To assess the effect of frequent small distractions with a magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) on spinal length gain and achieved distraction length in children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), and to determine whether the law of diminishing returns applies to this group of patients with MCGR.
Methods
A consecutive series of 3 males and 4 females with EOS who underwent MCGR implantation at a mean age of 10.2 years and were followed up for a mean of 3.8 years were reviewed. Distraction was aimed at 2 mm monthly. The coronal Cobb angle, T1-S1 length gain, and achieved distraction length were measured at 6-monthly intervals.
Results
The mean total number of distractions was 31. Four of the patients had problems that may have affected distractions. The mean coronal Cobb angle improved post-operatively and was maintained throughout the follow-up period. The mean T1-S1 length gain and achieved distraction length varied over the follow-up period and did not diminish with repeated lengthening.
Conclusions
Frequent small distractions with the MCGR for EOS enable T1-S1 and achieved distraction length gain without significant reduction in gain after repeated lengthening.
AkbarniaBA, BreakwellLM, MarksDS, McCarthyRE, ThompsonAG, CanaleSK. Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: The effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2008;33:984–90.
2.
AkbarniaBA, MarksDS, Boachie-AdjeiO, ThompsonAG, AsherMA. Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: A Multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2005;30:S46–57.
3.
ElsebaiHB, YaziciM, ThompsonGH, EmansJB, SkaggsDL, CrawfordAH. Safety and efficacy of growing rod technique for pediatric congenital spinal deformities. J Pediatr Orthop2011;31:1–5.
4.
ThompsonGH, AkbarniaBA, CampbellRMJr. Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop2007;27:354–61.
5.
SankarWN, SkaggsDL, YaziciM, JohnstonCE2nd, ShahSA, JavidanP. Lengthening of dual growing rods and the law of diminishing returns. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2011;36:806–9.
6.
AkbarniaBA, EmansJB. Complications of growth-sparing surgery in early onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2010;35:2193–204.
7.
BessS, AkbarniaBA, ThompsonGH, SponsellerPD, ShahSA, El SebaieH. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: Analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am2010;92:2533–43.
8.
WangX, XuZ, MiaoCH. Current clinical evidence on the effect of general anesthesia on neurodevelopment in children: An updated systematic review with meta-regression. PLoS One2014;9:e85760.
9.
CahillPJ, MarvilS, CuddihyL, SchuttC, IdemaJ, ClementsDH. Autofusion in the immature spine treated with growing rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2010;35:E1199–203.
10.
CheungJP, CahillP, YaszayB, AkbarniaBA, CheungKM. Special article: Update on the magnetically controlled growing rod: Tips and pitfalls. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)2015;23:383–90.
11.
AkbarniaBA, MundisG, SalariP, YaszayB. Innovation in growing rod technique; study of safety and efficacy of remotely expandable rod in animal model. J Child Orthop2009;3:513–4.
12.
AkbarniaBA, CheungK, NoordeenH, ElsebaieH, YaziciM, DannawiZ. Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: Preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2013;38:665–70.
13.
CheungKM, CheungJP, SamartzisD, MakKC, WongYW, CheungWY. Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: A Prospective case series. Lancet2012;379:1967–74.
14.
DannawiZ, AltafF, HarshavardhanaNS, El SebaieH, NoordeenH. Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early-onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J2013;95:75–80.
15.
RoltonD, RichardsJ, NnadiC. Magnetic controlled growth rods versus conventional growing rod systems in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: A Cost comparison. Eur Spine J2015;24:1457–61.
16.
CheungJP, SamartzisD, CheungKM. A novel approach to gradual correction of severe spinal deformity in a pediatric patient using the magnetically-controlled growing rod. Spine J2014;14:e7–13.
17.
CheungKM, LamJW, SamartzisD, LuWW, LukKD. The use of a modified fulcrum for fulcrum bending radiographs: A Technical note. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)2014;22:248–51.
18.
CheungKM, LukKD. Prediction of correction of scoliosis with use of the fulcrum bending radiograph. J Bone Joint Surg Am1997;79:1144–50.
19.
LukKD, CheungKM, LuDS, LeongJC. Assessment of scoliosis correction in relation to flexibility using the fulcrum bending correction index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1998;23:2303–7.
20.
CheungJP, BowC, SamartzisD, Ganal-AntonioAK, CheungKM. Clinical utility of ultrasound to prospectively monitor distraction of magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine J2016;16:204–9.
21.
McMasterMJ, MacnicolMF. The management of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br1979;61:36–42.
22.
MehtaMH. Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br2005;87:1237–47.
23.
RobinsonCM, McMasterMJ. Juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Curve patterns and prognosis in one hundred and nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am1996;78:1140–8.
24.
SponsellerPD, ThompsonGH, AkbarniaBA, GlaitSA, AsherMA, EmansJB. Growing rods for infantile scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2009;34:1711–5.
25.
WinterRB, MoeJH, LonsteinJE. Posterior spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis. An analysis of the cases of two hundred and ninety patients, five to nineteen years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am1984;66:1188–97.
26.
SponsellerPD, YaziciM, DemetracopoulosC, EmansJB. Evidence basis for management of spine and chest wall deformities in children. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2007;32:S81–90.
27.
ThompsonGH, AkbarniaBA, KostialP, Poe-KochertC, ArmstrongDG, RohJ. Comparison of single and dual growing rod techniques followed through definitive surgery: A Preliminary study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2005;30:2039–44.
28.
YilmazG, HuriG, DemirkranG, DaglogluK, OzkanC, AlanayA. The effect of posterior distraction on vertebral growth in immature pigs: An experimental simulation of growing rod technique. Spine (Phila Pa1976);35:730–3.
29.
MaharAT, BagheriR, OkaR, KostialP, AkbarniaBA. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique. Spine J2008;8:933–9.
