Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

One-dimensional materials, such as nanowires, nanotubes, or nanofibers, have attracted more and more attention recently due to their unique physical properties. Their large length-to-diameter ratio creates anisotropic material properties which could not be reached in bulk material. Especially one-dimensional magnetic structures are of high interest since the strong shape anisotropy reveals new magnetization reversal modes and possible applications. One possibility to create magnetic nanofibers in a relatively simple way is offered by electrospinning them from polymer solutions or melts with incorporated magnetic nanoparticles. This review gives an overview of most recent methods of electrospinning magnetic nanofibers, measuring their properties as well as possible applications from basic research to single-cell manipulation to microwave absorption.

Keywords

Electrospinning magnetic nanoparticles nanofibers

Production of magnetic nanofibers

Electrospinning technology

The electrospinning technology can be used to prepare nanofibers or nanofiber mats from polymer solutions or melts, possibly including ceramics, metallic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and so on, in addition.^1–3 Generally, electrospinning can be subdivided into needle-based and needleless techniques (Figure 1). In the needle-based method, a polymer solution or melt is pressed through a needle into a strong electrical field, drawing the polymer to a substrate and on this way stretching and thinning the fiber so that diameters of some ten to some hundred nanometers are reached. Needleless methods include, for example, a wire-based technique in which one wire is coated with a polymer solution or melt, which is drawn to the second wire by the strong electrical field between them. Alternatively, rotating cylinders and other geometries can be used as electrodes, modifying not only the amount of created fibers per time, but also their alignment. In both cases, the so-called Taylor cones are formed between both electrodes. This influences the fiber formation due to possible instabilities, resulting in modifications of the fiber lengths and diameters.⁴ Modified electrospinning equipment in addition allows for creating core-shell or similar double-material structures, also called Janus structures,^5–7 for electrospinning hollow fibers⁸ or even more sophisticated hierarchical structures.⁹

Figure 1.

Different electrospinning techniques: (a) needle-based, (b) wire-based, and (c) using a rotating cylinder.

Polymers for electrospinning

Typical electrospinning polymers are, for example, water-soluble ones such as polyethylene glycol (PEG or PEO) which is often used as spinning agent (Figure 2(a)),^10–12 polyacrylonitrile (PAN) which belongs to the few materials which can be electrospun from the low-toxic solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Figure 2(b))^13,14 and is often used as a precursor for carbon nanofibers,^15,16 or poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL) which is typically used in cell growth applications.^17,18 Blending different polymers is as well possible as adding non-polymeric substances, such as ceramics or metals.^19,20

Figure 2.

Nanofiber mats prepared from (a) PEG and (b) PAN.

Adding magnetic properties to nanofibers is usually performed by adding magnetic nanoparticles to the polymer solution or blend. Different mechanical and magnetic properties can be reached by working with the blended fibers or calcinating them to obtain the pure metallic fibers.

Field-assisted electrospinning technology

Guarino et al. used a needle-based electrospinning setup to create magnetic nanofibers with polycarbonate-urethane (PCU) as polymer filled with nickel nanoparticles. They modified the counter-electrode with permanent magnets, creating a constant magnetic field perpendicular to the electric field, in this way preparing aligned magnetic nanofibers between the magnetic poles (Figure 3).²¹

Figure 3.

Magnetic field–assisted needle-based electrospinning.

Another magnetic field–assisted electrospinning process was described by Mei et al. In their electrospun PAN/FeCo nanofibers, the alignment degree increased with decreasing voltage and increasing FeCo content.²²

Shehata and Abdelkader²³ used a concave collector, modified by magnetic disks creating a magnetic field during electrospinning, and found the degree of fiber orientation increased, as compared with the unmodified concave or the conventional flat collector. The self-organization of a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/ferrofluid cone array, forming tips from which electrospinning occurred in the presence of an electric field in addition to the magnetic field, was used to create magnetic nanofibers with relatively high saturation magnetization.²⁴

Nickel ferrite–barium titanate core-shell nanofibers were created by magnetic field–assisted electrospinning, allowing for assembling them into disks or films in a uniform or gradient magnetic field.²⁵

Magnetic composite nanofibers

Generally, magnetic nanofibers can be used when the polymer material is kept after electrospinning, so that the magnetic nanoparticles are usually embedded in a polymer matrix.

PAN nanofibers with Fe₃O₄ (magnetite) nanoparticles were needle-electrospun from DMF (dimethylformamide) after ultrasonic dispersion for 12 h.²⁶ Ultrasonic treatment, however, was investigated in detail by Peer et al., using Fe-based magnetic nanoparticles in a PEO matrix. They found that a compromise must be made between the increased nanoparticle distribution in the polymer solution and the loss of possible damage of the polymer, leading to a loss of quality of the electrospun nanofibers, which they suggested to be reached after 30 min of ultrasonic treatment.²⁷

Using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as spinning agent, Fe₃O₄/PVP nanofibers were electrospun as one layer of an electrospun composite, comprising magnetic, conductive, and photoluminescent properties.²⁸ In combination with PCL, Fe₃O₄/PCL nanofibers were needle-electrospun.²⁹ Different amounts of Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃/NiO (diiron nickel tetroxide or nickel ferrite) were electrospun with PAN by a wire-based technique.³⁰ Using a blend of carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) and PVA, Fe₃O₄/CMC/PVA-blended fibers were needle-electrospun, indicating that fiber diameters as well as the numbers and shapes of beads along the fibers vary with the metal content.³¹ Embedding Fe₃O₄/graphene nanoparticles in PVA nanofibers (Figure 4), Noori et al.³² found significantly reduced nanofiber diameters and increased thermal stability, as compared to pure PVA nanofibers.

Figure 4.

Embedding nanoparticles, for example, from graphene and Fe₃O₄, into a polymer solution, for example from PVA, results in composite nanofibers.³²

To avoid nanoparticle agglomerations, iron oxide nanoparticles were surface functionalized using polyethyleneimine (PEI), aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTS), PEG, and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) before electrospinning with polyamide (PA) 6.^33,34

Hernández et al. used electrospinning to prepare Nd_0.05Bi_0.95Fe_0.95Co_0.05O₃ fibers from a polymer blend solution, resulting in nanofibers with partly interesting curls. In addition, these fibers revealed conductivity above the usual ferroelectrical materials’ range.³⁵

Rare earth magnets are only scarcely used for electrospinning. Wang et al.,³⁶ for example, prepared gadolinium methacrylate from methacrylic acid (MAA) and gadolinium oxide, mixed the resulting crystal powder with dicumyl peroxide and PAN, and prepared nanofibers by needle-electrospinning.

Pure magnetic nanofibers

Another possibility is calcinating the polymer after electrospinning to obtain pure magnetic or pure ceramic nanofibers.

Li et al. prepared CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers by first preparing a sol of Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O, citric acid, ethanol, and distilled water. By calcinating this precursor under inert gas atmosphere, they received CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles which were needle-electrospun with PEO. Afterward the fibers were again calcinated in inert gas to obtain pure CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers.³⁷

Co_xZn_(1-x)O nanofibers were created by needle-electrospinning Zn(CH₃COO)₂·2H₂O, Co(CH₃COO)₂·4H₂O, and PVP from a DMF/ethanol solution, followed by calcination of the nanofibers.³⁸

A hybrid material of La_0.7Sr_0.3MnO₃ (LSMO), a ferromagnetic material with colossal magneto-resistance, and La_1.85Sr_0.15CuO₄ (LSCO), a high-temperature superconductor, was needle-electrospun using PVA. After calcination, an additional oxygenation step was necessary to tailor the desired phase composition.^39–42

SmCoFe nanofibers with different degrees of Fe substitution, as compared to pure SmCo nanofibers, were needle-electrospun using PVP as polymer, which was afterward calcinated out of the fibers. 10at% Fe substitution resulted in an increased net magnetic moment, coercive field, and saturation magnetization and thus in an increased maximum energy product.^43–45

Ghazi et al. prepared magnesium-zinc ferrite nanofibers by electrospinning, using PVP as the spinning polymer, doped with zinc nitrate, ferric nitrate and magnesium nitrate hexahydrate. They found the cubic spinel structure of magnesium ferrite to be obtained also for Zn doping. After calcination at 550°C, the maximum of the particle size distribution was smallest for 10% Zn concentration.⁴⁶

NiCo₂O₄ (nickel cobaltite) was embedded in a polymer solution from poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN); the electrospun nanofibers were afterward calcinated, resulting in fractal NiCo₂O₄ aggregates along the nanofibers after temperature treatment.⁴⁷

To obtain the α-Fe₂O₃ phase from PVA/Fe₂O₃ nanofibers, a heat treatment was used, reducing the fiber diameter which was also influenced by the PVA content of the mixture.⁴⁸

A more complicated technique was used by Guarino et al. to prepare polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) nanofibers with Ni nanoparticles. By coaxial electrospinning, core-shell fibers with PDMS/Ni in the core and a PVP shell were created. After removing the shell, the core exhibited interesting elasto-magnetic deflection due to transversal magnetization. Using such nanofibers, magnetic forces could be used to deform devices which may open new applications in biomedicine.⁴⁹

For the preparation of LaFe_1-xMn_xO₃ nanofibers, Jeong et al. dissolved La(NO₃)₃, Fe(NO₃)₃, and Mn(NO₃)₂ with PVP in DMF and performed needle-electrospinning. The fibers were afterward calcinated to remove the polymer. With increasing Mn doping, the average crystallite size decreased, while the fiber diameters stayed similar.⁵⁰

For strontium hexaferrite nanoparticles embedded in PVA nanofibers, Murillo-Ortiz et al.⁵¹ interestingly found a positive effect of relatively low nanoparticle densities in the polymer matrix on the fibers’ hard magnetic properties which was attributed to the vanishing inter-particle exchange interaction which made the magneto-static interaction dominant and created a new magnetic shape anisotropy along the fibers.

Magnetic carbon nanofibers

As explained above, PAN belongs to the possible precursors of carbon nanofibers. The aforementioned nanofibers either included the polymer used for electrospinning, or this polymer was calcinated out of the fibers to produce pure metal fibers. There are, however, also literature reports on a third approach, using PAN as the polymer enabling electrospinning and afterward stabilizing and carbonizing the PAN/nanoparticle-blended fibers to obtain magnetic carbon fibers (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

PAN/nanoparticle-blended electrospun nanofibers can be stabilized and carbonized to create magnetic carbon fibers.

Huang et al., for example, used PAN and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in different ratios, combined with Fe(NO₃)₃·9H₂O, for needle-electrospinning. These nanofiber mats were stabilized at 250°C in air and afterward carbonized at 800°C in nitrogen atmosphere to obtain carbon fibers with Fe and FeO_x nanoparticles.^52,53 The slow stabilization process in air is a necessary first step before carbonization can be carried out, resulting in cyclization, dehydrogenation, oxidation, aromatization, and crosslinking reactions.¹⁶ Without this thermal pretreatment, the PAN nanofibers would be decomposed at temperatures higher than approx. 300°C instead of being carbonized.

Blending PAN and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with C₁₅H₃₀FeO₆ was used to create porous carbon/Fe nanofibers by electrospinning, followed by stabilization and carbonization.⁵⁴

By using nickel(II) acetylacetonate and cobalt(III) acetylacetonate as precursors, partly combined with multiwall carbon nanotubes, magnetic carbon fibers were created by electrospinning both magnetic precursors with PAN from DMF. Here, the authors found that the fiber diameters decreased with increasing nanoparticle concentration, which they attributed to the increased conductivity of the spinning solution.⁵⁵

A more complicated method was necessary to create magnetic nanofibers containing gadolinium (Gd) and europium (Eu). To create Gd₂O₂S nanofibers doped with dysprosium (Dy) and Eu, Gd₂O₃, Eu₂O₃ and Dy₂O₃ were dissolved in HNO₃ (nitric acid). After heating and thus drying the solution, lanthanide nitrides were gained which were put into DMF in which afterward PVP was dissolved. Needle-electrospinning resulted in nanofibers which were afterward sintered at 700°C. These pre-products were then sulfurized using the dual-boat sulfurization method, placing the samples beside a porcelain boat with sulfur powder in the furnace, resulting in the desired Dy- and Eu-doped Gd₂O₂S nanofibers.⁵⁶

Abdalla et al. also added NiFe₂O₄ nanoparticles and partly additional multiwall carbon nanotubes to carbon nanofibers, produced by electrospinning them from a solution of PAN in DMF, and afterward stabilized and carbonized at 850°C. Adding the multiwall carbon nanofibers to the spinning solution resulted in an increase of the amount of prepared nanofibers by nearly a factor of 2.⁵⁷

Multifunctional magnetic nanofibers

Sometimes, magnetism is not the main function of magnetic nanofibers, but the magnetic material serves as a base for other functionalities. Most recently, Wang et al.⁵⁸ produced CuFe₂O₄ fibers in which they could tailor the amount of CuO nanoparticles on the fiber surfaces by modifying the ratio of Co to Fe precursor, making such fibers applicable for catalytic oxidation.

In other cases, other physical properties are desired besides ferromagnetism. In this case, Janus fibers are often useful to avoid undesired interdependencies between both functionalities (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Janus fibers can be produced by electrospinning from two syringes to combine desired material properties.

Conjugate electrospinning was used to prepare Janus microfibers which combined magnetic with fluorescent properties, but strictly separating both materials responsible for the respective properties which avoided undesired influences of each material on the other one.⁵⁹

Janus nanostructures with tunable magnetic and photoluminescent properties were prepared from Eu(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline, Tb(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline, Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, and PVP as the polymer used as a spinning agent.⁶⁰

Another method was described by Wang et al. They also used PVP in ethanol with Tb(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline to create fluorescence properties, but added Fe₃O₄ and PVP in ethanol for the magnetic part. Conjugate electrospinning was performed using two syringes with plastic spinnerets for the two solutions and a rotating drum as collector, resulting in aligned nanofibers with similar diameters.⁶¹

Xi et al.⁶² created luminescent, magnetic, and electrically conductive Janus fibers via a homemade coaxis/monoaxis spinneret, preparing a coaxial Fe₃O₄/PVP core and a Eu(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline/PVP shell as one part of the fiber, and adding the conductivity by the second half of the fiber, consisting of polyaniline/PVP.

Janus fibers from CoFe₂O₄/PAN and 1,8-naphthalene anhydride/PVP were electrospun, revealing good magnetic and fluorescent properties.⁶³

Fan et al.⁶⁴ combined magnetic and fluorescent properties by combining Fe₃O₄/PAN and Eu(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline/PAN electrospun nanofibers and found higher fluorescence than in mixed Fe₃O₄/Eu(benzoic acid)₃ 1,10-phenanthroline/PAN nanofibers.

An overview of typical recent materials of magnetic electrospun nanofibers is given in Table 1. As shown here, nanofibers from a broad range of magnetic materials can be electrospun, either in the form of a composite with a polymer, or purely or as a blend with carbon.

Table 1.

Typical combinations of polymers and magnetic materials used for electrospinning.

Polymer	Magnetic material	Other material	References
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)	–	–	10–12
Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)	–	–	13–18
Polycarbonate-urethane	Ni	–	21
PAN	FeCo	–	22
Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)	Magnetite (Fe₃O₄)	–	24
–	Nickel ferrite	Barium titanate	25
PAN	Magnetite	–	26, 30
PEG	Fe	–	27
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)	Magnetite	–	28
Poly(caprolactone) (PCL)	Magnetite	–	29
PAN	Fe₂O₃/NiO	–	30
Carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC)/PVA	Magnetite	–	31
PVA	Magnetite	Graphene	32
–	CoFe₂O₄	–	37
–	Co_xZn_(1-x)O	–	38
–	SmCo	–	43, 44
–	SmCoFe	–	45
–	Mg_1−xZn_xFe₂O₄	–	46
–	NiCo₂O₄	–	47
–	α-Fe₂O₃	–	48
–	LaFe_1-xMn_xO₃	–	50
–	FeO_x/Fe	Carbon	52, 53
–	Fe	Carbon	54
–	NiFe₂O₄	Carbon	57

Magnetic properties

Measuring magnetic properties can be done by most common instruments which are used to examine magnetic thin layers or nanostructures, such as superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID),⁶⁵ vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM),⁶⁰ or alternating gradient magnetometer (AGM).⁶⁶ Optical methods, such as magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE), have not yet been reported in the literature for investigations of electrospun nanofiber mats; the roughest materials examined in this way are to the best of our knowledge paper coated with magnetic flakes.⁶⁷

SQUID measurements were, for example, used to examine the magnetic properties of pure and Mn-doped electrospun barium titanate nanofibers which were found to be diamagnetic and paramagnetic, respectively.⁶⁸

LSMO nanofibers as well as LSMO/LSCO nanowire networks were investigated by SQUID, revealing their soft magnetic properties.^41,42

Gd₂O₂S nanofibers, partly doped with Dy and Eu in different ratios, were found to be strongly paramagnetic, using SQUID measurements.⁵⁶

SQUID measurements can also be used to measure zero field-cooling/field cooling curves in a broad temperature interval, allowing for detecting magnetic phase transitions. Such blocking temperatures were, for example, measured for Fe₃O₄/CMC/PVA nanofibers, where the blocking temperature was found to be only slightly dependent on the Fe₃O₄ concentration in the fibers, indicating that nanoparticles aggregate already at low magnetite concentrations.³¹

VSM measurements were used to investigate magnetic nanofibers containing ferromagnetic Ni nanoparticles, indicating a difference between measurements parallel and perpendicular to the axes of the aligned nanofibers.¹⁷ Similarly, VSM measurements revealed about a factor of 2 between saturation magnetization and remanence along and perpendicular to the aligned PAN/FeCo nanofibers, electrospun by a magnetic field–assisted technique.²²

For Co-doped ZnO nanofibers, VSM measurements found a strong dependence of the magnetic properties on the amount of Co, with higher Co content resulting in larger coercivities and a maximum saturation magnetization for an intermediate Co fraction,³⁸ while a previous study of the same system underlined the presence of a Co₃O₄ phase in samples with Co contents higher than 2% and a large paramagnetic signal in addition to the weak ferromagnetism at room temperature.⁶⁹ Huang and Or⁷⁰ reported that the dielectric loss and magnetic loss properties were significantly better for Co-doped ZnO nanofibers, as compared to nanoparticles of the same material.

VSM measurements were also applied to examine the influence of Fe substitution in SmCo nanofibers, showing changes in the maximum magnetization, squareness of the hysteresis loop and coercivity depending on the amount of Fe substitution.⁴⁵ Similarly, Zn doping of MgFe₂O₄ was investigated by VSM. Here, the doping decreased the net magnetization which was attributed to the decrease of the number of Fe³⁺ ions on the B-site of the spinel structure and the Mg²⁺ ions on the A-site.⁴⁶

For nanofibers produced from Nd_0.05Bi_0.95Fe_0.95Co_0.05O₃ in a polymer matrix, ferromagnetic behavior was revealed at room temperature, using a VSM.³⁵

Low-temperature measurements by VSM showed a spin-glass state in electrospun La_0.33Pr_0.34Ca_0.33MnO₃ nanofibers below approx. 50 K, in addition to a colossal magnetoresistance of up to 95%. Furthermore, a transition from a paramagnetic insulator to a ferromagnetic metal phase was found at approx. 70 K. These properties made such nanofibers promising for new microelectronic devices.⁷¹ Samarium–cobalt nanofibers were investigated by VSM, finding decreasing saturation magnetization and increasing coercivity with increasing Sm content.⁴³

Applications

Typical applications of nanofiber mats are based on their large surface-to-volume ratio and range from filter materials^72,73 to catalysts,^74,75 and from cell growth and tissue engineering to medical wound dressing.^76–78

Absorption of microwave and other irradiation

Magnetic nanofibers can, for example, be used for microwave absorption (Figure 7). Li et al.³⁷ found the microwave absorption performance of CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers strongly enhanced and the absorption bandwidth broadened, as compared to bulk material, which was attributed to the electromagnetic coupling between the nanofibers and the microwaves. Huang et al.,³⁸ Huang and Or,⁷⁰ and Qiao et al.⁷⁹ used Co-doped ZnO nanofibers as microwave absorbers. Ni-Zn spinel ferrite nanofibers were suggested by Hou et al.⁸⁰ as microwave absorbers for the range of 2–18 GHz. Porous carbon/Fe nanofibers were also shown to have good electromagnetic wave absorption properties.^54,81 In the range of 5.4–18 GHz, carbon/NiFe₂O₄ nanofibers with additional carbon nanotubes included in the spinning solution showed good microwave absorption.⁵⁷ Electrospun Co₃O₄/carbon nanofiber mats also showed good electromagnetic wave absorption between 4.5 and 14.4 GHz,⁸² similar to Co/C nanofibers.⁸³ Using Fe₃O₄/graphene oxide/PVDF nanofibers, Samadi et al.⁸⁴ could increase the microwave absorption and in addition show piezoelectric properties of these fibers. Electrospun Fe₃O₄/SiO₂ nanofibers showed good resistance against acids and high heat and flame resistance in addition to good microwave absorption between 7 and 18 GHz.⁸⁵ Fe₃O₄/PVP nanofibers showed good electromagnetic shielding for the frequency range between 8.2 and 12.4 GHz.⁸⁶ Using polycarbosilane and ferric acetylacetonate as precursors, Hou et al.⁸⁷ prepared electrospun Fe₃Si/SiC nanofibers which were found suitable for microwave absorption between 8.5 and 16.5 GHz. Mixing Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄ and SrFe₁₂O₁₉, a soft and a hard magnetic material, in porous electrospun composite fibers, Zhou et al.⁸⁸ found that by tailoring the mass ratio of soft and hard phases, the reflection loss and the bandwidth could be optimized for wide-band microwave absorption. A similar material was applied by Xiang et al.⁸⁹ who used Ni_0.4Co_0.2Zn_0.4Fe₂O₄/BaTiO₃ nanofibers for microwave absorption and found a broad effective absorption bandwidth between 7.8 and 17.3 GHz. Moradipour et al.⁹⁰ used electrospun nanofibers consisting of Cu₂Fe₂O₄, Fe₂O₃, Fe₃O₄, and Al₂O₃ to examine microwave absorbance in the frequency range of 5–12 GHz. FeNi/C nanofibers showed different microwave absorption properties depending on the carbonization time.⁹¹ Similarly, Bayat et al.⁹² found the electromagnetic shielding properties of electrospun Fe₃O₄/C nanofibers related to the carbonization temperature and the magnetite nanoparticle diameter.

Figure 7.

Magnetic nanofiber mats can be used for microwave absorption.

Absorption of thermal neutrons was investigated for PAN containing gadolinium, showing that the addition of this rare earth magnetic material significantly reduced the neutron transmissivity even through a thin shield.³⁶ Europium, on the other hand, was used as dopant for porous TiO₂ nanofibers, increasing the photoluminescence emission intensity with the europium content.⁹³

Removal and decomposition of contaminants

Fe₃O₄/PAN nanofibers mats were coated with horseradish peroxidase, a bio-enzyme with photocatalytic properties. This composite was used for phenol removal from wastewater.²⁶ Another approach to create photocatalytically active nanofibers was investigated by Chang et al. They produced CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers and decorated them afterward with BiOI nanoplates. These magnetic fibers showed high visible-light photocatalytic properties, degrading rhodamine B fast, could be re-used several times and collected in an external magnetic field after use.⁹⁴ Similarly, Chang et al.⁹⁵ found Fe₂O₃/BiOI electrospun hollow nanofibers to show high catalytic performance even under visible light for rhodamine B decomposition. Good catalytic properties and cycle stability was also recognized for PVA/poly(acrylic acid)/Fe₃O₄/MXene@Ag nanoparticle composites, produced by electrospinning,⁹⁶ as well as CuO-NiO/carbon nanofibers which were carbonized after electrospinning⁹⁷ and Bi₂MoO₆/ZnFe₂O₄ heterojunction nanofibers which were tested by rhodamine B degradation.⁹⁸ Electrospun magnetic nanofibers from a Fe₃O₄/PVA core and a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and PCL shell were decorated with TiO₂ nanoparticles by electrospraying, resulting in good photocatalytic activity under UV light.⁹⁹

Removal of Cr(VI) from drinking water, investigated with magnetic carbon fibers containing Fe and FeO_x, was found to strongly depend on Fe and N co-doping.⁵² Methylene blue was degraded in the presence of H₂O₂ and UV irradiation by PCL/Fe₃O₄ nanofiber mats²⁹ or by ZrO₂ hollow nanofibers with iron nanoparticles added along the inner surface.¹⁰⁰

Zhang et al.¹⁰¹ developed PLA/γ-Fe₂O₃ nanofibers with dual-scaled pores for motor oil absorption and found high absorption capacity combined with high oil permeation flux under gravitational force, making this system useful for continuous oil/water separation in wastewater treatment. Electrospun PVDF and polysulfone nanofibers with embedded Halloysite nanoclay and CoFe₂O₄ nanoparticles were found suitable for oily liquid sorption.¹⁰² Blending γ-Fe₂O₃ (maghemite) with a carbon precursor to create γ-Fe₂O₃/C electrospun core-shell nanofibers was suggested for the creation of an electrochemical sensor for trace cadmium ions.¹⁰³

For the decolorization of amaranth as a model dye, Lin et al. used cobalt ferrite nanoparticles electrospun from a PAN solution and afterward stabilized and carbonized to create CoFe₂O₄/carbon nanofibers. This material worked as a catalyst for the activation of peroxymonosulfate which then generated sulfate radicals and thus decolorize amaranth in an aqueous solution.¹⁰⁴ For the activation of peroxymonosulfate, Zhang et al.¹⁰⁵ found cobalt/carbon nanofiber composites suitable, with cobalt revealing higher catalytic performance than Co₃O₄ or carbon nanotubes. Fe₃O₄/graphene/PAN nanofibers were successfully used for removal of Basic Red 46 from aqueous solutions.¹⁰⁶ Electrospun Sr²⁺ doped BiFeO₃ nanofibers showed varying photocatalytic properties, as measured by methylene blue degradation, and photoluminescence; the photocatalytic properties were found significantly higher than in nanoparticles of the same material.¹⁰⁷ Doping BiFeO₃ with Sm, on the other hand, resulted in nanofibers with high magnetization, large dielectric constant, and polarization than pure BiFeO₃ over a wide temperature range.¹⁰⁸ Doping this material with Mn instead resulted in soft magnetic behavior with increased remanent magnetization.¹⁰⁹

Biotechnology and biomedicine

Even for cell growth applications, magnetic nanofibers are of interest. Polylactic acid–glycolic acid (PLGA) nanofibers with Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles were coated with pyrrole, resulting in polypyrrole (PPy)/Fe₃O₄/PLGA fibrous scaffolds with electrical and magnetic properties, thus enabling delivering electrical and magnetic signals. Pre-osteoblasts grown on these scaffolds were stimulated electrically and magnetically, resulting in higher cell viabilities than the reference cells, stimulated only with one method or not at all. Magnetic stimulation was even able to align cells on the magnetic scaffolds, making this material highly applicable in bone tissue engineering.¹¹⁰ Similarly, 3D growth and viability of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were found to be significantly supported by core-shell magnetic structures based on electrospinning.¹¹¹ Brito-Pereira et al.¹¹² found silk fibroin nanofibers filled with CoFe₂O₄ or Fe₃O₄ to be not cytotoxic and thus applicable for tissue engineering. Tissue engineering is one of the possible applications of electrospun PMMA nanofibers in which carbon nanotube/Fe₃O₄ fibers were embedded.¹¹³

For drug delivery or bioseparation, nanofibers with strong paramagnetic properties prepared by the coaxial technology (Figure 8), such as Gd₂O₂S, possibly doped with Eu or Dy, were suggested.⁵⁶ Combining doxorubicin (DOX), an anticancer drug, NaX nanozeolites and Fe₃O₄ in a PLA/chitosan spinning solution enabled controlled release of the DOX to kill H1355 carcinoma cells. The magnetic particles allowed for investigating the influence of a magnetic field, showing that in this way the antitumor activity could be increased to 82% dead tumor cells after 1-week treatment in an external magnetic field.¹¹⁴ Demir et al. examined Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in PCL nanofibers, produced by electrospinning, for drug delivery. Comparing the delivery of hydrophobic and hydrophilic model systems from such blended fibers with pure PCL fibers, they found different influence of the magnetic nanoparticles on release of hydrophobic and hydrophilic dyes, respectively.¹¹⁵ PCL/Fe₃O₄ electrospun nanofibers were used to deliver heat and anticancer drugs simultaneously, enabling killing HeLa cancer cells efficiently.¹¹⁶

Figure 8.

Utilization of the coaxial electrospinning technology for drug delivery from nanofiber mats.

Hyperthermia therapy applications were also based on magnetic nanofibers. Matos et al. developed electrospun nanofiber mats of cellulose acetate with included magnetic nanoparticles and measured their heating ability in comparison to the effect of a pure polymer nanofiber mat with magnetic nanoparticles coated on the fibers. While the latter showed a better heating capability, it had also the disadvantage of possible cytotoxic effects, making the nanofiber mat with embedded magnetic nanoparticles a responsible choice.¹¹⁷ Sarier et al.¹¹⁸ suggested magnetite/fatty acid embedded in electrospun poly(methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate) nanofibers.

Superparamagnetic γ-Fe₂O₃ nanoparticles were electrospun with polyurethane and used for hyperthermia treatment, exhibiting a high temperature increase in an alternating magnetic field.¹¹⁹

Magnetic sensors

Electrospun and calcinated Janus nanowires, containing barium titanate and cobalt ferrite, were used as magnetic field sensors. For this, they were placed on patterned metal electrodes on a silicon substrate, in this way connecting several nanowires in parallel. In this way, a magnetic field sensitivity of approx. 0.51 mV/Oe could be reached at 1 kHz.¹²⁰ Large magneto-electric coefficients were also found in barium titanate–cobalt ferrite and lead zirconate titanate–nickel zinc ferrite Janus nanowires.¹²¹

As an UV detection sensor as well as for photocatalysis, electrospun Fe₂O₃/TiO₂ nanofibers were used by Liu et al. The metal nanoparticles shifted the absorption range of TiO₂ from the UV to the visible range, enabling photocatalysis under visible light.¹²² Chemical adsorption of Hg(II) ions could be performed and measured by nanofibers containing fluorescent carbon quantum dots and Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles, indicating the Hg(II) sorption by a declining fluorescence signal.¹²³

Applications in physics

In the area of neuromorphic computing, PAN nanofibers with Fe₃O₄ and Fe₂O₃/NiO nanoparticles were suggested for data storage and transport.^30,124

For creation of a triboelectric nano-generator (Figure 9), Im and Park used nanofibers prepared from Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles in PVDF. They showed that for nanofiber contents above 17%, the particles became visible outside the fibers, correlated with a decrease in the triboelectric performance.¹²⁵ Garcia-Marquez et al.¹²⁶ suggested Fe₃N and Fe₃C electrospun nanocomposites as magneto-active membranes, in addition to the more common application in magnetic field–assisted separation. Due to their bio-compatibility, Guarino et al.¹²⁷ suggested nickel-polyurethane nanofibers as magneto-active components for biomedical purposes as well as sensors and actuators. Sensing acetone was performed with Pt-CuFe₂O₄ electrospun nanotubes.¹²⁸

Figure 9.

Electrospinning can be used to create a triboelectric nano-generator.¹²⁵

For hydrogen production by splitting water, usually precious metals are used as electrocatalysts. Due their high costs, more inexpensive alternatives are necessary. For this application, Zhang et al.¹²⁹ prepared CoFe₂O₄ by electrospinning these nanoparticles in PVP which was calcinated at different temperatures afterward, and found reasonable oxygen evolution reaction efficiencies.

For the use in supercapacitors, Bhagwan et al.¹³⁰ created spinel-NiMn₂O₄ electrospun nanofibers, showing good energy densities and power densities which could be supported by red light irradiation.

Conclusion

As the large number of scientific publications dealing with electrospun magnetic nanofibers even during the last 2 years underlines, this topic is of high recent interest in basic research as well as for diverse applications.

While the magnetic properties attract especially attention due to their possible strong differences in comparison with bulk or thin film materials, based on the usual shape anisotropy of magnetic materials as well as the special production process which results in different grain structures, they offer also new functionalities. Electrospun magnetic nanofibers can be used, for example, for microwave absorption, photocatalysis, biotechnological and medical applications, and even as sensors and actuators.

Our review gives an overview of the most recent basic examinations and applications and will support other research groups working on electrospinning to find suitable spinning techniques and materials as well as applications for their magnetic nanofiber mats.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by Volkswagen Foundation grant “Adaptive Computing with Electrospun Nanofiber Networks,” No. 93679.

ORCID iD

Andrea Ehrmann

References

Greiner

Wendorff

JH.

Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007; 46: 5670–5703.

Zhang

Zhao

Zhang

, et al. Electrospinning design of functional nanostructures for biosensor applications. J Mater Chem B 2017; 5: 1699–1711.

Cao

, et al. Fabrication of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polypropylene conductive fibrous membranes by melt electrospinning. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53: 2308–2317.

Rutledge

Shin

Brenner

, et al. Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities. Polymer 2001; 42: 9955–9967.

Wang

Dong

, et al. Magnetic-upconversion luminescent bifunctional flexible coaxial nanoribbon and Janus nanoribbon: one-pot electrospinning preparation, structure and enhanced upconversion luminescent characteristics. Chem Eng J 2015; 260: 222–230.

Tian

, et al. Electrospun flexible Janus nanoribbons array endowed with simultaneously tuned trifunctionality of electrically conductive anisotropy, photoluminescence and magnetism. New J Chem 2017; 41: 13983–13992.

Zhang

, et al. Electrostatic assembly of conjugated polymer thin layers on electrospun nanofibrous membranes for biosensors. High-quality Janus nanofibers prepared using three-fluid electrospinning. Chem Commun 2017; 53: 4542–4545.

Liu

Guo

Zhang

, et al. Fabrication of hollow CuO/PANI hybrid nanofibers for non-enzymatic electrochemical detection of H₂O₂ and glucose. Sensor Actuat B Chem 2019; 286: 370–376.

Arras

MML

Jana

Mühlstädt

, et al. In situ formation of nanohybrid shish-kebabs during electrospinning for the creation of hierarchical shish-kebab structures. Macromolecules 2016; 49: 3550–3558.

10.

Zeugolis

Paul

Attenburrow

Extruded collagen-polyethylene glycol fibers for tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res 2008; 85: 343–352.

11.

Wongchitphimon

Wang

Jiraratananon

, et al. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as an additive on the fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluropropylene (PVDF-HFP) asymmetric microporous hollow fiber membranes. J Membrane Sci 2011; 369: 329–338.

12.

Grothe

Brikmann

Meissner

, et al. Influence of solution and spinning parameters on nanofiber mat creation of poly(ethylene oxide) by needleless electrospinning. Mater Sci Medzg 2017; 23(4): 342–349.

13.

Neisiany

Lee

JKY

Khorasani

, et al. Self-healing and interfacially toughened carbon fibre-epoxy composites based on electrospun core-shell nanofibres. J Appl Polym Sci 2017; 134: 44956.

14.

Grothe

Wehlage

Böhm

, et al. Needleless electrospinning of PAN nanofibre mats. Tekstilec 2017; 60: 290–295.

15.

Sabantina

Rodríguez-Cano

MÁ

Klöcker

, et al. Fixing PAN nanofiber mats during stabilization for carbonization and creating novel metal/carbon composites. Polymers 2018; 10: 735.

16.

Sabantina

Klöcker

Wortmann

, et al. Stabilization of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats obtained by needleless electrospinning using dimethyl sulfoxide as solvent. J Ind Text. Epub ahead of print 15 January 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1528083718825315.

17.

Klinkhammer

Seiler

Grafahrend

, et al. Deposition of electrospun fibers on reactive substrates for In vitro investigations. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2009; 15: 77–85.

18.

Dalton

Klinkhammer

Salber

, et al. Direct in vitro electrospinning with polymer melts. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7: 686–690.

19.

Che Othman

Yusof

Hasbullah

, et al. Polyacrylonitrile/magnesium oxide-based activated carbon nanofibers with well-developed microporous structure and their adsorption performance for methane. J Ind Eng Chem 2017; 51: 281–287.

20.

García-Mateo

Cordero-Lanzac

Berenguer

, et al. Lignin-derived Pt supported carbon (submicron)fiber electrocatalysts for alcohol electro-oxidation. Appl Catal B Environ 2017; 211: 18–30.

21.

Guarino

Iannotti

Ausanio

, et al. Elastomagnetic nanofiber wires by magnetic field assisted electrospinning. Express Polym Lett 2019; 13: 419–428.

22.

Mei

Chen

Shao

, et al. Highly aligned magnetic composite nanofibers fabricated by magnetic-field-assisted electrospinning PAN/FeCo solution. High Perform Polym 2019; 31: 230–237.

23.

Shehata

Abdelkader

Impact of electro-magneto concave collector on the characterizations of electrospun nanofibers. J Electron Mater 2018; 47: 4772–4779.

24.

Wang

Liu

Huang

, et al. Continuous needleless electrospinning of magnetic nanofibers from magnetization-induced self-assembling PVA/ferrofluid cone array. J Magn Magn Mater 2018; 452: 1–4.

25.

Sreenivasulu

Zhang

, et al. Multiferroic core-shell nanofibers, assembly in a magnetic field, and studies on magneto-electric interactions. Materials 2018; 11: 18.

26.

Chen

, et al. Immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on electrospun magnetic nanofibers for phenol removal. Ecotox Environ Safe 2019; 170: 716–721.

27.

Peer

Stenicka

Filip

, et al. Magnetorheological characterization and electrospinnability of ultrasound-treated polymer solutions containing magnetic nanoparticles. Colloid Polym Sci 2018; 296: 1849–1855.

28.

Yang

, et al. Novel sandwich-structured composite pellicle displays high and tuned electrically conductive anisotropy, magnetism and photoluminescence. Chem Eng J 2019; 361: 713–724.

29.

Xue

Wang

, et al. Fe3O4/poly(caprolactone) (PCL) electrospun membranes as methylene blue catalyst with high recyclability. Colloid Surface A Physicochem Eng Asp 2019; 564: 115–121.

30.

Döpke

Grothe

Steblinski

, et al. Magnetic nanofiber mats for data storage and transfer. Nanomaterials 2019; 9: 92.

31.

Durán-Guerrero

Martínez-Rodríguez

Garza-Navarro

, et al. Magnetic nanofibrous materials based on CMC/PVA polymeric blends. Carbohyd Polym 2018; 200: 289–296.

32.

Noori

Ravari

Ehsani

Preparation of PVA nanofibers reinforced with magnetic graphene by electrospinning method and investigation of their degradation kinetics using master plot analyses on solid state. J Therm Anal Calorim 2018; 132: 397–406.

33.

Darwish

MSA

Nguyen

NHA

Sevcu

, et al. Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles and their effect on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Nanomater 2015; 2015: 416012.

34.

Darwish

MSA

Bakry

Kolek

, et al. Electrospun functionalized magnetic polyamide 6 composite nanofibers: fabrication and stabilization. Polym Composite 2019; 40: 296–303.

35.

Hernández

González-González

Dzul-Bautista

, et al. Electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) based flexible magnetoelectric nanofibers. Eur Polym J 2018; 109: 336–340.

36.

Wang

C-H

L-M

Wang

Z-F

, et al. Electrospun and in situ self-polymerization of polyacrylonitrile containing gadolinium nanofibers for thermal neutron protection. Rare Met 2019; 38: 252–258.

37.

Feng

, et al. Fiber-guided and particle-localized microwave absorption of nanoscale CoFe₂O₄ derived from citric acid-based precursor. Phys B Condens Matter 2019; 561: 16–22.

38.

Huang

Zhang

Qin

, et al. Bead-like Co-doped ZnO with improved microwave absorption properties. Ceram Int 2019; 45: 7789–7796.

39.

J-M

Zeng

X-L

A-D

, et al. Fabrication of cuprate superconducting La_1.85Sr_0.15CuO₄ nanofibers by electrospinning and subsequent calcination in oxygen. Crystengcomm 2011; 13: 6964–6967.

40.

Zeng

Koblischka

Hartmann

Synthesis and characterization of electrospun superconducting (La,Sr)CuO₄ nanowires and nanoribbons. Mater Res Express 2015; 2: 095022.

41.

Karwoth

Zeng

Koblischka

, et al. Magnetoresistance and structural characterization of electrospun La_1-xSr_xMnO₃ nanowire network fabrics with x = 0.2. Solid State Commun 2019; 290: 37–41.

42.

Zeng

Koblischka

Karwoth

, et al. Properties of La_1.85Sr_0.15CuO₄/La_0.7Sr_0.3MnO₃ hybride nanowire networks prepared by electrospinning. J Magn Magn Mater 2019; 475: 741–745.

43.

Lee

Hwang

T-Y

Kang

, et al. Synthesis of Samarium-Cobalt sub-micron fibers and their excellent hard magnetic properties. Front Chem 2018; 6: 18.

44.

Lee

Hwang

T-Y

Cho

H-B

, et al. Near theoretical ultra-high magnetic performance of rare-earth nanomagnets via the synergetic combination of calcium-reduction and chemoselective dissolution. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 15656.

45.

Lee

Hwang

Kang

, et al. High-performance, cost-effective permanent nanomagnet: microstructural and magnetic properties of Fe-substituted SmCo nanofiber. Appl Surf Sci 2019; 471: 273–276.

46.

Ghazi

Chenari

Ghodsi

FE.

Rietveld refinement, morphology analysis, optical and magnetic properties of magnesium-zinc ferrite nanofibers. J Magn Magn Mater 2018; 468: 132–140.

47.

Kumar

Gudla

Ambat

, et al. A mechanistic study on the structure formation of NiCo₂O₄ nanofibers decorated with in situ formed graphene-like structures. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 2018; 28: 1885–1900.

48.

Kim

Park

, et al. Fabrication and characterization of the magnetic ferrite nanofibers by electrospinning process. Thin Solid Film 2018; 660: 358–364.

49.

Guarino

Branda

Ausanio

, et al. Elastomagnetic NI-PDMS nanofibers via coaxial electrospinning. Mater Res Expr 2018; 5: 085029.

50.

Jeong

J-H

Song

C-G

Kim

K-H

, et al. Effect of Mn doping on particulate size and magnetic properties of LaFeO₃ nanofiber synthesized by electrospinning. J Alloy Compd 2018; 749: 599–604.

51.

Murilla-Ortiz

Mirabal-Garcia

Martinez Huerta

, et al. Analysis of the magnetic properties in hard-magnetic nanofibers composite. J Appl Phys 2018; 123: 105108.

52.

Huang

Cao

Shao

, et al. Magnetic nanocarbon adsorbents with enhanced hexavalent chromium removal: morphology dependence of fibrillar vs particulate structures. Ind Eng Chem Res 2017; 56: 10689–10701.

53.

Huang

Cao

Wen

, et al. Unraveling the intrinsic enhancement of fluorine doping in the dual-doped magnetic carbon adsorbent for the environmental remediation. J Colloid Interf Sci 2019; 538: 327–339.

54.

Zuo

Zhang

, et al. Porous magnetic carbon nanofibers (P-CNF/Fe) for low-frequency electromagnetic wave absorption synthesized by electrospinning. Ceram Int 2019; 45: 4474–4481.

55.

Abdalla

Salim

Zhu

, et al. Light and flexible composite nanofibrous membranes for high-efficiency electromagnetic absorption in a broad frequency. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2018; 10: 44561–44569.

56.

Chen

Song

, et al. Investigating efficient energy transfer in novel strategy-obtained Gd₂O₂S:Dy³⁺, Eu³⁺ nanofibers endowed with white emitting and magnetic dual-functionality. J Lumin 2019; 206: 509–517.

57.

Abdalla

, et al. Nanofibrous membrane constructed magnetic materials for high-efficiency electromagnetic wave absorption. Compos Part B Eng 2018; 155: 397–404.

58.

Wang

Dong

, et al. Controlling growth of CuO nanoparticles on CuFe₂O₄ nanotubes and their adsorption kinetics. J Nanosci Nanotechno 2019; 19: 4474–4480.

59.

Tian

, et al. Preparation of Janus microfibers with magnetic and fluorescence functionality via conjugate electro-spinning. Mater Design 2019; 170: 107701.

60.

Wang

Dong

Gai

, et al. One-pot facile electrospinning construct of flexible Janus nanofibers with tunable and enhanced magnetism–photoluminescence bifunctionality. J Nanopart Res 2015; 17: 91.

61.

Wang

Tian

, et al. Janus nanofiber array pellicle: facile conjugate electrospinning construction, structure and bifunctionality of enhanced green fluorescence and adjustable magnetism. RSC Adv 2019; 9: 206–214.

62.

Dong

, et al. Flexible special-structured Janus nanofiber synchronously endued with tunable trifunctionality of enhanced photoluminescence, electrical conductivity and superparamagnetism. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2018; 29: 7119–7129.

63.

Qang

Geng

, et al. Novel magnetic-fluorescent bifunctional Janus nanofiber membrane. Nanotechnology 2018; 29: 135702.

64.

Fan

Tian

, et al. Conjugate electrospinning-fabricated nanofiber yarns simultaneously endowed with bifunctionality of magnetism and enhanced fluorescence. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 2290–2302.

65.

Schneider

Reinholdt

Kreibig

, et al. Structural and magnetic properties of Ni/NiOxide- and Co/CoOxide core/shell nanoparticles and their possible use for ferrofluids. Z Phys Chem 2006; 220: 173–187.

66.

Regtmeier

Meyer

Mill

, et al. Influence of nanoparticular impurities on the magnetic anisotropy of self-assembled magnetic co-nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 2013; 326: 112–115.

67.

Blachowicz

Ehrmann

Mahltig

Magneto-optic measurements on uneven magnetic layers on cardboard. AIP Adv 2017; 7: 045306.

68.

Maldonado-Orozco

Ochoa-Lara

Sosa-Marquez

, et al. Absence of ferromagnetism in ferroelectric Mn-doped BaTiO₃ nanofibers. J Am Ceram Soc 2019; 102: 2800–2809.

69.

Das

Srinivasan

Magnetic and structural properties of Co doped ZnO nanowires prepared by heat treatment of electrospun PVA nanofibers containing Zn and Co acetates. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2018; 29: 4351–4356.

70.

Huang

SW.

Unique electromagnetic loss properties of Co-doped ZnO nanofiber. Mater Lett 2019; 238: 271–274.

71.

Sui

J-X

Wang

X-X

Song

, et al. Preparation and low-temperature electrical and magnetic properties of La_0.33Pr_0.34Ca_0.33MnO₃ nanofibers via electrospinning. J Magn Magn Mater 2018; 467: 74–81.

72.

Lemma

Esposito

Mason

, et al. Removal of bacteria and yeast in water and beer by nylon nanofibrous membranes. J Food Eng 2015; 157: 1–6.

73.

Roche

Yalcinkaya

Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes for point-of-use water and air cleaning. Chemistryopen 2019; 8: 97–103.

74.

Ruiz-Rosas

Rosas

Loscertales

, et al. Electrospinning of silica sub-microtubes mats with platinum nanoparticles for NO catalytic reduction. Appl Catal B Environ 2014; 156–157: 15–24.

75.

García-Mateos

Berenguer

Valero-Romero

, et al. Phosphorus functionalization for the rapid preparation of highly nanoporous submicron-diameter carbon fibers by electrospinning of lignin solutions. J Mater Chem A 2018; 6: 1219–1233.

76.

Ashammakhi

Ndreu

Yang

, et al. Nanofiber-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Eur J Plast Surg 2012; 35: 135–149.

77.

Wehlage

Blattner

Sabantina

, et al. Sterilization of PAN/gelatine nanofibrous mats for cell growth. Tekstilec 2019; 62: 78–88.

78.

Mamun

Review of possible applications of nanofibrous mats for wound dressings. Tekstilec 2019; 62: 89–100.

79.

Qiao

, et al. Self-assembled ZnO/Co hybrid nanotubes prepared by electrospinning for lightweight and high-performance electromagnetic wave absorption. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2018; 1: 5297–5306.

80.

Hou

Xiang

Zhang

, et al. Microwave absorption properties of single- and double-layer absorbers based on electrospun nickel-zinc spinel ferrite and carbon nanofibers. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 2018; 29: 12258–12268.

81.

Wang

Sun

, et al. Microwave absorption properties of 3D cross-linked Fe/C porous nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. Carbon 2018; 134: 264–273.

82.

Abdalla

Shen

, et al. Co₃O₄/carbon composite nanofibrous membrane enabled high-efficiency electromagnetic wave absorption. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 12402.

83.

Zhang

Wang

Chen

, et al. Microwave absorption properties of Co@C nanofiber composite for normal and oblique incidence. J Electron Mater 2018; 47: 4703–4709.

84.

Samadi

Hosseini

Mohseni

Investigation of the electromagnetic microwaves absorption and piezoelectric properties of electrospun Fe₃O₄-GO/PVDF hybrid nanocomposites. Org Electron 2018; 59: 149–155.

85.

Yuan

Feng

Zhao

, et al. Microwave absorption performance of in situ synthesized Fe₃O₄-SiO₂ hybrid fibres with enhanced environmental stability. Ceram Int 2018; 44: 6673–6680.

86.

Nasouri

Shoushtari

AM.

Fabrication of magnetite nanoparticles/polyvinylpyrrolidone composite nanofibers and their application as electromagnetic interference shielding material. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2018; 31: 431–446.

87.

Hou

Zhang

, et al. Flexible Fe₃Si/SiC ultrathin hybrid fiber mats with designable microwave absorption performance. RSC Adv 2018; 8: 33574–33582.

88.

Zhou

Xing

Han

, et al. Preparation and microwave absorption properties of porous structure soft/hard magnetic Ni_0.5Zn_0.5Fe₂O₄/SrFe₁₂O₁₉ composite fibers. Chin J Inorg Chem 2018; 34: 1043–1050.

89.

Xiang

Hou

Zhang

, et al. Facile synthesis and enhanced microwave absorption properties of multiferroic Ni_0.4Co_0.2Zn_0.4Fe₂O₄/BaTiO₃ composite fibers. J Alloy Compd 2018; 737: 412–420.

90.

Moradipour

Rajabi

Dabirian

Fabrication of a porous bulky layer ceramic nanofibrous composite with electromagnetic wave-absorbing properties. J Aust Ceram Soc 2018; 54: 23–21.

91.

Liang

, et al. Structural and carbonized design of 1D FeNi/C nanofibers with conductive network to optimize electromagnetic parameters and absorption abilities. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2018; 6: 7239–7249.

92.

Bayat

Yang

Effect of iron oxide nanoparticle size on electromagnetic properties of composite nanofibers. J Compos Mater 2018; 52: 1723–1736.

93.

Zhao

Jin

, et al. A facile and scalable method to sythesize Eu³⁺-doped TiO₂ porous nanofibers with electrospinning. Sci Adv Mater 2019; 11: 372–378.

94.

Chang

Cui

Wang

, et al. Recoverable magnetic CoFe₂O₄/BiOI nanofibers for efficient visible light photocatalysis. Colloid Surface A Physicochem Eng Asp 2019; 562: 127–135.

95.

Chang

Wang

, et al. Facile preparation of novel Fe₂O₃/BiOI hybrid nanostructures for efficient visible light photocatalysis. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 3682–3691.

96.

Huang

Wang

Jiao

, et al. Facile preparation of hierarchical AgNP-loaded MXene/Fe₃O₄/polymer nanocomposites by electrospinning with enhanced catalytic performance for wastewater treatment. ACS Omega 2019; 4: 1897–1906.

97.

Wang

Hai

, et al. Pressure and fluorescence dual signal readout CuO-NiO/C heterojunction nanofibers-based nanoplatform for imaging and detection of target cancer cells in blood. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2018; 6: 9921–9929.

98.

Zhao

Shao

, et al. Magnetically separable Bi₂MoO₆/ZnFe₂O₄ heterostructure nanofibers: controllable synthesis and enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J Alloy Compd 2018; 747: 916–925.

99.

Korina

Stoilova

Manolova

, et al. Polymer fibers with magnetic core decorated with titanium dioxide prospective for photocatalytic water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 2018; 6: 2075–2084.

100.

Zhou

Song

Zhang

, et al. Preparation of hollow magnetic porous zirconia fibers as effective catalyst carriers for Fenton reaction. J Mater Chem A 2018; 6: 12298–12307.

101.

Zhang

Jin

Huang

, et al. Electrospun fibrous membranes with dual-scaled porous structure: super hydrophobicity, super lipophilicity, excellent water adhesion, and anti-icing for highly efficient oil adsorption/separation. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2019; 11: 5073–5083.

102.

Dorneanu

Cojocaru

Samoila

, et al. Novel fibrous composites based on electrospun PSF and PVDF ultrathin fibers reinforced with inorganic nanoparticles: evaluation as oil spill sorbents. Polym Advan Technol 2018; 29: 1435–1446.

103.

Gao

Pui

Zhang

, et al. Flexible γ-Fe₂O₃@C nanofibers via electrospinning for sensitive electrochemical determination of trace cadmium (II). Mater Res Express 2019; 6: 025049.

104.

Lin

KYA

Yang

Lin

, et al. Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles supported on electrospun carbon fiber as a magnetic heterogeneous catalyst for activating peroxymonosulfate. Chemosphere 2018; 208: 502–511.

105.

Zhang

B-T

Zhang

Teng

YG.

Electrospun magnetic cobalt-carbon nanofiber composites with axis-sheath structure for efficient peroxymonosulfate activation. Appl Surf Sci 2018; 452: 443–450.

106.

Rahimi

Mirzaei

Akbari

, et al. Preparation of nanoparticle-modified polymeric adsorbent using wastage fuzzes of mechanized carpet and its application in dye removal from aqueous solution. J Clean Prod 2018; 178: 373–383.

107.

Yang

Sun

, et al. Structural, magnetic and photocatalytic properties of Sr²⁺ doped BiFeO₃ nanofibres fabricated by electrospinning. Ceram Int 2018; 44: 14032–14035.

108.

Yan

Hou

, et al. Enhanced magnetization and bias voltage-dependent dielectric properties of Sm-doped BiFeO₃ multiferroic nanofibers. J Mater Sci 2018; 53: 10249–10260.

109.

Bak

Song

C-G

Yoon

J-W.

Enhanced magnetic property of Mn-doped BiFeO₃ nanowires fabricated by electrospinning. J Ceram Process Res 2018; 19: 253–256.

110.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Positive effect of magnetic-conductive bifunctional fibrous scaffolds on guiding double electrical and magnetic stimulations to pre-osteoblasts. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2019; 15: 477–486.

111.

Chu

, et al. Fabrication and biocompatibility of core-shell structured magnetic fibrous scaffold. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2019; 15: 500–506.

112.

Brito-Pereira

Correia

Ribeiro

, et al. Silk fibroin-magnetic hybrid composite electrospun fibers for tissue engineering applications. Compos Part B Eng 2018; 141: 70–75.

113.

Van Deventer

Mallon

. Electrospun nanocomposite nanofibres with magnetic nanoparticle decorated carbon nanotubes. Macromol Symp 2018; 378: 1600140.

114.

Abasian

Radmansouri

Jouybari

, et al. Incorporation of magnetic NaX zeolite/DOX into the PLA/chitosan nanofibers for sustained release of doxorubicin against carcinoma cells death in vitro. Int J Biol Macromol 2019; 121: 398–406.

115.

Demir

Gures

Tecim

, et al. Magnetic nanoparticle-loaded electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofibers for drug delivery applications. Appl Nanosci 2018; 8: 1461–1469.

116.

Tiwari

Agarwal

Srivastava

, et al. The combined effect of thermal and chemotherapy on HeLa cells using magnetically actuated smart textured fibrous system. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2018; 106: 40–51.

117.

Matos

RJR

Chaparro

CIP

Silva

, et al. Electrospun composite cellulose acetate/iron oxide nanoparticles non-woven membranes for magnetic hyperthermia applications. Carbohyd Polym 2018; 198: 9–16.

118.

Sarier

Onder

Carvalho

, et al. Preparation of magnetite nanoparticle and fatty acid incorporated poly(methacrylic acid-ethyl acrylate) nanowebs via electrospinning for magnetic hyperthermia application. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2018; 460: 012025.

119.

Song

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Electric field-assisted in situ precise deposition of electrospun gamma-Fe₂O₃/polyurethane nanofibers for magnetic hyperthermia. Nanoscale Res Lett 2018; 13: 273.

120.

Bauer

Wen

Tiwari

, et al. Magnetic field sensors using arrays of electrospun magnetoelectric Janus nanowires. Microsyst Nanoeng 2018; 4: 37.

121.

Bauer

Arnold

Andrew

. Arrays of Janus-type magnetoelectric nanowires for passive magnetic field sensing. In: IEEE 18th international conference on nanotechnology, Cork, Ireland, 23–26 July 2018.

122.

Liu

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Highly flexible Fe₂O₃/TiO₂ composite nanofibers for photocatalysis and utraviolet detection. J Phys Chem Solids 2018; 121: 236–246.

123.

Wang

, et al. CQDs-doped magnetic electrospun nanofibers: fluorescence self-display and adsorption removal of mercury(II). ACS Omega 2018; 3: 4220–4230.

124.

Storck

Grothe

Mamun

, et al. Orientation of electrospun magnetic nanofibers near conductive areas. Materials 2020; 13: 47.

125.

J-S

Park

I-K.

Mechanically robust magnetic Fe₃O₄ nanoparticle/polyvinylidene fluoride composite nanofiber and its application in a triboelectric nanogenerator. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018; 10: 25660–25665.

126.

Garcia-Marquez

Glatzel

Kraupner

, et al. Branch-like iron nitride and carbide magnetic fibres using an electrospinning technique. Chem A Eur J 2018; 24: 4895–4901.

127.

Guarino

Ausanio

Iannotti

, et al. Electrospun nanofiber tubes with elastomagnetic properties for biomedical use. Express Polym Lett 2018; 12: 318–329.

128.

Zhao

Lan

Gong

, et al. Highly sensitive acetone-sensing properties of Pt-decorated CuFe₂O₄ nanotubes prepared by electrospinning. Ceram Int 2018; 44: 2856–2863.

129.

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Durable oxygen evolution reaction of one dimensional spinel CoFe₂O₄ nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning. RSC Adv 2018; 8: 5338–5343.

130.

Bhagwan

Rani

Sivasankaran

, et al. Improved energy storage, magnetic and electrical properties of aligned, mesoporous and high aspect ratio nanofibers of spinel-NiMn₂O₄. Appl Surf Sci 2017; 426: 913–923.

Most recent developments in electrospun magnetic nanofibers: A review

Abstract

Keywords

Production of magnetic nanofibers

Electrospinning technology

Polymers for electrospinning

Field-assisted electrospinning technology

Magnetic composite nanofibers

Pure magnetic nanofibers

Magnetic carbon nanofibers

Multifunctional magnetic nanofibers

Magnetic properties

Applications

Absorption of microwave and other irradiation

Removal and decomposition of contaminants

Biotechnology and biomedicine

Magnetic sensors

Applications in physics

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References