In This Issue: Intersectional Mixed Methods Research,Assessment Development and Validation Using Mixed Methods,Mixing Research and Religion,Mixed Methods and Clinical Practice Guidelines,and the Deductive-Inductive Dual Pillar Integration Process

Creamer E. G. (2025). Visual displays in qualitative and mixed method research: A comprehensive guide. Routledge.

Donmoyer R. Galloway F. McElroy R. C. Ehnow R. Goodman C. (2026). Mixing research and religion: Methodological insights from a participatory mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251363644

Kramarczuk Voulgarides C. Firestone A. R. Aylward A. Ahram R. Strassfeld N. Jeong J. Y. (2026). Top down and bottom up: Using the deductive-inductive dual pillar integration process (DID-PIP) to answer multilevel-systems questions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 184–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251381919

Peters M. (2026). Media review: Visual thinking and mixed methods doing: A review of “Visual displays in qualitative and mixed methods research: A comprehensive guide by Elizabeth Creamer”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251337573

Wang Y. Zhang L. Sharifan A. Lee M. S. Nakayama T. Chen Y. Li H. (2026). Mixed methods research in the field of clinical practice guidelines: The case of developing a methodological model for good practice recommendation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251362907

Younas A. (2026). Need for and importance of intersectional mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898261432845

Zhang J. Browne W. J. (2026). Assessment development and validation using mixed methods methodology: An example from assessing scientific argumentation competence. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 20(2), 114–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251355843