Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to disclose the results of shape factor analysis of the flow of a hybrid nanofluid over a curved sheet. The flow is caused by a stretchable curved sheet. Mathematical modeling and analyses have been performed in the presence of curvature, melting heat and heterogeneous-homogeneous reactions. Autocatalysis and the coefficients of the reactant are dealt with in a similar manner. The physical properties of the fluid, including the fluid velocity, the heat and mass transfer properties, the skin friction and the Nusselt number have been acquired and analyzed under the influences of the dimensionless curvature, melting and heterogeneous–homogeneous reaction variables. Boundary layer approximations are used in the mathematical formulation. Suitable transformations have been used to transform differential equations into nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The resulting nonlinear system of equations has been analyzed via the matlab bvp4c solver. Comparisons of nanoliquids with the hybrid nanoliquid are presented through graphs and tables. The results of this analysis show that the skin friction and the heat transfer rate in the hybrid nanofluid are seen more prominently than those of the nanofluid for larger values of the curvature parameter $k$ .

Keywords

Hybrid nanofluid nanofluid flow viscous fluid nonlinear curved sheet melting heat transfer homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions

Introduction

Boundary layer flow of viscous fluids has seen extensive use in industry because of the widespread use of stretching moveable surfaces with peculiar velocities. This type of flow is promising for implementation in a variety of industrial fields, including fabrication of prominences in polymer plates using a die or extraction of plastic sheets. The melted plastic is extracted from a slit during the sheet structuring process, consequently leaving the sheet stretchable and allowing the desired thickness to be achieved. The mechanical features of refined products depend on the cooling rate and the extending features of the products during these procedures. Boundary layer flow via a moving stretchable sheet was explored for the first time by Sakiadis^1,2. After this initial work,^1,2 researchers documented stretchable plates in boundary layer flow in various directions. Crane³ introduced three-dimensional analysis for incompressible laminar flow. However, closed form results for the Crane problem have been very scarce in fluid mechanics to date. Boundary layer flow research has broadened into numerous areas to explore other physical features of the flow, including suction/blowing and heat transmission. In addition, many associated problems have been developed, with each incorporating different aspects to provide a precise solution. Accurate analytical results for the Crane study³ were investigated by McLeod and Rajagopal.⁴ Stretched flow via injection/suction processes was researched by Gupta et al.⁵ Wang⁶ extended the axisymmetric flow into a three-dimensional stretching sheet. The stretching flow^7–11 was studied extensively for both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. The above research on linear and nonlinear extendable sheets focused on flat sheets only and few attempts have been made to analyze flow over stretchable curved sheets. The pioneering investigation of linearly stretchable curved sheets has been documented in the literature.¹² Subsequent studies of the use of liquid flow via curved extendable plates in industry have incorporated flow in the curved jaws of machines.^13–19

Nanofluids, which are composed of nanoparticles submerged in base liquids, have seen several real applications in numerous fields, including cancer treatment, temperature reduction in electronic tools, the nuclear field, drug delivery and many other areas. Because of their significance in the aforementioned areas, nanofluids have become a challenging research topic in recent years. The characteristics of final industrial products are largely dependent on heat transport aspects and thermal conduction, and low-thermal-conductivity fluids are mostly encountered in manufacturing industries. Nanoparticles are being developed to overcome this inadequacy in fluids for industrial applications. The pioneering analysis of these engineered liquids was introduced by Choi and Eastman.²⁰ Because of the unique features of nanofluids, they are being used increasingly widely in medical and engineering sciences in heat exchangers, targeted drug delivery, mechanical cooling, extraction of geothermal forces and many other fields.

Hybrid nanofluids (HBNFs) have been applied extensively in the cooling of machines and motors, bio-technologies and numerous other areas. An HBNF is a mixture of two differently-sized nanoparticles and a base liquid. An HBNF was analyzed experimentally for the first time in 2007 by Jana et al.²¹ A comprehensive review of the characteristics of HBNFs was later provided by Sarkar et al.²² They concluded that HBNFs enhance both pressure and heat transfer. Subsequent investigations^23–27 and further studies cited therein can be referred to for further analyses of HBNFs.

The solidification and melting features of materials have remained a prominent research topic because of their promising links to innovative technologies and industries. Research scientists tend to place importance on technologies that provide more durable, effective and low-cost energy storage. In the heat and power industries, lost heat recovery and solar energy applications are interlinked with these materials. Chemical storage and latent heat and sensible heat energies are used frequently for energy storage based on these techniques. Latent heat is more appropriate economically and there is an effective energy storage trend based on altering the phase of the storage materials. The thermal energy is preserved in the material through its latent heat by melting and is regained by later freezing the same material. The melting of ice chunks in steam was studied by Roberts.²⁸ Further literature reviews on aspects of melting and freezing were cited in several articles.^29–34

Heterogeneous–homogeneous reactions are implicated in a variety of chemical reaction phenomena. These phenomena are engaged together in both heterogeneous and homogeneous reactions. Various reactions proceed gradually or do not occur instantaneously in the presence of a catalyst. Within fluids and on catalyst surfaces, different reaction rates occur for the different reactant species. These reactions^35–36 are commonly used in processes that include food processing, fog formation and dispersion, polymer processing, combustion and biochemical processing. Merkin³⁷ proposed the pioneering concept of isothermal homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions. Autocatalyst diffusivity and reactants were also investigated in boundary layer flows by Chaudhary and Merkin.³⁸ The impact of diffusion species in nanofluids when varying the sheet thickness was reported by Hayat et al.³⁹ A computational study of these reactions for heat transport applications was performed by Waqas.⁴⁰

Molybdenum disulphide $(Mo S_{2})$ has been used as a catalyst, a hydrogenation nano-catalyst and a lubricant. MoS₂ has unique features that include chemical inertness, a photo-corrosion property and anisotropy with a layered structure. Graphene has properties that include high-speed electrons. Polymer electrical conduction could therefore be enhanced by using graphene within the polymer matrix. The thermal conductivity of the graphene oxide $(GO)$ shape factor could be accelerated by several orders of magnitude easily. Graphene has been found to have one of the highest in-plane thermal conductivities among the materials considered in this field.

The shape factors of the nanoparticles play an important role in advancement of heat transfer. However, very little consideration has been given to the heat transfer through exact nanoparticle shapes. The current analysis technique describes the flow of a water-based HBNF ( $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ ) on a curved nonlinear stretching surface, including the characteristics of heterogeneous–homogeneous reactions and melting heat. To the best of our knowledge,^41–45 nobody has previously tried to investigate HBNF flow over a curved nonlinear stretchable surface with melting heat effects and homogeneous–heterogeneous reactions with shape factors. The associated problems have been modeled first and then analyzed using the MATLAB bvp4c solver to provide numerical results. This approach is beneficial when compared with other methods, i.e. the Runge–Kutta integration method, the shooting technique, and the Keller box method, because of its rapid convergence.

Thermal characteristics of base liquid with shape factors

The composition of the HBNF comprises $Mo S_{2} (ϕ_{1})$ (molybdenum disulphide) and $GO (ϕ_{2})$ (graphene oxide) in a base liquid. According to the literature,⁴⁶ the mathematical form of the volume fraction for an HBNF is defined as

ϕ_{hnf} = \frac{V_{Mo S_{2}} + V_{GO}}{V_{f}} = ϕ_{1} + ϕ_{2},

(1)

where V_MoS2, V_GO and V_f are the volume of MoS₂, the volume of GO and the total volume of the fluid, respectively, and ϕ₁ and ϕ₂ are the volume fractions of MoS₂ and GO, respectively. The thermal characteristics of the base liquid and the nanoparticles are presented in Table 1. Table 2 compares the thermophysical characteristics of the $Mo S_{2} - water$ nanoliquid and the $Mo S_{2} + GO$ hybrid nanoliquid.

Table 1.

Characteristics of base liquid and nanoparticles.⁴⁷

Characteristics	Base liquid	Nanoscale particles
	Water	GO	MoS₂
Pr	6.2	-	-
$ρ$ (kg/m³)	997	1800	5060
$β_{1}$ (K⁻¹)	21	6.30×10⁷	2.84×10⁻⁴
$k_{1}$ (W/mK)	0.613	5000	904.4
$c_{p}$ (J/kgK)	4179	717	397.746

Pr: Prandtl number; ρ: density; β₁: thermal expansion; k₁: thermal conductivity; c_p: heat capacity.

Table 2.

Thermophysical properties of hybrid nanoliquid $(Mo S_{2} + GO) (ϕ_{2})$ and nanoliquid $(Mo S_{2}) (ϕ_{1})$ .⁴⁷

Properties	Hybrid nanoliquid	Nanoliquid
Density	$ρ_{hnf} = [(1 - ϕ_{2}) ((1 - ϕ_{1}) ρ_{f} + ϕ_{1} ρ_{s_{1}}) + ϕ_{2} ρ_{s_{2}}]$	$ρ_{nf} = [(1 - ϕ_{2}) ((1 - ϕ_{1}) ρ_{f} + ϕ_{1} ρ_{s_{1}})]$
Viscosity	$μ_{hnf} = \frac{μ_{f}}{{(1 - ϕ_{1})}^{2.5} {(1 - ϕ_{2})}^{2.5}}$	$μ_{nf} = \frac{μ_{f}}{{(1 - ϕ_{1})}^{2.5}}$
Thermal expansion	$\begin{matrix} (ρ β)_{hnf} = ϕ_{2} (ρ β)_{s_{2}} + \\ (1 - ϕ_{2}) [(1 - ϕ_{1}) (ρ β)_{f} + ϕ_{1} ρ β_{s_{1}}] \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} (ρ β)_{nf} = \\ (1 - ϕ_{2}) [(1 - ϕ_{1}) (ρ β)_{f} + ϕ_{1} ρ β_{s_{1}}] \end{matrix}$
Thermal conductivity	$\begin{matrix} \frac{k_{hnf}}{k_{bf}} = \frac{k_{s_{2}} + (m - 1) {k_{b}}_{f} - (m - 1) ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{2}})}{(k_{s_{2}} + 2 k_{nf}) + ϕ_{2} (k_{nf} - k_{s_{2}})} \\ with k_{bf} = \frac{k_{s_{1}} + (m - 1) k_{f} - (m - 1) ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{1}})}{k_{s_{1}} + (m - 1) k_{f} - ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{1}})} k_{f} \end{matrix}$	$\frac{k_{bf}}{k_{f}} = \frac{k_{s_{1}} + (m - 1) k_{f} - (m - 1) ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{1}})}{k_{s_{1}} + (m - 1) k_{f} - ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{1}})}$
Heat capacity	$\begin{matrix} (ρ c_{p})_{hnf} = ϕ_{2} (ρ c_{p})_{s_{2}} + \\ (1 - ϕ_{2}) [(1 - ϕ_{1}) (ρ c_{p})_{f} + ϕ_{1} (ρ c_{p})_{s_{1}}] \end{matrix}$	$\begin{matrix} (ρ c_{p})_{nf} = \\ (1 - ϕ_{2}) (ρ c_{p})_{f} + ϕ_{1} (ρ c_{p})_{s_{1}}] \end{matrix}$

Formulation

Consider a two-dimensional incompressible HBNF flow over a curved sheet with radius $R$ . The curved surface is stretchable in a nonlinear manner. The curved surface reduces to a flat sheet for larger values of R $(i . e . R - > \infty)$ . The curvature of the curved sheet depends on the distance $R$ from the center. The water-based hydrid nanoliquid is a mixture of molybdenum disulfide ( $Mo S_{2}$ $(ϕ_{1})$ ) and graphene oxide ( $GO$ $(ϕ_{2})$ ) nanoparticles. The nonlinear velocity $(i . e . u_{w} (s) = c_{1} s^{n})$ of the stretchable curve sheet is considered in the $sr -$ directions, as illustrated in Figure 1. In addition, the effects of melting features and heterogeneous–homogeneous reactions are included in the formulation. It is assumed that $T_{m}$ (melting temperature) > $T_{\infty}$ (ambient temperature) and that $T_{0}$ (solid surface temperature) < $T_{m}$ . The melting heat features are defined mathematically as follows:

k_{hnf} \frac{\partial T}{\partial r} = ρ_{hnf} (λ_{1} + C_{s} (T_{m} - T_{0})) u (s, 0),

(2)

Figure 1.

Geometric configuration of hybrid nanofluid (HBNF) problem.

where $k_{hnf}$ is the thermal conduction of the HBNF, $ρ_{hnf}$ is the density of the HBNF, and $λ_{1}$ and $C_{s}$ are the liquid latent heat and the solid specific heat, respectively.

The isothermal homogeneous reaction is defined as:

A_{1} + 2 B_{1} \to 3 B_{1}, rate k_{d} a b^{2},

(3)

and for cubic auto-catalysis, the heterogeneous reaction on the catalyst surface is defined as:

A_{1} \to B_{1}, rate k_{e} a,

(4)

where $k_{d}$ and $k_{e}$ are the rate constants and $a$ and $b$ are the concentrations of species $A_{1}$ and $B_{1}$ , respectively.

Momentum analysis

The momentum balance equation reveals how the diffusion of the nanoliquid molecules in the boundary layer is caused by the nonlinear stretchable curved sheet. The resultant problems after application of approximation theory are given by:

R \frac{\partial w}{\partial s} + \frac{\partial}{\partial r} ((r + R) u) = 0,

(5)

\frac{1}{r + R} w^{2} = \frac{1}{ρ_{hnf}} \frac{\partial p}{\partial r},

(6)

\begin{matrix} u \frac{\partial w}{\partial r} + \frac{R}{r + R} w \frac{\partial w}{\partial s} + \frac{1}{r + R} wu \\ = ν_{hnf} (\frac{\partial^{2} w}{\partial r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r + R} \frac{\partial w}{\partial r} - \frac{1}{{(r + R)}^{2}} w) \\ - \frac{1}{ρ_{hnf}} \frac{R}{r + R} \frac{\partial p}{\partial s}, \end{matrix}

(7)

with the following conditions:

\begin{matrix} w = w_{w} (s) = c_{1} s^{n}, u = 0 at r = 0 \\ w \to 0, \frac{\partial w}{\partial r} \to 0 as r \to \infty, \end{matrix}

(8)

where $w$ and $u$ are the velocity components, and $ρ_{hnf}$ , $p$ , $c_{1} > 0$ and $n$ represent the HBNF density, the pressure, the stretching constant and the power law index (where $n = 1$ indicates linear stretching, $n \neq 1$ represents nonlinear stretching and $n = 0$ corresponds to a constant stretching surface), respectively.

Energy analysis

Here, we examine how the temperature depends on the melting heat transfer. Therefore, we have the balance of energy equation as follows:

k_{hnf} (\frac{\partial^{2} T}{\partial r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r + R} \frac{\partial T}{\partial r}) = (ρ c_{p})_{hnf} (u \frac{\partial T}{\partial r} + \frac{R}{r + R} w \frac{\partial T}{\partial s}),

(9)

with the conditions that

T = T_{m} at r = 0, T \to T_{\infty} as r \to \infty,

(10)

where $(c_{p})_{hnf}$ , $k_{hnf}$ and $T$ represent the specific heat, the thermal conductivity and the temperature, respectively.

Mass transfer analysis

The mass balance equation shows how the concentration of an HBNF varies through homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. The resulting problems after application of approximation theory are:

D_{A_{1}} (\frac{\partial^{2} a}{\partial r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r + R} \frac{\partial a}{\partial r}) - k_{d} a b^{2} = u \frac{\partial a}{\partial r} + \frac{R}{r + R} w \frac{\partial a}{\partial s},

(11)

D_{B_{1}} (\frac{\partial^{2} b}{\partial r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r + R} \frac{\partial b}{\partial r}) + k_{d} a b^{2} = u \frac{\partial b}{\partial r} + \frac{R}{r + R} w \frac{\partial b}{\partial s},

(12)

with the conditions that

\begin{matrix} D_{A_{1}} \frac{\partial a}{\partial r} = k_{e} a, D_{B_{1}} \frac{\partial b}{\partial r} = - k_{e} a at r = 0, \\ a \to a^{*}, b \to 0 as r \to \infty, \end{matrix}

(13)

where $D_{A_{1}}$ and $D_{B_{1}}$ represent the diffusion coefficients for species $a, b$ , respectively.

By letting

\begin{matrix} w = c_{1} s^{n} f' (ξ), \\ u = - \frac{R}{r + R} \sqrt{c_{1} ν_{f} s^{n - 1}} (\frac{n + 1}{2} f (ξ) + \frac{n - 1}{2} ξ f' (ξ)), \\ ξ = \sqrt{\frac{c_{1} s^{n - 1}}{ν_{f}}} r, p = c_{1}^{2} ρ s^{2 n} P (ξ), k = \sqrt{\frac{c_{1} s^{n - 1}}{ν_{f}}} R, \\ θ (ξ) = \frac{T - T_{m}}{T_{\infty} - T_{m}}, \\ a = a^{☆} Φ (ξ), b = a^{☆} h (ξ), \end{matrix}

(14)

equation (5) is then balanced trivially and then equations (6–14) lead to the following form:

\begin{matrix} \frac{\partial P}{\partial ξ} = \frac{{f'}^{2}}{ξ + k}, \\ \frac{2 nk}{ξ + k} P + \frac{(n + 1) ξ k}{2 (ξ + k)} \frac{\partial P}{\partial ξ} = g_{1} (f ″' + \frac{f ″}{ξ + k} - \frac{f'}{{(ξ + k)}^{2}}) \end{matrix}

(15)

\begin{matrix} - (g_{2} \frac{2 nk + (n + 1) ξ}{2 (ξ + k)^{2}}) k {f'}^{2} + g_{2} \frac{(n + 1) k}{2 (ξ + k)} f f ″ \\ + g_{2} \frac{(n + 1) k}{2 (ξ + k)^{2}} f f', \end{matrix}

(16)

\frac{1}{\Pr} (g_{5} θ ″ + g_{5} \frac{θ'}{ξ + k}) + g_{6} \frac{k}{ξ + k} (\frac{n + 1}{2}) f θ' = 0,

(17)

\frac{1}{Sc} (Φ ″ + \frac{Φ'}{ξ + k}) + \frac{k}{ξ + k} (\frac{n + 1}{2}) f Φ' - K_{1} Φ h^{2} = 0,

(18)

\frac{δ}{Sc} (h ″ + \frac{h'}{ξ + k}) + \frac{k}{ξ + k} (\frac{n + 1}{2}) f h' + K_{1} Φ h^{2} = 0,

(19)

with

{\begin{matrix} g_{5} β θ' + g_{2} (\frac{k}{ξ + k}) \Pr (\frac{n + 1}{2} f + \frac{n - 1}{2} ξ f') = 0, \\ f = 0, f' = 1, θ = 0, Φ' = K_{2} Φ, δ h' = - K_{2} Φ at ξ = 0, \\ f' \to 0, f ″ \to 0, θ \to 1, Φ \to 1, h \to 0 as ξ \to \infty . \end{matrix}

(20)

In the above,

{\begin{matrix} g_{1} = [\frac{1}{{(1 - ϕ_{1})}^{2.5} {(1 - ϕ_{2})}^{2.5}}], \\ g_{2} = [(1 - ϕ_{2}) ((1 - ϕ_{1}) + ϕ_{1} \frac{ρ_{s_{1}}}{ρ_{f}}) + ϕ_{2} \frac{ρ_{s_{2}}}{ρ_{f}}], \\ g_{5} = [\frac{k_{s_{2}} + (m - 1) k_{nf} - (m - 1) ϕ_{2} (k_{nf} - k_{s_{2}})}{(k_{s_{2}} - k_{nf} (1 - m)) + ϕ_{2} k_{nf} - k_{s_{2}}}] [\frac{k_{s_{1}} + (m - 1) k_{f} - (m - 1) ϕ_{1} (k_{f} - k_{s_{1}})}{(k_{s_{1}} - k_{f} (1 - m)) + ϕ_{1} k_{f} - k_{s_{1}}}], \\ g_{6} = (1 - ϕ_{2}) [(1 - ϕ_{1}) + \frac{{(ρ c_{p})}_{s_{1}}}{{(ρ c_{p})}_{s_{1}}} ϕ_{1}] + ϕ_{2} \frac{{(ρ c_{p})}_{s_{2}}}{{(ρ c_{p})}_{s_{1}}} . \end{matrix}

(21)

The Schmidt number, the Prandtl number, the dimensionless curvature variable, the melting variable, the ratio of the diffusion coefficients, the homogeneous reaction variable and the heterogeneous reaction variable are denoted by $Sc$ , $\Pr$ , $k$ , $β$ , $δ$ , $K_{1}$ and $K_{2}$ , respectively. The dimensionless variables that appeared in the equations above can be defined as follows:

\begin{matrix} k = R \sqrt{\frac{c_{1} s^{n - 1}}{ν_{f}}}, β = \frac{c_{p} (T_{\infty} - T_{m})}{λ_{1} + C_{s} (T_{m} - T_{0})}, \\ \Pr = \frac{μ_{f} c_{p}}{k_{f}}, δ = \frac{D_{B_{1}}}{D_{A_{1}}}, K_{1} = \frac{{a^{☆}}^{2} k_{d}}{c_{1} s^{n - 1}}, \\ Sc = \frac{ν_{f}}{D_{A_{1}}}, K_{2} = \frac{k_{e}}{D_{A_{1}}} \sqrt{\frac{ν_{f}}{c_{1} s^{n - 1}}}, \end{matrix}

(22)

By simplifying equations (15) and (16), we obtain:

\begin{matrix} f^{″ ″} + \frac{1}{g_{1}} [\frac{2 f^{″'}}{ξ + k} - \frac{f ″}{{(ξ + k)}^{2}} + \frac{f'}{{(ξ + k)}^{3}} \\ - (\frac{3 n - 1}{2} g_{2} + \frac{(1 - g_{2}) (n - 1)}{ξ + k} ξ) \frac{k}{ξ + k} f' f ″ \\ + (g_{2} \frac{n + 1}{2} - 2 n - (1 - g_{2}) \frac{n - 1}{2} \frac{k}{ξ + k}) \frac{k}{{(ξ + k)}^{2}} f' \\ + \frac{g_{2} k}{ξ + k} \frac{n + 1}{2} f f^{″'} + \frac{g_{2} (n + 1)}{2 (ξ + k)^{2}} kf f ″ \\ - \frac{g_{2} (n + 1)}{2 (ξ + k)^{3}} kf f'] = 0, \end{matrix}

(23)

where the pressure from equation (16) is given as:

\begin{matrix} P = \frac{ξ + k}{2 nk} [g_{1} (f ″' + \frac{f ″}{ξ + k} - \frac{f'}{{(ξ + k)}^{2}}) \\ - (g_{2} nk + \frac{(k - k g_{2})}{ξ + k} \frac{n - 1}{2} ξ) \frac{{f'}^{2}}{ξ + k} \\ + g_{2} \frac{(n + 1) k}{2 (ξ + k)} f f ″ + g_{2} \frac{(n + 1) k}{2 (ξ + k)^{2}} f f'] . \end{matrix}

(24)

For equal diffusion coefficients, where $D_{A_{1}} = D_{B_{1}}$ and thus $δ = 1$ ,

Φ (ξ) + h (ξ) = 1 .

(25)

Equations (18) and (19) then yield

\begin{matrix} \frac{1}{Sc} (Φ ″ + \frac{Φ}{ξ + k}) + \frac{k}{ξ + k} (\frac{n + 1}{2}) f Φ' \\ - K_{1} Φ (1 - Φ)^{2} = 0, \end{matrix}

(26)

with

Φ' (0) = K_{2} Φ (0), Φ (\infty) \to 1 .

(27)

Physical quantities

The skin friction coefficient $C_{f}$ and the local Nusselt number $N u_{s}$ can be given in the following forms:

C_{f} = \frac{2 τ_{rs}}{ρ w_{w}^{2}}, N u_{s} = \frac{s q_{w}}{k_{f} (T_{m} - T_{\infty})},

(28)

where $τ_{w}$ and $q_{w}$ represent the shear stress and the heat flux, respectively, i.e.:

τ_{rs} = μ_{hnf} [\frac{\partial w}{\partial r} - \frac{w}{r + R}] |_{r = 0}, q_{w} = - K_{hnf} (\frac{\partial T}{\partial r}) |_{r = 0},

(29)

and the dimensionless quantities included above are defined as

\begin{matrix} \frac{C_{f} \sqrt{R e_{s}}}{2} = \frac{1}{{(1 - ϕ_{1})}^{2.5} {(1 - ϕ_{2})}^{2.5}} (f ″ (0) - \frac{1}{k} f' (0)), \\ \frac{N u_{s}}{\sqrt{R e_{s}}} = - \frac{k_{hnf}}{k_{f}} θ' (0), \end{matrix}

(30)

where $R e_{s} = \frac{u_{w} s}{ν_{f}}$ denotes the local Reynolds number.

Results and discussion

This section incorporates a graphical description of the dimensionless variables for the fluid velocity, the temperature, the nanofluid concentration, the skin friction and the Nusselt number. The solid lines in the figures represent the values for the nanofluid ( $(Mo S_{2}) / water$ ) and the dashed lines represent the values for the HBNF $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ . The values of the dimensionless variables $(i . e . k = β = 0.1, ϕ_{1} = ϕ_{2} = 0.01, n = 2, K_{1} = 0.4, K_{2} = Sc = 1.2)$ remain constant, except for the variables given in the figures. Tables 1-2 list the thermophysical and structural properties of both the nanofluid and the HBNF. Tables 3 - 4 compare the skin friction and the Nusselt number values for the $(Mo S_{2}) / water$ nanofluid and the $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ HBNF with different shape factors. Table 5 presents a comparison of the results of the current study with those given by Sajid¹² for $k$ .

Table 3.

Effects of variations in $ϕ_{1}$ (volume fraction) on skin friction coefficient ( $C_{f}$ ) and Nusselt number ( $N u_{s}$ ) for nanoliquid and HBNL when $ϕ_{2} = 0.00001$ , $k = 5$ , $β = 0.1$ , $n = 2$ , $K_{1} = 0.5$ and $K_{2} = Sc = 1.2$ .

Quantity		Brick shape(m = 3.7)		Cylinder shape(m = 4.9)		Platelet shape(m = 5.7)		Blade shape(m = 8.6)
	$ϕ_{1}$	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid
$C_{f}$	0.01	1.3801	1.3774	1.3801	1.3773	1.3800	1.3772	1.3799	1.3770
	0.012	1.3883	1.3855	1.3882	1.3854	1.3882	1.3853	1.3880	1.3851
	0.014	1.3965	1.3937	1.3964	1.3936	1.3963	1.3935	1.3962	1.3932
Nu_s	0.01	0.6916	0.8683	0.6949	0.8683	0.6971	0.8717	0.7052	0.8837
	0.012	0.6931	0.8659	0.6971	0.8719	0.6998	0.8759	0.7094	0.8903
	0.014	0.6947	0.8684	0.6994	0.8754	0.7025	0.8801	0.7136	0.8969

Table 4.

Effects of variations in $k$ on $N u_{s}$ and $C_{f}$ for nanoliquid and HBNF when $ϕ_{1} = ϕ_{2} = 0.01$ , $β = 0.1$ , $n = 2$ , $K_{1} = 0.5$ and $K_{2} = Sc = 1.2$ .

Quantity		Brick shape(m = 3.7)		Cylinder shape(m = 4.9)		Platelet shape(m = 5.7)		Blade shape(m = 8.6)
	$k$	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid	Nanofluid	Hybrid nanofluid
$C_{f}$	5	1.6565	1.7071	1.6564	1.7071	1.6564	1.7070	1.6564	1.7070
	10	1.5449	1.5925	1.5449	1.5924	1.5449	1.5924	1.5449	1.5923
	15	1.5100	1.5565	1.5100	1.5565	1.5100	1.5565	1.5100	1.5564
Nu_s	5	0.6916	0.8756	0.6949	0.8860	0.6971	0.8930	0.7052	0.9188
	10	0.4633	0.6231	0.4660	0.6325	0.4678	0.6387	0.4743	0.6619
	15	0.3796	0.5349	0.3822	0.5440	0.3839	0.5501	0.3902	0.5725

Table 5.

Comparison of skin friction coefficient (− $\frac{1}{2} C_{f} (R e_{z})^{0.5}$ ) with the results of Sajid et al.¹² in the limiting case for variations in $k$ when $ϕ_{1} = ϕ_{2} = K_{1} = K_{2} = ξ = 0, \Pr = Sc = 1.0$ and $n = 1$ .

k	Skin friction coefficient results from Sajid et al.¹²	Calculated skin friction coefficient (− $\frac{1}{2} C_{f} (R e_{z})^{0.5}$ , this work)
5.0	0.75763	0.75421
10	0.87349	0.87200
20	0.93561	0.93322
30	0.95686	0.95432
40	0.96759	0.96150
50	0.97405	0.97232
100	0.98704	0.98624
200	0.99356	0.99098
1000	0.99880	0.99716

Velocity field

Figure 2 shows the influence of the curvature parameter $k$ on the velocity profile (f′(ξ)). Higher values of $k$ correspond to enhancements of the velocity and the momentum boundary layer thickness. This occurs because a larger curvature parameter corresponds to a larger radius of curvature. This reduces the drag force produced on the surface for the fluid and results in enhancement of the fluid velocity. The velocity and the momentum boundary layer thickness in the HBNF $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ case are notably higher than the corresponding properties of the nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} / water)$ . Figure 3 displays the effect of $n$ (the power law index) on the velocities of the nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} / water)$ and the HBNF $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ . The velocity and the momentum boundary layer thickness for both fluids decrease in tandem with an increasing power law index $n$ . Physically, this indicates that the concavity of the sheet increases for larger values of $n$ . Therefore, a greater drag force is produced for the fluid movement and the velocity thus decreases. It is however noted that the velocity for the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ -based nanofluid is higher when compared with that of the $Mo S_{2} / water$ -based nanofluid. The effects of the shape factors (for shapes including bricks, cylinders, platelets and blades) represented by $m$ on the velocity profile f′(ξ) for the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF and the $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid are presented in Figure 4. The velocities for the different shape factors are observed to show slight differences. The shape factors are observed to have a more prominent effect in the case of the hybrid nanoliquid than for the normal nanoliquid.

Figure 2.

Curves of $k$ versus f′(ξ).

Figure 3.

Curves of n versus f′(ξ).

Figure 4.

Curves of $m$ versus f′(ξ).

Temperature field

The effects of the curvature variable $k$ on the temperature profiles of the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF and the $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid are shown in Figure 5. The temperature declines at larger $k$ values for both fluids. Larger values of $k$ correspond to a reduction of the resistive force for the fluid particles and consequently to a reduction in the heat produced as a result of friction. Therefore, the temperature of the fluid will then decrease. The temperature is observed to be higher for the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF than for the nanofluid $Mo S_{2} / water$ . Higher values of $n$ correspond to increments in the temperature profile for both the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF and the $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid (see Figure 6). In fact, as the value of $n$ increases, a resistive force develops in the fluid that causes increased internal friction between the fluid particles, which causes the temperature of the fluid to increase. Figure 7 illustrates the impact of the melting variable on the dimensionless temperature θ(ξ). The temperatures of both the nanofluid and the HBNF decreased as $β$ increased. A larger $β$ value results in more heat shifting from the hot liquid to the melting surface as a result of convective flow. Furthermore, the temperature of the $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid is higher when compared with that of the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF. Figure 8 illustrates the influence of the shape factor $m$ on the temperature profile. The temperatures of both fluids decrease at larger values of $m$ . This occurs because addition of nanoparticles to the fluid enhances the thermal conductivity of fluid and more heat is then emitted from the fluid; consequently, the fluid temperature then declines. The temperature decline in the case of the $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid is seen to be more prominent than that in the $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF case. Furthermore, higher temperatures are noted for bricks with $m = 3.7$ (red lines), cylinders with $m = 4.9$ (green lines), platelets with $m = 5.7$ (magenta lines) and blades with $m = 8.6$ (black lines).

Figure 5.

Curves of $k$ versus θ(ξ).

Figure 6.

Curves of $n$ versus θ(ξ).

Figure 7.

Curves of $β$ versus θ(ξ).

Figure 8.

Curves of $m$ versus θ(ξ).

Concentration field

Higher values of the homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction variables cause the fluid concentration profiles to decline (see Figures 9-10). Higher values of the homogeneous reaction variable $K_{1}$ correspond to homogeneity of the fluid concentration within the boundary layer thickness. In contrast, a low value of $K_{1}$ results in homogeneity occurring near the surface of the curved sheet. The reaction rate at the plate surface is enhanced by reducing the heterogeneous reaction parameter $K_{2}$ . The concentration is noted to be similar for both the nanofluid and hybrid fluid types. A larger Schmidt number tends to enhance the profile concentration (see Figure 11). The solutal layer thickness decreases when $Sc$ increases because of the inverse relationship between $Sc$ and the mass diffusivity. The concentrations are observed to be the same for both fluids. Figures 12-13 present the streamlines for the nanofluid and the HBNF, respectively. Figure 14 shows the isotherms for the HBNF. The normal temperature distribution through the fluid is also shown.

Figure 9.

Curves of $K_{1}$ versus Φ(ξ).

Figure 10.

Curves of $K_{2}$ versus Φ(ξ).

Figure 11.

Curves of $Sc$ versus Φ(ξ).

Figure 12.

Streamlines for $Mo S_{2} / water$ nanofluid.

Figure 13.

Streamlines for $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF.

Figure 14.

Isotherms for $Mo S_{2} + GO / water$ HBNF.

Table 3 shows that the magnitude of the skin friction is higher in the case of the hybrid nanoliquid when compared with that of the nanoliquid with variations in $ϕ_{1}$ . Furthermore, the skin friction has been noted to be higher for brick-shaped nanoparticles $(m = 3.7)$ and lower for blade-shaped nanoparticles $(m = 8.6)$ . The heat transfer rate in the HBNF case is observed to have a higher magnitude than that of the nanoliquid for higher values of $ϕ_{1}$ . The heat transfer rate was observed to be lower for brick-shaped nanoparticles with $m = 3.7$ and higher for blade-shaped nanoparticles $(8.6)$ . Table 4 shows that the drag coefficient in the hybrid nanoliquid is higher than that in the normal nanoliquid. The drag coefficient for the blade-shaped nanoparticles (m = 8.6) is shown to be lower when compared with those for the other shape factors. The heat transfer rate for the HBNF is higher than that for the nanofluid (see Table 4). Table 4 shows that the heat transfer rate reaches its maximum value following addition of blade-shaped nanoparticles, while the addition of brick-shaped nanoparticles causes it to reach a minimum value when compared with use of the other nano-sized particles. The hydrodynamics boundary layer for the hybrid nanoliquid is observed to be higher than that for the normal nanoliquid (see Figure 4). The temperature in the HBNF case is also observed to be higher than that of the normal nanoliquid. Higher and lower temperatures are noted for brick-shaped and blade-shaped nanoparticles, respectively, when compared with the other shape factors (see Figure 8).

Findings

This analysis has disclosed the results for the flow of a molybdenum sulphide $(Mo S_{2})$ and graphene oxide $(GO)$ hybrid nanofluid toward a curled nonlinear curved stretching sheet. The heat and mass balance equations for the hybrid nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ have been studied with respect to the effects of heterogeneous-homogeneous reactions and melting heat. The main points raised by the analysis are presented below.

Larger values of the curvature $k$ and the shape factor enhance the flow velocity and the opposite trend is shown for increasing power index $n$ . Additionally, the velocity for the hybrid nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ is higher than that of the nanofluid $(Mo S_{2})$ .

The fluid temperature declines at higher values of $k$ , $β$ and $m$ and it also decreases with decreasing $n$ for both the nanofluid and the hybrid nanofluid. The thermal layer thickness and the temperature are observed to increase more for the nanoliquid than for the hybrid nanoliquid.

Heterogeneous and homogeneous reaction variables show the same behavior for both fluids but the opposite was noted for the Schmidt number.

The hybrid nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ shows higher heat transfer and a higher drag coefficient versus $k$ when compared with the corresponding values for the nanofluid $(Mo S_{2})$ . The drag coefficient and the heat transfer at the surface are enhanced by increasing the volume fraction $ϕ_{1}$ for both the hybrid nanofluid $(Mo S_{2} + GO / water)$ and the nanofluid $(Mo S_{2})$ . The magnitude of the heat transfer in the hybrid nanofluid case is higher than that of the normal nanofluid for the same volume fraction while the reverse behavior is observed with respect to the skin friction.

Footnotes

Handling Editor: James Baldwin

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Zakir Hussain

References

Sakiadis

. Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: I. Boundary layer equations for two-dimensional and axisymmetric flow. AICHE J 1961; 7: 26–28.

Sakiadis

. Boundary layer behavior on continuous solid surfaces: II. The boundary layer on a continuous flat surface. AICHE J 1961; 7: 221–225.

Crane

LJ.

Flow past a stretching plate. Z Angew Math Phys 1970; 21: 645–647.

McLeod

Rajagopal

KR.

On the uniqueness of flow of a Navier-Stokes fluid due to a stretching boundary. Arch Ration Mech Anal 1987; 98: 385–393.

Gupta

AS.

Heat and mass transfer on a stretching sheet with suction or blowing. Can J Chem Eng 1977; 55: 744–746.

Wang

CY.

The three-dimensional flow due to a stretching flat surface. Phys Fluids 1984; 27: 1915–1917.

Balmforth

Young

YN.

Stratified Kolmogorov flow. J Fluid Mech 2002; 450: 131–167.

Hsiao

KL.

Stagnation electrical MHD nanofluid mixed convection with slip boundary on a stretching sheet. Appl Therm Eng 2016; 98: 850–861.

Hsiao

KL.

Micropolar nanofluid flow with MHD and viscous dissipation effects towards a stretching sheet with multimedia feature. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2017; 112: 983–990.

10.

Tian

ZM.

Convective stagnation point flow of a MHD non-Newtonian nanofluid towards a stretching plate. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018; 127: 768–780.

11.

Hayat

Sajjad

Muhammad

, et al. On MHD nonlinear stretching flow of Powell-Eyring nanomaterial. Results Phys 2017; 7: 535–543.

12.

Sajid

Ali

Javed

, et al. Stretching a curved surface in a viscous fluid. Chin Phys Lett 2010; 27: 024703.

13.

Naveed

Abbas

Sajid

MHD flow of micropolar fluid due to a curved stretching sheet with thermal radiation. J Appl Fluid Mech 2016; 9: 131–138.

14.

Abbas

Naveed

Sajid

Hydromagnetic slip flow of nanofluid over a curved stretching surface with heat generation and thermal radiation

J Mol Liq 2016; 215: 756–762.

15.

Sanni

Asghar

Jalil

, et al. Flow of viscous fluid along a nonlinearly stretching curved surface. Results Phys 2017; 7: 1–4.

16.

Hayat

Saif

Ellahi

, et al. Numerical study of boundary-layer flow due to a nonlinear curved stretching sheet with convective heat and mass conditions. Results Phys 2017; 7: 2601–2606.

17.

Saif

Muhammad

Haleema

, et al. Boundary layer flow due to a nonlinear stretching curved surface with convective boundary condition and homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 2020; 123996.

18.

Muhammad

Khan

, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) radiated nanomaterial viscous material flow by a curved surface with second order slip and entropy generation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020; 189: 105294.

19.

Saif

Muhammad

Haleema

, et al. Hydromagnetic flow of Jeffrey nanofluid due to a curved stretching surface. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 2020; 124060.

20.

Choi

SUS

Eastman

. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles, developments and applications of non-Newtonian flows. Report, FED-231/MD 66, 99105 1995.

21.

Jana

Salehi

Zhong

WH.

Enhancement of fluid thermal conductivity by the addition of single and hybrid nano-additives. Thermochim Acta 2007; 462: 4555.

22.

Sarkar

Ghosh

Adil

A review on hybrid nanofluids: Recent research, development and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015; 43: 164177.

23.

Iqbal

Maraj

Azhar

, et al. A novel development of hybrid (MoS₂-SiO₂/ H₂O) nanofluidic curvilinear transport and consequences for effectiveness of shape factors, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 20178; 1: 150–158.

24.

Usman

Hamid

Zubair

, et al. Cu-Al₂O₃/water hybrid nanofluid through a permeable surface in the presence of nonlinear radiation and variable thermal conductivity via LSM. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018; 126: 1347–1356.

25.

Khashi

Arifin

Nazar

, et al. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) axisymmetric flow and heat transfer of a hybrid nanofluid past a radially permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with Joule heating. Chin J Phys 2020; 64: 251–263.

26.

Khan

Hafeez

Hayat

, et al. Magneto rotating flow of hybrid nanofluid with entropy generation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020; 183: 105093.

27.

Waini

Ishak

Pop

Transpiration effects on hybrid nanofluid flow and heat transfer over a stretching/shrinking sheet with uniform shear flow. Alex Eng J 2020; 59: 91–99.

28.

Roberts

On the melting of a semi-infinite body of ice placed in a hot stream of air. J Fluid Mech 1958; 4: 505–528.

29.

Hayat

Farooq

Alsaedi

, et al. Melting heat transfer in the stagnation point flow of Powell-Eyring fluid. J Thermophys Heat Trans 2013; 27: 761–766.

30.

Hayat

Hussain

Farooq

, et al. Effects of homogeneous-heterogeneous and melting heat in viscoelastic fluid flow. J Mol Liq 215 (2016) 749–755.

31.

Hayat

Hussain

Alsaedi

, et al. Carbon nanotube effects in stagnation point flow towards a nonlinear stretching sheet with variable thickness. Adv Powder Tech 2016; 27: 1677–1688.

32.

Muhammad

Hayat

Alsaedi

, et al. Melting heat transfer in squeezing flow of base fluid (water), nanofluid (CNTs+ water) and hybrid nanofluid (CNTs+ CuO+ water). J Therm Anal Calorim 2020; 1–18.

33.

Hsiao

KL.

To promote radiation electrical MHD activation energy thermal extrusion manufacturing system efficiency by using Carreau-nanofluid with parameters control method. Energy 2017; 130: 486–499.

34.

Hsiao

KL.

Combined electrical MHD heat transfer thermal extrusion system using Maxwell fluid with radiative and viscous dissipation effects. Appl Therm Eng 2017; 112: 1281–1288.

35.

Bhattacharyya

Dual solutions in boundary layer stagnation-point flow and mass transfer with chemical reaction past a stretching/shrinking sheet. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 2011; 38: 917–922.

36.

Liu

Pan

Zheng

, et al. Effects of heterogeneous catalysis in porous media on nanofluid-based reactions. Int Commun Heat Mass Trans 2020; 110: 104434.

37.

Merkin

JH.

A model for isothermal homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in boundary layer flow. Math Comput Model 1996; 24: 125–136.

38.

Chaudhary

Merkin

JH.

A simple isothermal model for homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions in boundary-layer flow. II Different diffusivities for reactant and autocatalyst. Fluid Dyn Res 1995; 16: 335–359.

39.

Hayat

Hussain

Muhammad

, et al. Effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in flow of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching surface with variable surface thickness. J Mol Liq 2016: 221: 1121–1127.

40.

Waqas

A mathematical and computational framework for heat transfer analysis of ferromagnetic non-Newtonian liquid subjected to heterogeneous and homogeneous reactions. J Magn Magn Mater 2020; 493: 165646.

41.

Lin

Zheng

, et al. Particle shape and radiation effects on Marangoni boundary layer flow and heat transfer of copper-water nanofluid driven by an exponential temperature. Powder Tech 2016; 301: 379–386.

42.

Sheikholeslami

Bhatti

MM.

Forced convection of nanofluid in presence of constant magnetic field considering shape effects of nanoparticles. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2017; 111: 1039–1049.

43.

Kandasamy

Adnan

Mohammad

Nanoparticle shape effects on squeezed MHD flow of water based Cu, Al₂O₃ and SWCNTs over a porous sensor surface. Alex Eng J 2018; 57: 1433–1445.

44.

Rashid

Jawad

Liang

, et al. The shape effect of gold nanoparticles on squeezing nanofluid flow and heat transfer between parallel plates. Math Probl Eng 2020; 2020: 9584854.

45.

Hussain

Heat transfer through temperature dependent viscosity hybrid nanofluid subject to homogeneous-heterogeneous reactions and melting condition: A comparative study. Phys Scr 2020; 96: 015210.

46.

Shaiq

Maraj

Iqbal

Remarkable role of C₃H₈O₂ on transportation of MoS₂ SiO₂ hybrid nanoparticles influenced by thermal deposition and internal heat generation. J Phys Chem Solids 2019; 126: 294–303.

47.

Chu

Nisar

Khan

, et al. Mixed convection in MHD water-based molybdenum disulfide-graphene oxide hybrid nanofluid through an upright cylinder with shape factor. Water 2020; 12: 1723.

Effects of first-order chemical reaction and melting heat on hybrid nanoliquid flow over a nonlinear stretched curved surface with shape factors

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Thermal characteristics of base liquid with shape factors

Formulation

Momentum analysis

Energy analysis

Mass transfer analysis

Physical quantities

Results and discussion

Velocity field

Temperature field

Concentration field

Findings

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References