O’Donnell

TFX

Deery

Boitano

, et al. Aneurysm sac failure to regress after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower long-term survival. J Vasc Surg 2019 Feb; 69(2): 414–422.

22.

Tsilimparis

Dayama

Ricotta

. Remodeling of aortic aneurysm and aortic neck on mid- and long-term follow-up after endovascular repair with suprarenal fixation. J Vasc Surg 2011; 55(6): 96S.