The aim of this review article was to evaluate the long-term technical success rates of the known endovenous ablation procedures in the treatment of the incompetence of the great saphenous vein.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in the PubMed-database until the 5 January 2016. All publications with four to five years follow-up were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed by the IVhet-model.
Results
Eight hundred and sixty-two unique publications were found; 17 of them were appropriate for meta-analysis. Overall, 1420 limbs were included in the trial, 939 for endovenous laser ablation, 353 for radiofrequency ablation and 128 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. Overall, technical success rates were 84.8% for endovenous laser ablation, 88.7% for radiofrequency ablation and 32.8% for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy. There were no significant differences between endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy regarding the great saphenous vein reopening (p = 0.66; OR: 0.22; 95% of CI: 0.08–0.62 for radiofrequency ablation vs. endovenous laser ablation; p = 0.96; OR: 0.11; 95% of CI: 0.06–0.20 for endovenous laser ablation vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy; p = 0.93; OR: 3.20; 95% of CI: 0.54–18.90 for ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation).
Conclusion
Both endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are efficient in great saphenous vein occlusion on the long term. Lacking long-conducted large trials, the efficacy and reliability of ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy to treat great saphenous vein-reflux is not affirmed.
LattimerCR. CVD: a condition of underestimated severity. Int Angiol2014; 33: 222–228.
2.
MarianiFManciniSBucalossiM. Selective high ligation of the sapheno-femoral junction decreases the neovascularization and the recurrent varicose veins in the operated groin. Int Angiol2015; 34: 250–256.
3.
HermanJMusilDTichyM. Recurrent varicose veins: causes and neovascularisation. A 17-year experience. Int Angiol2015; 34: 53–59.
4.
CarrollCHummelSLeavissJ. Systematic review, network meta-analysis and exploratory cost-effectiveness model of randomized trials of minimally invasive techniques versus surgery for varicose veins. Br J Surg2014; 101: 1040–1052.
5.
NesbittCBedenisRBhattacharyaV. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014; 7: CD005624–CD005624.
6.
GuexJJ. Endovenous chemical (and physical) treatments for varices: what’s new?Phlebology2014; 29: 45–48.
7.
van den BosRRProebstleTM. The state of the art of endothermal ablation. Lasers Med Sci2014; 29: 387–392.
8.
CarradiceD. Superficial venous insufficiency from the infernal to the endothermal. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2014; 96: 5–10.
9.
CarrollCHummelSLeavissJ. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques to manage varicose veins: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Tech Assess2013; 17: i–xvi, 1–141.
10.
O’FlynnNVaughanMKelleyK. Diagnosis and management of varicose veins in the legs: NICE guideline. Br J Gen Pract2014; 64: 314–315.
11.
NicolaidesAKakkosSEklofB. Management of chronic venous disorders of the lower limbs Guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol2014; 33: 87–208.
12.
GloviczkiPComerotaAJDalsingMC. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg2011; 53: 2S–48S.
13.
SubwongcharoenSChitwisetS. Chronic venous disease treated with endovenous microwave ablation: long-terms results and quality of life. J Med Assoc Thai2014; 97: S76–S80.
14.
BalintRVizsyLFaricsA. The role of cryosurgery in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Review. Int Angiol2016; 35: 78–83.
15.
BalintIBVizsyLVargovicsE. Cryosclerosis. A forgotten endovenous procedure for treating the incompetence of the great saphenous vein. Short term results. Int Angiol2014; 33: 547–552.
16.
McHughSMLeahyAL. What next after thermal ablation for varicose veins: non-thermal ablation?Surgeon2014; 12: 237–238.
17.
EliasSLamYLWittensCH. Mechanochemical ablation: status and results. Phlebology2013; 28: 10–14.
18.
van den BosRRMalskatWSDe MaeseneerMG. Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus steam ablation (LAST trial) for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg2014; 101: 1077–1083. [Erratum in: Br J Surg 2014; 101: 1484].
19.
De MaeseneerMPichotOCavezziA. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins – UIP consensus document. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011; 42: 89–102.
20.
DoiSABarendregtJJRaoC. An updated method for risk adjustment in outcomes research. Value Health2014; 17: 629–633.
21.
ProebstleTMAlmBJGöckeritzO. Five-year results from the prospective European multicentre cohort study on radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins. Br J Surg2015; 102: 212–218.
22.
MerchantRFPichotO. Closure Study Group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg2005; 42: 502–509; discussion 509.
23.
KalodikiELattimerCRAzzamM. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial on ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy combined with saphenofemoral ligation vs standard surgery for varicose veins. J Vasc Surg2012; 55: 451–457.
24.
Chapman-SmithPBrowneA. Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux. Phlebology2009; 24: 183–188.
25.
RassKFringsNGlowackiP. Same site recurrence is more frequent after endovenous laser ablation compared with high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein: 5 year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS Study). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2015; 50: 648–656.
26.
GauwSALawsonJAvan Vlijmen-van KeulenCJ. Five-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia. J Vasc Surg2016; 63: 420–428.
27.
van der VeldenSKBiemansAADe MaeseneerMG. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg2015; 102: 1184–1194.
28.
KalteisMAdelsgruberPMessie-WerndlS. Five-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing high ligation combined with endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein. Dermatol Surg2015; 41: 579–586.
29.
FlessenkämperIHartmannMHartmannK. Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up. Phlebology2016; 31: 23–33.
30.
El-SheikhaJNandhraSCarradiceD. Clinical outcomes and quality of life 5-years after a randomized trial of concomitant or sequential phlebectomy following endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins. Br J Surg2014; 101: 1093–1097.
31.
RasmussenLLawaetzMBjoernL. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years. J Vasc Surg2013; 58: 421–426.
32.
SamuelNWallaceTCarradiceD. Comparison of 12-w versus 14-w endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: 5-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Vasc Endovascular Surg2013; 47: 346–352.
33.
DisselhoffBCder KinderenDJKelderJC. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg2011; 98: 1107–1111.
34.
DisselhoffBCder KinderenDJKelderJC. Five-year results of a randomised clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with and without ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2011; 41: 685–690.
35.
RaviRTraylerEABarrettDA. Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period. J Endovasc Ther2009; 16: 500–505.
36.
MyersKAJolleyD. Outcome of endovenous laser therapy for saphenous reflux and varicose veins: medium-term results assessed by ultrasound surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2009; 37: 239–245.
37.
DesmyttereJGrardCWassmerB. Endovenous 980-nm laser treatment of saphenous veins in a series of 500 patients. J Vasc Surg2007; 46: 1242–1247.
