The rationale for developing a new international growth reference derived principally from a Working Group on infant growth established by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1990. It recommended an approach that described how children should grow rather than describing how children grow; that an international sampling frame be used to highlight the similarity in early childhood growth among diverse ethnic groups; that modern analytical methods be exploited; and that links among anthropometric assessments and functional outcomes be included to the fullest possible extent. Upgrading international growth references to resemble standards more closely will assist in monitoring and attaining a wide variety of international goals related to health and other aspects of social equity. In addition to providing scientifically robust tools, a new reference based on a global sample of children whose health needs are met will provide a useful advocacy tool to health-care providers and others with interests in promoting child health.
World Health Organization.Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Series No. 854.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1995.
2.
JelliffeD.B.The assessment of the nutritional status of the community. WHO Monograph Series No. 53.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1966.
3.
World Health Organization.Methodology of nutritional surveillance. 27th Report of a Joint FAO/UNICEF/WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Series No. 593.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1976.
4.
World Health Organization Working Group.Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status. Bull WHO1986; 64: 929–41.
5.
World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth.An evaluation of infant growth.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994.
6.
National Center for Health Statistics.Growth curves for children birth–18 years, United States. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11, No. 165. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Publication No. 78–1650.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1977.
7.
de OnisM., YipR.The WHO growth chart: historical considerations and current scientific issues. In: PorriniM., WalterP eds. Nutrition in pregnancy and growth. Bibl Nutr Dieta1996; 53: 74–89.
8.
Food and Nutrition Board, National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council.Comparison of body weights and lengths or heights of groups of children. Nutr Rev1974; 32: 284–8.
9.
Food and Nutrition Board: Committee on Nutrition Advisory to CDC.Comparison of body weights and body heights of groups of children.Atlanta, Ga, USA: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, 1974.
10.
HamillP.V.V., DrizT.A., JohnsonC.L., ReedR.B., RocheA.F., MooreW.M.Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr1979; 32: 607–29.
11.
WaterlowJ.C., BuzinaR., KellerW., LaneJ.M., NichamanM.Z., TannerJ.M.The presentation and use of height and weight data for comparing nutritional status of groups of children under the age of 10 years. Bull WHO1977; 55: 489–98.
12.
World Health Organization.A growth chart for international use in maternal and child health care. Guidelines for primary health care personnel.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1978.
13.
World Health Organization Working Group on Infant Growth.An evaluation of infant growth: the use and interpretation of anthropometry in infants. Bull WHO1995; 73: 165–74.
14.
World Health Organization Task Force for Epidemiological Research on Reproductive Health; Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction.Progestogen-only contraceptives during lactation: I. Infant growth. Contraception1994; 50: 35–53.
15.
World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility.The World Health Organization Multinational Study of Breastfeeding and Lactational Amenorrhea. I. Description of infant feeding patterns and of the return of menses. Fertil Steril1998; 70: 448–60.
16.
World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility.The World Health Organization Multinational Study of Breastfeeding and Lactational Amenorrhea. II. Factors associated with the length of amenorrhea. Fertil Steril1998; 70: 461–71.
17.
World Health Organization Working Group on the Growth Reference Protocol, Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility.Growth patterns of breastfed infants in seven countries. Acta Paediatr2000; 89: 215–22.
18.
de OnisM., GarzaC., VictoraC.G., OnyangoA.W., FrongilloE.A., MartinesJ., for theW.H.O. Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull2004; 25(1)(suppl 1): S15–26.
19.
World Health Organization Working Group on the Growth Reference Protocol, Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility.Growth of healthy infants and the timing, type, and frequency of complementary foods. Am J Clin Nutr2002; 76: 620–7.
20.
Kramer MS.Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull WHO1987; 65: 663–737.
21.
MeyerM.B.Breast-feeding and smoking. Lancet1979; 1: 975–6.
22.
VioF., SalazarG., InfanteC.Smoking during pregnancy and lactation and its effects on breast-milk volume. Am J Clin Nutr1991; 54: 1011–6.
23.
MansbachI.K., GreenbaumC.W., SulkesJ.Onset and duration of breastfeeding among Israeli mothers: relationships with smoking and type of delivery. Soc Sci Med1991; 33: 1391–7.
24.
WijnhovenT.M.A., de OnisM., OnyangoA.W., WangT., BjoerneboeG.E.A., BhandariN., LarteyA., Al RashidiB., for theW.H.O. Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of gross motor development in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Food Nutr Bull2004; 25(1)(suppl 1): S37–45.
25.
HabichtJ.P., MartorellR., YarbroughC., MalinaR.M., KleinR.E.Height and weight standards for preschool children: How relevant are ethnic differences in growth potential?Lancet1974; 1: 611–4.
26.
GraitcerP.L., GentryE.M.Measuring children: one reference for all. Lancet1981; 2: 297–9.
27.
MartorellR.Child growth retardation: a discussion of its causes and of its relationship to health. In: BaxterK.L., WaterlowJ.C., eds. Nutritional Adaptation in Man.London: John Libbey, 1985: 13–30.
28.
Onyango AW, Pinol AJ, de Onis M, for the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group.Managing data for a multicountry longitudinal study: experience from the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Food Nutr Bull2004; 25(1)(suppl 1): S46–52.
29.
de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea WC, Martorell R, for the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group.Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull2004; 25(1)(suppl 1): S27–36.
30.
BarkerD.J.Programming the baby. In: BarkerD.J., ed. Mothers, babies, and disease in later life.London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1994: 14–36.
31.
WaterlandR.A., GarzaC.Potential mechanisms of metabolic imprinting that lead to chronic disease. Am J Clin Nutr1999; 69: 179–97.
32.
World Health Organization.The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: a systematic review.Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.
33.
WHO Global Strategy for Infant and Young-Child Feeding.The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding, Fifty-fourth WHA A54/INF.DOC/4, May 2001 (Resolution WHA 54.2).
