Inferior selective crossectomy for great saphenous vein incompetence: Our experience

Abstract

Objective

To describe the mid-term outcome after inferior selective crossectomy in a subset of patients with symptomatic chronic venous disease and both great saphenous vein and suprasaphenic valve incompetence.

Methodsː Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. During an eight-year period, 1095 ligations of all saphenofemoral junction inferior tributaries and great saphenous vein stripping were performed in 814 Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathophysiology C2–C6 patients. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were performed after 30 days, 6 months, and 2 years, and saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns and varicose veins recurrence rates were evaluated.

Results

Two hundred and twenty patients completed the two-year follow-up period. At the 30-day Duplex ultrasound evaluations, two different hemodynamic patterns were described. Type 1, with physiological drainage of saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in 214 patients. Type 2, without flow in saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in six patients. Overall varicose vein recurrence rates were 0, 2.3, and 2.7% at the 30-day, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up examinations, respectively. At the two-year follow-up, Type 1 patients showed 0% varicose vein recurrence, while Type 2 patients showed 100%.

Conclusionsː Inferior selective crossectomy seems to be a valid and safe option in case of both suprasaphenic valve and great saphenous vein incompetence. Duplex ultrasound evaluation, according to our protocol, allows us to identify two different saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns that could predict varicose vein recurrence at mid-term. An optimal stump washing after inferior selective crossectomy, warranted by patency and large caliber saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, seems to be the key point in preventing varicose vein recurrence in this context. However, large prospective studies regarding saphenofemoral junction modifications and varicose vein recurrence are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

Keywords

Inferior selective crossectomy saphenofemoral junction great saphenous vein suprasaphenic valve varicose veins

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Eklöf

Rutherford

Bergan

, et al. Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1248–1252.

Wittens

Davies

Bækgaard

, et al. Management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 678–737.

Dickson

Hill

Thomson

, et al. The valves and tributary veins of the saphenofemoral junction: ultrasound findings in normal limbs. Veins Lymphatics 2013; 2: e18.

Ricci

The sapheno femoral junction involvement in the treatment of varicose veins disease. Veins Lymphatics 2017; 6: 6822.

Cirocchi

Henry

Rambotti

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the anatomic variants of the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019; 7: 128–138.

Pagano

Bissacco

Flore

, et al. Great saphenous vein reflux treatment in patients with femoral valve incompetence, the excluded saphenous vein technique (ESVT): a pilot study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018; 22: 7453–7457.

Perrin

Guex

Ruckley

, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 8: 233–245.

Bissacco

Castronovo

Romagnoli

, et al. Recurrent varices after surgery: a clinical and color-Doppler ultrasound scan analysis. Int Angiol 2018; 37: 176–180.

Kostas

Ioannou

Touloupakis

, et al. Recurrent varicose veins after surgery: a new appraisal of a common and complex problem in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27: 275–282.

10.

Genovese

Furino

Quarto

Superficial epigastric vein sparing in the saphenous-femoral crossectomy or in the closures of the saphena magna. Ann Ital Chir 2015; 86: 383–385.

11.

Mariani

Mancini

Bucalossi

, et al. Selective high ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction decreases the neovascularization and the recurrent varicose veins in the operated groin. Int Angiol 2015; 34: 250–256.

12.

Casoni

Lefebvre-Vilardebo

Villa

, et al. Stump evolution after great saphenous vein stripping with high ligation. Veins Lymphatics 2016; 5: 5573.

13.

Gomes

ES.

Iliac valve regurgitation disease: implications for the surgical approach of the venous insufficiency in the lower extremities. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2002; 17: 339–344.

14.

Gianesini

Occhionorelli

Menegatti

, et al. Femoral vein valve incompetence as a risk factor for junctional recurrence. Phlebology 2018; 33: 206–212.

15.

Antignani

Benedetti-Valentini

Aluigi

, et al. Diagnosis of vascular diseases. Ultrasound investigations – guidelines. Int Angiol 2012; 31: 1–77.

16.

Critchley

Handa

Maw

, et al. Complications of varicose vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79: 105.

17.

Pittaluga

Chastanet

Lymphatic complications after varicose veins surgery: risk factors and how to avoid them. Phlebology 2012; 27: 139–142.

18.

Holme

Skajaa

Holme

Incidence of lesions of the saphenous nerve after partial or complete stripping of the long saphenous vein. Acta Chir Scand 1990; 156: 145–148.

19.

Mariani

Bucalossi

Mancini

, et al. Selective vs radical crossectomy of the great saphenous vein in primitive venous insufficiency: results at 5 years. Acta Phlebol 2009; 10: 5–10.

20.

Cappelli

Molino-Lova

Giangrandi

, et al. Ligation of the saphenofemoral junction tributaries as risk factor for groin recurrence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 6: 224–229.

21.

Onida

Davies

AH.

CHIVA, ASVAL and related techniques – concepts and evidence. Phlebology 2015; 30: 42–45.