Community-based growth monitoring (GM) and growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) have been implemented worldwide. The literature provides controversial messages regarding their effectiveness. Numerous countries have GM as their main community-based activity and need guidance for future programming. The notion of GM is usually clear, but the follow-up actions include a range of activities and interventions, all under the heading of “promotion.”
Objective
We suggested definitions, objectives, and outcomes of the GM and GMP. By providing some clarity on these conceptual issues we attempted to provide a basis for consensus building and development of recommendations on when this activity should be promoted or discouraged.
Methods
We reviewed basic concepts and global experience of GM and GMP using publications about GM and GMP, UNICEF country reports and other publications, field observations, and reports of recent expert consultations.
Results
Realistic added benefits are suggested as compared with general counseling that could also be delivered outside the GM session. We provide a narrow definition of “promotion” in GMP, in which actions are tailored to the results of monitoring, as well as suggest quality implementation criteria.
Conclusions
GM, even if complemented by a promotional package, can have only a limited impact if it is not part of a comprehensive program. GMP cannot be viewed as a competitor to highly effective interventions, but may serve as a possible platform for their delivery. The decision to build community-based programs on a GMP platform should be based on consideration of benefits, feasibility of quality implementation, and capacity of human resources.
CashRKeuschGTLamsteinJ. Child health and survival: the UNICEF GOBI-FFF Program. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
2.
GopalanCChatterjeeM. Use of growth charts for promoting child nutrition: a review of global experience. New Delhi: Nutrition Foundation of India, 1985.
3.
HendrataLRohdeJ. Promoting growth: foundation for child health. Mothers Child1988;7:1–3.
4.
GereinNM. Is growth monitoring worthwhile?Health Policy Plan1988;3:181–94.
5.
NabarroDChinnockP. Growth monitoring: inappropriate promotion of an appropriate technology. Soc Sci Med1988;26:941–8.
6.
RuelMTPelletierDLHabichtJPMasonJBChobokoaneCSMarupingAP. Comparison of mothers' understanding of two child growth charts in Lesotho. Bull World Health Organ1990;68:483–91.
7.
LotfiM. Growth monitoring: a brief literature review of current knowledge. Food Nutr Bull1988;10:3–10.
8.
AshworthAShrimptonRJamilK. Growth monitoring and promotion: review of evidence of impact. Matern Child Nutr2008;4(suppl 1):86–117.
9.
LaurieSMFaberM. Integrated community-based growth monitoring and vegetable gardens focusing on crops rich in β-carotene: project evaluation in a rural community in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Sci Food Agric2008;88:2093–101.
10.
de OnisMWijnhovenTOnyangoAW. Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring. J Paediatr;2004;144:461–65.
11.
GarzaCde OnisM. A new international growth reference for young children. Am J Clin Nutr1999;70:169S–72S.
12.
BryceJCoitinhoDDarnton-HillIPelletierDPinstrup-AndersenP. Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: effective action at national level. Lancet2008;371:510–26.
13.
UNICEF. Revisiting growth monitoring and its evolution to promoting growth as a strategic program approach: Building consensus for future program guidance. Report of a Technical Consultation, UNICEF Headquarters, New York, September 25–26, 2007. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_documents.html. Accessed 10 November 2010.
14.
UNICEF. Experts' consultation on growth monitoring and promotion strategies: Program guidance for a way forward. Recommendations from a Technical Consultation, UNICEF Headquarters. New York, June 16–18, 2008. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_documents.html. Accessed 10 November 2010.
15.
HendrataLRohdeJE. Ten pitfalls of growth monitoring and promotion. Indian J Pediatr (Suppl) 1988;55:9–15.
16.
MorleyDKnoxG. The birth weights of Yoruba babies. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp1960;67:975–80.
17.
MorleyDC. Paediatric priorities in the developing world. London: Butterworths, 1973.
18.
DaviesDPWilliamsT. Is weighing babies in clinics worth while?Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)1983;286:860–3.
19.
World Health Organization. Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser1995;854:1–452.
20.
UNICEF. The state of the world's children 1984. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
21.
PearsonR. Thematic evaluation of UNICEF support to growth monitoring. New York: UNICEF, 1995.
22.
WisnerB. GOBI versus PHC? Some dangers of selective primary health care. Soc Sci Med1988;26:963–9.
23.
GhassemiH. Monitoring growth of young children: an informal consultation. Working paper. New York: UNICEF, 1985.
24.
UNICEF. The state of the world's children 1998. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
25.
GarnerPPanpanichRLoganS. Is routine growth monitoring effective? A systematic review of trials. Arch Dis Child2000;82:197–201.
26.
PanpanichRGarnerP. Growth monitoring in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2000;(2):CD001443.
27.
The Joint WHO/UNICEF Nutrition Support Programme in Iringa, Tanzania1983–1988. Evaluation Report. Dar es Salaam: Government of the United Republic of Tanzania/World Health Organization/UNICEF, 1989.
28.
ShekarMLathamMC. Growth monitoring can and does work! An example from the Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition Project in rural south India. Indian J Pediatr1992;59:5–15.
29.
MarekTDialloINdiayeBRakotosalamaJ. Successful contracting of prevention services: fighting malnutrition in Senegal and Madagascar. Health Policy Plan1999;14:382–9.
30.
GeorgeSMLathamMCAbelREthirajanNFrongilloEAJr. Evaluation of effectiveness of good growth monitoring in south Indian villages. Lancet1993;342:348–52.
31.
Save the Children UK. Thin on the ground: questioning the evidence behind World Bank funded community nutrition projects in Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Uganda. London: Save the Children UK, 2003. Available at: http://www.savethechildren.org.uk. Accessed 10 November 2010.
32.
World Health Organization. WHO child growth standards: methods and development: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
33.
World Health Organization. WHO child growth standards: methods and development; and growth velocity based on weight, length and head circumference. Geneva: WHO, 2009.
PriyosusiloA. Health in the balance: the under-fives weighing program. Indian J Pediatr1988;551:S88–99.
36.
GriffithsM. Growth monitoring. Primary Health Care Issues, series 1, no. 3. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1981.
37.
ShekarM. The Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition Project: a review of the project with special emphasis on the monitoring and information system. Cornell Food and Nutrition Policy Program Working Paper 14. Ithaca: Cornell University Press1991.
38.
YeeVZerfasA. Issues in growth monitoring and promotion. LTS/International Nutrition Unit. In: Information packet: growth monitoring. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1987.
39.
GwatkinDRWilcoxJRWrayJD. Can health and nutrition interventions make a difference? Monograph no. 13. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council, 1980.
40.
PielemeierNR. Use of the child's growth chart as an educational tool. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development, 1978.
41.
CuthbertsonWFJMorleyD. A health and weight chart for children from birth to five. West Afr Med J1962;11:237–40.
42.
HossainSMMDuffieldATaylorA. An evaluation of the impact of a US$60 million nutrition programme in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan2005;20:35–40.
43.
RuelMTMenonPHabichtJPLoechlCBergeronGPeltoGArimondMMaluccioJMichaudLHankeboB. Age-based preventive targeting of food assistance and behaviour change and communication for reduction of childhood undernutrition in Haiti: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet2008;371:588–95.
44.
RosatoMLaverackGGrabmanLHTripathyPNairNMwansamboCAzadKMorrisonJBhuttaZPerryHRifkinSCostelloA. Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet2008;372:962–71.
IsmailSJImminkMDCMazarINantelG. Community-based food and nutrition programmes, what makes them successful. A review and analysis of experience. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization, 2003.
47.
UNICEF. The state of the world's children 1990. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
48.
BhuttaZADarmstadtGLHasanBSHawsRA. Community-based interventions for improving perinatal and neonatal health outcomes in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Pediatrics2005;115(2 suppl):519–617.
49.
KarimFHuqNBrownLChowdhuryAMR. Growth monitoring in the context of a primary health care programme. Food Nutr Bull1994;15:192–9.
50.
BergA. Malnutrition: what can be done?Washington, DC: World Bank, 1987.
51.
EttyangGAKielmannAAMaritimGK. Growth monitoring in rural Kenya: experiences from a pilot project. In: CervinskasJGereinNMGeorgeS, eds. Growth promotion for child development. Proceedings of the Nyeri Colloquium on Growth Promotion for Child Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1992:178–87.
52.
GeorgeSMLathamMCAbelREthirajanNFrongilloEA. Evaluation of effectiveness of good growth monitoring in south Indian villages. Lancet1993;342:348–52.
53.
KielmannAA. Growth monitoring and promotion in the health services setting. In: CervinskasJGereinNMGeorgeS, eds. Growth promotion for child development. Proceedings of the Nyeri Colloquium on Growth Promotion for Child Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1992:119–28.
54.
GereinNMRossDA. Is growth monitoring worthwhile? An evaluation of its use in three child health programmes in Zaire. Soc Sci Med1991;326:667–75.
55.
GriffithsMDickinKFavinM. Promoting the growth of children: what works. Rationale and guidance for programs. Washington, DC: The Manoff Group, 1996:1–101.
56.
GriffithsM. Growth of preschool children. Practical considerations for primary health care projects. Information for Action Issue Paper no. 3. Washington, DC: World Federation of Public Health Associations, 1985.
57.
FaberMPhungulaMAKvalsvigJDBenadeAJ. Acceptability of community-based growth monitoring in a rural village in South Africa. Food Nutr Bull2003;244:350–9.
58.
GopaldasTChristianPSAbbiRDGujralS. Does growth monitoring work as it ought to in countries of low literacy?J Trop Pediatr1990;36:322–7.
59.
Satoto. GMP implementation in Indonesia: does behavior change take place? In: CervinskasJGereinNMGeorgeS, eds. Growth promotion for child development. Proceedings of the Nyeri Colloquium on Growth Promotion for Child Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1992:197–207.
60.
MedinaM. GMP programs in Ecuador. In: CervinskasJGereinNMGeorgeS, eds. Growth promotion for child development. Proceedings of the Nyeri Colloquium on Growth Promotion for Child Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1992:208–13.
61.
RoberfroidDLefevrePHoereeTKolsterenP. Perceptions of growth monitoring and promotion among an international panel of district medical officers. J Health Popul Nutr2005;23:207–14.
62.
RoberfroidDKolsterenPHoereeTMaireB. Do growth monitoring and promotion programs answer the performance criteria of a screening program? A critical analysis based on a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health2005;10:1121–33.
63.
GrantKStoneT. Maternal comprehension of a home-based growth chart and its effect on growth. J Trop Pediatr1986;32:255–7.
64.
RoberfroidDPeltoGHKolsterenP. Plot and see! Maternal comprehension of growth charts worldwide. Trop Med Int Health2007;12:1074–86.
65.
GereinNM. When research does not shape programming: GMP in Zaire. In: CervinskasJGereinNMGeorgeS, eds. Growth promotion for child development. Proceedings of the Nyeri Colloquium on Growth Promotion for Child Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 1992:129–49.
66.
FagbuleDOOlaosebikanAParakoyiDB. Community awareness and utilization of growth chart in a semi-urban Nigerian community. East Afr Med J1990;67:69–74.
67.
CorderyRHutsonH. The TALC direct recording scales in Nepal. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg1994;88:714.
68.
OwusuWBLarteyA. Growth monitoring: experience from Ghana. Food Nutr Bull1992;14:97–100.
69.
ShrimptonRVictoraCGde OnisMLimaRCBlossnerMClugstonG. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: implications for nutritional interventions. Pediatrics2001;107:E75.
70.
RiveraJRuelMT. Growth retardation starts in the first three months of life among rural Guatemalan children. Eur J Clin Nutr1997;51:92–6.
71.
HuttlySRVictoraCGBarrosFCTeixeiraAMVaughanJP. The timing of nutritional status determination: implications for interventions and growth monitoring. Eur J Clin Nutr1991;45:85–95.
72.
de OnisMWijnhovenTMOnyangoAW. Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring. J Pediatr2004;144:461–5.
