Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in workers with trigger digit. There are few cross-sectional studies that assess this relationship. Methods: A baseline examination of 1216 workers from 17 diverse manufacturing facilities was conducted. Worker demographics, medical history, and symptoms of trigger digit were assessed. Age, sex, and body mass index were obtained. Biomechanical factors were individually measured using the Strain Index (SI). Prevalence was assessed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Unadjusted prevalence of trigger digit was 12.0%, and among those workers, there was an unadjusted CTS prevalence of 26.7%. The adjusted multivariate model found an odds ratio (OR) of CTS of 1.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.36) among the workers with trigger digit. The ORs of CTS for SI (OR = 1.53 [95% CI, 1.04-2.23]), age (OR = 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.04]), and current smoking (OR = 1.76 [95% CI, 1.12-2.75]) were also significant. Sex and diabetes were not statistically significant covariates. Conclusion: The prevalence of CTS is higher among workers with trigger digit.
FalkinerSMyersS.When exactly can carpal tunnel syndrome be considered work-related?ANZ J Surg. 2002;72(3):204-209.
2.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2015, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh2.nr0.htm. Accessed November 20, 2019.
3.
DeKromMCKnipschildPGKesterAD, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome—prevalence in the general-population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(4):373-376.
4.
AtroshiIGummessonCJohnssonR, et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153-158.
5.
DaleAMHarris-AdamsonCRempelD, et al. Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(5):495-505.
6.
GellNWernerRAFranzblauA, et al. A longitudinal study of industrial and clerical workers: incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome and assessment of risk factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(1):47-55.
7.
GerrFMarcusMEnsorC, et al. Prospective study of computer users: I. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med. 2002;41:221-235.
8.
BarnesCGCurreyHL.Carpal tunnel syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis. A clinical and electrodiagnostic survey. Ann Rheum Dis. 1967;26(3):226-233.
9.
BonfiglioliRMattioliSArmstrongTJ, et al. Validation of the ACGIH TLV for hand activity level in the OCTOPUS cohort: a two-year longitudinal study of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39(2):155-163.
10.
WeilbyA.Trigger finger: incidence in children and adults and the possibility of a predisposition in certain age groups. Acta Orthop Scand. 1970;41(4):419-427.
11.
StromL.Trigger finger in diabetes. J Med Soc N J. 1977;74:951-954.
12.
ChammasMBousquetPRenardE, et al. Dupuytren’s disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger, and diabetes mellitus. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(1):109-114.
13.
GorscheRWileyJPRenderR, et al. Prevalence and incidence of stenosing flexor tenosynovitis (trigger finger) in a meat-packing plant. J Occup Environ Med. 1996;40:556-560.
14.
KapelluschJMGargAHegmannKT.The Strain Index and ACGIH TLV for HAL risk of trigger digit in the WISTAH prospective cohort. Hum Factors. 2013;56(1):98-111.
KumarPChakrabartiI.Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger: is there an association. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009;34(1):58-59.
17.
LinFYManriqueOJLinCL, et al. Incidence of trigger digits following carpal tunnel release: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(27):e7355.
18.
GargAHegmannKTWertschJJ, et al. The WISTAH hand study: a prospective cohort study of distal upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:90.
19.
BaoSSKapelluschJMGargA, et al. Developing a pooled job physical exposure data set from multiple independent studies: an example of a consortium study of carpal tunnel syndrome. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(2):130-137.
20.
GargAKapelluschJHegmannKT, et al. The Strain Index (SI) and threshold limit value (TLV) for hand activity level (HAL): risk of CTS in a prospective cohort. Ergonomics. 2012;55(4):396-414.
21.
MooreJSGargA.The Strain Index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995;56(5):443-458.
