Deciding on which unit root test to use is a topic of active interest. This study compares three unit root tests; the self-normalized, the bootstrap, and the Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root tests in identifying nonstationarity (or stationarity) in time series data with conditional heteroscedasticity. We use a Monte Carlo simulation framework with an AR(1)-GARCH(1,1), MA(1)-GARCH(1,1) and ARMA-GARCH(1,1) data-generating processes to evaluate the performance of unit root tests across different configurations of GARCH parameters, persistence levels, and sample sizes. Through simulation results, the self-normalized (SN) test is the most effective choice followed by the bootstrap when inference heavily relies on identifying near-unit-root behavior in heteroscedastic settings of AR(1)-GARCH(1,1). The best choice under MA(1)-GARCH(1,1) is the PP test followed by the SN test. Under the ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1), both SN and PP tests exhibit strong power for negative MA coefficients, but suffer size for negative coefficients. The Boot test lags in power but shows stable size properties.
AndersenT. G.BollerslevT.ChristoffersenP. F.DieboldF. X. (2006). Volatility and correlation forecasting. Handbook of Economic Forecasting, 1, 777–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01015-3
2.
BlackF.ScholesM. (1972). The valuation of option contracts and a test of market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 27(2), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978484
CavaliereG.TaylorA. M. R. (2007). Testing for unit roots in time series models with non-stationary volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 919–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.07.019
5.
CavaliereG.TaylorA. M. R. (2008). Bootstrap unit root tests for time series with nonstationary volatility. Econometric Theory, 24(1), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466608080043
6.
ChangY.ParkJ. Y. (2003). A sieve bootstrap for the test of a unit root. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 24(4), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00312
7.
Del Barrio CastroT.RodriguesP. M. M.TaylorA. M. R. (2015). On the behaviour of Phillips–Perron tests in the presence of persistent cycles. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12091
8.
DickeyD. A.BellW. R.MillerR. B. (1986). Unit roots in time series models: Tests and implications. The American Statistician, 40(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1986.10475349
9.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
10.
DritsakiM.DritsakiC. (2020). Forecasting European Union CO emissions using autoregressive integrated moving average–autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.9186
LingS.LiW. K.McAleerM. (2003). Estimation and testing for unit root processes with GARCH(1,1) errors: theory and Monte Carlo evidence. Econometric Reviews, 22(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1081/ETC-120020462
14.
MantalosP.KaragrigoriouA. (2012). Bootstrapping the augmented Dickey–Fuller test for unit root using the MDIC. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 82(3), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2010.539219
15.
NgS.PerronP. (2001). Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519–1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00256
ParkH. M. (2015). Hypothesis testing and statistical power of a test. Working Paper, Indiana University.
19.
PaulR. K. (2015). ARIMAX-GARCH-WAVELET model for forecasting volatile data. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 10(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.3233/MAS-150328
20.
PhillipsP. C. B. (1987a). Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913237
21.
PhillipsP. C. B. (1987b). Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica, 55(2), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913237
SchwertG. W. (2002). Tests for unit roots: A Monte Carlo investigation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410354
26.
ShaoX. (2015). Self-normalization for time series: A review of recent developments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(512), 1797–1817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1050493
27.
ShittuO. I.IbiF. G. (2019). Development of GARCH model with generalized -distributed error innovation with application. Annals of Statistical Theory and Applications (ASTA), 1, 1–20.
28.
SjölanderP. (2008). A new test for simultaneous estimation of unit roots and GARCH risk in the presence of stationary conditional heteroscedasticity disturbances. Applied Financial Economics, 18(7), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100601018815
29.
SmeekesS.TaylorA. M. R. (2012). Bootstrap union tests for unit roots in the presence of nonstationary volatility. Econometric Theory, 28(2), 422–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466611000387
30.
SuprihatinB.GuritnoS.HaryatmiS. (2015). Asymptotic distribution of the bootstrap parameter estimator for AR(1) process. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 10(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.3233/MAS-140311
31.
WangG.MaoW.-L. (2008a). Unit root testing in the presence of heavy-tailed GARCH errors. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 50(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2008.00517.x
32.
WangQ.MaoY.-X. (2008b). Self-normalized unit root tests. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney.
