This study fills a gap in the literature on the impact of digital tools on employee motivation, emphasizing the mediating roles of ease of use and perceived usefulness. The direct influence of digital tools on motivation and associated processes remains limited, despite their growing popularity. The research employed Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to interview 750 employees regarding the relationships between digital tools, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and employee motivation. The study employed structural equation modeling (SEM) and findings revealed that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly mediate the relationship between digital tools and employee motivation, with path coefficients of 0.39 and 0.45, respectively. The findings indicated that perceived ease of use (β = 0.45) and perceived usefulness (β = 0.39) are significant determinants of enhanced employee motivation. Therefore, organizations should prioritize user-friendly and advantageous digital tools to enhance employee motivation.
AcharyaB.SigdelK.KhatriR.RimalP.ShresthaS.SharmaD.ShresthaJ.SapkotaS. (2024). Improving the quality of global mental health services with digital tools: Best practices and lessons learned from rural Nepal. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 9(3), 522–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00389-8
2.
AdeelA.BatoolS.MadniZ.-A. (2023). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: the role of digital technology and knowledge integration ability in facilitating creativity. International Journal of Management Studies, 30, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2023.30.1.1
3.
AlfaruqueS. Y.SultanaS.RastogiR.JabeenZ. (2023). Integrating literature with technology and use of digital tools: Impact on learning outcomes. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 278. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p278
4.
AlghamdiN. S.AlghamdiS. M. (2022). The role of digital technology in curbing COVID-19. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148287
5.
AlmullaM. A. (2022). Using digital technologies for testing online teaching skills and competencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9), 5455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095455
6.
AlnemerH. A. (2022). Determinants of digital banking adoption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A technology acceptance model approach. Digital Business, 2(2), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100037
7.
AlNuaimiB. K.Kumar SinghS.RenS.BudhwarP.VorobyevD. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038
8.
AlshuridehM. T.Al KurdiB. (2023). Factors affecting social networks acceptance: An extension to the technology acceptance model using PLS-SEM and machine learning approach. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.8.010
9.
ArezzoM. F.HorodnicI. A.WilliamsC. C.GuagnanoG. (2024). Measuring participation in undeclared work in Europe using survey data: A method for resolving social desirability bias. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 91, 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101779
10.
BarangerD. A. A.FinsaasM. C.GoldsteinB. L.VizeC. E.LynamD. R.OlinoT. M. (2023). Tutorial: Power analyses for interaction effects in cross-sectional regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231187531
11.
BektasA.MüllerJ.WäspiF.HallerS. (2023). An empirical analysis of the perceived usefulness of digital governance tools among heterogeneous Swiss municipalities. 56th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2023).
12.
BiemansW. (2023). The impact of digital tools on sales-marketing interactions and perceptions. Industrial Marketing Management, 115, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.10.015
13.
BolodeokuP. B.IgbinobaE.SalauP. O.ChukwudiC. K.IdiaS. E. (2022). Perceived usefulness of technology and multiple salient outcomes: The improbable case of oil and gas workers. Heliyon, 8(4), e09322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09322
14.
ChenL.AklikokouA. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government adoption: Testing the mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
15.
ChiuT. K. F. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909
16.
DashG.PaulJ. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
17.
Di DomenicoS. I.RyanR. M.BradshawE. L.DuineveldJ. J. (2022). Motivations for personal financial management: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977818
18.
EbadiS.RayganA. (2023). Investigating the facilitating conditions, perceived ease of use and usefulness of mobile-assisted language learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(30), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00250-0
19.
EvansP.VansteenkisteM.ParkerP.Kingsford-SmithA.ZhouS. (2024). Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36(7), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09841-2
20.
FornerV. W.JonesM.BerryY.EidenfalkJ. (2020). Motivating workers: How leaders apply self-determination theory in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 18(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-03-2020-0891
21.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
22.
GesualdoF.DaverioM.PalazzaniL.DimitriouD.Diez-DomingoJ.Fons-MartinezJ.JacksonS.VignallyP.RizzoC.TozziA. E. (2021). Digital tools in the informed consent process: A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(18), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8
23.
GhaniE. K.AliM. M.MusaM. N. R.OmonovA. A. (2022). The effect of perceived usefulness, reliability, and COVID-19 pandemic on digital banking effectiveness: Analysis using technology acceptance model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18), 11248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811248
24.
Gonzalez-MohinoM.Rodriguez-DomenechMÁCallejas-AlbiñanaA. I.Castillo-CanalejoA. (2023). Empowering critical thinking: The role of digital tools in citizen participation. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1385
25.
GrijalbaM. A.HernándezY. B.Perez-EncinasA.UrdaB. S. (2024). Does the use of digital tools improve a firm’s performance?Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00750-4
26.
GuentherP.GuentherM.RingleC. M.ZaefarianG.CartwrightS. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111(May), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010
27.
HairJ. F.AstrachanC. B.MoisescuO. I.RadomirL.SarstedtM.VaithilingamS.RingleC. M. (2021a). Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(3), 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392
28.
HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.DanksN. P.RayS. (2021b). Evaluation of the structural model. In: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. In Classroom Companion: Business.
29.
HikmahH.RatnawatiA. T.DarmantoS. (2023). Role of attitude and intention on the relationship between perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, trust, and E-tax system behavior. Global Business and Finance Review, 28(7), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.7.89
30.
HöyngM.LauA. (2023). Being ready for digital transformation: How to enhance employees’ intentional digital readiness. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 11, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100314
31.
HrastinskiS. (2021). Digital tools to support teacher professional development in lesson studies: A systematic literature review. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2020-0062
32.
IbragimovY.BerishviliN. B. (2023). Analysis of intrinsic motivation influence on employee affective commitment during digital change. London Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2023.6.97
33.
IddrisuI. (2023). Influence of staff performance on public university operations: Examining motivation and retention factors. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100744
34.
IliyasuR.EtikanI. (2021). Comparison of quota sampling and stratified random sampling. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 10(1), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2021.10.00326
35.
IlyasM.ud dinA.HaleemM.AhmadI. (2023). Digital entrepreneurial acceptance: An examination of technology acceptance model and do-it-yourself behavior. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(15), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00268-1
KreckovaJ.KennedyD. M.BrozovaH.RydvalJ. (2022). Project management communication planning: An improved optimization model with additional recipients and individualized weights. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2973643
38.
KulkarniH.ChongC.LamM. (2023). Impact of a digital intervention tool for workplace behavior and emotional wellbeing on Employees’ stress, motivation, and productivity. Applied Psychology Readings: Selected Papers from the Singapore Conference on Applied Psychology, 2022, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2613-8_6
39.
LeeY.KimH. L.HyunS. S. (2022). Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on service performance after parental leave. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052715
40.
LegateA. E.HairJ. F.ChretienJ. L.RisherJ. J. (2023). PLS-SEM: Prediction-oriented solutions for HRD researchers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 34(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21466
41.
LiaoK. H. (2021). Institutional theory, expectation theory and self-determination theory. International Journal of Service and Knowledge Management, 5(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.52731/ijskm.v5.i2.579
42.
Liesa-OrúsM.Latorre-CosculluelaC.Sierra-SánchezV.Vázquez-ToledoS. (2023). Links between ease of use, perceived usefulness and attitudes towards technology in older people in university: A structural equation modelling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2419–2436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11292-1
43.
LinC.ShiptonH.TengW.KittA.DoH.ChadwickC. (2022). Sparking creativity using extrinsic rewards: A self-determination theory perspective. Human Resource Management, 61(6), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22128
44.
LinY.YuZ. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(34), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
45.
LinggialloH. D.RiadiS. S.HariyadiS.AdhimursandiD. (2021). The effect of predictor variables on employee engagement and organizational commitment and employee performance. Management Science Letters, 11(2021), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.033
46.
LiuY. X.WangS.ZhangJ.LiS. J. (2022). When and how job design influences work motivation: A self-determination theory approach. Psychological Reports, 125(3), 1573–1600. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211027320
47.
LuhN.SawitriP. W.AyuG.GiantariK. (2020). The role of trust mediates the effect of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness on online repurchase intention. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 4(1), 374–381.
48.
MaJ.WangP.LiB.WangT.PangX. S.WangD. (2024). Exploring user adoption of ChatGPT: A technology acceptance model perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1431–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2314358
49.
MadiJ.Al KhasawnehM.DandisA. O. (2024). Visiting and revisiting destinations: Impact of augmented reality, content quality, perceived ease of use, perceived value and usefulness on E-WOM. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 41(6), 1550–1571. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2023-0314
50.
MeirbekovA.MaslovaI.GallyamovaZ. (2022). Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101023
51.
MillerB. K.SimmeringM. J. (2023). Attitude toward the color blue: An ideal marker Variable. Organizational Research Methods, 26(3), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221075361
52.
MogotC. L. C. P.SaerangD. P. E.PandowoM. H. C. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and trust on intention to use Dana as a mobile payment. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 11(1), 1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v11i1.47140
53.
NaS.HeoS.HanS.ShinY.RohY. (2022). Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies in construction firms: Applying the technology acceptance model (TAM) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (TOE) framework. Buildings, 12(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020090
54.
NishimuraT.KomuraK. (2023). How to facilitate intrinsic aspirations: An intervention through self-determination theory perspectives. Learning and Motivation, 82, 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2023.101885
55.
NoorS.TajikO.JawadG. (2022). Sampling method | Descriptive research simple random sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies, 1(2), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijels.2022.162982
56.
NugrohoA.SiagianH.OktavioA.TariganZ. J. H. (2023). The effect of e-WOM on customer satisfaction through ease of use, perceived usefulness and e-wallet payment. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.007
57.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P.WilliamsL. J.HuangC.YangJ. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11 (January), 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
58.
RamsurrunH.ElaheebocusR.ChiniahA. (2024). Digital tools in informal science education sites: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 569–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10105-z
59.
SairagaA. L.MaulanaA. (2023). The influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and trust on intention reuse of go-pay. Marketing Management Studies, 3(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.24036/mms.v3i1.338
60.
SetyaningsihA. W.UsmanO.MusyaffiA. M. (2023). Analysis of perceived usefulness, perceived security, and perceived easy of use on intention to use QRIS through trust as mediation in DKI Jakarta. International Journal of Current Economics & Business Ventures, 1(3), 560–574.
61.
SiagianH.TariganZ. J. H.BasanaS. R.BasukiR. (2022). The effect of perceived security, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on consumer behavioral intention through trust in digital payment platform. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.010
62.
TaharA.RiyadhH. A.SofyaniH.PurnomoW. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.537
63.
TorlakN. G.BudurT.KhanN. U. S. (2024). Links connecting organizational socialization, affective commitment and innovative work behavior. Learning Organization, 31(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-04-2023-0053
64.
ToukolaS.AholaT. (2022). Digital tools for stakeholder participation in urban development projects. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100053
65.
ToukolaS.StåhleM.MahlamäkiT. (2023). Renaissance of project marketing: Avenues for the utilisation of digital tools. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100091
66.
TuffahatiN. N.NugrahaJ. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on the google classroom against learning motivation. Journal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), 12(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.56327/jurnaltam.v12i1.1005
67.
UzkurtC.EkmekciogluE. B.CeyhanS.HatibogluM. B. (2024). Digital technology use of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: Mobile applications’ role on motivation and job performance. Kybernetes, 53(4), 1354–1373. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2022-1189
68.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
69.
WafiyyahR. S.KusumadewiN. i. M. W. (2021). The effect of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and trust on repurchase intention on e-commerce shopee. IJISET-International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 8(7), 428–434. http//doi.org/1001.www.ijiset.com
70.
WhiteM. L.WayneJ. H.CasperW. J.MatthewsR. A.Odle-DusseauH.JeanE. L. (2024). The authentic self in work and family roles and well-being: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 97(1), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12473
71.
Wilson-StrydomM.OkkolinM. A. (2016). Enabling environments for equity, access and quality education post-2015: Lessons from South Africa and Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.03.010
72.
XiaoJ.GouliasK. G. (2022). Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 161, 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.007
ZhangB.KonstantopoulosS. (2024). Statistical power analysis for univariate meta-analysis: A three-level model. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2290544
