Salicylic Acid and Gemma-Aminobutyric Acid Mediated Regulation of Growth,Metabolites,Antioxidant Defense System and Nutrient Uptake in Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) Under Arsenic Stress

Abstract

Background

Arsenic (As) is a highly toxic and carcinogenic pollutant commonly found in soil and water, posing significant risks to human health and plant growth.

Objective

The objectives of this study to evaluate morphological, biochemical, and physiological markers, as well as ion homeostasis, to alleviate the toxic effects of As in sunflowers through the exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and their combination.

Methods

A pot experiment was conducted using two sunflower genotypes, FH-779 and FH-773, subjected to As stress (60 mg kg⁻¹) to evaluate the effects of SA at 100 mg L⁻¹, GABA at 200 mg L⁻¹, and their combination on growth and related physiological and biochemical attributes under As stress.

Results

The study revealed that As toxicity had a detrimental effect on various growth parameters, chlorophyll pigments, relative water content, total proteins, and nutrient uptake in sunflower plants. It also led to increased oxidative stress, as indicated by higher levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), along with As accumulation in the roots and leaves. However, the application of SA and GABA protected against As-induced damage by enhancing the enzymatic antioxidant defense system. This was achieved through the activation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and peroxidase (POD) activities, as well as an increase in osmolytes. They also improved nutrient acquisition and plant growth under As toxicity.

Conclusions

We investigated the regulatory roles of SA and GABA in mitigating arsenic-induced phytotoxic effects on sunflower. Our results revealed a significant interaction between SA and GABA in regulating growth, photosynthesis, metabolites, antioxidant defense systems, and nutrient uptake in sunflower under As stress. These findings provide valuable insights into plant defense mechanisms and strategies to enhance stress tolerance in contaminated environments. In the future, SA and GABA could be valuable tools for managing stress in other important crops facing abiotic stress conditions.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

antioxidants malondialdehyde photosynthetic pigment oxidative stress osmolytes

Highlights

• SA and GABA were used to enhance arsenic (As) tolerance in sunflower crops.

• SA and GABA increased growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake in As-stressed plants.

• SA and GABA improved the antioxidant defense system and reduced ROS in plants under As stress.

• SA and GABA influenced metabolic pathways and essential plant metabolites under As stress.

Novelty Statement

This study investigates the use of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and salicylic acid together to alleviate the effects of arsenic stress on sunflowers. This innovative approach reveals the complex mechanisms involved in the regulation mediated by SA and GABA, providing insights into their significant impact on growth, metabolite composition, and nutrient absorption in sunflower crops under challenging arsenic conditions. The specific functions of GABA and SA together in regulating plant defense responses to abiotic stresses, such as arsenic toxicity, are not well understood and require further research.

Introduction

The rising pollution levels in the environment are disrupting ecosystem biodiversity and threatening ecological balance.¹ Environmental stress factors negatively impacts plant growth, development, and productivity.^2,3 Plants use defense mechanisms like antioxidant enzyme activity, hormonal signaling, and gene expression changes to cope with stress.^4,5 However, prolonged stress can result in higher plant mortality.⁶

Arsenic, a naturally occurring metalloid found in the earth’s crust, is widely distributed in the environment, from soil to groundwater.⁷ The main sources of As in the environment are sulfide minerals like As-rich pyrite (FeS₂) and arsenopyrite (FeAsS).⁸ Arsenic enters farming systems through natural geochemical processes,⁹ As-containing pesticides, mining operations, irrigation with As-contaminated groundwater, and fertilization with municipal solid waste.¹⁰ It significantly impacts plant growth and development by disrupting biochemical processes and altering nutrient uptake.¹¹ Arsenic exposures can lead to health issues such as cancer, high blood pressure, arsenosis, and diabetes in humans.¹² In plants, As disrupts physiological, biochemical, and metabolic pathways, impairs nutrient absorption, negatively affects plant growth and the photosynthetic apparatus, disrupts plant water status, and interacts with enzyme functional groups.^11,13 Additionally, As toxicity can result in oxidative damage to essential macromolecules such as lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and DNA, ultimately leading to cell death.^12,14 Plant cells have efficient enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activity to counteract oxidative stress.¹⁵ Other stress markers, such as H₂O₂ levels, indicate the degree of damage and its prevention.

Arsenic compounds, such as arsenate (As⁵⁺) and arsenite (As³⁺), are highly toxic to humans and other organisms.^16,17 Inorganic As species are more toxic than organic ones.¹⁸ Arsenite binds to biological ligands with sulfur groups, leading to an increase in ROS and suppression of the antioxidant defense system, causing oxidative injury to cells.¹⁹ Plants can absorb higher concentrations of As⁵⁺ than As³⁺, which can accumulate in plant tissue and be consumed by animals and humans.¹¹ Arsenate is the main form of As in aerobic soils and is similar to phosphate. Plants can absorb As⁵⁺ instead of phosphate, but they are unable to utilize it for their regular metabolic processes, resulting in adverse effects on their growth and development.¹⁶ Arsenite is often found in anaerobic environments, where it can undergo various chemical reactions depending on ecological conditions.²⁰ In anaerobic environments, certain bacteria can convert As³⁺ to more toxic methylated As compounds, which can accumulate in aquatic organisms and humans.^21,22 Arsenic in plants can disrupt their metabolism and growth, leading to iron deficiency.¹³ Iron deficiency can reduce chlorophyll production, photosynthesis, and other physiological processes in plants.¹³

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is a popular crop known for its edible seeds and oil,²³ which is rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, including 19.81% oleic and 64.35% linoleic fatty acids. It also contains 33.85% proteins, 65.42% lipids, and 18% mineral elements.²⁴ Sunflowers can accumulate up to 3000 mg/kg of As in their shoots and roots, making them effective for phytoremediation of As-contaminated soils.^25,26 This natural ability to remove contaminated elements from the soil makes sunflowers an environmentally friendly and cost-effective approach for phytoremediation of As-contaminated soils.²⁷ Sustainable methods are needed to reduce As toxicity and control its transfer from the environment to sunflower plants for food safety. ²⁸

Salicylic acid (SA) is a beneficial compound for plant growth, enhancing resilience and productivity under stressful environmental conditions. ²⁹ It also acts as a signal molecule in plant defense responses to various stresses.³⁰ Salicylic acid regulating photosynthesis and serving as a precursor for growth regulators and nitrogen metabolism.³¹ SA also improves antioxidant defense, membrane stability, and osmoprotectants.³² Additionally, SA detoxifies ROS by inducing gene expression in ROS scavenging and antioxidant defense mechanisms.^33,34

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a 4-carbon amino acid present in animals, plants, and microorganisms.^35,36 Research suggests that GABA plays a vital role in plant growth and development under abiotic stresses.³⁷ It acts as a signaling molecule to improve plant stress tolerance and defense responses.³⁸ GABA has been found to alleviate the adverse effects of As on plants by regulating gene expression and antioxidant activity.^39,40 A recent study has found that GABA has the ability to enhance the detoxification and antioxidant functions in white clover.⁴¹ Furthermore, nano materials of these plant growth regulators have the ability to regulate phytohormone levels, thereby altering plant growth and defensive mechanisms.^3,42,43 However, research regarding the effects of SA and GABA supplementation on plant growth and As toxicity has been rare to date. Arsenic toxicity has emerged as a significant contaminant and threat to agriculture and environmental sustainability around the globe. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the changes in plant metabolism and physiological indices in response to As contamination. Sunflower, an important oilseed crop, has the ability to tolerate various environmental conditions but is susceptible to damage from As toxicity. The underlying regulatory mechanisms that enable sunflower to tolerate As toxicity are not fully understood. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by examining the interactive roles of GABA and SA, two essential signaling molecules in plant defense responses. Therefore, the objective of present study to evaluate the morphological, physiological, biochemical markers and ion homeostasis for alleviating As toxicity in sunflower plants through exogenous application of SA and GABA. These findings may provide insights into how GABA and SA influence sunflowers under As toxicity.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Two sunflower genotypes, FH-779 and FH-773, were selected for this study. The seeds were collected from AARI Faisalabad, Pakistan, and the experiment was conducted at the Botanica Garden of Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan. The seeds of both genotypes were disinfected with sodium hypochlorite (.1%) and washed thoroughly many times with distilled water and then planted in pots containing 10 kg of soil, with ten seeds per pot, thinned to 3 seedlings per pot. The pots were placed in a wire-house with an average day/night temperature of 18 ± 2/7 ± 2°C, an average relative humidity of 62.0 to 65.1%, and an average day length of 10.30 to 11 hours. The physical and chemical characteristics of the soil were determined using the method of Jackson⁴⁴ before sowing the seeds (see Table 1 for details). Sodium arsenate salt (Na₂HAsO₄•7H₂O) was used as the source of arsenic (As⁵⁺), and 60 mg As⁵⁺ kg⁻¹ soil was mixed into the soil to spike the loamy dry soil in the pots, as described by Liu et al.⁴⁵ An equal quantity of sodium (Na⁺) in the form of sodium chloride salt was added to the control plants to account for the variances from the Na₂HAsO₄·7H₂O. The plants were watered with a half-strength nutrient solution.⁴⁶ At the flowering stage, the plants were sprayed with SA (100 mg/L), GABA (200 mg/L), and their combination with .1% Tween-20. An average volume of 200 mL of each spray was applied at 9 am until each plant was completely drenched, while the control plants were also treated with distilled H₂O in the same volume. After 3 weeks of treatment, the plants were harvested at the flowering stage, and different growth, physio-chemical attributes, and As accumulation in particular genotypes were examined.

Table 1.

Physio-Chemical Properties of Soil Used for Experiment.

Soil Property	Values
Soil texture	Clay loam
Clay (%)	56
Sand (%)	32
Slit (%)	14
Saturation percentage (%)	32
Moisture percentage (%)	19
Soil pH	7.8
ECe (dS m⁻¹)	2.5
Organic matter (%)	0.7
Nitrogen (%)	4.8
Available phosphorus (mg kg⁻¹ dry soil)	5.8
Potassium (mg kg⁻¹ dry soil)	197.1
Calcium (mg kg⁻¹ dry soil)	103
Total arsenic (μg g⁻¹ dry soil)	0.3

Growth Attributes

The sunflower plants were removed from the pots, and the soil was gently shaken off the roots, followed by washing with distilled water and drying with a muslin cloth. The plants were then separated into root and shoot portions, and their height and root length were measured. The fresh weights of the roots and shoots were recorded, and then they were placed in an oven at 80°C until a constant weight was achieved to determine the dry weight.

Chlorophyll Pigments

The Lichtenthaler⁴⁷ procedure was employed to measure the photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids) in sunflower leaves (1987) . A .25 g fresh leaf sample was ground in 80% acetone and then centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 minutes. Chlorophyll levels were determined by measuring absorbance at 480, 663, and 645 nm, with acetone serving as a blank, using a spectrophotometer.

Measurement of Relative Water Content

Relative water content (RWC) was measured following the protocol of González and González-Vilar.⁴⁸ The fresh weight (FW) of the leaves was recorded, and then the leaves were floated in distilled water to determine the turgid weight (TW). Subsequently, the leaves were dried in an oven at 70°C to obtain the dry weight (DW). The RWC was calculated using the formula

RWC (%) = [\frac{(FW) - (DW)}{(TW) - (DW)}] \times 100

where FW, fresh weight; DW, dry weight; TW, turgid weight

Determination of H₂O₂ and MDA Contents

Using the protocol of Velikova et al⁴⁹ the content of H₂O₂ in fresh leaf biomass was measured (2000) . Heath and Packer method was used to assess the MDA level (1968),⁵⁰ with the optical density of the mixture measured at 532 and 600 nm. Malondialdehyde contents were determined using an absorption coefficient of 155 000 nmol mol¹.

Malondialdehyde (nmol / mL) = [\frac{(532 - 600)}{155000}] \times 10^{6}

Estimation of Ascorbic Acid

A .5 g leaf sample was ground in a 10 mL solution of 6% trichloroacetic acid. The homogenate was filtered, and 2 mL of the filtrate was mixed with 1 mL of 2% 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and a drop of 10% thiourea in ethanol. The samples were then heated in a water bath at 95°C for 30 minutes, cooled in an ice bath, and 2.5 mL of 80% H₂SO₄ was added. The optical density (OD) of the samples was measured at 530 nm.⁵¹

Total Soluble Protein Determination

The total soluble protein (TSP) of fresh leaf tissue (.5 g) was measured by homogenizing samples in 10 mL of 50 mM KP buffer (pH 7.5) using the protocol of Bradford.⁵² The optical density (OD) of the supernatant was measured at 595 nm using a spectrophotometer. Bovine serum albumin was used as the standard protein.

Anthocyanin Content Measurement

The leaf tissue was homogenized in methanol with 1% HCl and then centrifuged to obtain the supernatant. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 530 nm and 657 nm using the method described by Hodges and Nozzolillo.⁵³ The content of anthocyanin was calculated using the following formula

A n t h o c y a n i n = A 530 - 0.25 \times A 657

Flavonoids Content Estimation

Zhishen et al⁵⁴ method was used to determine the flavonoid content in the leaf sample. A 0.5 g sample was homogenized in 10 mL of 80% aqueous ethanol. The resulting solution was mixed with 300 μL of NaNO₂ and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 5 minutes. Afterward, 300 μL of AlCl₃ and 2 mL of 1M NaOH were added. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 510 nm with the use of a spectrophotometer.

Phenolic Contents Measurement

The total phenolic content was determined using the method described by (1985).⁵⁵ Firstly, a .25 g fresh leaf sample was ground in 10 mL of 80% acetone and then centrifuged at 10 000 g for 10 minutes. The resulting supernatant was used for the reaction solution, which included 1 mL of Folin and Ciocalteau’s phenol reagent, 2 mL of distilled water, and 5 mL of 20% Na₂CO₃. The optical density (OD) of the reaction solution was measured at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer.

Cytosolutes Determination

Using the method of Bates et al⁵⁶ the free proline was estimated from leaf samples (1973). First, .25 g of fresh leaf material was ground in 80% ethanol. The resulting extract was then mixed with the anthrone reagent to determine the total amount of soluble sugars present using the method of Yemm and Willis.⁵⁷ The total free amino acids present in the .25 g leaf samples were analyzed by grinding them in KP buffer (pH 7.8) and following the procedure given by Hamilton and Van Slyke.⁵⁸

Enzymatic Antioxidants Assay

The antioxidant activity in 0.5 g fresh leaf samples was determined by homogenizing them in 10 mL of pre-chilled 50 mM tris buffer (pH 7.5). After that, centrifuge the mixture at 10 000 g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The resulting supernatant were used to estimate the activity of the following antioxidants: Using the method of Zhang et al the SOD activity was measured (2008),⁵⁹ recording the capacity of each unit to inhibit 50% photochemical reduction of nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT). Using the method of Upadhyaya et al.⁶⁰ POD activity was measured using the guaiacol method . The absorbance of the solution was noted at 470 nm on a spectrophotometer for POD activity. The Aebi⁶¹ method was used to measure the CAT activity (1947) . The absorbance values were taken at 240 nm at 60-second intervals using a UV spectrophotometer (UV-2600).

Determination of Arsenate Reductase (AR) Activity

Using the method of Ellis et al⁶² the AR activity was determined with some modifications (2006) . A 1 g dry sample of leaves and roots was ground in 5 mL of 50 mM MOPS (3-(N-Morpholino) propane sulfonic acid) buffer, 50 mM MES (2-(N-morpholino) ethane sulfonic acid) having pH 6.5, glycerol (5%), NaCl (300 mM), PMSF (1 mM) in CH₃OH (pH 7.5), 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (βME), and PVP (3.3%). The mixture was then centrifuged at 8000 r/min at 4°C for 15 minutes. The resulting mixture contained .5 mL supernatant, 2 mL assay buffer (50 mM-MOPS and MES) with pH 6.5, BSA (0.1 mg/mL), 300 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM GSH, and 50 nM GR. To this mixture, .5 mL Na₃AsO₄ (10 mM), .8 mL NADPH (250 μM), and .5 mL DTT (10 mM) were added. The enzyme activity was measured for 3 minutes at 345 nm.

Determination of Total As (V), As (III), and Elemental Uptake in Root and Leaf of Plants

The roots and leaves (1g) were ground and then digested in glass test tubes using an acid digestion procedure that involved 65% nitric acid (4 mL), 30% hydrogen peroxide (1 mL), and 45% hydrogen fluoride (3 mL). Once digested, the samples were diluted with dH₂O₂ up to 50 mL, filtered, and used to measure the levels of Fe, Zn, Mg, and ca The analysis was performed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Z-2000, Tokyo, Japan) with a fuel-rich air-acetylene flame, a 10 cm burner head, .2-.7 nm slit width, and a 10-mA lamp current. The contents of As, Mg, Ca, Zn, and Fe were measured at 193.7, 285.2, 422.7, 213.9, and 248.3 nm, respectively. Using the method of Abdel-Lateef et al⁶³ arsenite content was determined with modified procedure (2013).

Statistical Analysis

The experiment followed a completely randomized design (CRD) with 3 replications for each treatment. Analysis of variance was conducted using Statistix software (Version 8.0). Differences among treatment means were compared using the Tukey test at P ≤ .05. Pearson correlation coefficients and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed using Rstudio.

Results

Growth-Related Traits

The results demonstrate that exposure to As toxicity at a level of 60 mg kg⁻¹ soil significantly decreased various growth parameters in FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes. This included a decline in shoot length (21.31% and 31.66%), root length (25.66% and 56.59%), shoot fresh weight (30.95% and 38.76%), shoot dry weight (13.24% and 32.99%), root fresh weight (27.21% and 13.79%), and root dry weight (27.08% and 40.16%). However, the application of SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA at concentrations of 100, 200, and 100 + 200 mg L⁻¹ promoted growth in FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes under As toxicity, respectively. This resulted in improved shoot length (22.52%–46.87% and 21.60%–42.37%), root length (32.82%–52.15% and 26.99%–49.04%), shoot fresh weight (8.46%–19.54% and 14.81%–23.51%), shoot dry weight (12.28%–32.66% and 18.96%–40.47%), root fresh weight (31.94%–53.91% and 8.83%–31.61%), and root dry weight (36.68%–56.12% and 18.47%–35.91%) in FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes relative to control plants under As toxicity. Similar growth improvement was observed in FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes under normal conditions with the exogenous application of SA, GABA, and their combination at the flowering stage. Additionally, the combined SA + GABA significantly increased growth in both FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes as shown in Table 2 and Table S1.

Table 2.

Effect of Salicylic Acid (SA) and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) on Growth Characteristics in Two Sunflower Genotypes at the Flowering Stage Under Arsenic Stress.

Treatments	Shoot Length (cm)	Root Length (cm)	Shoot Fresh Weight (g)	Shoot dry Weight (g)	Root Fresh Weight (g)	Root dry Weight (g)
FH-779
NS	81.33 ± 1.25 cd	23.77 ± .94a-d	73.00 ± 2.78b-d	13.37 ± 1.01c-d	13.65 ± .48d-f	7.50 ± .53a-d
SA (100 mg/L)	87.60 ± 1.39a-c	27.78 ± .71ab	78.27 ± .74a-c	15.93 ± .90ab	16.53 ± 1.37b-d	8.44 ± .60ab
GABA (200 mg/L)	91.67 ± 1.77ab	25.28 ± 1.59a-c	81.60 ± 1.29ab	16.61 ± .70ab	17.41 ± 1.10ab	9.29 ± .46a
SA + GABA	95.40 ± 1.17a	29.56 ± .93a	88.81 ± 1.56a	19.33 ± .88a	19.49 ± .77a	9.99 ± .52a
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	64.00 ± 1.44ef	17.67 ± 1.25de	50.40 ± 1.29g-j	11.60 ± .68c-f	9.93 ± .32f	5.47 ± .61c-e
SA + As⁵⁺	83.73 ± 3.08b-d	23.47 ± 1.55b-d	56.78 ± 2.55f-h	13.78 ± 1.30c-d	13.86 ± 1.02b-f	7.73 ± .67a-d
GABA + As⁵⁺	78.41 ± 1.84d	24.45 ± 1.98a-c	54.67 ± .98f-i	13.02 ± .45b-e	13.11 ± .84b-f	7.48 ± .75a-d
SA + GABA +As⁵⁺	94.00 ± 1.55a	26.88 ± 1.42a-c	60.25 ± 1.22e-g	15.38 ± 1.30a-c	15.29 ± 1.09a-e	8.54 ± .45ab
FH-773
NS	66.67 ± 1.43e	20.65 ± .71 cd	64.99 ± 1.45d-f	9.07 ± .44e-h	12.19 ± .53d-f	7.28 ± .56a-d
SA (100 mg/L)	76.27 ± 1.64d	21.12 ± 1.35 cd	68.00 ± 2.37c-e	10.54 ± .56d-g	15.44 ± .68a-e	7.57 ± .24a-d
GABA (200 mg/L)	78.47 ± 2.81 cd	21.69 ± 2.02b-d	73.87 ± 2.79b-d	10.85 ± .59d-g	15.74 ± .82a-e	7.97 ± .61a-c
SA + GABA	82.53 ± 1.85b-d	24.22 ± .35a-c	77.93 ± .75bc	11.57 ± .72c-f	16.67 ± .91a-c	8.29 ± .55ab
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	45.56 ± 2.32 g	8.96 ± .24f	39.80 ± 2.19j	6.08 ± .79h	10.51 ± .60f	4.36 ± .52e
SA + As⁵⁺	60.89 ± .85ef	11.96 ± .89ef	47.14 ± 2.31h-j	7.55 ± .58f-h	12.79 ± .67c-f	5.40 ± .37c-e
GABA + As⁵⁺	55.40 ± .90f	11.38 ± .82ef	45.69 ± 3.69ij	7.23 ± .51gh	11.44 ± .81ef	5.16 ± .19de
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	64.87 ± .85e	13.36 ± .83ef	49.15 ± 2.37h-j	8.54 ± .37f-h	13.84 ± .74b-f	5.92 ± .39b-e

A three-way ANOVA was performed, and differences among means were tested using Tukey’s HSD (P < .05). Each column represents the mean values of 3 replicates followed by standard errors. Different lowercase letters on the mean values indicate a significant difference among the treatments. Abbreviations: NS = no spray; SA = salicylic acid; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; As = arsenic.

Photosynthetic Pigments, and Relative Water Contents

Arsenic toxicity caused a significant decrease in the levels of chlorophyll in both FH-779 and FH-773. Chlorophyll a decreased by 24.34% and 36.82%, chlorophyll b by 36.99% and 38.63%, and total chlorophyll by 29.91% and 37.65%, respectively. However, when SA, GABA, and SA + GABA were applied as foliar sprays, the levels of chlorophyll noticeably increased in both genotypes. Chlorophyll a increased by 11.90% to 25.07%, chlorophyll b by 51.47% to 68.89%, and total chlorophyll by 27.73% to 42.60% in FH-779. Meanwhile, in FH-773, chlorophyll a increased by 39.30% to 58.10%, chlorophyll b by 34.14% to 64.87%, and total chlorophyll by 36.98% to 61.14%. Notably, As toxicity led to a significant increase in carotenoid content in both genotypes, with increases of 23.62% in FH-779 and 45.06% in FH-773. When foliar applications of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA were done, carotenoid contents also increased noticeably in both genotypes with increases ranging from 17.00% to 39.03% in FH-779 and 13.45% to 32.62% in FH-773 (Table 3 and Table S1).

Table 3.

Effect of SA and GABA on Physiological Characteristics in Two Sunflower Genotypes at the Flowering Stage Under Arsenic Stress.

Treatments	Chlorophyll a (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Chlorophyll b (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Total Chlorophyll (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Total Carotenoid (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Relative Water Content (%)
FH-779
NS	2.82 ± .06a-d	2.26 ± .11b-e	5.08 ± .16b-d	.67 ± .06a-f	79.55 ± 3.28b
SA (100 mg/L)	3.12 ± .25a-c	2.62 ± .11a-c	5.74 ± .20a-c	.82 ± .06ab	89.46 ± 1.59a
GABA (200 mg/L)	3.24 ± .13ab	2.77 ± .11ab	6.00 ± .24ab	.84 ± .06ab	93.53 ± 1.66a
SA + GABA	3.45 ± .12a	2.83 ± .13a	6.29 ± .25a	.89 ± .03a	97.62 ± 1.27a
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	2.14 ± .09d-f	1.43 ± .09gh	3.56 ± .15gh	.51 ± .07c-g	54.16 ± .53gh
SA + As⁵⁺	2.56 ± .13b-f	2.23 ± .13c-e	4.78 ± .24d-g	.66 ± .07a-f	73.80 ± 2.31bc
GABA + As⁵⁺	2.39 ± .09d-f	2.16 ± .06c-e	4.55 ± .15d-f	.60 ± .04b-g	70.67 ± 2.40b-d
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	2.67 ± .13b-e	2.41 ± .11a-d	5.08 ± .17b-d	.71 ± .06a-e	77.92 ± 1.84b
FH-773
NS	2.22 ± .22d-f	1.86 ± .12e-g	4.08 ± .13f-h	.66 ± .03a-f	58.99 ± 1.04e-g
SA (100 mg/L)	2.43 ± .07d-f	2.04 ± .12d-f	4.47 ± .16d-g	.64 ± .05a-g	63.90 ± .98d-f
GABA (200 mg/L)	2.53 ± .12c-f	2.14 ± .09c-e	4.67 ± .19d-f	.73 ± .04a-d	68.11 ± .98c-e
SA + GABA	2.74 ± .09b-e	2.29 ± .04b-e	5.02 ± .09c-e	.78 ± .05a-c	72.38 ± 2.29b-d
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	1.40 ± .15 g	1.14 ± .12h	2.54 ± .27i	.36 ± .06 g	45.16 ± 2.38h
SA + As⁵⁺	2.11 ± .07ef	1.76 ± .08e-g	3.87 ± .01f-h	.44 ± .08e-g	54.20 ± 2.01gh
GABA + As⁵⁺	1.95 ± .08 fg	1.53 ± .07f-h	3.48 ± .12h	.41 ± .05 fg	52.85 ± .61gh
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	2.21 ± .12d-f	1.88 ± .05d-g	4.10 ± .14e-h	.48 ± .06d-g	56.85 ± 1.55 fg

Each column represents the mean values of 3 replicates with standard errors. A three-way ANOVA was performed, and differences among means were tested using Tukey’s HSD test (P < .05). Different lowercase letters on the mean values indicate significant differences between the treatments. Abbreviations: NS = no spray; SA = salicylic acid; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; As = arsenic.

Furthermore, As toxicity resulted in a significant decrease in the RWC of FH-779 by 31.92% and FH-773 by 23.44%. However, when exogenous SA, GABA, and a combination of both were applied, resulted in a notable improvement in the RWC of FH-779 (30.49%–43.87%) and FH-773 (17.02%–25.87%) under As toxicity (Table 3 and Table S1). Moreover, under control conditions, the exogenous application of SA, GABA, and their combination increased the levels of chlorophyll a (10.59%–22.46% and 9.86%–23.47%), chlorophyll b (15.97%–25.18% and 9.43%–22.90%), total chlorophyll (12.98%–23.67% and 9.66%–23.21%), total carotenoid (22.85%–32.95% and 5.58%–17.93%), and RWC (12.46%–22.71% and 8.32%–22.70%) in FH-779 and FH-773. The combination of SA and GABA had the most significant impact on increasing photosynthetic pigments and RWC in both genotypes (Table 3 and Table S1).

Secondary Metabolites, Osmolytes and Ascorbic Acid Contents

There was a significant rise in TSS levels in the FH-779 (38.12%) and FH-773 (23.67%) genotypes under As toxicity compared to their respective control plants. The application of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA externally increased the accumulation of TSS in FH-779 (11.86% and 47.33%) and FH-773 (28.31% and 63.64%) compared to plants that were not treated under As toxicity (Table 4 and Table S1).

Table 4.

Effect of SA and GABA on Metabolites, Osmolytes, and Ascorbic Acid Characteristics in Two Sunflower Genotypes at the Flowering Stage Under Arsenic Stress.

Treatments	TFAA (mg g⁻¹ FW)	TSP (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Anthocyanin (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Flavonoid (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Phenolic (mg g⁻¹ FW)	TSS (mg g⁻¹ FW)	Ascorbic Acid (mg g⁻¹ FW)
FH-779
NS	3.47 ± .59f	6.40 ± .59ab	3.15 ± .24ef	1.98 ± .07i	1.90 ± .04hi	16.25 ± .99g-i	1.50 ± .11gh
SA (100 mg/L)	3.99 ± .43ef	7.50 ± .65ab	4.32 ± .08b-e	2.46 ± .05e-i	2.75 ± .11 fg	22.68 ± .67d-f	1.73 ± .04 fg
GABA (200 mg/L)	4.10 ± .19ef	7.70 ± .74ab	4.56 ± .07b-d	2.61 ± .13d-g	3.25 ± .12d-f	25.79 ± .25b-d	1.82 ± .05 fg
SA + GABA	4.37 ± .75ef	8.59 ± .55a	4.99 ± .28a-d	2.95 ± .03c-e	3.52 ± .02d	27.87 ± .36a-c	1.88 ± .06e-g
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	8.06 ± .68a-d	4.84 ± .64b	4.41 ± .12b-e	2.61 ± .11d-g	3.51 ± .06d	22.44 ± 1.55c-f	2.41 ± .05a-d
SA + As⁵⁺	10.19 ± .46a	6.39 ± .67ab	5.43 ± .32ab	3.52 ± .12d-h	4.87 ± .13ab	29.26 ± .57ab	2.64 ± .12ab
GABA + As⁵⁺	9.55 ± .55ab	6.12 ± .63ab	5.12 ± .22a-c	3.15 ± .06bc	4.68 ± .06bc	25.11 ± .54b-d	2.52 ± .12a-c
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	10.64 ± .45a	7.15 ± .74ab	6.13 ± .39a	3.85 ± .02a	5.26 ± .04a	33.07 ± 1.98a	2.80 ± .09a
FH-773
NS	4.30 ± .59ef	6.35 ± .80ab	2.29 ± .22f	1.44 ± .05j	1.63 ± .18i	11.95 ± 1.14i	.97 ± .08i
SA (100 mg/L)	5.30 ± .65d-f	6.94 ± .73ab	3.72 ± .08de	2.03 ± .12hi	2.94 ± .04ef	14.69 ± .17hi	1.08 ± .07i
GABA (200 mg/L)	5.48 ± .55d-f	7.46 ± .57ab	3.91 ± .42c-e	2.16 ± .07g-i	3.12 ± .19d-f	18.07 ± 1.48f-h	1.09 ± .05hi
SA + GABA	6.07 ± .83c-f	7.97 ± .87ab	4.53 ± .27b-d	2.52 ± .10d-h	3.46 ± .09de	21.87 ± .59d-f	1.13 ± .06hi
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	6.97 ± .41b-e	4.66 ± .60b	3.90 ± .35c-e	2.30 ± .04f-i	2.32 ± .12gh	14.78 ± .78hi	1.78 ± .08 fg
SA + As⁵⁺	9.22 ± .54ab	5.83 ± .56ab	5.07 ± .18a-c	2.69 ± .08c-f	3.57 ± .08d	21.72 ± 1.19d-g	2.13 ± .07c-f
GABA + As⁵⁺	8.49 ± .72a-c	5.26 ± .69ab	4.75 ± .12b-d	2.61 ± .18d-f	3.43 ± .03de	18.96 ± .97e-h	2.05 ± .11d-f
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	9.52 ± .32ab	6.37 ± .71ab	5.35 ± .33ab	2.99 ± .12 cd	4.15 ± .12c	24.18 ± 1.18b-e	2.25 ± .05b-e

Each Column Represents the Mean Values of Three Replicates With Standard Errors. A Three-Way ANOVA was Performed, and Differences Among Means Were Tested Using Tukey’s HSD Test (P < .05). Different Lowercase Letters on the Mean Values Indicate Significant Differences Between the Treatments. Abbreviations: NS = no Spray; SA = salicylic Acid; GABA = γ-aminobutyric Acid; As = arsenic; TFAA = Total Free Amino Acids; TSP = Total Soluble Protein; TSS = total Soluble Sugar.

Under As stress, TFAA levels increased by 132.38% in FH-779 and by 62.18% in FH-773. Additionally, spraying SA, GABA, and SA + GABA significantly increased TFAA levels in FH-779 (18.42%-31.95%) and FH-773 (21.79%-36.59%) compared to unsprayed plants (Table 4 and Table S1).

The results indicate a notable decrease in TSP content under As toxicity in FH-779 (24.41%) and FH-773 (26.54%). However, supplementation with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA increased TSP levels in FH-779 (26.39% and 47.64%) and FH-773 (12.86% and 36.62%) compared to non-sprayed plants under As toxicity (Table 4 and Table S1).

A recent study found that the levels of ascorbic acid in the leaves of the FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes (60.51% and 83.01%) increased significantly under As stress. The increase in the content of ascorbic acid was higher in FH-773 compared to FH-779. Additionally, the application of SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA increased the ascorbic acid content in FH-779 (4.72%–16.35%) and FH-773 (14.89%–26.14%) compared to unsprayed plants under As stress (Table 4 and Table S1).

Exposure to As also increased the phenolic content of FH-779 (84.38%) and FH-773 (42.48%). Spraying with SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA enhanced phenolic levels in both FH-779 (33.38%-51.1%) and FH-773 (47.73%–78.68%) genotypes under As toxicity (Table 4 and Table S1).

Furthermore, the study showed that As toxicity significantly increased flavonoid content in both FH-779 (31.67%) and FH-773 (60.04%). Foliar spray with SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA enhanced flavonoid content in both FH-779 (20.76%–47.51%) and FH-773 (13.45%–30.21%) under As stress compared to control plants (Table 4 and Table S1).

Our results show that under As toxicity, there was a significant increase in anthocyanin levels in FH-779 (40.10%) and FH-773 (70.41%). Additionally, the application of SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA further increased anthocyanin levels in FH-779 (16.06%-38.95%) and FH-773 (21.59%-36.99%) compared to unsprayed plants (Table 4 and Table S1).

In control conditions, we observed a similar increasing trend in TSS (39.54%–71.49% and 22.91%–83.08%), TSP (17.03%–34.05% and 9.35%–25.59%), TFAA (15.13%–26.09% and 23.33%–41.11%), ascorbic acid (15.62%–25.42% and 10.96%–15.65%), total phenolic (44.65%–85.12% and 80.69%–112.41%), flavonoid (23.99%–48.61% and 41.19%–75.16%), and anthocyanin content (16.06%–38.95% and 21.60%–30.99%) in both FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes with the application of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA at the flowering stage. Importantly, the combined application of SA + GABA resulted in a significant increase in these parameters in both FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes (Table 4 and Table S1).

Oxidative Markers and Proline Content

Both FH-773 and FH-779 genotypes showed a significant increase in ROS levels, specifically H₂O₂ and MDA, under As stress. The increase in H₂O₂ levels was 103.15% and 265.01% in FH-779 and FH-773, respectively, while MDA levels increased by 16.09% and 98.87% in the same genotypes. However, when both genotypes were treated with SA, GABA, and a combination of SA + GABA, there was a decrease in MDA levels by 3.67%–10.46% and 6.75%–26.94%, respectively. Additionally, there was a reduction of 4.70%–26.21% and 9.00%–25.18% in H₂O₂ levels for FH-779 and FH-773, respectively. Similar reductions were observed for H₂O₂ (10.09%–31.11% and 19.49%–32.51%) and MDA levels (5.59%–12.02% and 2.03%–16.68%) in control plants of both FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes with SA, GABA, and combined SA + GABA during the flowering stage (Figure 1 and Table S1).

Figure 1.

Influence of GABA and SA spray on oxidative stress indicators and proline levels in sunflower at the flowering stage under arsenic stress. The bars graphs represent the mean values of 3 replicates followed by the standard error. Tukey’s HSD (P < .05) was performed to compare the means of different treatments. Different lowercase letters on the bars indicate significant differences between the means.

Under As stress, both FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes had an increased proline content. FH-779 showed a 178.93% increase, while FH-773 exhibited a 73.78% increase in proline content compared to the control. However, when treated with SA, GABA, and combined SA + GABA during the flowering stage, both genotypes showed an increased proline accumulation. FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes showed a 12.42%–43.08% and 19.24%–40.95% increase in proline content, respectively. Control plants of both genotypes also showed similar increases in proline content when treated with SA, GABA, and combined SA + GABA during the flowering stage (Figure 1 and Table S1).

Enzymatic Antioxidants

Our study revealed that exposure to As toxicity led to a significant increase in the activity of SOD in FH-779 (32.84%) and FH-773 (29.29%) plants, respectively. Applying foliar supplements of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA also led to a significant increase in SOD activity in both FH-779 (11.14%–23.69%) and FH-773 (10.99%–23.53%) under stress conditions compared to the control treatment. Moreover, FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes subjected to As toxicity showed a significant increase in POD activity, with increases of 55.09% and 40.70%, respectively, compared to control plants. Foliar application of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA intensified POD activity in both FH-779 (24.70%–39.05%) and FH-773 (32.59%–65.36%) relative to non-sprayed plants under As toxicity. This study also found that As toxicity caused a significant increase in CAT activity in FH-779 and FH-773, with increases of 33.68% and 36.05%, respectively. Foliar spray of SA, GABA, and SA + GABA substantially increased CAT activity in both genotypes FH-779 and FH-773 by a significant amount (21.71%–41.70% and 07%–17%) relative to control plants under As toxicity (Figure 2 and Table S1).

Figure 2.

Influence of GABA and SA spray on enzymatic antioxidants of sunflower at the flowering stage under arsenic stress. The bars graphs represent the mean values of 3 replicates followed by the standard error. Tukey’s HSD (P < .05) was performed to compare the means of different treatments. Different lowercase letters on the bars indicate significant differences between the means.

Additionally, FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes showed a similar increase in SOD (14.08%–33.30% and 10.64%–25.25%), POD (26.09%–56.49% and 40.11%–87.18%), and CAT (8.84%–39.29% and 12.41%–35.02%) activities under control conditions with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA. The addition of SA + GABA significantly increased enzymatic antioxidant activities in both genotypes. Based on these findings, FH-779 plants may not have sufficient antioxidant capacity to alleviate As-induced oxidative damage under high levels of As stress. Meanwhile, an enhanced enzymatic antioxidant defense system was observed in FH-773, which helps FH-779 to be both less affected by the As toxicity (Figure 2 and Table S1).

Arsenate Reductase (AR) Activity

During the flowering stage, FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes showed an increase in ascorbate reductase (AR) activity, which indicates the rate of As⁵⁺ to As³⁺ reduction under As toxicity. The increase in AR activity was observed in both leaves and roots, but it was more significant in roots than in leaves. In FH-779 and FH-773, root AR activity increased by 585.51% and 584.32% respectively, under As stress. However, supplementation with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA reduced root AR activity by 19.53%–55.19% and 22.30%–55.51% in FH-779 and FH-773 respectively. Leaf AR activity also increased significantly in FH-779 and FH-773, with percentages of 456.85% and 545.94% respectively, under As toxicity. However, supplementation with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA reduced leaf AR activity by 30.69%–55.81% in FH-779 and by 43.54%–57.35% in FH-773 compared to control plants. In both roots and leaves, SA + GABA > SA > GABA reduced AR activity under both conditions in FH-779 and FH-773 during the flowering stage (Figure 3 and Table S2).

Figure 3.

Influence of GABA and SA spray on root and leaf arsenate activity of sunflower at the flowering stage under arsenic stress. The bar graphs represent the mean values of 3 replicates followed by the standard error. Tukey’s HSD (P < .05) was performed to compare the means of different treatments. Different lowercase letters on the bars indicate significant differences between the means.

As⁵⁺ and As³⁺ Uptake and Accumulation

FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes showed a significant increase in the accumulation of As⁵⁺ in their roots (516.55% and 632.95%, respectively) and leaves (557.52% and 617.47%, respectively) when exposed to As toxicity. However, when treated with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA, the As⁵⁺ content in their roots decreased by 24.53%–73.25% and 20.28%–74.04% and in their leaves by 33.60%–57.23% and 33.78%–55.66%. The same plant genotypes also exhibited an increase in As³⁺ accumulation in their roots (275.30% and 174.39%, respectively) and leaves (273.66% and 281.38%, respectively) under As toxicity. But, when treated with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA, the As³⁺ content in their roots decreased by 11.95%–55.22% and 7.62%–52.34% and in their leaves by 22.74%–40.68% and 13.30%–44.85%. The reduction of As⁵⁺ and As³⁺ levels followed the order: SA + GABA > SA > GABA in the roots and leaves of FH-779 and FH-773 during the flowering stage under both conditions (Figure 4 and Table S2).

Figure 4.

Influence of GABA and SA spray on total arsenic uptake in roots and leaves of sunflower at the flowering stage under arsenic stress. The line graphs represent the mean values of 3 replicates followed by the standard error. Tukey’s HSD (P < .05) was performed to compare the means of different treatments. Different lowercase letters on mean values indicate significant differences between them.

Nutrient Acquisition

During the flowering stage, As toxicity led to a significant reduction in calcium (Ca) levels in the roots (10.50% and 12.69%) and leaves (7.02% and 8.10%) of FH-779 and FH-773 compared to the control. However, spraying with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA significantly increased Ca levels in the roots (33.16%–69.20% and 21.63%–58.04%) and leaves (25.54%–61.72% and 17.36%–64.43%) of FH-779 and FH-773 under As toxicity (Table 5 and Table S2).

Table 5.

Effect of Salicylic Acid (SA) and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) Application on Elemental Uptake in Two Sunflower Genotypes at the Flowering Stage Under Arsenic Stress.

Treatments	Root Ca (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Leaf Ca (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Root Mg (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Leaf Mg (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Root Zn (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Leaf Zn (μg g⁻¹ DW)	Root Fe (μg g−¹ DW)	Leaf Fe (μg g⁻¹ DW)
FH-779
NS	15.29 ± .55ij	6.08 ± .30 g	223.34 ± 4.38d-h	81.07 ± 2.22c-e	33.56 ± .48bc	21.65 ± 1.19a-e	198.25 ± 3.80de	75.45 ± 2.17a-d
SA (100 mg/L)	18.11 ± 1.00g-i	7.78 ± .21d-g	236.63 ± 5.11a-e	88.88 ± 2.43a-c	37.73 ± .87ab	23.10 ± 1.15a-c	218.33 ± 3.73bc	80.04 ± .67ab
GABA (200 mg/L)	21.92 ± .47c-f	9.03 ± .20b-f	246.70 ± 2.34a-c	91.81 ± 2.34ab	39.23 ± 1.39a	24.19 ± 1.37ab	226.40 ± 4.17a-c	83.91 ± .96a
SA + GABA	25.45 ± .73a-c	10.66 ± .40a-c	254.14 ± 4.88a	94.45 ± 1.18a	41.08 ± .58a	24.76 ± .64a	235.29 ± 1.78ab	86.58 ± 1.19a
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	13.68 ± .51j	5.66 ± .22 g	210.30 ± 3.08hi	72.46 ± 2.44e-i	25.62 ± .52gh	20.53 ± 1.14b-e	165.69 ± 6.60h	59.85 ± 3.58e
SA + As⁵⁺	18.22 ± .43g-i	7.10 ± .31e-g	216.73 ± 1.34e-i	78.75 ± 2.01d-f	27.83 ± .51e-h	21.00 ± .25a-e	174.52 ± 4.20gh	63.19 ± 1.18e
GABA + As⁵⁺	20.39 ± .34e-g	8.27 ± .64c-g	220.30 ± 1.93f-i	81.40 ± 2.01c-e	29.18 ± .72d-g	22.47 ± 1.14a-d	181.19 ± 3.39e-h	67.41 ± 1.32c-e
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	23.15 ± .52a-e	9.15 ± .37b-f	229.75 ± 2.98c-g	84.43 ± 1.72b-d	30.74 ± 1.15c-f	22.55 ± .32a-d	194.19 ± 2.63ef	69.59 ± 1.49b-e
FH-773
NS	18.59 ± 1.00f-i	7.43 ± .93e-g	222.75 ± 4.08d-i	69.65 ± 3.30f-i	29.32 ± .64d-g	19.43 ± .18c-e	213.95 ± 1.69 cd	77.87 ± 3.98a-c
SA (100 mg/L)	21.67 ± .61d-g	9.17 ± .60b-f	225.00 ± 1.43-e	70.66 ± .98f-i	30.49 ± .66c-f	20.08 ± .28c-e	221.05 ± 2.25a-c	80.23 ± 1.19ab
GABA (200 mg/L)	24.75 ± .84a-d	10.52 ± .56a-d	239.17 ± 2.41a-d	73.76 ± 1.92e-h	31.74 ± 1.07c-e	20.94 ± .55a-e	230.92 ± 2.68a-c	83.46 ± 2.24a
SA + GABA	26.79 ± .49a	12.48 ± .47a	248.53 ± 2.37ab	75.65 ± 1.26d-g	33.23 ± 1.01 cd	21.72 ± .42a-e	237.42 ± 1.19a	84.83 ± 1.05a
As⁵⁺ (60 mg/kg soil)	16.23 ± .75h-j	6.82 ± .60 fg	204.56 ± 3.75i	59.77 ± 1.19j	24.82 ± .86h	18.39 ± .43e	176.49 ± 4.49f-h	59.01 ± 2.18e
SA + As⁵⁺	19.74 ± .38e-h	8.01 ± .89c-g	209.16 ± 1.90g-i	63.88 ± 1.44ij	26.84 ± .39f-h	18.81 ± .58de	185.54 ± 3.87e-g	61.08 ± 1.74de
GABA + As⁵⁺	23.06 ± 1.03b-e	9.78 ± .89a-e	212.08 ± 4.18hi	64.81 ± 1.39h-j	28.07 ± .65e-h	19.74 ± .57c-e	193.09 ± 3.12ef	64.81 ± 2.00ef
SA + GABA + As⁵⁺	25.65 ± 1.01ab	11.22 ± .67ab	218.78 ± 5.45e-i	67.56 ± .86g-j	28.94 ± .63e-h	20.69 ± .64a-e	194.45 ± 2.62ef	67.49 ± 1.09c-e

Each column represents the mean values of 3 replicates with standard errors. A three-way ANOVA was performed, and differences among means were tested using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test (P < .05). Different lowercase letters on the mean values indicate significant differences between the treatments. Abbreviations: NS = no spray; SA = salicylic acid; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; As = arsenic; Zn = zinc content; Fe = iron content; Ca = calcium content; Mg = magnesium content.

Similarly, there was a significant decrease in magnesium (Mg) content in the roots (5.84% and 8.17%) and leaves (10.61% and 14.18%) of FH-779 and FH-773 under As toxicity. However, spraying with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA led to a noticeable improvement in root (3.05%–9.25% and 2.25%–6.95%) and leaf Mg (8.67%–16.51% and 6.89%–13.03%) levels of FH-779 and FH-773 under As toxicity (Table 5 and Table S2).

A significant decrease in zinc (Zn) content was observed in As-stressed plants of FH-779 and FH-773, both in the roots (23.67% and 15.36%) and leaves (5.17% and 5.34%). However, treatment with SA, GABA, and SA + GABA substantially improved Zn content in the roots (8.65%–19.99% and 8.15%–16.58%) and leaves (2.27%–9.84% and 2.31%–12.53%) of FH-779 and FH-773 (Table 5 and Table S2).

Arsenic toxicity also resulted in a significant decrease in iron (Fe) content of FH-779 and FH-773 in the roots (16.42% and 17.51%) and leaves (20.68% and 24.22%). However, SA, GABA, and SA + GABA applications led to a considerable improvement in the root (5.33%–17.20% and 5.12%–10.17%) and leaf (5.57%–16.27% and .45%–14.36%) Fe content in FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes. Under both conditions, SA, GABA, and SA + GABA increased Ca, Mg, Zn, and Fe in roots and leaves in the following order: SA + GABA > GABA > SA in FH-779 and FH-773 (Table 5 and Table S2).

Pearson’s Correlation

Figure 5 A Pearson’s correlation graph was used to analyze the relationship between growth attributes and As uptake in sunflower plants treated with GABA and SA in As-contaminated soil, as shown in Figure 6. The concentration of As in the plants’ underground parts directly correlated with the As contents in the leaf and root tissues, as well as oxidative stress markers (H₂O₂ and MDA), osmolytes, and antioxidants. This relationship was also negatively associated with growth attributes, photosynthetic pigments, RWC, and nutrient acquisition (Ca, Mg, Zn, and Fe) in sunflowers. These results emphasize the importance of using SA, GABA spray, and combined SA + GABA to promote sunflower growth in As-contaminated soil.

Figure 5.

Influence of GABA and SA spray on As-III uptake in roots and leaves of sunflower at the flowering stage under arsenic stress. The line graphs represent the mean values of 3 replicates followed by the standard error. Tukey’s HSD (P < .05) was performed to compare the means of different treatments. Different lowercase letters on mean values indicate significant differences between them.

Figure 6.

The study investigated the correlation between various morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes of two sunflower genotypes (FH-779 and FH-773) grown in As-contaminated soil. Foliar sprays of GABA (200 mg/L) and SA (100 mg/L) were applied. Various abbreviations used in the figure are as follows: SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; RAR, root arsenate activity; LAR, leaf arsenate activity; RTAs, root total arsenic content; LTAs, leaf total arsenic content; RAs.III, root arsenite content, LAs.III, leaf arsenite content; MDA, malondialdehyde; H₂O₂, hydrogen peroxide; TSS, soluble sugar; Chla, chlorophyll a; Chlb, chlorophyll b; TChl, total chlorophyll; Caro, carotenoid; Antho, anthocyanin; SL, shoot length; AsA, ascorbic acid; RWC, relative water content; RDW, root dry weight; RFW, root fresh weight; SDW, shoot dry weight; TSP, total soluble protein; TFAA, total free amino acids; RL, root length; SFW, shoot fresh weight; RCa, calcium in root; LCa, calcium in leaf; RMg, magnesium in root; LMg, magnesium in leaf; RZn, zinc in root; LZn, zinc in leaf; RFe, iron in root; LFe, iron in leaf.

Principal Component Analysis

The loading plots of PCA in Figure 7 reveal the effects of SA and GABA on As toxicity in sunflower. The most significant impact was observed in Dim1 and Dim2, which explained 84.2% of the total variance. Dim1 contributed 60%, and Dim2 contributed 24.2%. The attributes studied were distributed well in the database, indicating that As toxicity had a significant impact on the morphological and physio-chemical characteristics of sunflower genotypes. Negative correlations were found between As content in leaves and roots, oxidative markers (H₂O₂ and MDA), arsenate activity, and morphological attributes, chlorophyll pigments, RWC, and nutrient uptake (Ca, Mg, Zn, and Fe). On the other hand, positive associations were observed between phenolic, flavonoids, TSS, proline, anthocyanin, AsA content, antioxidants (SOD, POD, and CAT), and As concentrations in roots and leaves with the additional studied variables.

Figure 7.

The loading plots show the results of principal component analysis for two sunflower genotypes (FH-779 and FH-773) grown in sandy loamy soil with exogenous application of GABA and SA, with or without toxic concentrations of arsenic. Various abbreviations used in the figure are as follows: SOD, superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; RAR, root arsenate activity; LAR, leaf arsenate activity; RTAs, root total arsenic content; LTAs, leaf total arsenic content; RAs.III, root arsenite content, LAs.III, leaf arsenite content; MDA, malondialdehyde; H₂O₂, hydrogen peroxide; TSS, soluble sugar; Chla, chlorophyll a; Chlb, chlorophyll b; TChl, total chlorophyll; Caro, carotenoid; Antho, anthocyanin; SL, shoot length; AsA, ascorbic acid; RWC, relative water content; RDW, root dry weight; RFW, root fresh weight; SDW, shoot dry weight; TSP, total soluble protein; TFAA, total free amino acids; RL, root length; SFW, shoot fresh weight; RCa, calcium in root; LCa, calcium in leaf; RMg, magnesium in root; LMg, magnesium in leaf; RZn, zinc in root; LZn, zinc in leaf; RFe, iron in root; LFe, iron in leaf.

Discussion

Arsenic, which is a non-essential element for plant metabolism, has become more common in soil due to human activities such as agriculture and industry.⁶⁴ It disrupts enzymes and inhibits plant growth, which leads to reduced photosynthesis, crop yield, nutrient uptake, and even plant death in severe cases.¹¹ The present study have shown that As negatively impacts sunflower growth and biomass production, especially in As-sensitive genotypes.⁶⁵ Arsenic accumulation in plants disturbs physiological processes, inhibiting growth and reducing biomass. Our study has demonstrated a significant decrease in shoot and root length, as well as fresh and dry mass under As treatment. The FH-779 genotype exhibited greater tolerance to As stress compared to the FH-773 genotype, possibly due to lower oxidative stress and higher photosynthetic activity (Table 2). Arsenic can interfere with cellular processes in various crops such as Oryza sativa,⁶⁶ Vigna mungo,⁶⁷ Arabidopsis,⁶⁸ and Zea mays.⁶⁹ Pearson’s correlation analysis has revealed a negative relationship between plant growth and biomass traits and As concentration in roots and leaves, as well as oxidative stress markers (Figure 7). SA and GABA have been found to enhance plant tolerance against stress and counteract the harmful effects of As, thereby improving plant growth.⁷⁰ Arsenic toxicity can reduce mitotic activity in plant roots, thereby decreasing the rate of cell division.⁷¹

It has been reported that As reduces the photosynthetic pigments in plants by increasing the activity of chlorophyll-degrading enzymes such as chlorophyllase and decreasing the activity of chlorophyll-synthesizing enzymes like δ-aminolaevulinic acid dehydrogenase. This leads to the build-up of ROS and oxidative stress, which can impact plant growth negatively.⁷² In a recent study, it was found that the FH-773 genotype sunflowers showed a more significant reduction in chlorophyll levels under As treatment compared to the FH-779 genotype (Table 3). This difference in pigment levels may be attributed to As disrupting chloroplasts and inhibiting chlorophyll synthesis due to ROS production.⁷³ Similar effects of As stress on pigment reduction have been observed in rice⁷⁴ and spinach plants.⁷⁵ Under heavy metal stress, rice plants and other plants also show decreased chlorophyll content.⁷⁶ However, the application of SA and GABA has been found to help mitigate chlorophyll degradation in As-stressed plants (Table 3). Studies have shown that in lettuce plants under metal stress, the application of SA and GABA enhances photosynthetic activity and increases photosynthetic pigments, leading to an overall improvement in photosynthetic activity.⁷⁷

Metal toxicity can negatively impact the water relations in plants. This study found that As stress reduced the RWC in leaves, consistent with previous research by Ahmad et al.⁷⁸ This decrease in RWC may be due to increased oxidative stress and disrupted root growth from As toxicity, as shown by Vezza et al.⁷⁹ However, the application of SA and GABA spray improved RWC by potentially reducing oxidative stress and enhancing osmolyte uptake in As-exposed plants (Table 3). Similar results were seen in studies on Lactuca sativa,⁸⁰ H annuus,⁸¹ and O sativa.²⁹ Arsenic stress affects electron transport pathways in plants, leading to increased ROS levels, as demonstrated by Li et al.⁶⁶ In our study, we found that there were elevated H₂O₂ levels with As treatment, with the FH-773 genotype showing higher H₂O₂ concentration than FH-779 under As stress (Figure 1). This suggests that the FH-779 may have a stronger antioxidant system, resulting in lower ROS accumulation in cells. Sunflower plants with lower ROS levels may exhibit better resistance to As stress, consistent with prior studies.⁸² Previous research has shown elevated H₂O₂ levels in rice under As stress by Ghorbani et al⁸³ and in spinach by Natasha et al.⁸⁴

Malondialdehyde is a byproduct of lipid peroxidation resulting from oxidative stress induced by As toxicity.⁸⁵ FH-779 has been found to have lower levels of MDA, suggesting that it is better able to tolerate As stress. This is consistent with previous studies on Brassica napus,⁸⁶ which showed that different cultivars have varying levels of ROS production and lipid peroxidation under As stress. In addition, the application of SA and GABA has been shown to significantly reduce oxidative stress in plants exposed to As (Figure 1). This may be due to their ability to scavenge radicals or enhance antioxidant activity, as observed in other plant species.²⁹

Plants have developed mechanisms to counteract harmful ROS that are generated during oxidative stress. These mechanisms include both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants that help to reduce oxidative damage in plants.⁶⁸ The present study has shown that, in response to As stress, plants increase the production of metabolites such as flavonoids, phenolics, anthocyanins, and ascorbic acid, which act as non-enzymatic antioxidants to scavenge ROS and protect plant cells (Table 4). The accumulation of these compounds significantly increases under As stress compared to control plants, which is consistent with previous research.¹⁵ Furthermore, the application of SA and GABA leads to a notable increase in these antioxidant compounds, which may enhance their protective effect on plants.⁸⁷

Proline is an osmolyte in plants that plays a crucial role in reducing metal-induced toxicity.⁸⁸ It is a well-known osmoprotectant that maintains cell wall flexibility, optimal hydration levels, and protects plants from damage by ROS.¹¹ Recent study suggests that under As stress, the FH-779 and FH-773 genotypes accumulated more free proline, with FH-779 having higher levels than FH-773. FH-773 was more susceptible to As toxicity, leading to higher proline concentrations (Figure 1). However, excessive proline accumulation can be detrimental, as it may degrade specific proteins or result in the de novo synthesis of amino acids.⁸⁹ Similar results have been observed in other plants like Coriandrum sativum under cadmium stress.⁹⁰ On the other hand, B napus improved proline accumulation with GABA application under salinity,⁹¹ and SA under drought stress,²⁹ similar to the improvement seen in Sedum alfredii,⁹² and Brassica juncea.⁹³ The application of SA and GABA increased proline levels in both sunflower genotypes under As treatment, with FH-773 exhibiting a more significant increase (Table 4). These findings align with studies conducted in other plant species such as lettuce and rice plants.^29,80

The results of this study showed a significant decrease in TSP content under As stress (Table 4), which is consistent with previous research on metal stress in plants.¹¹ This decline may be caused by As-induced oxidative stress, leading to protein degradation or increased protease enzyme activity.¹⁴ On the other hand, SA and GABA increased TSP levels in As-exposed plants by enhancing the antioxidant system and reducing oxidative stress.^29,87 Additionally, As stress increased the TSS and TFAA contents in both sunflower genotypes. The application of SA and GABA also elevated TSS and TFAA levels in As-stressed plants (Table 4). TSS accumulation protects cellular membranes from oxidative damage and maintains redox balance, while TFAA and TSS contribute to water uptake and cell maintenance.⁹⁴ Higher levels of TSS and TFAA indicate greater tolerance to metal stress in plants.⁹⁵

Plants have defense mechanisms to protect themselves from oxidative damage caused by ROS when they are exposed to As stress.⁸³ Antioxidative enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and POD are crucial in minimizing oxidative stress. SOD converts O₂^- to H₂O₂, which is then detoxified by CAT.⁸⁴ The activities of these enzymes are used as biomarkers for plant growth in heavy metal conditions.⁹⁶ Our study compared the response of two plant genotypes, FH-773 and FH-779, to As stress. FH-773 showed higher levels of H₂O₂ and O₂^- production, reduced SOD activity, and a lack of CAT activity, leading to more severe oxidative damage compared to FH-779 (Figure 2). FH-779 exhibited higher tolerance to As stress due to reduced oxidative damage, enhanced antioxidative activity, and improved seedling growth. Moreover, SA and GABA can alleviate growth inhibition, lower ROS levels, and reduce oxidative damage in As-exposed plants by boosting the activity of APX, CAT, and POD enzymes. These findings are consistent with previous studies on white clover⁴¹ and rice.²⁹

In this experiment, we observed an increase in As and As III levels in various plant tissues following As exposure. The roots showed the highest levels, followed by the leaves (Figure 3). This increase is attributed to the enhanced uptake of As facilitated by Pi transporters in the roots, leading to a potential disruption of plant metabolism. The enzyme arsenate reductase transforms As V to As III.⁸⁵ Treatment with SA and GABA led to a reduction in total As and As III content, as well as in arsenate reductase activity in sunflower genotypes. Higher concentrations of SA and GABA resulted in decreased As accumulation in both leaves and roots of sunflower plants, indicating the protective role of these compounds in reducing As uptake. This reduction may be attributed to decreased As uptake or reduced arsenate reductase activity, as observed in rice,⁹⁷ and soybean.⁷⁸

Several studies have shown As has a negative impact on plant growth by causing disruptions in ionic balance, metabolism, and nutrient uptake.⁷⁸ Arsenic toxicity can lead to reduced photosynthesis, stomatal regulation, and transpiration rates in plant roots, affecting the uptake of water and ions.^79,98 It can also impede nutrient absorption, leading to changes in nutrient concentration and accumulation. Some plants, such as sunflowers, have developed mechanisms to restrict the transfer of As to above-ground parts by absorbing it in their roots.⁹⁸ In soils containing organic acids, As movement is restricted as these acids bind to form insoluble compounds. The presence of As was found to decrease the levels of Mg, Ca, Zn, and Fe in sunflower roots and leaves (Table 5). A negative correlation was observed between the As content and growth characteristics, which was more pronounced in FH-773 than in FH-779 (Figure 7). Pearson’s correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between As content and H₂O₂ and MDA levels (Figure 6). Certain substances such as SA, GABA, and their combination can enhance nutrient uptake, reduce As uptake, and decrease As accumulation in plants under arsenic toxicity.

Conclusion

The study on sunflower plants exposed to As toxicity found that it inhibits growth, biomass production, photosynthetic pigments, and protein content due to oxidative damage and reduced nutrient uptake. Two sunflower genotypes, FH-773 and FH-779, showed varying susceptibility to As toxicity, with FH-773 being more severely affected. However, the addition of SA, GABA, or their combination improved plant health by enhancing photosynthetic pigments, reducing As accumulation, regulating osmotic pressure, and minimizing oxidative damage, resulting in decreased As translocation and toxicity. SA and GABA application also boosted the accumulation of secondary metabolites, antioxidant systems, osmolytes, and nutrient uptake while reducing As accumulation in leaves and roots. Foliar application of SA and GABA could enhance biomass and yield in sunflowers under stress conditions. Further research in field settings is recommended to gain a better understanding of stress tolerance mechanisms. SA and GABA could be effective stress mitigation strategies for other crops facing abiotic stress in the future.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Salicylic Acid and Gemma-Aminobutyric Acid Mediated Regulation of Growth, Metabolites, Antioxidant Defense System and Nutrient Uptake in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Under Arsenic Stress

Supplemental Material for Salicylic Acid and Gemma-Aminobutyric Acid Mediated Regulation of Growth, Metabolites, Antioxidant Defense System and Nutrient Uptake in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Under Arsenic Stress by Muhammad Nawaz, Iqbal Hussain, Mahmood-ur-Rehman, Muhammad A. Ashraf, and Rizwan Rasheed in Dose-Response

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

This study is part of Muhammad Nawaz’s PhD dissertation. The authors would like to acknowledge the Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan for their support through GCUF-RSP (Project Code: 48-Bot-7).

Author Contributions

Iqbal Hussain and Mahmood-ur-Rahman: conceptualization, visualization. Iqbal Hussain: Writing-original draft, supervision, and methodology. Muhammad Nawaz: Investigation, methodology, visualization and writing-original draft. Muhammad Arslan Ashraf and Rizwan Rasheed: Review and editing.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Iqbal Hussain

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Nawaz

Sun

Shabbir

, et al. A review of plants strategies to resist biotic and abiotic environmental stressors. Sci Total Environ. 2023;900:165832.

Rivero

Mittler

Blumwald

Zandalinas

. Developing climate resilient crops: Improving plant tolerance to stress combination. Plant J. 2022;109(2):373-389.

Mariyam

Upadhyay

Chakraborty

, et al. Nanotechnology, a frontier in agricultural science, a novel approach in abiotic stress management and convergence with new age medicine-A review. Sci Total Environ. 2023;5:169097.

Nawaz

Azeem

, et al. Insight of transcriptional regulators reveals the tolerance mechanism of carpet-grass (Axonopus compressus) against drought. BMC Plant Biol, 2021;21(1):1-14.

Choudhary

Rajput

Ghodake

, et al. Comprehensive journey from past to present to future about seed priming with hydrogen peroxide and hydrogen sulfide concerning drought, temperature, UV and ozone stresses- a review. Plant Soil. 2024. doi:10.1007/s11104-024-06499-9

Mohsin

Wang

. Abscisic acid and glycine betaine mediated tolerance mechanisms under drought stress and recovery in Axonopus compressus: a New Insight. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1).

WHO World Health . Organization. Cancer. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1 (2021).

O'Day

Vlassopoulos

Root

Rivera

Turekian

. The influence of sulfur and iron on dissolved arsenic concentrations in the shallow subsurface under changing redox conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(38):3703-13708.

Smedley

Kinniburgh

. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem. 2002;17(5):517-568.

10.

Kanwar

Sharma

Srivastav

Rani

. Phytoremediation of toxic metals present in soil and water environment: A critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:44835-44860.

11.

Abbas

Murtaza

Bibi

, et al. Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2018;15(1):59.

12.

Robles-Osorio

Sabath-Silva

Sabath

. Arsenic-mediated nephrotoxicity. Ren Fail. 2015;37:542-547.

13.

Karimi

Shayesteh

Ghasmpour

Alavi

. Effects of arsenic on growth, Photosynthetic activity, and accumulation in two new hyperaccumulating populations of Isatis cappadocica Desv. J Plant Growth Regul. 2013;32:823-830.

14.

Souri

Karimi

Ahmad

. The effect of NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) and glutathione (GSH) on Isatis cappadocica, under arsenic (As) toxicity. Int J Phytoremediation. 2021;23(9):945-957.

15.

Fortunato

Lasorella

Dipierro

Vita

de Pinto

. Redox signalling in plant heat stress response. Antioxidants. 2023;12(3):605.

16.

Souri

Karimi

Sandalio

. Arsenic hyperaccumulation strategies: An overview. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017;5:67.

17.

Gao

Tang

, et al. Effects of silicon on the uptake and accumulation of arsenite and dimethylarsinic acid in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Hazard Mater. 2021;409:124442.

18.

Rehman

Fatima

Akash

MSH

. Biochemical investigation of association of arsenic exposure with risk factors of diabetes mellitus in Pakistani population and its validation in animal model. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191:1-15.

19.

Chandrakar

Naithani

Keshavkant

. Arsenic-induced metabolic disturbances and their mitigation mechanisms in crop plants: a review. Biologia. 2016;71(4):367-377.

20.

Khan

Gupta

. Arsenic–silicon priming of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds influence mineral nutrient uptake and biochemical responses through modulation of Lsi-1, Lsi-2, Lsi-6 and nutrient transporter genes. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10301.

21.

Hoque

Burgess

Shamsudduha

Ahmed

. Delineating low-arsenic groundwater environments in the Bengal Aquifer system, Bangladesh. Appl Geochem. 2011;26(4):614-623.

22.

Beesley

Zhang

Zhi

Jia

Ding

. Microbial arsenic methylation in soil and uptake and metabolism of methylated arsenic in plants: A review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2019;16(24):5012.

23.

Forleo

Palmieri

Suardi

Coaloa

Pari

. The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:3138-3153.

24.

Agnihotri

Seth

. Transgenic Brassicaceae: A promising approach for phytoremediation of heavy metals. In: Transgenic plant technology for remediation of toxic metals and metalloids. Academic Press. Jan.; 2019:239-255.

25.

Petraru

Ursachi

Amariei

. Nutritional characteristics assessment of sunflower seeds, oil and cake. Perspective of using sunflower oilcakes as a functional ingredient. Plants. 2021;10(11):2487.

26.

Sahito

Zehra

Tang

, et al. Arsenic and mercury uptake and accumulation in oilseed sunflower accessions selected to mitigate co-contaminated soil coupled with oil and bioenergy production. J Clean Prod. 2021;291:125226.

27.

Rezania

Taib

Din

MFM

Dahalan

Kamyab

. Comprehensive review on phytotechnology: Heavy metals removal by diverse aquatic plants species from wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2016;318:587-599.

28.

Srivastava

Shukla

Rajput

, et al. Arsenic remediation through sustainable phytoremediation approaches. Minerals. 2021;11(9):936.

29.

Asma

Ashraf

, et al. Alleviating effects of salicylic acid spray on stage-based growth and antioxidative defense system in two drought-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Turk J Agric For. 2023;47(1):79-99.

30.

Liu

Qiu

Liu

. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone, combats abiotic stresses in plants. Life. 2022;12(6):886.

31.

Nazar

Umar

Khan

. Exogenous salicylic acid improves photosynthesis and growth through increase in ascorbate-glutathione metabolism and assimilation in mustard under salt stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(3):e1003751.

32.

Ogunsiji

Umebese

Stabentheiner

Iwuala

Odjegba

Oluwajobi

. Salicylic acid enhances growth, photosynthetic performance and antioxidant defense activity under salt stress in two mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] variety. Plant Signal Behav. 2023;18(1):2217605.

33.

Agnihotri

Gupta

Dwivedi

, et al. Counteractive mechanism (s) of salicylic acid in response to lead toxicity in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. cv. Varuna. Planta. 2018;248:49-68.

34.

Kaya

Sarıoglu

Ashraf

Alyemeni

Ahmad

. The combined supplementation of melatonin and salicylic acid effectively detoxifies arsenic toxicity by modulating phytochelatins and nitrogen metabolism in pepper plants. Environ Pollut. 2022;297:118727.

35.

Heli

Hongyu

Dapeng

, et al. Recent advances of γ-aminobutyric acid: physiological and immunity function, enrichment, and metabolic pathway. Front Nutr. 2022;9:1076223.

36.

Gao

, et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) promotes characteristics of Levilactobacillus sp. LB-2. LWT. 2023;184:115014.

37.

Bashir

Riaz

Anwar

, et al. Morpho-physiological changes in carrots by foliar γ-aminobutyric acid under drought stress. Braz J Bot. 2021;44:57-68.

38.

Hasan

Alabdallah

Alharbi

, et al. GABA: A key player in drought stress resistance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18):10136.

39.

Kumar

Dubey

Upadhyay

. GABA accretion reduces Lsi-1 and Lsi-2 gene expressions and modulates physiological responses in Oryza sativa to provide tolerance towards arsenic. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8786.

40.

Kumar

Gautam

Dubey

. GABA mediated reduction of arsenite toxicity in rice seedling through modulation of fatty acids, stress responsive amino acids and polyamines biosynthesis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;173:15-27.

41.

Zhou

Hassan

Peng

, et al. γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) priming improves seed germination and seedling stress tolerance associated with enhanced antioxidant metabolism, DREB expression, and dehydrin accumulation in white clover under water stress. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:776939.

42.

Kumar

Singh

Upadhyay

, et al. Review on interactions between nanomaterials and phytohormones: novel perspectives and opportunities for mitigating environmental challenges. Plant Sci. 2024;340:111964.

43.

Kim

Patel

SKS

Rasool

, et al. Bioinspired silver nanoparticle-based nanocomposites for effective control of plant pathogens: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;908:168318.

44.

Jackson

. Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice Hall, Inc; 1962.

45.

Liu

Zheng

Tan

Sun

. Effects of high concentrations of soil arsenic on the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L) and rape (Brassica napus). Plant Soil Environ. 2012;58(1):22-27.

46.

Hoagland

Arnon

. The water-Culture method for growing plants without soil. In: California Agricultural Experiment Station, Circular-347, 1950.

47.

Lichtenthaler

. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Academic Press; 1987:350.

48.

González

González-Vilar

. Determination of relative water content. In: Reigosa Roger

, ed. Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques. Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer; 2001:207-212.

49.

Velikova

Yordanov

Edreva

. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000;151:59-66.

50.

Heath

Packer

. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125(1):189-198.

51.

Mukherjee

Choudhuri

. Implications of water stress induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiol Plant. 1983;58(2):166-170.

52.

Bradford

. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1-2):248-254.

53.

Hodges

Nozzolillo

. Anthocyanin and anthocyanoplast content of cruciferous seedlings subjected to mineral nutrient deficiencies. J Plant Physiol. 1996; 147(6):749-754.

54.

Zhishen

Mengcheng

Jianming

. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64(4):555.

55.

Julkunen-Tiitto

. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J Agric Food Chem. 1985;33(2):213-217.

56.

Bates

Waldren

Teare

. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205-207.

57.

Yemm

Willis

. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J. 1954;57(3):508.

58.

Hamilton

Van Slyke

. Amino acid determination with ninhydrin. J Biol Chem. 1943;150(1):231-250.

59.

Zhang

Raziuddin

. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on oilseed rape seedling growth under herbicide toxicity stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2008;27:159-169.

60.

Upadhyaya

Sankhla

Davis

Sankhla

Smith

. Effect of Paclobutrazol on the activities of some enzymes of activated oxygen metabolism and lipid peroxidation in senescing soybean leaves. J Plant Physiol. 1985;121(5):453-461.

61.

Aebi

. Catalase invitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-126.

62.

Ellis

Gumaelius

Indriolo

Pickering

Banks

Salt

. A novel arsenate reductase from the arsenic hyperaccumulating fern Pteris vittata. Plant Physiol. 2006;141(4):1544-1554.

63.

Abdel-Lateef

Mohamed

Mahmoud

. Determination of arsenic (III) and (V) species in some environmental samples by atomic absorption spectrometry. Adv Chem Sci. 2013;2(4):110-113.

64.

Armendariz

Talano

Travaglia

Reinoso

Oller

ALW

Agostini

. Arsenic toxicity in soybean seedlings and their attenuation mechanisms. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;98:119-127.

65.

Khan

MIR

Kumari

Nazir

Khanna

Gupta

Chhillar

. Defensive role of plant hormones in advancing abiotic stress-resistant rice plants. Rice Sci. 2023;v30(1):15-35.

66.

Chu

Sun

Bao

Huang

. Melatonin alleviates arsenite toxicity by decreasing the arsenic accumulation in cell protoplasts and increasing the antioxidant capacity in rice. Chemosphere. 2023;312:137292.

67.

Banerjee

Islam

Mondal

Saha

Sen

. Proactive attenuation of arsenic-stress by nano-priming: zinc oxide nanoparticles in Vigna mungo (L.) hepper trigger antioxidant defense response and reduce root-shoot arsenic translocation. J Hazard Mater. 2023;446:130735.

68.

Kumar

Dhankher

Tripathi

Seth

. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles potentially regulate the mechanism (s) for photosynthetic attributes, genotoxicity, antioxidants defense machinery, and phytochelatins synthesis in relation to hexavalent chromium toxicity in Helianthus annuus L. J Hazard Mater. 2023;454:131418.

69.

Sun

Shi

Zhao

, et al. Effects of polyethylene and biodegradable microplastics on photosynthesis, antioxidant defense systems, and arsenic accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings grown in arsenic-contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ. 2023;868:161557.

70.

Rezaei-Chiyaneh

Seyyedi

Ebrahimian

Moghaddam

Damalas

. Exogenous application of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) alleviates the effect of water deficit stress in black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Ind Crops Prod. 2018;112:741-748.

71.

Mumthas

Chidambaram

Sundaramoorthy

Ganesh

. Effect of arsenic and manganese on root growth and cell division in root tip cells of green gram (Vigna radiate L.). Emir J Food Agric. 2010;22(4):285-297.

72.

Jalil

Alghanem

Al-Huqail

. Zinc oxide nanoparticles mitigated the arsenic induced oxidative stress through modulation of physio-biochemical aspects and nutritional ions homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chemosphere. 2023;338:139566.

73.

Ibrahimova

Zivcak

Gasparovic

, et al.

Electron and proton transport in wheat exposed to salt stress: is the increase of the thylakoid membrane proton conductivity responsible for decreasing the photosynthetic activity in sensitive genotypes?

Photosynthesis Res. 2021;150(1-3):195-211.

74.

Das

. Comparative study of silicon and selenium to modulate chloroplast pigments levels, Hill activity, photosynthetic parameters and carbohydrate metabolism under arsenic stress in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;17:1-22.Biswas

75.

Saleem

Mfarrej

MFB

Alatawi

. Silicon enhances morpho–physio–biochemical responses in arsenic stressed spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) by minimizing its uptake. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(3):2053-2072.

76.

Chen

Han

Zhao

, et al. Response of plant element traits to soil arsenic stress and its implications for vegetation restoration in a post-mining area. Ecol Indic. 2023;146:109931.

77.

Seifikalhor

Aliniaeifard

Bernard

. γ-Aminobutyric acid confers cadmium tolerance in maize plants by concerted regulation of polyamine metabolism and antioxidant defense systems. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3356.

78.

Ahmad

Alyemeni

Al-Huqail

, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles application alleviates arsenic (As) toxicity in soybean plants by restricting the uptake of as and modulating key biochemical attributes, antioxidant enzymes, ascorbate-glutathione cycle and glyoxalase system. Plants. 2020;9(7):825.

79.

Vezza

Llanes

Travaglia

Agostini

Talano

. Arsenic stress effects on root water absorption in soybean plants: Physiological and morphological aspects. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;123:8-17.

80.

Waris

Noreen

Shah

, et al. Efficacy of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) on physio-biochemical attributes of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) under cadmium toxicity. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42:5041-5057.

81.

Kumar

Sinha

Datta

Asif

Trivedi

. microRNA408 and its encoded peptide regulate sulfur assimilation and arsenic stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2023;192(2):837-856.

82.

Saeed

Quraishi

Malik

. Arsenic uptake and toxicity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A review of multi-omics approaches to identify tolerance mechanisms. Food Chem. 2021;355:129607.

83.

Ghorbani

Pishkar

Roodbari

Tavakoli

Jahromi

. Nitrate reductase is needed for methyl jasmonate-mediated arsenic toxicity tolerance of rice by modulating the antioxidant defense system, glyoxalase system and arsenic sequestration mechanism. J Plant Growth Regul. 2023;42(2):1107-1119.

84.

Natasha

Shahid

Khalid

. Influence of biochar on trace element uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants and associated health risks: a critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2022;52(16):2803-2843.

85.

Finnegan

Chen

. Arsenic toxicity: The effects on plant metabolism. Front Physiol. 2012;3:182.

86.

Bano

Kumar

Alyemeni

Ahmad

. Protective mechanisms of sulfur against arsenic phytotoxicity in Brassica napus by regulating thiol biosynthesis, sulfur-assimilation, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;188:1.

87.

Sheteiwy

Shao

, et al. GABA-alleviated oxidative injury induced by salinity, osmotic stress and their combination by regulating cellular and molecular signals in rice. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5709.

88.

Mahakham

Sarmah

Maensiri

Theerakulpisut

. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8263.

89.

Sharma

Dietz

. The significance of amino acids and amino acid-derived molecules in plant responses and adaptation to heavy metal stress. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(4):711-726.

90.

Sardar

Ahmed

Yasin

. Role of exogenously applied putrescine in amelioration of cadmium stress in Coriandrum sativum by modulating antioxidant system. Int J Phytoremed. 2022;24(9):955-962.

91.

Lei

Liang

et al. Poly (γ-glutamic acid) enhanced tolerance to salt stress by promoting proline accumulation in Brassica napus L. Plant Growth Regul. 2016; 78:233-241.

92.

Sun

Zhou

Sun

Jin

. Antioxidative defense and proline/phytochelatin accumulation in a newly discovered Cd-hyperaccumulator, Solanum nigrum L. Environ Exp Bot. 2007;60(3):468-476.

93.

Gupta

Seth

. Interactive role of exogenous 24 Epibrassinolide and endogenous NO in Brassica juncea L. under salinity stress: Evidence for NR-dependent NO biosynthesis. Nitric Oxide. 2020;97:33-47.

94.

Jogawat

. Osmolytes and their role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress: Biol Biotechnol. 2019;1:91-104.

95.

Kohli

Bali

Tejpal

, et al. In-situ localization and biochemical analysis of bio-molecules reveals Pb-stress amelioration in Brassica juncea L. by co-application of 24-Epibrassinolide and salicylic acid. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3524.

96.

Song

Yang

Shao

Zheng

Brestic

. The alleviative effects of salicylic acid on the activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase in malting barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seedling leaves stressed by heavy metals. Clean. 2014;42(1):88-97.

97.

Fang

Yan

Pan

Tang

. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on arsenic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.): germination, early growth, and arsenic uptake. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:26974-26981.

98.

Shaibur

Kitajima

Sugawara

Kondo

Huq

Kawai

. Effect of arsenic on phytosiderophores and mineral nutrition of barley seedlings grown in iron-depleted medium. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2009;55(2):283-293.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.33 MB

Salicylic Acid and Gemma-Aminobutyric Acid Mediated Regulation of Growth,Metabolites,Antioxidant Defense System and Nutrient Uptake in Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) Under Arsenic Stress

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Highlights

Novelty Statement

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Growth Attributes

Chlorophyll Pigments

Measurement of Relative Water Content

Determination of H2O2 and MDA Contents

Estimation of Ascorbic Acid

Total Soluble Protein Determination

Anthocyanin Content Measurement

Flavonoids Content Estimation

Phenolic Contents Measurement

Cytosolutes Determination

Enzymatic Antioxidants Assay

Determination of Arsenate Reductase (AR) Activity

Determination of Total As (V), As (III), and Elemental Uptake in Root and Leaf of Plants

Statistical Analysis

Results

Growth-Related Traits

Photosynthetic Pigments, and Relative Water Contents

Secondary Metabolites, Osmolytes and Ascorbic Acid Contents

Oxidative Markers and Proline Content

Enzymatic Antioxidants

Arsenate Reductase (AR) Activity

As5+ and As3+ Uptake and Accumulation

Nutrient Acquisition

Pearson’s Correlation

Principal Component Analysis

Discussion

Conclusion

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Salicylic Acid and Gemma-Aminobutyric Acid Mediated Regulation of Growth, Metabolites, Antioxidant Defense System and Nutrient Uptake in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Under Arsenic Stress

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Author Contributions

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material

Determination of H₂O₂ and MDA Contents

As⁵⁺ and As³⁺ Uptake and Accumulation