Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Abstract

Purpose

Carotid artery anatomy is thought to influence internal carotid artery access time (ICA-AT) in patients requiring mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. This study investigates the association between ICA-AT and carotid anatomy.

Material and methods

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) data of 76 consecutive patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke requiring mechanical thrombectomy for middle cerebral artery or carotid T occlusion were evaluated. The supraaortic extracranial vasculature was analyzed regarding take-off angles and curvature of the affected side. Digital subtraction angiography data were primarily analyzed regarding ICA-AT and secondarily regarding recanalization time and radiographic result.

Results

ICA-AT was significantly influenced by vessel tortuosity. Take-off angle of the left common carotid artery (p = 0.001) and the brachiocephalic trunk (p = 0.002) as well as the tortuosity of the common carotid artery (p = 0.002) had highest impact on ICA-AT. For recanalization time, however, we found only the take-off angle of the left common carotid artery to be of significance (p = 0.020). There was a tendency for ICA-AT to correlate with successful (mTICI ≥ 2 b) revascularization (average time of successful results was 24.3 minutes, of unsuccessful was 35.6 minutes; p = 0.065). Every evaluated segment with less carotid tortuosity showed a carotid AT below 25 minutes.

Conclusion

Supraaortic vessel tortuosity significantly influences ICA-AT in mechanical thrombectomy for an acute large vessel. There furthermore was a trend for lower successful recanalization rates with increasing ICA-AT.

Keywords

AIS thrombectomy carotid anatomy tortuosity ICA access time

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nikoubashman

Jungbluth

Schürmann

et al.

Neurothrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: A prospective single-centre study and comparison with randomized controlled trials. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23: 807–816.

Berkhemmer

Fransen

Beumer

et al.

A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 11–20.

Goyal

Demchuk

Menon

et al.

Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1019–1030.

Saver

Goyal

Bonafe

et al.

Solitaire with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SWIFT PRIME) trial: Protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing the Solitaire revascularization device with IV tPA with IV tPA alone in acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 439–448.

Weiner

Ducruet

. ESCAPE trial supports rapid endovascular thrombectomy in the management of large-vessel acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 2015; 76: N15–N16.

Molina

Chamorro

Rovira

et al.

REVASCAT: A randomized trial of revascularization with SOLITAIRE FR device vs. best medical therapy in the treatment of acute stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting within eight–hours of symptom onset. Int J Stroke 2015; 10: 619–626.

Campbell

Mitchell

Kleinig

et al.

Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1009–1018.

Zaidat

Yoo

Khatri

et al.

Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: A consensus statement. Stroke 2013; 44: 2650–2663.

Boehme

Esenwa

Elkind

. Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circ Res 2017; 120: 472–495.

10.

Schmitz

Yeatts

Tomsick

et al.

Recanalization and angiographic reperfusion are both associated with a favorable clinical outcome in the IMS III Trial. Interv Neurol 2016; 5: 118–122.

11.

Lin

Trocciola

Rhee

et al.

Analysis of anatomic factors and age in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vase Surg 2005; 19: 798–804.

12.

Naggara

Touzé

Beyssen

et al.

Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2011; 42: 380–388.

13.

Wiesmann

Kalder

Reich

et al.

Feasibility of combined surgical and endovascular carotid access for interventional treatment of ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 571–575.

14.

Mokin

Snyder

Levy

et al.

Direct carotid artery puncture access for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: Technical aspects, advantages, and limitations. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 108–113.

15.

Jadhav

Ribo

Grandhi

et al.

Transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6: 652–657.

16.

Castaño

Remollo

García

et al.

Mechanical thrombectomy with ‘ADAPT’ technique by transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiol J 2015; 28: 617–622.