This study compares capabilities of two different modelling methodologies for predicting breaking strength of rotor spun yarns. Forty eight yarn samples were produced considering variations in three drawing frame parameters namely break draft, delivery speed, and distance between back and middle rolls. Several topologies with different architectures were trained to get the best adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and gene expression programming (GEP) models. Prediction performance of the GEP model was compared with that of ANFIS using root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R2-Value) parameters on the test data. Results show that, the GEP model has a significant priority over the ANFIS model in term of prediction accuracy. The correlation coefficient (R2-value) and root mean square error for the GEP model were 0.87 and 0.35 respectively, while these parameters were 0.48 and 0.53 for the ANFIS model. Also, a mathematical formula was developed with high degree of accuracy using GEP algorithm to predict the breaking strength of the yarns. This advantage is not accessible in the ANFIS model.
SetteS.; BoullartL.; LangenhoveA. V.; KiekensP.; Optimizing the Fibre-to-Yarn Production Process with a Combined Neural Network/Genetic Algorithm Approach;Textile Research Journal1997, 67, 84–92.
2.
PlonskerH. R.; BackerS.; The Dynamics of Roller Drafting, Part I: Drafting Force Measurement;Textile Research Journal1967, 37, 673–687.
3.
DasA.; IshtiaqueS. M.; NiyogiR.; Optimization of Fibre Friction, Top Arm Pressure and Roller Setting at Various Drafting Stages;Textile Research Journal2006, 76, 913–921.
4.
BalasubramanianN.; The Effect of Top-Roller Weighting, Apron Spacing and Top-Roller Setting Upon Yarn Quality;Textile Research Journal1975, 45, 322–325.
5.
SilvaE. A.; PaivaA. P.; BalestrassiP. P.; SilvaC. E. S.; New Modelling and Process Optimisation Approach for the False-Twist Texturing of Polyester;Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe2009, 17, 57–62.
6.
MajumdarA.; GhoshA.; Yarn Strength Modelling Using Fuzzy Expert System;Journal of Engineered Fibres and Fabrics2008, 3, 61–68.
7.
ErolR.; SagbasA.; Multiple Response Optimisation of the Staple-Yarn Production Process for Hairiness, Strength and Cost;Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe2009, 17, 40–42.
8.
BaykasogluA.; OztasA.; OzbayE.; Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of High-Strength Concrete Parameters via Soft Computing Approaches;Expert Systems with Applications2009, 36, 6145–6155.
9.
MajumdarA.; MajumdarP. K.; SarkarB.; Application of Linear Regression, Artificial Neural Network and Neuro-Fuzzy Algorithms to Predict the Breaking Elongation of Rotor-Spun Yarns;Indian Journal of Fibers & Textile Research2005, 30, 19–25.
10.
ChenT.; ZhangC.; ChenX.; LiL.; A Soft Computing Model for Predicting Yarn Breaking Strength;Research Journal of Textile and Apparel2007, 11, 80–86.
11.
RajamanickamR.; HansenS.; JayaramanS.; Analysis of the Modelling Methodologies for Predicting the Strength of Air-jet Spun Yarns;Textile Research Journal1997, 67, 39–44.
12.
MajumdarA.; MajumdarP. K.; SarkarB.; Application of an Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy System for the Prediction of Cotton Yarn Strength from HVI Fiber Properties;Journal of the Textile Institute2005, 96, 55–60.
13.
DayikM.; Prediction of Yarn Properties Using Evaluation Programming;Textile Research Journal2009, 79, 963–972.
14.
BaykasogluA.; DereliT.; TanisS.; Prediction of Cement Strength Using Soft Computing Techniques;Cement and Concrete Research2004, 34, 2038–2090.
15.
ChenZ. H.; XuB. G.; ChiZ. R.; FengD. G.; Mathematical Formulation of Knitted Fabric Spirality Using Genetic Programming;Textile Research Journal2012, 82, 667–676.
16.
DarwinC.; On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, John Murray, 1859.
17.
HollandJ. H.; Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, 1975.
18.
KozaJ. R.; Genetic Programming: on the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press, 1992.
19.
MajumdarA.; MitraA.; BanerjeeD.; MajumdarP. K.; Soft Computing Applications in Fabrics and Clothing; A Comprehensive Review;Research Journal of Textile and Apparel2010, 14, 1–17.
20.
FerreiraC.; Gene Expression Programming; A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems;Complex Systems2001, 13, 87–129.
21.
FerreiraC.; Gene Expression Programming: Mathematical Modeling by an Artificial Intelligence. 2nd ed, Germany, Springer, 2006.
22.
CranganuC.; BautuE.; Using Gene Expression Programming to Estimate Sonic Log Distributions Based on the Natural Gamma Ray and Deep Resistivity Logs: A Case Study From the Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering2010, 70, 243–255.
23.
TangC. J.; DuanL.; PengJ.; The Strategies to Improve Performance of Function Mini-genetic Modifying, Overlapped Gene, Back-tracking and Adaptive Mutation. DEWJ06 (DBSJ Annual Conference), Invited talk and paper, Okinawa, Japan, 2006.
24.
KaukoT.; On Current Neural Network Applications Involving Spatial Modeling of Property Prices, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment2003, 18, 159–181.
25.
Eogratias NurwahaD.; WangX. H.; Prediction of Rotor Spun Yarn Strength from Cotton Fiber Properties Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Method, Fibers and Polymers2010, 11, 97–100.
26.
GhoshA.; Forecasting of Cotton Yarn Properties Using Intelligent Machines;Research Journal of Textile and Apparel2010, 14, 55–61.
27.
JangJ. S. R.; ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics1993, 23, 665–683.
28.
BeheraB. K.; GuruprasadR.; Predicting Bending Rigidity of Woven Fabrics Using Artificial Neural Networks, Fibers and Polymers2010, 11, 1187–1192.
