Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Exposure to environmental toxins presents substantial health risks, particularly for individuals facing heightened exposure due to occupational hazards. This analytic review highlights the critical need to address these risks through a lifestyle medicine approach, advocating for integrated care strategies to mitigate the long-term health impacts of toxic environmental exposures. We explore exposures to environmental toxins in 2 at-risk populations, military service members exposed to airborne hazards and burn pits during overseas deployments and first responders to the World Trade Center terrorist attack. The review highlights the immediate and long-term chronic health effects of toxic environmental exposures, emphasizing the variable symptoms, long latency, and long-term complex outcomes that necessitate an exposure-informed health care model. Exposure-informed care can enhance overall well-being and reduce the risks of chronic illnesses by incorporating lifestyle medicine principles supported by a learning community system. The proposed model makes recommendations for a shift to exposure-informed preventative care. This enhanced approach aims to promote a longer and healthier life for those at increased risks following toxic environmental exposures. Understanding the context of military burn pit and World Trade Center environmental exposures and the possibilities of exposure-informed care is paramount in shifting from a traditional disease-centered model to a holistic, person-centered approach.

Keywords

lifestyle medicine environmental toxic exposure veterans health outcomes world trade center medical monitoring first responders

“Environmental toxic exposures can lead to detrimental acute and long-term health effects seen following exposures by military service members and WTC responders.”

Introduction

Exposure to environmental toxins can result in both acute and chronic health conditions.^1,2 Two populations, military service members exposed to airborne hazards and burn pits during deployments and individuals affected by toxic exposure following the World Trade Center terrorist attack, offer invaluable insights into post-exposure care. Military personnel exposed to airborne toxins have reported respiratory illnesses, cancers, and other chronic conditions.¹ Similarly, first responders and civilians living or working near the World Trade Center (WTC) site have experienced chronic respiratory and gastrointestinal disorders, various cancers, long-term psychological effects, and other health issues linked to environmental toxins.^1,2 These populations have benefited from more than a decade of research and clinical evidence of health outcomes and post-exposure care models. They provide an opportunity for critical case studies identifying exposure-informed care strategies for not only Veterans and WTC survivors, but also other at-risk groups, including industrial workers, disaster first responders, and similar populations.

Lifestyle medicine employs evidence-based behavioral interventions to prevent, treat and manage chronic disease and shifts the focus from treating chronic illness after it has occurred to “recognizing, educating, and supporting patients’ healthy and disease-reversing behaviors in their contextual environment” by addressing the root causes and life choices that underlie chronic illness.³ A lifestyle medicine model is an ideal match for chronic health problems that are multi-system and may be best treated from a “whole person” perspective rather than an organ-by-organ approach. Following this “whole person” perspective, lifestyle medicine has 3 primary goals for individuals: remain healthy, remain independent, and live well as long as possible.⁴ This holistic approach to health and wellness can be universally beneficial, especially for individuals at increased risks for chronic diseases following toxic environmental, occupational and other exposures.

The aim of this analytic review is to increase awareness about the wide-ranging health effects of toxic environmental exposure and discuss the potential benefits of a lifestyle medicine approach to post-exposure care. To accomplish this, we will discuss 2 populations at-risk for acute and chronic health effects following toxic exposures: (1) post 9/11 military service members exposed to airborne hazards and open-air burn pits, and (2) first responders to the World Trade Center terrorist attack. The goal for this review is to develop a deeper understanding of post-exposure care in these, and other, vulnerable populations.

Lifestyle Medicine Following Toxic Environmental Exposure

Lifestyle medicine addresses chronic diseases by promoting positive health behaviors⁵ and is defined as “the evidence-based practice of helping individuals and communities with comprehensive lifestyle changes (including nutrition, physical activity, stress management, social support, and environmental exposures) to help prevent, treat, and even reverse the progression of chronic diseases by addressing the underlying cause.”⁶ Lifestyle medicine is an upstream preventative approach rather than a response after illness and focuses on 6 main areas: increasing physical activity; developing strategies to manage stress; forming and maintaining meaningful relationships; improving sleep; avoidance of risky substances; and healthful eating.⁵

Lifestyle medicine has several important benefits including the potential for the additive effects of lifestyle interventions. For example, improving mental health often leads to improvements in physical health.⁷ Thus, an intervention aimed at strengthening mental health will also likely reduce the risk of chronic illness by also improving physical health.⁷ Lifestyle medicine is administered by a multidisciplinary team to meet the medical and psychological needs of individuals. Lifestyle medicine practitioners use motivational interviewing, health coaching, routine health visits, and other tools to provide education and direction.⁶ A team-based approach also addresses importance of key social risk factors on wellness such as housing, employment, financial distress, and education,⁷ which are known to contribute to poor health outcomes.

Individuals exposed to toxic environments, and their health care team, often lack a comprehensive understanding of the increased risks of chronic illness associated with toxic exposures. The World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP) and the Veteran’s Administration (VA) each have components of lifestyle medicine available to patients, and are conducting research on lifestyle medicine factors, yet neither has a fully integrated lifestyle medicine program for post-exposure care. Lifestyle medicine approaches present an opportunity to encourage healthy lifestyle behaviors, to mitigate the risks of additional negative health outcomes (Table 1) and encourage a whole-person and wellness-focused goal of lifelong thriving with an increased “healthspan.”⁸

Table 1.

Chronic Health Conditions Post-toxic Exposure Matched to Evidence-Based Lifestyle Medicine Interventions.

Physical Activity	Nutrition	Sleep	Social Connections	Stress Management	Avoidance of Risky Behaviors
Cancer	Cancer	Sleep apnea	PTSD	PTSD	Cancer
Hypertension	GERD	PTSD	Anxiety	Anxiety	GERD
Asthma	Respiratory disorders	Anxiety	Depression	Depression	Asthma
Sleep apnea	Sleep apnea	Depression		Hypertension	Respiratory disorders
Respiratory disorders					Hypertension
COPD
Depression

Note: not inclusive of all chronic health conditions post-exposure. COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), PTSD (Post-traumatic stress disorder).

Epidemiology Program, Health Outcomes Military Exposures, Office of Patient Care Services, Department of Veterans Affairs. (2021). Post Deployment Health Surveillance Tables of Prevalence and Incidence: 2010-2019. Washington, DC: Author. (URL).

Kubale T, Katruska A, Brown EP, Santiago-Colón A, Daniels RD, Reissman DB [2022]. Summary of World Trade Center Health Program research: NIOSH research compendium. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health:1-684.

Military Service Members

Military service members exposed to environmental hazards during deployments may experience lasting detrimental health effects.⁹ Veterans of the Gulf War exposed to toxic substances show a significant increase in adverse respiratory conditions and chronic multi-symptom illness.¹⁰ The deleterious health effects are persistent, increase over time, and remain higher in deployed Veterans 20 years following exposure than in non-deployed Veterans.¹¹ Millions of U.S. military Veterans who served in Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF), Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and New Dawn (OND) or deployed to Western Asia were exposed to airborne hazards and open-air burn pits.^12-15 The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs defines “airborne hazards” as any contaminant or potentially toxic substance that is in the air we breathe.¹⁶ Burn pits were utilized at over 250 sites with larger sites burning an estimated 85,000 pounds (227 metric tons) of hazardous waste daily using JP-8 jet fuel to ignite the fires.^17,18 Burn pits were located adjacent to military housing, work areas, and dining facilities.¹⁹ Items burned included, but were not limited to, electronics, weapons, medical waste, lithium-ion batteries, plastics, Styrofoam, insecticide canisters, and vehicles.¹⁷ Burn pit emissions contained particulate matter in a range of sizes coated with toxic chemicals such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and heavy metals (titanium, iron).²⁰ The health effects of airborne hazards are compounded by other common environmental factors related to military deployment including sandstorms, extreme temperatures, psychological stress, noise, and sleep deprivation.¹⁹

Post 9/11 Veterans exposed to burn pits and other airborne hazards report a wide range of respiratory symptoms and diseases, including persistent dyspnea, chronic cough, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, constrictive bronchiolitis, and other chronic respiratory conditions. These symptoms, collectively referred to as Deployment-Related Respiratory Disease (DRRD), often result from inhalation of toxic fumes, particulate matter, and other environmental contaminants during deployment. The term DRRD provides a broad descriptor for these conditions, emphasizing the need for comprehensive diagnostic evaluations and proactive, exposure-informed care strategies tailored to this population.^12,21-23 Findings from the Airborne Hazards and Open-Air Burn Pit Registry (AHOBPR) indicate that almost half of the Veterans enrolled report dyspnea and almost one-third report decreased exercise tolerance or cough after exposures.¹ A recent retrospective cohort study of Veterans Health Administration medical records and deployment records identified that prolonged deployment was associated with increased risks for asthma (adjusted conditional odds ratio [AOR] 1.01; 95% CI 1.01 – 1.02), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02 – 1.07), hypertension (AOR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02-1.03), and ischemic stroke (AOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97 – 1.14).²¹ During post 9/11 deployment, many service members were in their 20s and 30s and at the peak of their physical health and lung functions, and yet reported an increase in respiratory symptoms (chronic persistent cough, dyspnea, and wheezing) from pre- to post-deployment.²⁴ Further, significant associations between their burn pit exposure and chronic respiratory symptoms are emerging, including increased risk of respiratory symptoms in women.²⁵

Military service members (service from 1990 – 2021) report migraines, hypertension, major depressive disorder, arthritis, dermatitis, decreased functional status, and other symptoms following burn pit exposures.²⁶ In a recent study, 29% of post 9/11 Veterans reported hematuria and high rates of urinary frequency (84%) and urgency (76%) post-deployment.²⁷ Secondary data from a qualitative survey found that post 9/11 Veterans reported all parts of their body being affected during and post-deployment.²⁸ Specifically, Veterans reported fatigue, general pain, memory issues, slow recovery from illness, and chronic sleep problems.²⁸

The current model of care following toxic environmental or occupational exposures is primarily treatment focused. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) takes a “Whole Health” approach to care, believing that “every health system’s primary purpose should be to help the people that it serves achieve whole health.”²⁹ The VA has been a leader in this approach, implementing a Whole Health System approach in 18 sites that focus on chronic pain, mental health, and disabilities.²⁹ The recent passage of the Sergeant Heath Robinson Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxins (PACT) Act expands VA health care and benefits for all Veterans exposed to burn pits and other airborne hazards. (https://www.va.gov/resources/the-pact-act-and-your-va-benefits/) The PACT Act will ensure that all Veterans who have been exposed to toxic environments are screened for health effects of exposure and, thus, identify those Veterans who may benefit from a lifestyle medicine approach to care.

Lifestyle medicine programs within the VA system have had positive results. While not specific to post-exposure Veterans, they provide evidence of the benefits of a lifestyle medicine model of care. A comprehensive lifestyle medicine program for post-stroke Veterans (including any era of military service) includes exercise, cooking, mindfulness, education, and group support delivered over 12 weeks.³⁰ Following this program, significant improvements were seen in exercise duration, balance, blood pressure management and, importantly, high self-reported satisfaction rates.³⁰ A study of a remote health coaching, lifestyle medicine intervention for Veterans (including any era of military service) incorporated clinical recommendations with health goals identified by Veterans.³¹ Individual health goals identified by Veterans (including physical activity, mindset and diet) were fully met (56%) or partially met (44%) in the study.³¹

World Trade Center Responders

The attacks at the World Trade Center (WTC) in 2001 expelled a combustion plume and ambient dust that contaminated New York City. The first responders to the attack and the population who lived and worked nearby were exposed to the initial plume created by the fire and building collapses, from ongoing fires that lasted at least 3 months, and from exposures to toxic air particles during the cleanup and transport of debris.^32,33 The complex mixture of fine particulate matter and coarse WTC dust was filled with asbestos, lead, mercury, polyvinyl chloride, and dioxins that are known to cause acute and chronic adverse health effects.³⁴

Numerous detrimental health effects have been reported in first responders after exposures at the WTC site.³⁵ The most frequent reported health effects include aerodigestive disorders, cancer, and mental ill health.³⁵ Cancer has been documented in 16% of all WTC responders, raising particular concerns as survivors age and their risk of cancer increases.³⁵ Twenty years after Sept 11^th related toxic exposures, the first responders to the WTC had higher rates of all cancers combined as well as higher rates of prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, and leukemia.³⁵ Individual characteristics such as age and smoking status may contribute to these increases.² In WTC responders, mental and physical illness are often intertwined, necessitating a multidisciplinary coordinated approach to care.^36,37

The World Trade Center Health Program (WTCHP) includes medical monitoring and treatment of first responders and survivors who lived, worked, or attended school in the affected area.³⁷ The WTCHP includes components of lifestyle medicine such as smoking cessation, dietary support, and mental health care. In addition to a medical exam and clinical testing, the WTCHP includes diagnostic testing, health education and counseling aimed to empower individuals with the knowledge to manage their health more effectively.³⁸

Recent studies have identified a significantly lower than expected mortality among WTCHP firefighters and general survivors as compared with national, state, and local populations.^39-42 Singh and colleagues investigated if the mortality benefit could be from the “healthy worker effect”⁴³ by comparing 2 cohorts of firefighters: WTC-exposed firefighters and firefighters from 3 urban fire departments with similar occupational exposures (except for the WTC exposure).⁴⁴ Both firefighter cohorts had lower than expected all-cause mortality. However, the WTC-exposed firefighters had lower all-cause mortality and cancer-specific, cardiovascular-specific, and respiratory disease-specific mortality as compared with the non-WTC-exposed firefighters.^44,45 These findings suggest both cohorts had a healthy worker effect, but the WTC-exposed firefighter had an additional improvement in mortality. The lower mortality may be attributed to improved access to free, comprehensive health monitoring (including components of lifestyle medicine) and treatment received from the WTCHP. How much of an effect the lifestyle medicine components (diet, mental health, avoidance of risky behaviors, and others) had on this mortality improvement is not known and warrants further study.

Discussion

Environmental toxic exposures can lead to detrimental acute and long-term health effects seen following exposures by military service members and WTC responders. Each population continues to experience high rates of both acute and chronic respiratory disease as well as increased morbidity and risks for cancer. Our analytic review highlights the immediate and long-term health effects of toxic exposures, emphasizing the variable symptoms, long latency, and long-term outcomes that benefit from a holistic care model incorporating lifestyle modification as a cornerstone of treatment.

Other populations are also routinely exposed to toxic environments and would also benefit from an exposure-informed plan of care. A recent study identified blue-collar workers from “Construction,” “Professional, Scientific, Technical Services,” “Real estate, Rental, Leasing,” “Manufacturing,” and “Wholesale Trade” as having higher biomarker levels of toxicants including arsenic (16%-58%), led (1%-3%) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (1% - 33%).⁴⁶ Ongoing research to identify and characterize toxic exposures and health effects in these high-risk populations is an important component to exposure-informed care models.

A holistic care model focuses on lifestyle medicine factors to enhance patient engagement and support positive behavior change. Shifting the focus from a reactive approach to a proactive approach where lifestyle behaviors are considered medical interventions that are promoted, implemented, and sustained is an important goal.⁴⁷ Importantly, lifestyle behaviors tend to cluster⁴ and while addressing all behaviors should be a goal, even making a change in 1 behavior is likely to show lasting health benefits. This additive benefit is important and cost-effective in resource-limited settings where improving behaviors in 1 lifestyle domain can have ripple effects on other lifestyle factors. In a general population of U.S. adults, adherence to 5 low-risk lifestyle medicine factors (never smoking, healthy weight, regular physical activity, healthy diet and moderate alcohol consumption) could extend life expectancy at age 50 by 14.0 years for female and 12.2 years for male adults, compared to individuals who did not adopt these lifestyle factors.⁴⁸ For populations at high-risk for chronic disease post-exposure, such as military service members or responders to the World Trade Center attack, these benefits are welcome.

Conclusions

Exposures to toxic environmental hazards leads to detrimental health outcomes. A lifestyle medicine approach has the potential to mitigate and even prevent some of these post-exposure detrimental outcomes. The decrease in cancer mortality seen in the WTCHP, which includes components of lifestyle medicine, provides encouraging evidence for the benefits of this approach. Future research on the quantitative and qualitative benefits of lifestyle medicine models points to a better understanding of post-exposure care and how best to implement these models at the point of care. Applying care management lessons learned from military service members and the WTC population can inform care for other populations at-risk following toxic environmental exposures.

Supporting individuals and families in maintaining a healthy lifestyle should be standard in post-exposure care and requires management and organizational processes that help individuals adopt, engage and maintain healthy behaviors.^4,49 A majority of military service members (65.7%) report that a lifestyle medicine approach is an extremely or very important part of the discussion with their health care providers.⁵⁰ However, few (10.3%) military service members have knowledge of the elements that underpin lifestyle medicine.⁴⁹ Health care systems should work to integrate a lifestyle medicine approach into exposure-informed care, and include patients and families in this planning (co-design) to ensure the care models meet their needs. Implementing a lifestyle medicine approach requires a coordinated effort and represents an opportunity to improve the health of populations exposed to toxic environmental exposures.⁵¹

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Rosie Lopez Tores, BS, Burn Pits 360; Sunny Chung, MLIS, AHIP, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Librarian; VA BLRD 1 I01 BX004146 (to TAB). VA BLRD Field Planning Award-MTEC (to TAB, MAK and JHT). UMN -CTSI The MN Pulmonary Airborne Clinical Toxin (M-PACT) Study (to TAB, MAK and JHT).

Author Contributions

PKG conceptualized the theme of the manuscript. PKG, PBA, TAB, JP, JHT, JT, MAK and PBA conceptualized and drafted the original manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the draft manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The views expressed in this material are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Government, the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Department of the Army.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Pamela K. Ginex

References

Davis

Lopez

Bell

, et al. The severity of functional small airway disease in military personnel with constrictive bronchiolitis as measured by quantitative computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206(6):786. doi:10.1164/rccm.202201-0153LE

Boffetta

Hall

Todd

, et al. Cancer risk among World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers: a review. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(4):308. doi:10.3322/caac.21723. Epub 20220324.

Parkinson

Stout

Dysinger

. Lifestyle medicine: prevention, treatment, and reversal of disease. Med Clin. 2023;107(6):1109-1120. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jul 16.

Gray

Kross

Renfrew

Wood

. Precision medicine in lifestyle medicine: the way of the future? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019;14(2):169-186. doi:10.1177/1559827619834527

Phillips

Frates

Park

. Lifestyle medicine. Phys Med Rehabil Clin. 2020;31(4):515-526. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2020.07.006

Rippe

. Lifestyle Medicine. 1st ed. Malden, Mass, USA: Blackwell Science; 1999.

Lacagnina

Moore

Mitchell

. The lifestyle medicine team: health care that delivers value. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;12(6):479-483. doi:10.1177/1559827618792493

Olshansky

. From lifespan to healthspan. JAMA. 2018;320:1323-1324. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12621

Falvo

Osinubi

Sotolongo

Helmer

. Airborne hazards exposure and respiratory health of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:116. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxu009. Epub 20150114.

10.

Porter

Long

Rull

Dursa

Millennium Cohort Study Team . Prevalence of chronic multisymptom illness/gulf war illness over time among millennium cohort participants, 2001 to 2016. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62(1):4-10. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001716

11.

Gwini

SMFA

Forbes

Kelsall

Ikin

Sim

. Increased symptom reporting persists in 1990-1991 Gulf War veterans 20 years post deployment. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58:1246. doi:10.1002/ajim.22490

12.

Falvo

Helmer

Klein

, et al. Isolated diffusing capacity reduction is a common clinical presentation in deployed Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with deployment-related environmental exposures. Clin Res J. 2018;12(2):795. doi:10.1111/crj.12552. Epub 20160927.

13.

Olsen

Caruana

Cheslack-Postava

, et al. Iraq/Afghanistan war lung injury reflects burn pits exposure. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14671. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18252-2. Epub 20220829.

14.

Woskie

Bello

Rennix

Jiang

Trivedi

Savitz

. Burn pit exposure assessment to support a cohort study of US veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Occup Environ Med. 2023;65(6):449. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002788. Epub 20230111.

15.

Garshick

Abraham

Baird

, et al. Respiratory health after military service in southwest Asia and Afghanistan. An official American thoracic society workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(8):e1-e16. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-344WS

16.

US Department of Veterans Affairs, V. H. A . (2013, December 13). Va.gov: Veterans Affairs . Airborne Hazards and Burn Pit Exposures. https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/Accessed March 12, 2025.

17.

Trembley

Nixon

, et al. Whole-body inhalation of nano-sized carbon black: a surrogate model of military burn pit exposure. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):275. doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06165-2. Epub 20220811.

18.

BurnPits360 . Military toxic exposure guide. BurnPits360. (n.d.). https://burnpits360.org/pages/military-toxic-exposure-guide. Accessed March 12, 2025.

19.

National Academies of Sciences Engineering

and Medicine.

Assessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23677/assessment-of-the-department-of-veterans-affairs-airborne-hazards-and-open-burn-pit-registry. Accessed 19 June 2024.

20.

Trembley

Barach

Tomáška

, et al. Current understanding of the impact of United States military airborne hazards and burn pit exposures on respiratory health. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2024;21(1):43. doi:10.1186/s12989-024-00606-5. PMID: 39434148; PMCID: PMC11492460.

21.

Savitz

Woskie

Bello

, et al. Deployment to military bases with open burn pits and respiratory and cardiovascular disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e247629. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7629

22.

Szema

Peters

Weissinger

Gagliano

Chen

. New-onset asthma among soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31(5):67-71. doi:10.2500/aap.2010.31.3383

23.

Szema

Salihi

Savary

Chen

. Respiratory symptoms necessitating spirometry among soldiers with Iraq/Afghanistan war lung injury. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(9):961. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31822c9f05

24.

Morris

Walter

McCann

, et al. Clinical evaluation of deployed military personnel with chronic respiratory symptoms: study of active duty military for pulmonary disease related to environmental deployment exposures (STAMPEDE) III. Chest. 2020;157(6):1559. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.01.024. Epub 20200201.

25.

Garshick

Redlich

Korpak

, et al. Chronic respiratory symptoms following deployment-related occupational and environmental exposures among US veterans. Occup Environ Med. 2024;81(2):59-65. doi:10.1136/oemed-2023-109146

26.

Chassé

Rossi

Downs

Ortiz

. Associations between self-reported burn pit exposure and functional status, 1990-2021. Mil Med. 2023;27:usad474. doi:10.1093/milmed/usad474. Epub ahead of print.

27.

Perveen

Mayo-Malasky

Lee-Wong

, et al. Gross hematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with military burn pits exposures in US veterans deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. J Occup Environ Med. 2023;65(9):740. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002919. Epub 20230624.

28.

Bith-Melander

Ratliff

Poisson

Jindal

Ming Choi

Efird

. Slow burns: a qualitative study of burn pit and toxic exposures among military veterans serving in Afghanistan, Iraq and throughout the Middle East. Ann Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021;4(1):1042. Epub 20211227.

29.

National Academies of Science

Medicine

. Reassessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2022. https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/reassessment-of-the-department-of-veterans-affairs-airborne-hazards-and-open-burn-pit-registrypagexii. Accessed 19 June 2024.

30.

Krauss

Frates

Parekh

Chan

Kiratli

Myers

. Comprehensive lifestyle medicine program improves fitness, function, and blood pressure in poststroke Veteran cohort: a pilot study. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;16(6):765-771.

31.

Summers

McCullers

Jachimowicz

, et al. Distance-based lifestyle medicine for veterans with chronic multi-symptom illness (CMI): health coaching as behavioral health intervention for clinical adherence. In: Schmorrow

Fidopiastis

, eds. Augmented Cognition. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer; 2024:236-249, Vol 14695. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61572-6_16

32.

Murphy

Brackbill

Thalji

Dolan

Pulliam

Walker

. Measuring and maximizing coverage in the world trade center health Registry. Stat Med. 2007;26(8):1688-1701. doi:10.1002/sim.2806

33.

Lippmann

Cohen

Chen

. Health effects of World Trade Center (WTC) dust: an unprecedented disaster’s inadequate risk management. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2015;45(6):492-530. doi:10.3109/10408444.2015.1044601

34.

McGee

Chen

Cohen

, et al. Chemical analysis of World Trade Center fine particulate matter for use in toxicologic assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111(7):972. doi:10.1289/ehp.5930

35.

Smith

Holmes

Larkin

. Health trends among 9/11 responders from 2011-2021: a review of world trade center health program statistics. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2021;36(5):621. doi:10.1017/S1049023X21000881. Epub 20210902.

36.

Kubale

Katruska

Brown

Santiago-Colón

Daniels

Reissman

. Summary of World Trade Center Health Program Research: NIOSH Research Compendium. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2022:1-684.

37.

Calvert

Anderson

Cochran

, et al. The world trade center health program: an introduction to best practices. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2023;78(4):199-205. doi:10.1080/19338244.2022.2156975. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

38.

Santiago-Colon

Daniels

Reissman

, et al. World trade center health program: first decade of research. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(19):7290. doi:10.3390/ijerph17197290. Epub 20201006.

39.

Colbeth

Zeig-Owens

Hall

Webber

Schwartz

Prezant

. Mortality among fire department of the city of New York rescue and recovery workers exposed to the world Trade center disaster, 2001-2017. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17:6266.

40.

Jordan

Stein

, et al. Mortality among rescue and recovery workers and community members exposed to the September 11, 2001 world trade center terrorist attacks, 2003-2014. Environ Res. 2018;163:270.

41.

Stein

Wallenstein

Shapiro

, et al. Mortality among world Trade center rescue and recovery workers, 2002-2011. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:87-95.

42.

Hall

Yung

, et al. A 15-year follow-up study of mortality in a pooled cohort of world trade center rescue and recovery workers. Environ Res. 2023;219:115116.

43.

Sung

. A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology. Occup Med (Lond). 1999;49:225.

44.

Singh

Zeig-Owens

Cannon

, et al. All-cause and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of WTC-exposed and non-WTC-exposed firefighters. Occup Environ Med. 2023;80(6):297-303. doi:10.1136/oemed-2022-108703. Epub 20230327.

45.

Goldfarb

Zeig-Owens

Kristjansson

, et al. Cancer survival among World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers: a collaborative cohort study. Am J Ind Med. 2021;64(10):815-826. doi:10.1002/ajim.23278

46.

Nguyen

Colacino

Patel

Sartor

Jolliet

. Identification of occupations susceptible to high exposure and risk associated with multiple toxicants in an observational study: national Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2014. Exposome. 2022;2(1):osac004. doi:10.1093/exposome/osac004

47.

Juszczak

Rosenfeld

. Lifestyle medicine and otolaryngology: embracing the future. OTO Open. 2021;5(4):2473974X211059091. doi:10.1177/2473974X211059091

48.

Pan

Wang

, et al. Impact of healthy lifestyle factors on life expectancies in the US population. Circulation. 2018;138(4):345-355. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047

49.

Webber

Bornstein

Kiel

Wilkins

Bryant

. Physical activity and the health of a nation: a national challenge and collective response. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024;18(5):632-637. doi:10.1177/15598276241237762. PMID: 39309331; PMCID: PMC11412370.

50.

Monti

Thomas

. Knowledge and attitudes of lifestyle medicine-based care in a military community. Mil Med. 2023;188(3-4):e497-e502. doi:10.1093/milmed/usab279

51.

Lianov

Dysinger

. Lifestyle medicine: a mandate with strong implications for military health care. Mil Med. 2011;176(12):1355. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-11-00315

Exposure-Informed Care Following Toxic Environmental Exposures: A Lifestyle Medicine Approach

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Lifestyle Medicine Following Toxic Environmental Exposure

Military Service Members

World Trade Center Responders

Discussion

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References