Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the existing research, polygonal -shaped dies were manufactured based on the dimensions of the design. These dies were then assembled on the deep-drawing device to create polygonal cups (specifically heptagonal cups) for conducting experimental work tests. The process was achieved via a deep-drawing operation to create heptagonal cups with dimensions (diameter D = 40mm and height L = 31.5 mm). For both experimental work and finite element analysis, the cups of heptagonal shapes were formed from flat circular blanks of Low Carbon Steel (thickness t_o = 0.7 mm) and diameter D = 80mm. A commercial software program, ANSYS, was employed to perform this finite element analysis. The research aims to study the effect of different radial clearance (R_C = 1.1t_o,1.2t_o, and 1.3t_o) between die and punch for heptagonal shape DD operations on the forming load, the height of the cup, thickness distribution, strain and stress distribution along the cup wall (side-wall and wall curvature). The analysis outcomes indicate that the maximum forming force was 51.250 kN with the wall curvature, the maximum effective strain was 0.8231, and the maximum stress was 676 MPa when the $(R_{C =}$ 1.1t_o). Additionally, the squeezing process in the mug wall occurred with $(R_{C =}$ 1.1t_o).

Keywords

Radial clearance strain and stress distribution heptagonal shape deep-drawing

Introduction

Deep-Drawing (DD) is one of the processes of Sheet Metal Forming (SMF) employed in considerable industrial fields. By it, a sheet metal blank (B) draws in a typical die of conventional or complex shapes like circular, box, conical, oval, trigonal, octagonal, etc. The process has many apps in kitchen appliances, beverage containers, automobiles, the aerospace industry, etc. The process of DD is highly intricate and is influenced by many factors such as Forming Limit Diagram (FLD), punch and die radius, the radial clearance between the punch & die, lubrication system type, the press velocity, sheet metal features, etc.¹ One of the parameters that plays an important role in the SMF processes is the FLD. the FLD is a crucial tool in SMF processes, providing a graphical representation of a material’s formability. It helps manufacturers assess the limits of plastic deformation without failure, optimize the forming process, and select suitable materials for specific applications. So many researchers conducted multiple studies about FLD; Park et al.^2–4 conducted three studies on the Fracture Limit Diagram. The first study developed a unique anisotropic ductile fracture criterion and transformed it into a Fracture Forming Limit Diagram (FFLD) to assess forming severity for high-strength steel sheets. The proposed criterion accurately predicted fracture strain under different stress conditions. The second study presented a solution that models anisotropy and asymmetry-induced distortional yielding behavior in metal sheets. This solution accurately predicted the evolution of the distorted yield surface for different materials and conditions. Lastly, the third study used a decoupled formulation and Lagrangian interpolation function to simulate anisotropic fracture behavior in the automotive industry. This approach accurately represented the fracture behavior of automotive components. Basak and Panda^5–7 conducted multiple studies on the FLD. In the initial investigation, focused on predicting the failure strain in two types of SM, namely EDD and AA5052 SM. Among the various yield theories considered, the Yld2000-2d yield theory provided the most accurate description of the experimental limiting strains. Additionally, the MK-FLD and BW-FFLD models demonstrated accurate predictions of the limiting strains in the PEPS locus. Furthermore, the calibrated BW fracture loci effectively estimated the fracture strains in different forming tests. In a subsequent study, accurately estimated and analyzed the forming limit criteria for necking and fracture in the two-stage forming process of anisotropic SM using the Yld2000-2d yield model. observed minimal shifting of the strains during the process. By incorporating the PEPS based failure limits as the damage model in FES, they achieved a max absolute error of 5% and 6% for necking and fracture, respectively, in predicting the dome height. Lastly, in their third study, the researchers examined the failure limits of aluminum AA5052 SM through experiments and fracture models. The utilization of the anisotropic model significantly improved the accuracy of predictions, while the BW model precisely estimated the fracture surface strains. Moreover, the BW model successfully predicted the location of fractures and the dome height in two-stage forming experiments with minimal error. Multiple studies have examined factors affecting DD operations to achieve a flawless end product. Zein et al.⁸ studied the effect of die design parameters on SM blank thickness and thinning in the DD process. They validated their findings by comparing FE analysis with experimental results. They also created a model to predict blank thickness and thinning based on die design parameters. FEA can optimize performance parameters without costly funding practices. A study by Reddy et al.⁹ analyzed strains on a cylindrical mug made of Aluminum alloy AA6061. The study used a sheet blank with a diameter of 350 mm and a thickness of 0.953 mm. The results showed that by optimizing design parameters, deeper mugs could be produced. The experimental outcomes were consistent with the published EES outcomes. In a study by Krupal Shah et al.,¹⁰ the parameters of DD operation effect were analyzed to identify the causes of imperfections and thinning in products. Statistical and experimental procedures were used to determine the influence of these process parameters. The study found that the force of BH had the greatest impact in the DD process, followed by die radii and punch nose radii. Smaller punch beak radius led to ripping in the mug, while wrinkling in the drawn product was caused by a small force of Arab¹¹ conducted research paper about the DD operation of circular shape blanks was studied using FEM analysis. The drawability of the circular blank was compared to theoretical and experimental (EXP) values, considering the initial diameter of the blank and DD parameters. The resulting circumferential and radial strains were plotted. The thickness variation of the mug flange was also analyzed using FEA and EXP values, taking work-hardening into account. Saani et al.¹² simulated a single-stage St mug DD process, considering industry specifications. They investigated the effects of parameter deviations, including B-H force, die filet radii, and friction coefficient, on the thickness of the drawn mug, punch load response, and equivalent plastic strain. The study found that die filet radii had significant variation and were fragile, while the force of B-H was the smallest and most delicate parameter. Sener and Kurtaran¹³ conducted a study on a rectangular mug manufactured from a stainless steel AISI 304 sheet. The mug underwent analysis using both Finite Element (FE) and Experimental (EXP) methods. Computer modeling was employed to carry out the Finite Element Method (FEM) for the Deep Drawing (DD) operation. The thickness distribution predicted by the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was compared to the Experimental (EXP) values. The results indicated a reasonable agreement between the FEA and EXP outcomes. It was observed that the minimum thickness occurred at the punch radius in both the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Experimental (EXP) approaches. Jawad and Jaafar¹⁴ examined various factors related to the punch in the forming process of a mug. These factors included the profile radius of the punch, the thickness of the mug wall, the amount of spring-back generated after forming, the attachment areas between the punch and the blank, the strain distribution across the mug wall, and the height of the mug in the DD process. The results of their study revealed that the distributions of strain were similar for all punch shapes. Additionally, the corner radii of the punch did not have a significant impact on the drawing load. However, as the profile radii of the punch increased, the thinning of the mug, the height of the formed mug, and the percentage of spring-back quantity all increased. Vedpathak et al.¹⁵ expected the required load for conducting the DD process. The sizes of the punch and die are obtained from theoretical values. The load required to draw the cup, as well as the deformation and faults such as wrinkles and tearing, can be represented by FES. By using this procedure, it is easy to determine the required load in a minimal stage, compared to the traditional trial and error method. This leads to saving time, money, and material wastage. Gharehchahi et al.¹⁶ conducted research on the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of a cylindrical mug’s DD parameters. The FEA outcomes were compared to experimental testing (EXP) results. The study used the Abaqus Software Program and the Finite Element Method (FEM). Comparing thickness and circumferential strains distribution, as well as radial load distribution, between FEA and experimental outcomes, it was shown that FEA accurately examined the DD operation. Mukhirmesh and Jawad^17,18 conducted a study on DD processes of heptagonal shapes, focusing on two types of research. The first research examined the one-stage DD operation, while the second research explored the multi-stage DD operation. Both studies utilized Direct & Indirect Methods, incorporating EXP work and FEA to manufacture intricately shaped mugs (spline) and analyze various process parameters. The findings from both studies indicate that the DD process can successfully produce parts with heptagonal shapes. Additionally, it was concluded that the Indirect (Redrawing) Method is capable of creating a complete heptagonal part with flaws, in comparison to the Direct (Drawing) Method. Kabakçı et al.¹⁹ conducted an experiment on the mechanical formability of Al6061-T6 sheet material using a pre-bulging process. A unique die entrance design was incorporated into traditional DD dies. The study examined the formability of the material and analyzed the impact of the innovative design on energy consumption and thickness distribution. The experiments involved DD dies capable of mechanically pre-bulging at angles of 0°, 15°, and 30°. The results showed that the material could now be deep drawn at a drawing ratio of ß = 2.2 using the new method, compared to ß = 2.0 with the conventional method. The forming force was also reduced by 24.45%. Jawad and Ikal²⁰ researched the impact of different radial clearances on stress and strain distribution in star-shaped cups made through the DD process was investigated. Three clearances (1.1, 1.2, and 1.3) between the die and punch were used. The findings showed that the highest drawing force, effective stress, effective strain, and wall squeezing in the DD process occurred with a radial clearance of 1.1 t. a study of EXP and FE about the different radial clearance influences on the strain & stress distribution in the star mugs of DD process. Three kinds of different Radial Clearance (1.1, 1.2, & 1.3) between punch & die are employed to examine the effect of RC. The outcomes displayed that the max. of the drawing force, effective stress, effective strain, and a squeeze process of DD with the mug wall emerged when RC (1.1 t) was employed. Luigi²¹ introduced a new method for analyzing DD operation control using Punch-Travel. The method considers the blank draw-in at different points and adapts the force of BH as a process parameter. The technique is applied to a T-Shaped part DD process using a St (DC05) blank with a thickness of 0.750 mm. The analysis shows that the size of the blank draw-in is a representative indicator for the quality of the formed part, specifically in terms of thinning and decorative defects. Once the optimal condition and corresponding blank draw-in are determined, the feedback control algorithm can adjust the force of BH accordingly. In a study by Mukhirmesh and Dalfi,²² the DD operation for creating heptagonal shapes from circular blanks and cylindrical mugs was analyzed. The study compared EXP and FEA results and found that the maximum punch load required for a heptagonal-shaped mug is 40.25 kN, while in the redrawing process, it is 35.16 kN. The maximum effective strain recorded during redrawing for a heptagonal-shaped cup is 0.418. The redrawing operation is a suitable deep-drawing procedure for manufacturing heptagonal parts. Dağtekin et al.²³ developed various techniques to improve the drawing height, including using blanks with precisely machined edges. The edges of the blank material were thinned at specific angles during the examination to minimize negative effects. The study compared these machined blanks to unprocessed ones. The best drawing height was achieved with a 1° machined edge and a blank diameter of 95 mm. Additionally, using the specially manufactured blank in the DD process reduced power consumption by approximately 7%–31% and material weight. Ballikaya et al.²⁴ studied the impact of the HMDDM method with an angled die surface on sheet metal cups. The study used 0.9 mm thick sheet metal material and examined various parameters. Numerical analysis experiments were conducted using ANSYS 15.0. The Taguchi experiment plan and L18 orthogonal array were used. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA in MINITAB 17.0. Results showed a maximum thinning effect of 15% and a thickening effect of 10%. Tricarico and Palmieri.²¹ studied process control during the punch stroke and proposed a new method. The method uses blank draw-in as the control variable and blank holder force as the adjustable process parameter. The study focused on DD a T-shaped component using a 0.75 mm thick blank made of DC05 steel. Results showed that measuring blank draw-in effectively indicates component quality. An optimal condition and corresponding blank draw-in were determined, and a feedback control algorithm successfully adjusted the blank holder force based on recorded draw-in. Reddy et al.²⁵ studied metal sheet formability in DD, analyzing the effects of different sheets and die/blank holder angles. Specifically, 0.8 mm SS304 and Brass sheets, along with a 0.9 mm Aluminum sheet, were examined. DD tools were created and utilized, and numerical simulations were performed on cylindrical cups with different variables. The evaluation of punch forces and dome heights revealed the correlation between metal sheet formability and tool geometries. Brass sheets exhibited higher strain formation, while aluminum sheets experienced higher stress. Vallaster et al.²⁶ analyzed the impact of strain rate dependent material modeling on simulating SMF. They performed tests on steel HC340LA at different strain rates and used the data to create a material card for numerical simulations. Experiments were conducted to validate the model, comparing results with force-displacement curves and part geometry. Numerical investigations were also done to study the influence of draw bead height and blank holder force on strain rate distribution and process force. The objective of this research study is to develop and examine the heptagonal shape (heptagonal) in comparison to other research studies that utilize single-stage DD operations using EXP and FEA. Additionally, the EXP and FEA results will be compared for the load of punch, thickness, effective strain, and effective stress distribution under different Radial Clearance ( $R_{C}$ = 1.1t_o, 1.2t_o, and 1.3t_o) effects between the die and punch for heptagonal shape DD operations.

Experimental procedure

The sheet metal blank utilized

In this research work-study, the sheet metal blank utilized is Low Carbon Steel (LCS) (1008-AISI). It is selected because of its specification, more heightened ductility, and due to excessive utilization in several industrial fields. Chemical analysis was applied at (State Company for Engineering Rehabilitation and Testing) to inspect and verify the chemical content of LCS and confirm the manufacturing credential of its (Table 1).

Table 1.

LCS (1008- AISI) chemical content.

$Element$	$Testing$	$AISI$
$C %$	$0.0615$	≤ $0.08$
$Si %$	$0.0221$	$0.01$
$Mn %$	$0.3230$	$0.25 - 0.4$
$P %$	$0.0160$	$\leq 0.04$
$S %$	$0.0215$	$\leq 0.05$
$Cr %$	$0.0316$	–
$Ni %$	$0.0314$	–
$Mo %$	$0.0021$	–
$Cu %$	$0.0911$	–
$Al %$	$0.0151$	–
$V %$	$0.0011$	–

The mechanical characteristics of the employed sheet metal blank play a crucial role in the deep-drawing (DD) operation. In order to specify the mechanical characteristics of the LCS (1008-AISI) and obtain more precise FEA results, trusting on the ASTM E8M,²⁷ three tensile test experimental samples are created from the LCS (1008-AISI) sheet metal. These samples are cut using a wire-cutting machine (WCM) in three different rolling directions (RD) (RD = 0°, 45°, and 90°). The test samples are then experimentally tested using an adaptable testing machine to determine the mechanical characteristics of the LCS (1008-AISI) (Figure 1), as shown in Table 2.

Figure 1.

True stress-strain curves for tensile samples taken from LCS (1008-AISI) sheet metal.

Table 2.

Mechanical properties of LCS (1008-AISI) sheet metal.

Mechanical property	Value (RD = 0°)	Value (RD = 45°)	Value (RD = 90°)	Mean value (RD Mean)
Yield stress ( $MPa$ )	225	221	226	224
Ultimate stress ( $MPa$ )	382	380	387	383
Young modulus $(GPa)$	200	200	200	200
Tangent modulus ( $GPa$ )	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
Mass density (gr/ $c m^{3})$	7.80	7.80	7.80	7.80
Poison $ratio$	$0 .$ 31	$0 .$ 31	$0 .$ 31	$0 .$ 31

Experimental tests

To carry out the experimental work, the dies for the DD process were fabricated according to their design sizes from structural steel due to their high strength and hardness by CNC machine and WCM. After the machining process, a heat treatment process was performed on the dies of DD to increase their hardness. Then, the test device type $(WDW - 200 E)$ (Figure 2) with DD dies assembly was used to produce a tested heptagonal cup for the cold DD (single-stage) process in the Materials Strength Lab. The heptagonal cup $(D = 40 mm & L = 31.5 mm)$ has been drawn from the circular blank $(D = 80 mm & t = 0.7 mm)$ was made by WJM from $LCS (0.08 % C)$ (Figure 3) under the blank holder force $(BHF = 10 to 15 KN),$ the punch velocity (υ = 100 mm/min), and the radial clearances $(R_{C} = 1.1 t_{o}, 1.2 t_{o}, and 1.3 t_{o}) .$ To estimate the thickness and strain distribution on the wall cup (sidewall and wall curvature) of the DD process, a net of square grids (2 mm × 2 mm) was etched at a low depth on the blank face using a Laser Machine (LM), as shown in Figure 4(a). After perfecting the DD experiments, the deformation occurred in the net square block longitudinally and approached the perimeter on the heptagonal cup wall. However, the net of square grids at the base-formed cup remained unchanged, as depicted in Figure 4(b). To estimate the distribution of thickness over the cup wall (side and curvature), a digital type micrometer was employed. Additionally, a microscope device was used to estimate the alterations in radial and rim dimensions of the net grid square on the fully formed heptagonal cup. Therefore, based on the aforementioned dimensional alterations, the radial strain $(ϵ_{r})$ and the hoop strain $(ϵ_{θ})$ were respectively estimated. The following equations were employed to estimate the thickness, radial strain, hoop strain, and effective strains.

Thickness Strain (ϵ_{t}) = \ln \frac{t}{t_{o}}

(1)

Redail Strain (ϵ_{r}) = \ln \frac{R}{R_{o}}

(2)

Hoop Strain (ϵ_{θ}) = - (ϵ_{r} + ϵ_{t})

(3)

Effective Strain (ϵ_{effe}) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3} ({ϵ_{t}}^{2} + {ϵ_{r}}^{2} + {ϵ_{θ}}^{2})}

(4)

Figure 2.

The tools and dies of heptagonal shapes DD operation.

Figure 3.

The cup of heptagonal shape DD operation.

Figure 4.

The square grid (a) before the DD operation, and (b) after the DD operation.

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is now widely employed and has created a lucrative industry worth billion. It effortlessly solves complex stress-related problems and is considered indispensable. The FEM is a numerical technique for analyzing stresses and deformations in structures. It involves dividing the structure into smaller elements connected by nodes. Accuracy depends on the type, arrangement, and number of elements. A finite element model is constructed, with material properties, loading conditions, and boundary conditions specified. Engineering software packages are available to model and simulate structures, providing insights into their behavior.²⁸ In this FE study of the DD process of the polygonal cup with seven edges, the software program ANSYS (Workbench) (von-mises) was employed to perform the FEA and to model and analyze the DD process of the heptagonal cup (D = 40 mm, and L = 31.5 mm) made from an acicular shape blank of LCS (1008-AISI) with dimensions (DB = 80 mm and t = 0.7 mm). In this analysis, the used metal is LCS, so it is added to the engineering data of the static structure and set with the materials with its characteristics, as shown in Table 2. All dies of DD processes are designed related to the size of die dimensions and analyzed in the system analysis static structure of the workbench software. The set die tools of DD; the circular shape blank (B) is a flexible and pointed LCS as a material, while the remaining tools of DD; Die (D), Punch (P), and Blank-Holding (BH) are rigid and made from structural steel. The set contact dies areas; In this DD process, there are three contact friction areas. The first contact area is the upper face of the B (as a contact part) in contact with the lower face of the BH (as a target part). The second contact area is the upper face of the B (as a contact part) in contact with the face of the P head and the faces of the side wall of the P (as a target part). The third contact area is the bottom face of the B (as a contact part) in contact with the top face of the D and the side wall faces of the D cavity (as a target part). The Coeff. of friction between interface B & P $(μ = 0.10) .$ And the Coeff. of friction between B & interface DD dies (D & BH) $(μ = 0.075)$ . One of the significant processes in finite element analysis is the meshing of the parts. The meshing is the process of dividing a continuous body into a finite number of elements. The accuracy of the analysis results depends on the number of elements used. A finer mesh will increase the solution time, while a coarser mesh may introduce stress errors. Determining the appropriate number of elements for an analysis is a challenging task for CAE engineers. It requires a balanced approach to achieve accurate results with an optimal number of elements.²⁹ Therefore, in the set of meshing, all the tools utilized in the DD process automatically mesh based on the size dimensions of the parts, with an element size of 0.0025 m for all die tools components of the heptagonal shape (Figure 5(a)). Eventually, in order to characterize the deformable circular shape blank (B) and achieve Numerical Simulation (NS) of the DD process for a heptagonal cup under unchanged velocity (υ = 100 mm/min), the displacement was set in the table to traverse the punch along the path of the z-axis direction. The other path directions of axes (X&Y) were set to zero in the table. Lastly, the results of the DD process of the existing FEA have been verified with numerous formerly researched studies in the literature, and it appears that the DD process is close to it.^17,18,20,22 The heptagonal cup of the DD process FEA is illustrated in Figure 5(b).

Figure 5.

(a) Die tools of heptagonal shape DD and (b) cup of heptagonal shape DD (FEA).

Results and discussion

This research arrangement with EXP and FE was employed to produce heptagonal cups of DD operation from the flat circular blanks of LCS, as depicted in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Heptagonal shape DD operations for EXP & FEA.

The outcomes of both EXP & FE of DD process heptagonal shape were registered, estimated, and then plotted in multiple Figures to discuss, analyze, and compare to study the radial clearance effect on the heptagonal cup wall along the sidewall and wall curvature.

I. Deep Drawing Force: For both EXP & FE, Figure 7 describes the graph between punch load and punch travel of the DD process of heptagonal shape under the effect of various $(R_{C} = 1.1 t_{o}, 1.2 t_{o}, and 1.3 t_{o}) .$ The figure shows that the drawing force increases and reaches a maximum, then reduces due to the decrease in the diameter of the circular-blank with progressive punch travel and the decrease in friction between the die and blank. Additionally, from this Figure, it can be stated that the maximum drawing force registered ( $F_{dr} = 51.250 kN)$ occurred with $(R_{C} = 1.1 t_{o})$ at the wall curvature (Figure 7) (attributed to the severe metal flow and exposure to high stress) and was higher than the maximum drawing force registered ( $F_{dr} = 36.833 kN)$ with ( $R_{C} = 1.3 t_{o})$ .

II. Thickness & Thickness Strain Distribution: For both EXP & FEA, Figures 8 and 9 reveal the thickness and thickness strain distribution along the heptagonal cup wall (side & curvature) under the effect of various $(R_{C} = 1.1 t_{o}, 1.2 t_{o}, and 1.3 t_{o}) .$ The figures show that the thickness and thickness strain do not change at the bottom of the heptagonal cup. This is attributed to the highest friction at the bottom, thus no change in the base cup thickness. The high thinning & thickness strain occurs at the curvature of the wall with $(R_{C} = 1.1 t_{o})$ which is attributed to the severe metal flow and exposure to high stresses. In the curling area of the formed mug, the thinning & thickness strain starts and its value decreases with $R_{C} = 1.3 t_{o})$ at the cup side wall.

III. Effective Strain: For both EXP & FEA, Figure 10 displays the effective strain along the sidewall of the wall curvature of the heptagonal cup under the effect of various $R_{C}$ (1.1t_o, 1.2t_o, and 1.3t_o). This figure seems to show that the Eff. Strain is equivalent to zero at the heptagonal cup base, which is attributed to the highly supplemented friction in the cup base. Therefore, there is no alteration in the cup base thickness (no deformation). The maximum Eff. Strain value (0.872) occurred with ( $R_{C}$ = 1.1t_o) at the cup throat on the wall curvature, which is higher than the effective strain along the heptagonal cup sidewall. This is due to the intricate flow of metal and also the elevation of radial stress.

IV. Effective Stress: For FEA, Figure 11 shows the effective stress along the sidewall and the wall curvature of the heptagonal cup under the effect of various $R_{C}$ (1.1t_o, 1.2t_o, and 1.3t_o). This figure seems to indicate that the effective stresses are increasing from the area of the heptagonal cup curvature to the top of the heptagonal cup. The maximum effective stress recorded (676 Mpa) occurred with ( $R_{C}$ = 1.1t_o) at the wall curvature, which can be attributed to this area being exposed to the highest tension stress compared to the other areas with ( $R_{C}$ = 1.1t_o). The least effective stress was observed with ( $R_{C}$ =1.3t_o) along the sidewall.

V. Figure 12 represents the radial clearance $R_{C} = (1.1 t_{o}, 1.2 t_{o}, and 1.3 t_{o})$ effect on the height of the formed heptagonal mug by FEA and EXP. This figure shows that the drawn mug height rises with the reduction of the radial clearance value due to the increase in the metal caused by extreme elongation of metal with the smaller radial clearance, which contributes to a rise in the height of the formed mug for both FEA and EXP.

Figure 7.

The diagram shows the relationship between the loads of punch and the displacement of punch of heptagonal shape DD.

Figure 8.

The thickness distribution under various radial clearances along the cup wall (sidewall and wall curvature).

Figure 9.

The thickness strain distribution under various radial clearances along the cup wall (sidewall and wall curvature).

Figure 10.

The effective strain distribution under various radial clearances along the cup wall (sidewall and wall curvature).

Figure 11.

The effective stress distribution under various radial clearances along the cup wall (sidewall and wall curvature).

Figure 12.

The radial clearance effect on the height of the cup height by FEA and EXP.

Conclusion

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different radial clearances (1.1t_o, 1.2t_o, and 1.3t_o) on heptagonal deep-drawing operations. The main objective was to understand how these clearances impact forming force, strain, stress, and the occurrence of squeezing in the cup wall. In conclusion, the findings of this research emphasize the importance of carefully selecting the appropriate radial clearance for heptagonal deep-drawing operations. A radial clearance of 1.1t_o was found to result in maximum forming force, strain, and stress, as well as the occurrence of squeezing in the cup wall. These insights can be valuable for manufacturers and engineers involved in deep-drawing processes, as they provide guidance on optimizing the design and parameters to achieve desired outcomes and minimize potential issues.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their thanks and appreciation to the team of Materials Strength Lab, Production Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq for assisting in conducting experiments related to this research study.

Handling Editor: Chenhui Liang

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

HK Dalfi

References

Dieter

. Mechanical Metallurgy. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1961.

Park

Huh

Yoon

. Anisotropic fracture forming limit diagram considering non-directionality of the equi-biaxial fracture strain. Int J Solids Struct 2018; 151: 181–194.

Park

Stoughton

Yoon

. A criterion for general description of anisotropic hardening considering strength differential effect with non-associated flow rule. Int J Plast 2019; 121: 76–100.

Park

Stoughton

Yoon

. A new approach for fracture prediction considering general anisotropy of metal sheets. Int J Plast 2020; 124: 199–225.

Basak

Panda

. Failure strains of anisotropic thin sheet metals: experimental evaluation and theoretical prediction. Int J Mech Sci 2019; 151: 356–374.

Basak

Panda

. Necking and fracture limit analyses of different pre-strained sheet materials in polar effective plastic strain locus using Yld2000-2d yield model. J Mater Process Technol 2019; 267: 289–307.

Basak

Panda

. Use of uncoupled ductile damage models for fracture forming limit prediction during two-stage forming of aluminum sheet material. J Manuf Process 2023; 97: 185–199.

Zein

El-Sherbiny

Abd-Rabou

, et al. Effect of die design parameters on thinning of sheet metal in the deep drawing process. Am J Mech Eng 2013; 1: 20–29.

Reddy

ACS

Rajesham

Reddy

, et al. Experimental study on strain variation and thickness distribution in deep drawing of axisymmetric components. Int J Eng 2013; 2: 178–182.

10.

Krupal Shah

Chaudhary

Bhatt

. Analysis of the effect of process parameters in deep drawing. Int J Adv Eng Res Dev 2014; 1: 2348–4470.

11.

Arab

. Analytical and experimental analysis of axisymmetric deep drawing process. 2014; 7(2): 59–66.

12.

Saani

Mostafa

Abdessalem

. Single stage steel cup deep drawing analysis using finite element simulation. Int J Eng Res 2015; 4: 395–400.

13.

Sener

Kurtaran

. Modeling the deep drawing of an AISI 304 stainless-steel rectangular cup using the finite-element method and an experimental validation. Mater Tehnol 2016; 50: 961–965.

14.

Jawad

Jaafar

. The influence of punch profile radius on deep drawing process in case of a low carbon steel cylindrical cup. Eng Technol J 2018; 36: 1048–1058.

15.

Vedpathak

Tadamalle

Burande

. Evaluation of deep drawing force in sheet metal forming. Int J Eng Res Technol 2019; 8: 7.

16.

Gharehchahi

Kazemzadeh-Parsi

Afsari

, et al. Numerical study of effective parameters in the deep drawing process of a cylindrical cup and comparison with experimental results. J Mod Process Manuf Prod 2020; 9: 31–42.

17.

Mukhirmesh

Jawad

. A spline shape deep drawing using finite element simulation and experimental work test. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021; 1094; (1): 012132.

18.

Mukhirmesh

Jawad

. The procedure of experimental work and finite element simulation to produce spline shape multi-stage deep-drawing operation. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021; 1094; (1): 012133.

19.

Kabakçı

Karaağaç Demirel

. A novel approach to the conventional deep drawing process. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2023; 237: 280–289.

20.

Jawad

Ikal

. Effect of radial clearance on stress and strain distribution in the astral deep drawing. Eng Technol J 2019; 37: 332–340.

21.

Tricarico

Palmieri

. Robust design of deep drawing process through in-line feedback control of the draw-in. Appl Sci 2023; 13: 1717.

22.

Mukhirmesh

Dalfi

. Experimental and numerical study on redrawing cylindrical products to polygon shapes. Strength Mater 2023; 55: 330–339.

23.

Dağtekin

Gavas

Köklü

. Experimental investigation of the effect of specially manufactured blank (SMB) materials on deep drawing. Proc IMechE, Part E: J Process Mechanical Engineering 2023; 237: 1300–1309.

24.

Ballikaya

Savaş

Özay

. Investigation of sheet thickness and punch force in die surface angled hydro-mechanical deep drawing method. El-Cezeri 2023; 10: 475–491.

25.

Reddy

Ramulu

Madhuri

, et al. Design and analysis of deep drawing process on angular deep drawing dies for different anisotropic materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2016; 149; (1): 012142.

26.

Vallaster

Wiesenmayer

Merklein

. Effect of a strain rate dependent material modeling of a steel on the prediction accuracy of a numerical deep drawing process. Prod Eng 2024; 18: 47–60.

27.

ASTM. ASTM E8/E8M-16a: standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016.

28.

Trivedi

. Finite element analysis: a boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014; 4: 200–203.

29.

Jalammanavar

Pujar

Raj

. Finite element study on mesh discretization error estimation for Ansys Workbench. In: 2018 International conference on computational techniques, electronics and mechanical systems (CTEMS), Belgaum, India, 21–22 December 2018, pp.344–350. New York: IEEE.

Radial clearance influence on strain and stress distribution of the polygonal shape deep-drawing operation

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental procedure

The sheet metal blank utilized

Experimental tests

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Results and discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References