Nonwoven Uniformity — Measurements Using Image Analysis

Abstract

Statistical measures have been developed for quality control as well as characterization of mass distribution in fibrous substrates. The mass distribution in 2D space has been measured by imaging the substrate. The intensity distribution of reflected/transmitted light has been used as a representative of the mass distribution. Spatial mass uniformity has been measured in terms of a standardized index of dispersion and mass anisotropy ratio that are reasonably independent of fiber mass density. The dispersion index is standardized between the limits of −1 and +1, with −1 representing uniform distribution and +1 representing aggregated distribution. Furthermore, the standardized values have been combined with the qualitative grades to categorize and differentiate uniform patterns. Standardized index of dispersion and mass anisotropy ratio have been evaluated for a wide range of non-woven webs and adhesive lay down patterns.

References

Aggarwal

R. K.

, Kennon

W. R.

, and Porat

, “A Scanned-laser Technique for Monitoring Fibrous Webs and Nonwoven Fabrics,” J. Textile Inst. 83, (3), 1992, pp. 386–398.

Boeckerman

P. A.

, “Meeting the Special Requirements for On-line Basis Weight Measurement of Lightweight Nonwoven Fabrics,” Tappi J. 7, 5 (12), 1992, pp. 166–172.

Chhabra

, “An Experimental Study of Fiber Motion and Nonwoven Webs in Melt Blowing,” Ch. 3 and; 4, Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 1997.

Ericson

C. W.

and Baxter

J. F.

“Spunbonded Nonwoven Fabric Studies I: Characterization of Filament Arrangement in the Web,” Textile Res. J 4.3, 1973, pp. 371–378.

Huang

and Bresee

R. R.

, “Characterizing Nonwoven Web Structure Using Image Analysis Techniques. Part III: Web Uniformity Analysis,” INDA J. Nonwovens Res 5, (3), 1993, pp. 28–38.

“IMSL Integrated Mathematical and Statistical Libraries Stat/Library,” FORTRAN Subroutines for Statistical Applications, Vol. 2; Visual Numerics: Houston, TX, 1994, pp. 1132–1133.

Kallmes

, Scharcanski

, and Dodson

C. T. J.

, “Uniformity and Anisotropy in Nonwoven Fibrous Materials,” Intl. Nonwovens Tech. Conf. 2000, Dallas, TX, September 26–28, 2000, pp. 470–477

Krebs

C. J.

, “Ecological Methodology,” 2nd Ed., Benjamin/Cummings, 1998, pp. 114–123, 213–219.

Myers

J. H.

, “Selecting a Measure of Dispersion,” Environ. Entomology, 7 (5), 1978, pp. 619–621.

10.

Pound

W. H.

, “Real World Uniformity Measurement in Nonwoven Coverstock,” Intl. Nonwovens J 10,(1), 2001, pp. 35–39.

11.

Pourdeyhimi

, “Assessing Wrinkling Using Image Analysis and Replicate Standards,” Textile Res. J. 65, (3), 1995, pp. 149–157.

12.

Pourdeyhimi

, “Evaluating Carpet Appearance Loss: Periodicity and Tuft Placement,” Textile Res. J 64, (1), 1994, pp. 21–32.

13.

Russ

J. C.

, “The Image Processing Handbook,” 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 1994, pp. 216–220.

14.

Scharcanski

and Dodson

C. T. J.

, “Local Spatial Anisotropy and Its Variability,” J. Pulp Paper Sc 25, (11), 1999, pp. 393–397.

15.

Scharcanski

and Dodson

C. T. J.

, “Texture Image Analysis for Paper Anisotropy and Its Variability,” Appita J., 4, 1996, pp. 100–104.

16.

Shambaugh

R. L.

and Chhabra

“From the Spinneret to the Collection Screen: A Statistical Analysis of Fiber Motion in Melt Blowing”, Tappi Nonwovens Conference, St. Petersburg, FL, March 9–11, 1998.

17.

Smith-Gill

S. J.

, “Cytophysiological Basis of Disruptive Pigmentary Patterns in the Leopard Frog Rana pipiens. II. Wild Type and Mutant Cell-Specific Patterns,” J. Morph., 146, 1975, pp. 35–54.

18.

Trepanier

R. J.

, Jordan

B. D.

, and Nguyen

N. G.

, “Specific Parameter – A Statistic for Assessing Formation and Print Quality by Image Analysis,” Tappi J., 81 (10), 1998, pp. 191.