Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Physical fitness is tightly linked to our ability to be physically active, and poor fitness is tied to increased risk of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adulthood. In 2011, the Institute of Medicine appointed an expert committee to review the evidence between physical fitness and health outcomes in youth. Specifically, experimental and longitudinal studies published between 2000 and 2010 were reviewed in the areas of body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, musculoskeletal fitness, and flexibility. Specific fitness tests that were linked to health risk factors or health outcomes in each of these areas were identified. Recommendations for the best fitness test items for use in schools and also for a national survey were given. In addition, guidance was provided for interpretation of fitness test scores along with recommendations for areas of needed future research. Key findings from the final report “Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth” will be reviewed.

Keywords

fitness testing health risk factors aerobic fitness musculoskeletal fitness flexibility body composition

‘Physical fitness has been defined as “a set of attributes that people have or achieve that relates to the ability to perform physical activity.”’

The lack of adequate physical activity that is affecting our nation’s youth has received considerable attention over the past few decades, and only again more recently have we seen a resurgence in the promotion of physical fitness and the study of its impact on health outcomes. Physical fitness has been defined as “a set of attributes that people have or achieve that relates to the ability to perform physical activity.”¹ It is through several of these attributes that fitness is associated with our ability to be physically active and in turn acquire additional health benefits such as decreased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Over a half of a century ago, physical fitness testing among American’s youth focused on performance-related fitness, such as measures related to sports or military performance. Today, fitness testing has evolved to focus on health-related fitness, which has been categorized to include 4 general areas/components: body composition, cardiorespiratory endurance, musculoskeletal fitness, and flexibility. In adults, each of these has been related to specific health outcomes; however, research supporting similar relationships for each of these in children and adolescents is less well-established, especially in identifying specific fitness tests that correspond to health risk factors and/or health outcomes.

In 2011, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) appointed an expert committee to assess the research evidence for the relationship between each of the fitness components and related health outcomes. Within this context, the committee was asked to identify physical fitness test items for youth that are valid, reliable, and related to health as well as suitable to include in a national survey to measure health-related fitness. Finally, the committee was tasked with identifying areas for future research. This review will serve to outline these practical recommendations from the final report titled “Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth” that was released in the fall of 2012.² Readers may wish to use this information for enhanced interpretation of field-based and clinical research studies and to better understand needed areas of future research in the context of youth fitness and health outcomes.

Methodology

The primary evidence base that the IOM committee used was a systematic review. This was performed and compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and included literature on physical fitness and health outcomes published from 2000 to 2010 encompassing 3 major areas: cardiorespiratory endurance, musculoskeletal fitness, and flexibility. Over 32, 000 abstracts from 4 literature searches retrieved by CDC Reference Librarian were initially screened, more than 20, 000 screened for inclusion after removal for duplicates, 462 papers were fully reviewed, and from these 179 were extracted for the working database (cross-sectional studies were not included). The reviewed studies were grouped into longitudinal studies, experimental studies, and quasi-experimental studies. Table 1 refers to the number of studies examined in each group by fitness category. Body composition was not independently compiled by the CDC due to the relationship between body composition and health outcomes being well-established. However, the committee developed their conceptual framework (Figure 1) and determined that body composition should be assessed as both a fitness measure and health outcome. Body composition studies were therefore gathered from the CDC literature search when examined as a fitness component with independent health outcomes. In addition, IOM committee members supplemented the systematic search with select publications based on their knowledge of the scientific literature.

Table 1.

Number of Final Studies Accessed and Reviewed by IOM Committee Linking Specific Fitness Categories to Health Outcomes in Youth by Study Design.

	Experimental	Quasi-Experimental	Experimental/No Control	Longitudinal
Cardiorespiratory endurance	47	29	35	24
Musculoskeletal fitness	23	12	22	6
Flexibility	7	5	9	4

Figure 1.

Conceptual framework for physical fitness measures, modifying factors, and health markers/outcomes in youth.

The conceptual framework (Figure 1) guided the systematic review. First, the committee established a link between individual fitness components and health risk factors and/or outcomes. Health risk factors are included as many health outcomes are not yet detectable in youth. Once the link between a fitness component and health risk factors/outcomes was established, studies were reviewed for the most reliable, valid, and practical measures of fitness for each component and their link with health outcomes. A standard rubric was used to evaluate each study for strength and quality of research design and findings. Links between test items and health outcomes were categorized as direct or associational based on the strength of the study design and the rigor of the statistical analysis. The strength of the evidence was categorized as sufficient or insufficient based on the number of studies with direct or indirect evidence, the study designs, appropriate populations, assessment of known confounders, and the statistical significance of the association.

Finally, modifying factors (e.g. age, sex, maturity, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, weight status, motor coordination, etc.) affecting fitness tests and health outcomes were assessed. A more thorough explanation of the detailed methodologies undertaken for the review is outlined in the final IOM report.² Below we outline the findings and practical recommendations for each fitness component.

Findings From Individual Fitness Components

Body Composition

Body weight and body fat are elements of body composition, which the committee defined as a component of fitness, a modifier of fitness, and a health marker/outcome (Figure 1). Body composition can vary widely due to age, sex, maturation status, and race/ethnicity. Sex differences in body mass index (BMI) are small during childhood but increase during adolescence.³ In childhood, girls experience faster increases in fat mass than do boys, and fat mass plateaus near boys’ adolescent growth spurt.⁴ For both sexes, BMI reaches its lowest point around 5 to 6 years of age and then continues to increase linearly with age through early adulthood. Males accumulate relatively more subcutaneous fat on the trunk, while females have a more equal distribution between the trunk and the extremities.^5,6 In addition, youth who are more advanced in maturity status have more body fat and more subcutaneous fat on the trunk.^3,6

Body Composition as a Fitness Component

There is a well-established link between excessive body fat and risk factors for chronic disease. The Bogalusa Heart Study found that 60% of children who were overweight by the age of 10 had at least one biomarker or risk factor for cardiovascular disease.⁷ NHANES data also revealed a dose–response relationship between increasing body weight and 2 or more cardiovascular disease risk factors.⁸ This association between elevated weight status and increased risk of cardiovascular disease is particularly evident in children with low cardiorespiratory fitness.^9,10 Higher childhood weight was also associated with markers of metabolic syndrome¹¹ and prediabetes.¹² The location of adipose may also play an important role in disease risk. In the Bogalusa Heart Study, an increase in waist circumference was associated with a decrease in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and an increase in triglycerides and insulin among African American girls.¹³ Another study in children found that fat distribution was a better predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factors than BMI.¹⁴

These relationships also track into adulthood. Research from the Fels Longitudinal Study shows a relationship between childhood and adult obesity,¹⁵ and more data from the Bogalusa study demonstrate that skinfolds and BMI z-score in childhood were the main contributors to C-reactive protein (CRP; another cardiovascular disease risk factor) in adults.¹⁶

Body Composition as a Modifier of Fitness

Body composition is also a major factor/modifier of physical fitness and performance on physical fitness tests. Studies in youth found negative correlations between BMI and the sum of skinfolds and various fitness tests in both sexes.^17-19 Also, low levels of cardiorespiratory endurance were correlated with percent body fat in African American and white adolescents²⁰ and with BMI and skinfolds in obese children aged 6 to 13.²¹ Children and adolescents aged 5-14 who were classified as “underfit” had a higher risk of obesity.²²

Measures of Body Composition

Though there is no body composition method that is universally accepted as the gold standard,²³ laboratory measures (ie, underwater weight, body potassium, total body water, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DEXA]) are recognized as the most accurate. However, these methods require specific training, expensive equipment, and often a clinical setting and are therefore are unlikely to be feasible for measuring body composition of large samples of youth.

Field-based measures include measurement of BMI, skinfolds, bioelectrical impedance, and waist circumference. BMI, calculated from height and weight, is most useful for classification of weight status. Though there is no prediction of body fat,²⁴ BMI is adequately well-correlated with fat mass and percent body fat in youth.^25,26 Skinfold thickness is a double fold of skin along with underlying fat tissue taken at specific body sites—the most often used are triceps and subscapular (under the shoulder blade). Skinfold measurements performed by trained individuals are valid and reliable estimates of subcutaneous fat distribution and predictors of body fat.^27-29 Waist circumference is useful as an indicator of abdominal fat.³⁰ Though it is not a particularly reliable indicator of percent body fat, it provides information about abdominal fat, a useful dimension of body composition linked to health risks.

National Youth Survey

For large national surveys, field-based measures of body composition—BMI (estimate of body weight relative to height), skinfold thickness (at the triceps and under the shoulder blade as indicator of subcutaneous body fat), and waist circumference (indicate of abdominal adiposity)—are recommended. Each of these measurements of body composition has limitations, including reduced accuracy and high variability, with variable validity. However, due to each assessing a different aspect of body composition, along with their minimal subject burden, adequate reliability, and associations with markers of health risk, their inclusion in a national youth fitness survey is justified.

School-Based Survey

For school-based fitness tests, the committee recommends measuring BMI, which is a practical measurement that can be performed rather quickly through measurement of standing height (linear growth) and weight (body mass). Due to measurement in a school environment, potential privacy issues may be encountered and care should be taken to ensure privacy.

Future Studies

To date, many studies examining fitness and health outcomes in youth have not adequately controlled for or measured body composition. Future studies involving body composition should explore the relationship between specific body composition measures and physical fitness tests with particular attention to the potential interactions among body composition, fitness, and health in youth.

Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Cardiorespiratory endurance, the ability to perform whole-body exercise at moderate to high intensities for long periods of time,³¹ is an important component of physical fitness. Producing energy at high rates through aerobic metabolism depends on transport of oxygen through with cardiovascular system, consumption of oxygen in the aerobic metabolic process, and removal of waste products. Those with high levels of cardiorespiratory endurance have well-adapted skeletal muscles and highly functional cardiorespiratory systems. In adults, clear relationships have been found between cardiorespiratory endurance and health outcomes such as lower risk of cardiovascular disease,^32-34 type 2 diabetes,³⁵ hypertension,³⁶ certain cancers,³⁷ and premature mortality.^33,38,39

Fitness Tests

The usual laboratory test for assessing cardiovascular endurance is maximal aerobic power (VO_2max), the gold standard. This is measured by a participant exercising at a maximal level on a treadmill or cycle ergometer, typically via a graded exercise test, and is a key physiologic determinant of cardiorespiratory endurance.^40-42 Distance or timed runs such as the 1 mile run and shuttle runs, in which participants run between 2 set points 20 meters apart, are also reliable and valid field tests used for assessing cardiorespiratory endurance.^43,44 Distance run tests greater than 1 mile have acceptable validity versus VO_2max^28,45 and have also been found to be reliable.⁴⁵

Studies in Youth

Among studies assessing cardiorespiratory endurance through treadmill and cycle ergometer tests, one found that an increase in VO_2max through adolescence corresponded to a healthy cardiovascular risk profile in adulthood,⁴⁶ and another demonstrated a relationship between changes in cardiorespiratory endurance and health markers over 5 years.⁴⁷ Other longitudinal studies also found associations between improvements in cardiorespiratory endurance and improvements in BMI, along with a lower risk of becoming overweight.^48-51

Considering the high correlation between cardiorespiratory endurance and body fatness, it can be difficult to assess their individual effects since both are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Walther and colleagues revealed increases in VO_2max in youth without corresponding decreases in adiposity.⁵² Several studies also examined the relationship between changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and changes in adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors but were not always able to tease out the independent effects of changes in fitness and adiposity on the health markers.^53-58 One cycle ergometry study found improvements in cardiorespiratory endurance and corresponding improvements in HDL cholesterol in overweight youth after exercise training independent of changes in adiposity.⁵⁹ Overall, cardiorespiratory endurance as measured by either treadmill or cycle ergometry tests demonstrate the strong relationships with changes in adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors.

For studies involving distance/timed run and shuttle run tests, of which the shuttle run studies were the most common, most were school based. Two school-based experimental studies found a relationship between increases in physical fitness and decreases in adiposity, improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors,⁶⁰ and blood pressure.⁶¹ Others demonstrated relationships between improved performance on the shuttle run and improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors,^61,62 while two other longitudinal studies found inverse relationships between baseline cardiorespiratory endurance and increasing BMI and incidence of overweight.^22,63 Two studies demonstrated fitness improvements and corresponding improvements in bone health⁶⁴ and blood pressure.⁶¹ Overall, the strongest relationships identified in these studies used the shuttle run as the fitness test and indicated a strong relationship with changes in BMI as the health outcome.

National Youth Survey

The three tests that demonstrate the strongest evidence for a relationship to health—shuttle run, treadmill, and cycle ergometer—are all generally feasible. The treadmill and cycle ergometer, while requiring much less space, necessitate expensive equipment and extensive training for the administrator. Therefore, the shuttle run is recommended for a national survey of cardiorespiratory fitness. If space is limited, the cycle ergometer and treadmill tests are valid and reliable alternatives.

School-Based Survey

For school-based surveys of cardiorespiratory fitness, the progressive shuttle run is recommended. Additional tests, such as the distance or timed runs, although not yet shown to be related to health, may be considered as supplemental educational tools.

Future Studies

Studies should continue to examine the relationship between changes in cardiorespiratory endurance as measured by field tests and subsequent changes in health risk factors in youth beyond weight status and cardiometabolic risk factors (eg, bone health and neurocognitive function and behavior). Additionally, many studies to date have not appropriately examined the effects of various modifiers such as demographics, body composition, and nutrition on the relationship between cardiorespiratory endurance and health.

Musculoskeletal Fitness

Musculoskeletal fitness by definition encompasses muscular strength (ability of skeletal muscle to produce force), endurance (ability of skeletal muscle to perform repeated contractions over time), and power (the rate at which muscle work is performed).^65,66 In adults, a review of fitness test items and health outcomes found a valid link between abdominal/core strength and back health with musculoskeletal fitness.⁶⁷ Over time, research has moved beyond back health and associations have been uncovered connecting muscle strength with personal independence, quality of life, lower cardiometabolic risk factors, and the declining frequency of cardiovascular disease events.^68-72 Muscle endurance has been associated with overall quality of life and negatively associated with falling and the associated injuries,⁷¹ while the loss of muscle power has been associated with decreases in functional ability and decreased mobility and premature mortality.^71,73

Fitness Tests

Over the years, musculoskeletal fitness has been assessed in youth using a variety of different fitness test items. There has been an increased focus on these test items in youth since the 1970s due to health data from the adult population.^74-77 In fact, more than 11 different classes of fitness test items have been used to evaluate musculoskeletal fitness in children, though many of those items do not satisfy the physiological definitions of the aforementioned three dimensions (muscular strength, endurance, and power) and many are site-specific (eg, upper vs lower body). Examples include hand-grip strength test (static strength), standing long jump (strength, power), pull-ups and flexed arm hang (strength, endurance), sit-ups (strength, endurance), and throwing (explosive strength).

Studies in Youth

Though far less evidence exists to support the relationship between musculoskeletal fitness and health in youth, it has been studied recently in relation to the development of the Fitnessgram/Activitygram⁷⁸ and a new test battery for European youth.^79-81 A recent review⁸⁰ reported inverse associations between lower-limb muscular power and lower-abdominal obesity in youth,⁸² a composite muscle fitness index score and a composite measure of cardiovascular risk in adolescent girls,⁸³ and cardiovascular inflammatory markers and muscular strength normal-weight and overweight adolescents.⁸⁴ Another recent review found strong associations between changes in muscular strength and changes in overall adiposity.⁸¹ There are still questions regarding the possible association between improved musculoskeletal fitness and bone health. There is indirect evidence of associations between upper-body, trunk, and lower-body strength with various skeletal measures, mainly in girls.^85-87 Few have studied this relationship in boys, and only two studies found direct evidence linking musculoskeletal health and bone health.^88,89

Studies examining the relationship between musculoskeletal fitness and markers of metabolic health exclusively studied overweight/obese youth. One found associational evidence between muscle strength (upper-body, trunk, and lower-body) and hepatic insulin sensitivity and glucose production,⁹⁰ while another provided direct evidence of an association between bench press and leg press and improved insulin sensitivity in boys.⁹¹ As for cardiorespiratory health, among normal-weight boys and girls there was an association between increases in handgrip strength and reductions in systolic blood pressure.⁴⁷ Another revealed that gains in bench press and leg press strength were linked to systolic blood pressure improvements and markers of heart function in obese boys and girls.⁹²

National Youth Survey

Although several relationships have been determined in adults between musculoskeletal fitness and health, a lack of studies has resulted in fewer relationships between musculoskeletal fitness and health outcomes in children. Due to a lack of high-quality studies studying these relationships in children, the committee does not recommend specific musculoskeletal fitness test items (to be measured in a health context) for inclusion in a national fitness survey. However, due to evidence found in adult populations, both the handgrip strength and standing long jump tests may be included due to their adequate validity, reliability, and feasibility.^79,82,93-96 These tests should not be interpreted in a health context until more research confirms their relationships with health outcomes.

School-Based Survey

Schools should also incorporate the handgrip strength and standing long jump tests in their fitness surveys. The modified pull-up or push-up can also be measured for assessment of upper body musculoskeletal strength and the curl-up for measuring core strength—these are valid and reliable tests although at this time they have not been conclusively related to health in youth.

Future Studies

Studies should continue to address the relationship between specific musculoskeletal fitness items and health markers in youth. Many were not designed to appropriately determine the relationship between musculoskeletal fitness tests and health outcomes (either the intervention was not specific enough or the dosage and duration was inadequate) and others were statistically underpowered. Priority should be given to test items for which there is growing evidence, such as the handgrip or the standing long jump, or others that are promising. Since musculoskeletal fitness is a multivariate construct, the studies should be designed so that a variety of tests are conducted.

Flexibility

Flexibility is the intrinsic property of body tissues, including muscle and connective tissue, which determines the range of motion achievable without injury at a joint or group of joints. Flexibility is also specific; one can have good range of motion at the hips but be limited in his or her shoulders. In adults, studies demonstrating associations between flexibility and health are mixed. Flexibility may enhance postural stability and balance among adults,⁷⁰ yet the association between flexibility and low-back pain is less conclusive.⁷⁷ Due to its role in sports performance, flexibility has also been studied in its relation to muscle cramps,⁹⁷ injury,⁹⁸ performance,^99,100 postural stability,¹⁰¹ and delayed muscle soreness.^102,103 However, data linking flexibility to more general health outcomes is scarce. Activities that involve stretching have been linked to health outcomes, such as yoga’s association with treating low-back pain,^104-106 but these activities also involve other components of fitness (eg, strength, muscular endurance) and therefore it is difficult to tease out the effect of flexibility.

Fitness Tests

Flexibility can be determined through laboratory tests, which measure the angle of joints or their range of motion with goniometers, or field tests. In the United States, the most popular of the field tests are the shoulder stretch, the trunk lift, and sit-and-reach. The reliability of these tests is high, though the validity ranges from low to moderate depending on the test.^{28,45,77,79,107}

Studies in Youth

In youth studies, physical activity programs often result in improved flexibility among youth.^108,109 However, there are differences based on age and sex. Girls were shown to be more flexible than boys, across all age groups.¹¹⁰ Welk and colleagues also found improvements in flexibility through the years for boys, though girls had lower sit-and-reach scores in high school when compared to lower grade levels.¹¹¹ The most recent California fitness test also found that more girls than boys meet the sit-and-reach standards and more youth overall meet the standard at upper grades.¹¹²

Though flexibility tests have been present in many youth fitness tests, it has proven difficult to link them to health outcomes due to joint specificity of the tests. One study found that back pain scores in teens improved as flexibility increased.¹⁰⁸ And in a small study of teens with back pain, those exposed to 8 weeks of rehabilitation increased performance with side bends, sit-and-reach, and sit-ups, and lessened their pain intensity.¹⁰⁹ Good flexibility, as measured through the sit-and-reach, was associated with decreased neck tension in boys, but not back pain.¹¹³ Burton et al found that flexibility was not predictive of back pain when tracking adolescents over 4 years.¹¹⁴ Finally, two studies showed an association between decreases in flexibility and higher skinfold measurements¹¹⁵ and BMI,²² but others found no association among these measures.^116,117

In youth, the main health outcomes that may be correlated with flexibility include prevention of low-back pain, prevention of musculoskeletal injury, and improved posture. At this time, however, there is little solid data to support a strong link between flexibility and health outcomes in children due to a lack of large-scale studies, an effect of the combination with other musculoskeletal variables, and a high degree of variability among studies.

National and School-Based Surveys

Due to the high specificity of flexibility, it is difficult to correlate a single flexibility test to a health outcome. There is the added difficulty of field tests and their possible inability to isolate the flexibility of particular joints. Due to these restrictions, the committee recommends further research on this fitness component and the use of flexibility tests only for educational purposes. A flexibility fitness test in a national survey of youth is not currently recommended; however, the inclusion of a measure of flexibility, such as the sit-and-reach test, in a school survey may be considered for educational purposes.

Future Studies

Studies in youth should investigate the relationship between specific flexibility items (eg, sit-and-reach and its modifications), either by themselves or in combination with musculoskeletal items, and potential health markers (eg, back pain, posture, injury prevention). Such studies should include stretching interventions specifically designed to produce changes in joint specific flexibility. Since flexibility is a multivariate construct, the studies should be designed so that a variety of tests are conducted. Researchers should investigate the development and validation of a general marker of musculoskeletal systemic flexibility and its relationship to health markers and risk factors.

Interpretation of Results

Developers of fitness test batteries should use age- and sex-specific cutoff scores to determine which individuals are at risk of poor fitness-related health outcomes. Two evaluation approaches have been often used in fitness evaluation: norm-referenced and criterion-referenced standards.¹¹⁸ In the norm-referenced evaluation approach, a test taker’s performance is compared with his/her peers, often by gender and age. For example, students’ scores might be categorized depending on whether they score below or equal or higher than the 85th percentile of their peers. When the interest is in performance, then the norm-referenced evaluation is appropriate. However, limitations of norm-referenced standards include time dependence, population dependence, discouragement of unfit youth, and favoring genetically gifted and/or punishing disadvantaged youth.

Many of these limitations are overcome with the use of a criterion-referenced evaluation approach, when a test taker’s performance is compared with an absolute criterion (eg, low HDL threshold) related to whether a child meets a minimal needed physical fitness level. Because the criterion is defined independently, it is not affected by changes in a population that occur over time or in level of fitness of the specific population. Cutoff scores should therefore be based on criterion values if available. In their absence, interim values may be used until necessary data are available to establish health-related cut-points. For example, population-based (percentile) values can be extrapolated from the adult population or from standards for other health-related fitness measures. The reader is referred to the final report for further details regarding the derivation and use of cut-points for each fitness category.

Summary and Future Research Needs

Collecting fitness data at both the national level and school/educational level should remain a public health priority. Well-designed research studies aimed at advancing understanding of the associations between fitness components and health in youth should continue to be undertaken. Researchers should ensure that the interventions studied are both specific and sufficient (ie, appropriate dosage and duration) to induce a change in fitness. In addition, studies should be designed so that the effect of potential confounders (eg, nutrition, physical activity, demographic variables, maturity status, etc) can be analyzed. Longitudinal studies should also be conducted to provide empirical evidence concerning how health markers related to fitness track from youth into adulthood. Collecting these data not only helps with setting and achieving fitness goals in our nation’s youth but also promotes it further as a priority for public health.

During 2012, the NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey measured fitness physical fitness in a nationally representative sample of youth for the first time in over 25 years, but unfortunately, biological and health markers such as these were not assessed in the same sample of children.¹¹⁹ The collection of fitness and health data in the same individuals would have enabled investigators to further confirm whether relationships between specific test items and health markers and risk factors exist. Considerable limitations thus remain in the available research to link specific fitness components and tests to health in youth. As additional research is needed and performed, we will advance our understanding of the health impact of physical fitness, answer remaining questions about fitness test items, and advance the national conversation about fitness in youth.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for compiling the extensive literature review, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies for convening the report committee, and to all the Institute of Medicine committee members for their work on the Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth report.

References

US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.

Pate

Oria

Pillsbury

, eds. Fitness Measures and Health Outcomes in Youth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012.

Malina

Bouchard

Bar-Or

. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004.

Malina

. Growth, maturation, and performance. In: Garrett

Kirkendall

, eds. Exercise and Sport Science. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:425-444.

Malina

. Regional body composition: age, sex, and ethnic variation. In: Roche

Heymsfield

Lohman

, eds. Human Body Composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996:217-256.

Malina

Bouchard

. Subcutaneous fat distribution during growth. In: Bouchard

Johnston

, eds. Fat Distribution During Growth and Later Health Outcomes. New York, NY: Alan R. Liss; 1988:63-84.

Freedman

Dietz

Srinivasan

Berenson

. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999;103:1175-1182.

May

Kuklina

Yoon

. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among US adolescents, 1999-2008. Pediatrics. 2012;129:1035-1041.

Carnethon

Gulati

Greenland

. Prevalence and cardiovascular disease correlates of low cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents and adults. JAMA. 2005;294:2981-2988.

10.

Lobelo

Pate

Dowda

Liese

Daniels

. Cardiorespiratory fitness and clustered cardiovascular disease risk in U.S. adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:352-359.

11.

Rizzo

Ruiz

Hurtig-Wennlof

Ortega

Sjostrom

. Relationship of physical activity, fitness, and fatness with clustered metabolic risk in children and adolescents: the European youth heart study. J Pediatr. 2007;150:388-394.

12.

Ford

Zhao

Mokdad

. Prevalence of pre-diabetes and its association with clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors and hyperinsulinemia among U.S. adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:342-347.

13.

Freedman

Serdula

Srinivasan

Berenson

. Relation of circumferences and skinfold thicknesses to lipid and insulin concentrations in children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:308-317.

14.

Freedman

Dietz

Srinivasan

Berenson

. Risk factors and adult body mass index among overweight children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 2009;123:750-757.

15.

Guo

Chumlea

Roche

. Predicting overweight and obesity in adulthood from body mass index values in childhood and adolescence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:653-658.

16.

Toprak

Chen

Srinivasan

Berenson

. Adiposity in childhood is related to C-reactive protein and adiponectin in young adulthood: from the Bogalusa Heart Study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19:185-190.

17.

Beunen

Malina

Ostyn

Renson

Simons

Van Gerven

. Fatness, growth and motor fitness of Belgian boys 12 through 20 years of age. Hum Biol. 1983;55:599-613.

18.

Malina

. Anthropometry. In: Maud

Foster

, eds. Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1995:205-219.

19.

Dumith

Van Dusen

Kohl

. Physical fitness measures among children and adolescents: are they all necessary? J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012;52:181-189.

20.

Gutin

Yin

Humphries

Barbeau

. Relations of moderate and vigorous physical activity to fitness and fatness in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:746-750.

21.

Nassis

Psarra

Sidossis

. Central and total adiposity are lower in overweight and obese children with high cardiorespiratory fitness. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:137-141.

22.

Kim

Must

Fitzmaurice

. Relationship of physical fitness to prevalence and incidence of overweight among schoolchildren. Obes Res. 2005;13:1246-1254.

23.

Ackland

Lohman

Sundgot-Borgen

. Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission. Sports Med. 2012;42:227-249.

24.

Moreno

Blay

Rodriguez

. Screening performances of the International Obesity Task Force body mass index cut-off values in adolescents. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006;25:403-408.

25.

Goran

Allison

Poehlman

. Issues relating to normalization of body fat content in men and women. Int J Obes. 1995;19:638-643.

26.

Mei

Grummer-Strawn

Pietrobelli

Goulding

Goran

Dietz

. Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:978-985.

27.

Boileau

Lohman

Slaughter

Ball

Going

Hendrix

. Hydration of the fat-free body in children during maturation. Hum Biol. 1984;56:651-666.

28.

Safrit

. The validity and reliability of fitness tests for children: a review. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1990;2:9-28.

29.

Gutin

Litaker

Islam

Manos

Smith

Treiber

. Body-composition measurement in 9-11-y-old children by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, skinfold-thickness measurements, and bioimpedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63:287-292.

30.

Despres

Nadeau

Tremblay

. Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes. 1989;38:304-309.

31.

Saltin

. Oxygen transport by the circulatory system during exercise in man. In: Keul

, ed. Limiting Factors of Physical Performance. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 1973:235-252.

32.

Arraiz

Wigle

Mao

. Risk assessment of physical activity and physical fitness in the Canada Health Survey mortality follow-up study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:419-428.

33.

Blair

Kohl

Paffenbarger

Clark

Cooper

Gibbons

. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262:2395-2401.

34.

Sandvik

Erikssen

Thaulow

Erikssen

Mundal

Rodahl

. Physical fitness as a predictor of mortality among healthy, middle-aged Norwegian men. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:533-537.

35.

Colberg

Sigal

Fernhall

. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement executive summary. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2692-2696.

36.

Blair

Goodyear

Gibbons

Cooper

. Physical fitness and incidence of hypertension in healthy normotensive men and women. JAMA. 1984;252:487-490.

37.

Oliveria

Kohl

Trichopoulos

Blair

. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and prostate cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28:97-104.

38.

Blair

Kohl

Barlow

. Physical activity, physical fitness, and all-cause mortality in women: do women need to be active? J Am Coll Nutr. 1993;12:368-371.

39.

Blair

Kohl

Barlow

Paffenbarger

Gibbons

Macera

. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. JAMA. 1995;273:1093-1098.

40.

Wahlund

. Determination of physical working capacity: physiological and clinical study with special reference to standardization of cardiopulmonday, functional tests. Acta Med Scand. 1948;132(suppl 215).

41.

Watkins

Ewing

. Physical working capacity and mile run performance in adolescent boys. Br J Sports Med. 1983;17:188-192.

42.

Watson

O’Donovan

. The physical working capacity of male adolescents in Ireland. Irish J Med Sci. 1976;145:383-391.

43.

Léger

Mercier

Gadoury

Lambert

. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6:93-101.

44.

Artero

Espana-Romero

Castro-Pinero

. Reliability of field-based fitness tests in youth. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32:159-169.

45.

Freedson

Cureton

Heath

. Status of field-based fitness testing in children and youth. Prev Med. 2000;31(2):S77-S85.

46.

Twisk

Kemper

van Mechelen

. Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1455-1461.

47.

Janz

Dawson

Mahoney

. Increases in physical fitness during childhood improve cardiovascular health during adolescence: the Muscatine Study. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23(suppl 1):S15-S21.

48.

Ortega

Labayen

Ruiz

. Improvements in fitness reduce the risk of becoming overweight across puberty. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1891-1897.

49.

Byrd-Williams

Shaibi

Sun

. Cardiorespiratory fitness predicts changes in adiposity in overweight Hispanic boys. Obesity. 2008;16:1072-1077.

50.

Eisenmann

Wickel

Welk

Blair

. Relationship between adolescent fitness and fatness and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adulthood: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS). Am Heart J. 2005;149:46-53.

51.

Johnson

Figueroa-Colon

Herd

. Aerobic fitness, not energy expenditure, influences subsequent increase in adiposity in black and white children. Pediatrics. 2000;106(4):E50.

52.

Walther

Gaede

Adams

. Effect of increased exercise in school children on physical fitness and endothelial progenitor cells: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2009;120:2251-2259.

53.

Ben Ounis

Elloumi

Makni

. Exercise improves the ApoB/ApoA-I ratio, a marker of the metabolic syndrome in obese children. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:1679-1685.

54.

Wong

Chia

Tsou

. Effects of a 12-week exercise training programme on aerobic fitness, body composition, blood lipids and C-reactive protein in adolescents with obesity. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37:286-293.

55.

Barbeau

Litaker

Woods

. Hemostatic and inflammatory markers in obese youths: effects of exercise and adiposity. J Pediatr. 2002;141:415-420.

56.

Carrel

Clark

Peterson

Nemeth

Sullivan

Allen

. Improvement of fitness, body composition, and insulin sensitivity in overweight children in a school-based exercise program: a randomized, controlled study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:963-968.

57.

Davis

Dotson

Curtis

. A simplified technique for the determination of per cent body fat in adult males. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1985;25:255-261.

58.

Farpour-Lambert

Aggoun

Marchand

Martin

Herrmann

Beghetti

. Physical activity reduces systemic blood pressure and improves early markers of atherosclerosis in pre-pubertal obese children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2396-2406.

59.

Kelly

Wetzsteon

Kaiser

Steinberger

Bank

Dengel

. Inflammation, insulin, and endothelial function in overweight children and adolescents: the role of exercise. J Pediatr. 2004;145:731-736.

60.

Chang

Liu

Zhao

. Effect of supervised exercise intervention on metabolic risk factors and physical fitness in Chinese obese children in early puberty. Obes Rev. 2008;9(suppl 1):135-141.

61.

Reed

Warburton

Macdonald

Naylor

McKay

. Action Schools! BC: a school-based physical activity intervention designed to decrease cardiovascular disease risk factors in children. Prev Med. 2008;46:525-531.

62.

Puder

Marques-Vidal

Schindler

. Effect of multidimensional lifestyle intervention on fitness and adiposity in predominantly migrant preschool children (Ballabeina): cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d6195.

63.

Martins

Santos

Gaya

Twisk

Ribeiro

Mota

. Cardiorespiratory fitness predicts later body mass index, but not other cardiovascular risk factors from childhood to adolescence. Am J Hum Biol. 2009;21:121-123.

64.

Murphy

Ni Dhuinn

Browne

Orathaille

. Physical activity for bone health in inactive teenage girls: is a supervised, teacher-led program or self-led program best? J Adolesc Health. 2006;39:508-514.

65.

Kell

Bell

Quinney

. Musculoskeletal fitness, health outcomes and quality of life. Sports Med. 2001;31:863-873.

66.

Knuttgen

Kraemer

. Terminology and measurement in exercise performance. J Strength Cond Res. 1987;1:1-10.

67.

Plowman

. Physical activity, physical fitness, and low back pain. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1992;20:221-242.

68.

Bohannon

. Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2008;31:3-10.

69.

Cooper

Kuh

Cooper

. Objective measures of physical capability and subsequent health: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011;40:14-23.

70.

Garber

Blissmer

Deschenes

. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334-1359.

71.

Warburton

Gledhill

Quinney

. Musculoskeletal fitness and health. Can J Appl Physiol. 2001;26:217-237.

72.

Williams

Haskell

Ades

. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation. 2007;116:572-584.

73.

Reid

Fielding

. Skeletal muscle power: a critical determinant of physical functioning in older adults. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012;40:4-12.

74.

AAHPERD (American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance). Health Related Physical Fitness Test: Technical Manual. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 1984.

75.

Jackson

. The evolution and validity of health-related fitness. Quest. 2006;58:160-175.

76.

Morrow

Zhu

Franks

Meredith

Spain

. 1958-2008: 50 years of youth fitness tests in the United States. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80:1-11.

77.

Plowman

. Muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility assessments. In: Welk

Meredith

, eds. Fitnessgram/Activitygram Reference Guide. Dallas, TX: Cooper Institute; 2008:11.11-11.40.

78.

Welk

Blair

. Health benefits of physical activity and fitness in children. In: Welk

Meredith

, eds. Fitnessgram/Activitygram Reference Guide. Dallas, TX: Cooper Institute; 2008. http://www.cooperinstitute.org/vault/2440/web/files/662.pdf. Accessed June 13, 2012.

79.

Castro-Pinero

Artero

Espana-Romero

. Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:934-943.

80.

Ortega

Ruiz

Castillo

Sjostrom

. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32:1-11.

81.

Ruiz

Castro-Pinero

Artero

. Predictive validity of health-related fitness in youth: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:909-923.

82.

Brunet

Chaput

Tremblay

. The association between low physical fitness and high body mass index or waist circumference is increasing with age in children: the “Quebec en Forme” project. Int J Obes. 2007;31:637-643.

83.

Garcia-Artero

Ortega

Ruiz

. Lipid and metabolic profiles in adolescents are affected more by physical fitness than physical activity (AVENA study). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60:581-588.

84.

Ruiz

Ortega

Warnberg

. Inflammatory proteins and muscle strength in adolescents: the Avena study. Arch Pediat Adolesc Med. 2008;162:462-468.

85.

Morris

Naughton

Gibbs

Carlson

Wark

. Prospective ten-month exercise intervention in premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:1453-1462.

86.

Heinonen

Sievanen

Kannus

Oja

Pasanen

Vuori

. High-impact exercise and bones of growing girls: a 9-month controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:1010-1017.

87.

Kontulainen

Kannus

Pasanen

. Does previous participation in high-impact training result in residual bone gain in growing girls? One year follow-up of a 9-month jumping intervention. Int J Sports Med. 2002;23:575-581.

88.

Witzke

Snow

. Effects of plyometric jump training on bone mass in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1051-1057.

89.

Nichols

Sanborn

Love

. Resistance training and bone mineral density in adolescent females. J Pediatr. 2001;139:494-500.

90.

Van Der Heijden

Wang

Chu

. Strength exercise improves muscle mass and hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1973-1980.

91.

Shaibi

Cruz

Ball

. Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescent males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1208-1215.

92.

Naylor

Watts

Sharpe

. Resistance training and diastolic myocardial tissue velocities in obese children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:2027-2032.

93.

Holm

Fredriksen

Fosdahl

Vollestad

. A normative sample of isotonic and isokinetic muscle strength measurements in children 7 to 12 years of age. Acta Paedtr. 2008;97:602-607.

94.

Milliken

Faigenbaum

Loud

Westcott

. Correlates of upper and lower body muscular strength in children. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22:1339-1346.

95.

Benefice

Fouere

Malina

. Early nutritional history and motor performance of Senegalese children, 4-6 years of age. Ann Hum Biol. 1999;26:443-455.

96.

Ruiz

Ortega

Gutierrez

Sjostrom

Castillo

. Health-related fitness assessment in childhood and adolescence: a European approach based on the AVENA, EYHS and HELENA studies. J Public Health. 2006;14:269-277.

97.

De Vries

. Quantitative electromyographic investigation of the spasm theory of muscle pain. Am J Phys Med. 1966;45:119-134.

98.

McHugh

Cosgrave

. To stretch or not to stretch: the role of stretching in injury prevention and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20:169-181.

99.

Kay

Blazevich

. Effect of acute static stretch on maximal muscle performance: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:154-164.

100.

McHugh

Nesse

. Effect of stretching on strength loss and pain after eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:566-573.

101.

Nelson

Kokkonen

Arnall

. Acute stretching increases postural stability in nonbalance trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26:3095-3100.

102.

Henschke

Lin

. Stretching before or after exercise does not reduce delayed-onset muscle soreness. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:1249-1250.

103.

Herbert

de Noronha

Kamper

. Stretching to prevent or reduce muscle soreness after exercise. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD004577.

104.

Sherman

Cherkin

Erro

Miglioretti

Deyo

. Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:849-856.

105.

Sherman

Cherkin

Wellman

. A randomized trial comparing yoga, stretching, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:2019-2026.

106.

Tilbrook

Cox

Hewitt

. Yoga for chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:569-578.

107.

Espana-Romero

Artero

Jimenez-Pavon

. Assessing health-related fitness tests in the school setting: reliability, feasibility and safety; the ALPHA Study. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31:490-497.

108.

Ahlqwist

Hagman

Kjellby-Wendt

Beckung

. Physical therapy treatment of back complaints on children and adolescents. Spine. 2008;33:E721-E727.

109.

Jones

Stratton

Reilly

Unnithan

. The efficacy of exercise as an intervention to treat recurrent nonspecific low back pain in adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007;19:349-359.

110.

Tremblay

Shields

Laviolette

Craig

Janssen

Connor Gorber

. Fitness of Canadian children and youth: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2010;21(1):7-20.

111.

Welk

Meredith

Ihmels

Seeger

. Distribution of health-related physical fitness in Texas youth: a demographic and geographic analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(suppl 3):S6-S15.

112.

California Department of Education. PFT results. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/pf/pftresults.asp. Accessed June 18, 2012.

113.

Mikkelsson

Nupponen

Kaprio

Kautiainen

Mikkelsson

Kujala

. Adolescent flexibility, endurance strength, and physical activity as predictors of adult tension neck, low back pain, and knee injury: a 25 year follow up study. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:107-113.

114.

Burton

Clarke

McClune

Tillotson

. The natural history of low back pain in adolescents. Spine. 1996;21:2323-2328.

115.

Matton

Thomis

Wijndaele

. Tracking of physical fitness and physical activity from youth to adulthood in females. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1114-1120.

116.

Aires

Mendonca

Silva

. A 3-year longitudinal analysis of changes in body mass index. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31:133-137.

117.

Chen

Wall

Kennedy

Unnithan

Yeh

. Predictors of increased body mass index in Chinese children. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007;22:138-144.

118.

Safrit

Wood

. Criterion-referenced measurement: validity. In: Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 1st ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1989.

119.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New survey measures the fitness of America’s youth. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/newsletter/2013_January/a3.htm. Accessed October 6, 2013.

Current Evidence for the Impact of Physical Fitness on Health Outcomes in Youth

Abstract

Keywords

Methodology

Findings From Individual Fitness Components

Body Composition

Body Composition as a Fitness Component

Body Composition as a Modifier of Fitness

Measures of Body Composition

National Youth Survey

School-Based Survey

Future Studies

Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Fitness Tests

Studies in Youth

National Youth Survey

School-Based Survey

Future Studies

Musculoskeletal Fitness

Fitness Tests

Studies in Youth

National Youth Survey

School-Based Survey

Future Studies

Flexibility

Fitness Tests

Studies in Youth

National and School-Based Surveys

Future Studies

Interpretation of Results

Summary and Future Research Needs

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References