Abstract
Background
Flow diversion (FD) is increasingly used to treat ruptured intracranial aneurysms (rIA); however, antiplatelet (AP) management remains controversial. Intravenous (IV) GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors provide rapid, reversible platelet inhibition and may reduce hemorrhagic risk. We performed a meta-analysis and reported our institutional series to compare IV GPIIb/IIIa and classic AP protocols in FD for rIA.
Methods
A systematic search identified studies reporting ischemic and hemorrhagic complications after FD for rIA stratified by AP regimen. Meta-analyses estimated pooled event rates and meta-regression compared outcomes between GPIIb/IIIa and classic AP strategies. We retrospectively reviewed rIA patients treated with FD at our institution.
Results
Twenty-six studies were included (387 patients): 167 (43.1%) received GPIIb/IIIa-only protocols and 220 (56.9%) received classic AP (predominantly aspirin and clopidogrel). The hemorrhagic complication rate was 9% (confidence interval (CI): 6%–13%), 5% (CI: 2%–10%) in the GPIIb/IIIa patients, and 12% (CI: 8%–17%) in the classic AP group; meta-regression demonstrated a lower hemorrhagic rate with GPIIb/IIIa (p = 0.047). The ischemic complication rate was 13% (CI: 9–19%), 11% (CI: 6–18%) in the GPIIb/IIIa group, and 15% (CI: 9%–24%) in the classic AP group (p = 0.38). Our cohort included seven patients (mean age: 59.1). Six received intra-procedural tirofiban, and one received ticagrelor/aspirin. Hemorrhagic and ischemic complications each occurred in 1/7 (14.3%) patients, two (28.6%) died and four (57.1%) achieved modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2 at 90 days.
Conclusions
IV GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors administered at FD deployment for rIA are associated with fewer hemorrhagic complications without increased ischemic events and represent a feasible acute management strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
