Recognizing a lack of formal knowledge organization systems for digital forensic artifacts, this paper proposes the Autopsy Ontology, which, for the first time, defines the de facto standard Autopsy tool’s terminology in OWL. This ontology was designed to be used for automated reasoning over, and advanced querying of, digital forensic artifacts analyzed in Autopsy, and generating semantic knowledge graphs of digital forensic datasets in resource description framework.
BrinsonA.RobinsonA.RogersM. (2006). A cyber forensics ontology: Creating a new approach to studying cyber forensics. Digital Investigation: The International Journal of Digital Forensics & Incident Response, 3, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2006.06.008
2.
ChabotY.BertauxA.NicolleC.KechadiT. (2015). An ontology-based approach for the reconstruction and analysis of digital incidents timelines. Digital Investigation, 15, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2015.07.005
3.
ChikulP.BahsiH.MaennelO. (2021). An ontology engineering case study for advanced digital forensic analysis. In C. Attiogbé & S. B. Yahia (Eds.), Model and data engineering (pp. 67–74). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78428-7_6.
4.
ChuH. C.DengD. J.ChaoH. C. (2009). An ontology-driven model for digital forensics investigations of computer incidents under the ubiquitous computing environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 56, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-009-9886-x
5.
EllisonD.IkuesanR. A.VenterH. S. (2019). Ontology for reactive techniques in digital forensics. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (pp. 83–88). Heidelberg: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968696
6.
GallM. L.ColeC.HaynesD.DaéidN. N. (2022). Developing a digital forensics terminology using natural language processing. In LykkeM.SvarreT.HaynesD.SkovM.ThellefsenM.Martínez-ÁvilaD. (Eds.), Knowledge organization across disciplines, domains, services, and technologies (pp. 173–186). ISKO. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956509568-173
7.
GrojekA. E.SikosL. F. (2022). Ontology-driven artificial intelligence in IoT forensics. In K. Daimi, G. F. III & L. H. Encinas (Eds.), Breakthroughs in digital biometrics and forensics (pp. 257–286). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10706-1_12.
8.
HargreavesC.van BeekH.CaseyE. (2025). SOLVE-IT: A proposed digital forensic knowledge base inspired by MITRE ATT&CK. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 52, 301864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301864
9.
HerronD.Jiménez-RuizE.WeydeT. (2025). On the potential of logic and reasoning in neurosymbolic systems using OWL-based knowledge graphs. Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence, 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/29498732251320043
10.
KorolA.SikosL. F. (2025). FEAR: A novel framework for representing digital forensic artifacts in knowledge graphs. In DFDS ’25: Proceedings of the Digital Forensics Doctoral Symposium (p. 9). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3712716.3712726
NgoH. Q.Le-KhacN. A. (2023). Ontology-based case study management towards bridging training and actual investigation gaps in digital forensics. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 47, 301621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.301621
13.
ParraB.VegettiM.LeoneH. (2019). Advances in the application of ontologies in the area of digital forensic electronic mail. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 17(10), 1694–1705. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2019.8986448
14.
SikosL. F. (2019). Knowledge representation to support partially automated honeypot analysis based on Wireshark packet capture files. In I. Czarnowski, R. J. Howlett & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent Decision Technologies 2019 (pp. 345–351). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8311-3_30
15.
SikosL. F. (2020). AI in digital forensics: Ontology engineering for cybercrime investigations. WIREs Forensic Science, 3(3), e1394. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1394
16.
SikosL. F.StumptnerM.MayerW.HowardC.VoigtS.PhilpD. (2018). Representing network knowledge using provenance-aware formalisms for cyber-situational awareness. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.206
17.
SilvaT. J.MazurA. H.OliveiraJrE.ZorzoA. F.BarcellosM. P. (2025). An ontology for promoting controlled experimentation in digital forensics. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 52, 301845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301845
18.
TokY. C.ZhengD. Y.ChattopadhyayS. (2025). A smart city infrastructure ontology for threats, cybercrime, and digital forensic investigation. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 52, 301883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301883
19.
WangN. (2020). A knowledge model of digital evidence review elements based on ontology. In Information Resources Management Association (ed.) Digital forensics and forensic investigations: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 281–290). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3025-2.ch019.
