This study aims to evaluate recovery time, patient-centric postoperative outcomes, and the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating venous insufficiency associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux.
Methods
In this single-center, self-paired, randomized trial, 16 limbs from 8 patients with symptomatic bilateral GSV insufficiency were treated. LA was performed on one lower limb, and after 40 days, the contralateral limb was treated with RFA. For LA, we used a 1470-nm endolaser with radial fiber, and for RFA, the VNUS ClosureFast™ system. All patients were followed with clinical, radiological, and laboratory evaluations for 6 months postoperatively.
Results
Both techniques showed similar postoperative pain scores, number of complications, time to return to work, and patient satisfaction scores. LA and RFA decreased the mean Venous Clinical Severity Score by the end of the study and achieved a 100% vein occlusion rate, along with a reduction in GSV size. Procedure time was significantly shorter with LA.
Conclusion
LA and RFA demonstrated similar recovery profiles, pain levels, and patient satisfaction outcomes, maintaining high efficacy in resolving venous insufficiency associated with GSV reflux.
Beebe-DimmerJLPfeiferJREngleJSSchottenfeldD. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15(3):175-184. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.015
3.
RhodesJMGloviczkiPCantonLGRookeTLewisBDLindseyJR. Factors affecting clinical outcome following endoscopic perforator vein ablation. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2):162-167. doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00169-x
4.
KimYPngCYMSumpioBJDeCarloCSDuaA. Defining the human and health care costs of chronic venous insufficiency. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021;34(1):59-64. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.007
5.
GaoRDQianSYWangHHLiuYSRenSY. Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency. World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(18):5946-5956. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i18.5946
6.
VlachovskýRNovotnýTStaffaRBednaříkZ. Endovenous ablation of varicose veins current status and overview of methods. Rozhl Chir. 2022;101(5):200-210. doi:10.33699/PIS.2022.101.5.200-210
7.
ProebstleTMSandhoferMKarglA, et al.Thermal damage of the inner vein wall during endovenous laser treatment: key role of energy absorption by intravascular blood. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(7):596-600. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01309.x
8.
LabropoulosNBhattiALeonLBorgeMRodriguezHKalmanP. Neovascularization after great saphenous vein ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(2):219-222. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.030
9.
SiribumrungwongBNooritPWilasrusmeeCAttiaJThakkinstianA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44(2):214-223. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.017
10.
DzieciuchowiczLEspinosaGPáramoJA. Haemostatic activation and inflammatory response after three methods of treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence. Phlebology. 2014;29(3):154-163. doi:10.1177/0268355512474445
11.
van den BosRRMalskatWSJDe MaeseneerMGR, et al.Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus steam ablation (LAST trial) for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1077-1083. doi:10.1002/bjs.9580
12.
JiangWLiangYLongZHuMYangHQinX. Endovenous radiofrequency ablation vs laser ablation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12:101842. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101842
13.
CowplandCACleeseALWhiteleyMS. Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins - a review of the clinical evidence. Phlebology. 2017;32(5):299-306. doi:10.1177/0268355516648067
14.
VuylstekeMEMordonSR. Endovenous laser ablation: a review of mechanisms of action. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26(3):424-433. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.037
15.
SchwarzTvon HodenbergEFurtwänglerCRastanAZellerTNeumannFJ. Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins with the 1470-nm diode laser. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(6):1474-1478. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.027
16.
von HodenbergEZerweckCKnittelMZellerTSchwarzT. Endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins with the 1470 nm diode laser using a radial fiber - 1-year follow-up. Phlebology. 2015;30(2):86-90. doi:10.1177/0268355513512825
17.
MeseBBozoglanOErogluE, et al.A comparison of 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of great saphenous veins 10 mm or more in size. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(7):1368-1372. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.063
18.
IwagamiMTakeuchiY. Introduction to self-controlled study design. Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2021;3(3):67-73. doi:10.37737/ace.3.3_67
19.
EklöfBRutherfordRBBerganJJ, et al.Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1248-1252. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.027
20.
VasquezMARabeEMcLaffertyRB, et al.Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(5):1387-1396. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.161
21.
Correa PosadaMOContreras CorreaLMGarcía VélezJF. Factors associated with chronic venous disease: study in 1,136 patients treated for varicose veins of the lower limbs in a specialized clinic. J Vasc Bras. 2022;21:e20220051. doi:10.1590/1677-5449.202200513
22.
ShepherdACOrtega-OrtegaMGohelMSEpsteinDBrownLCDaviesAH. Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(5):289-296. doi:10.1017/S0266462315000537
23.
GaleSSLeeJNWalshMEWojnarowskiDLComerotaAJ. A randomized, controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation using the 810-nm wavelength laser and the closurePLUS radiofrequency ablation methods for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):645-650. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.030
24.
AlmeidaJIKaufmanJGöckeritzO, et al.Radiofrequency endovenous ClosureFAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY study). J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;20(6):752-759. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.03.008
25.
LawsonJAGauwSAvan VlijmenCJ, et al.Prospective comparative cohort study evaluating incompetent great saphenous vein closure using radiofrequency-powered segmental ablation or 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation with radial-tip fibers (Varico 2 study). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(1):31-40. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.016
26.
KempeneersACBechter-HuglBThomisSvan den BusscheDVuylstekeMEVuylstekeMM. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, using a 1470 nm diode laser in combination with a Tulip-TipTM fiber versus radiofrequency (Closure FASTTM VNUS®), in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Int Angiol. 2022;41(4):322-331. doi:10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04747-2
27.
ShepherdACGohelMSBrownLCMetcalfeMJHamishMDaviesAH. Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2010;97(6):810-818. doi:10.1002/bjs.7091
28.
GoodeSDChowdhuryACrockettM, et al.Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(2):246-253. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.026
29.
NordonIMHinchliffeRJBrarR, et al.A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):876-881. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a
30.
RasmussenLLawaetzMSerupJ, et al.Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins with 3-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2013;1(4):349-356. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.04.008
31.
BozoglanOMeseBErogluE, et al.Comparison of endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation in treating varicose veins in the same patient. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;50(1):47-51. doi:10.1177/1538574415625813
32.
CalcagnoDRossiJAHaC. Effect of saphenous vein diameter on closure rate with ClosureFAST radiofrequency catheter. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;43(6):567-570. doi:10.1177/1538574409345026
33.
MerchantRFPichotOClosure Study Group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(3):502-509. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.007
34.
ToregeaniJFRochaASTKimuraCJ, et al.Radiofrequency thermal ablation versus conventional saphenectomy. J Vasc Bras. 2015;14:4-9. doi:10.1590/1677-5449.20140060
35.
SouzaJBPerissinottiDMN. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in Brazil – a population-based study with secondary data of the study on chronic pain prevalence in Brazil. BrJP. 2018;1:345-348. doi:10.5935/2595-0118.20180065
36.
SlimK. The benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery. J Vis Surg. 2016;153(6S):S41-S44. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.09.001
37.
ShahABaileyCR. Outcomes following surgery: are we measuring what really matters?Anaesthesia. 2019;74(6):696-699. doi:10.1111/anae.14562
38.
BilligJISearsEDTravisBNWaljeeJF. Patient-reported outcomes: understanding surgical efficacy and quality from the patient’s perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(1):56-64. doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07748-3
39.
LurieFCretonDEklofB, et al.Prospective randomised study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure) versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(1):67-73. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.019
40.
TheivacumarNSDellagrammaticasDDarwoodRJMavorAIDGoughMJ. Fate of the great saphenous vein following endovenous laser ablation: does re-canalisation mean recurrence?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(2):211-215. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.03.014
