Subtilisin treatment is feasible in benign conditions, and yields a clean, dynamic approach for Polyamide 6,6 (PA 6,6) modification. In this study, the water contact angle (WCA) method, capillary height and moisture regain were used measure hydrophilicity. To characterization the modification, the scanning electron microscope (SEM), amino group quantification and x-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) were used. Fabric burst strength and hand properties were characterized. Optimum conditions for subtilisin treatment were found to be 55oC, neutral pH with 10% (owf) enzyme concentration for a fixed 90 min treatment period. X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) results showed that carboxyl groups were produced on the modified fiber surface. The modified fibers showed much improved hydrophilicity as indicated by reduced wicking time, improved capillary height and moisture regain percentage. The creation of carboxylic acid group sand increased number of amino groups detected on the fabric surface may positively influence hydrophilicity. In comparison to harsh alkali modification, the enzyme treatment led to smaller weight loss. In general, enzymatic treatments- a more eco-friendly alternative to alkaline treatments, resulted in a significant improvement in surface properties of PA 6,6 fabrics.
GashtiM. P., WilloughbyJ., & AgrawalP.Surface and bulk modification of synthetic textiles to improve dyeability.INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2011, p. 39.
2.
VertommenM. A. M. E.Enzymatic surface modification of poly (ethylene terephthalate). Journal of Biotechnology2005, 120(4): 376–86.
3.
SilvaC. M.Tratamento alcalino e enzimático de fibras sintéticas.Universidade do Minho, 2002.
4.
ZeronianS. H., and CollinsM. J.Surface Modification of Polyester by Alkaline Treatments. Textile Progress1989; 20: 1–26.
5.
WuJ.Eco-friendly surface modification on polyester fabrics by esterase treatment. Applied Surface Science2014; 295: 150–7.
6.
ParvinzadehM., AssefipourR., and KiumarsiA.Biohydrolysis of nylon 6, 6 fiber with different proteolytic enzymes. Polymer Degradation and Stability2009; 94: 1197–205.
7.
KiumarsiAmir, and ParvinzadehMazeyar, Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Nylon 6 Fiber Using Lipolytic Enzyme, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2010, 116, 6: 3140–3147.
8.
KimH.R., and SeoH.Y.Enzymatic hydrolysis of polyamide fabric by using acylase. Textile Research Journal.2013. DOI: 10.1177/0040517512471747
9.
HeumannS.New model substrates for enzymes hydrolysing polyethyleneterephthalate and polyamide fibres. Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods2006; 69: 89–99.
10.
ParvinzadehMazeyar, A new approach to improve dyeability of nylon 6 fibre using a subtilisin enzyme, Coloration Technology.2009; 125: 228–33.
11.
GashtiM.P.Enzymatic surface hydrolysis of polyamide 6, 6 with mixtures of proteolytic and lipolytic enzymes. Preparative biochemistry & biotechnology2013; 43: 798–814.
12.
SongA. R., KimH. R., and SongW. S.Optimization of enzymatic treatment of polyamide fabrics by bromelain. Fibers and Polymers2012; 13: 282–288.
13.
SilvaC., and Cavaco-PauloA.Monitoring biotransformations in polyamide fibres. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation2004; 22: 357–360.
14.
SilvaC. M.Cutinase - A new tool for biomodification of synthetic fibers. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry2005; 43(11): 2448–2450.
15.
KlunU., FriedrichJ., and KržanA.Polyamide-6 fibre degradation by a lignolytic fungus. Polymer Degradation and Stability2003; 79(1): 99–104.
16.
SilvaCM. Enzymatic treatment of polyamide 6.6 fibres. Department of Textile Engineering. PhD Thesis, University of Minho, Portugal, 2008.
17.
Li-naZ.Detection of Amino-Group on the surface of Core-Shell Magnetic Nanoparticles. Progress in Modern Biomedicine2008; 8: 475–7.
18.
MarklandF.S., and SmithE.L. 16 Subtilisins: primary structure, chemical and physical properties. The enzymes1971; 3:561–608
19.
PhilippM., and BenderM.L., Kinetics of subtilisin and thiolsubtilisin. Molecular and cellular biochemistry1983; 51(1): 5–32.
20.
SimileC.B.Critical evaluation of wicking in performance fabrics. MA thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA,.2004.
21.
PeršinZ., Stana-KleinschekK., Sfiligoj-SmoleM.Determining the surface free energy of cellulose materials with the powder contact angle method. Textile research journal2004; 74(1): 55–62.
22.
KimH.R., and SongW.S.Optimization of Enzymatic Treatment of Polyester Fabrics by Lipase from Porcine Pancreas. Fibers and Polymers2008b; 9(4): 423–430.
23.
Cavaco-PauloA., and GubitzG (Eds.). Textile processing with enzymes, Elsevier2003.
24.
HaleL.P.Proteinase activity and stability of natural bromelain preparations. International immunopharmacology.2005; 5(4): 783–793.
25.
TanakaA., and HoshinoE.Thermodynamic and Activation Parameters for the Hydrolysis of Amylose with Bacillus α-Amylases in a Diluted Anionic Surfactant Solution. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering2002; 93(5): 485–490.
26.
TanakaA., and HoshinoE.Study on the Substrate Specificity of α-Amylases - That Contribute to Soil Removal in Detergents. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents.1999; 2(2): 193–199.
27.
MontserretR.Involvement of Electrostatic Interactions in the Mechanism of Peptide Folding Induced by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Binding. Biochemistry2000; 39(29): 8362–8373.
28.
HagiharaY.Aggregation of â2-Glycoprotein I Induced by Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and Lysophospholipids. Biochemistry2002; 41(3): 1020–1026.
29.
RussellG.L., and BrittonL.N.Use of Certain Alcohol Ethoxylates to Maintain Protease Stability in the presence of Anionic Surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents2002; 5(1): 5–10.
30.
Bravo RodríguezV.Modification of the activity of an α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis by several surfactants. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology2006; 9(5): 566–571.
31.
SongA.R., and KimH.R.Effectiveness of flavourzyme treatment on polyamide fabric. Fibers and Polymers2013; 14(12): 2212–2220.
32.
ZhangX., and BaiR.Immobilization of Chitosan on Nylon 6, 6 and PET Granules through Hydrolysis Pretreatment. Journal of Applied Polymer Science2003; 90(14): 3973–3979.
33.
McIntyreJ.E., and DanielsP.N.Textile terms and definitions.Textile Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom, 1995.
34.
KawabataS.The standardization and analysis of hand evaluation.Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 1980.
35.
AliS.I., and BegumS.Fabric softeners and softness perception. Ergonomics1994; 37(5): 801–806.
