This study aims to counteract ageism in a non-profit organization. It utilized a generative sequential mixed methods approach, consisting of a qualitative inquiry focused on challenging the criticalities identified in a previous quantitative assessment. The first phase used the Fraboni Scale of Ageism to assess participants’ discriminatory attitudes toward older individuals. In the second phase, volunteers participated in a qualitative inquiry consisting of “generative” interviews designed to counter age prejudice openly. Thematic analysis revealed the themes used by participants to foster an organizational culture that is positive for aging and intergenerational dynamics. The study provided a detailed procedure with which to create focused generative inquiries and personalized interview protocols to enhance the effectiveness of the generative sequential mixed methods design.
Adams-PriceC. E.MorseL. W. (2009). Dependency stereotypes and aging: The implications for getting and giving help in later life. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2967–2984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00557.x
2.
AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC. (2018). Introduction to the section: Ageism—concept and origins. In AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 1–10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_1
3.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV.RanceN. (2014). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In VosslerA.MollerN. (Eds.), The counseling & psychotherapy research handbook (pp. 183–197). Sage.
DavenportB.NewmanA.MoffattS. (2021). The impact on older people’s wellbeing of leaving heritage volunteering and the challenges of managing this process. Qualitative Report, 26(2), 334–351. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4499
DonizzettiA. R. (2010). We are assessing ageism: The Fraboni Scale of Ageism’s Italian validation and analysis of differences by gender and age. Giornale di Psicologia, 4, 262–274.
FraboniM.SaltstoneR.HughesS. (1990). The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 9(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800016093
16.
GendronT. L.WellefordE. A.InkerJ.WhiteJ. T. (2016). The language of ageism: Why we need to use words carefully. The Gerontologist, 56(6), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv066
GergenK. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075
22.
GergenK. J. (2022). An invitation to social construction: Co-Creating the future (4th ed.). Sage.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), (2008). Ways of aging. John Wiley & Sons.
25.
HanrahanE. A.Huntoon LindemanM. I.FinkelsteinL. M. (2017). Discounting seniors: Implications of age stereotypes at work. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(4), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000132
HarrisK.KrygsmanS.WaschenkoJ.Laliberte RudmanD. (2018). Ageism and the older worker: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, 58(2), e1–e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw194
HowardV. (2013). Expanding the application of appreciative inquiry based on its principles of human systems. Qualitative Report, 18(7), 1–5.
30.
HuoM.MillerL. M. S.KimK.LiuS. (2021). Volunteering, self-perceptions of aging, and mental health in later life. The Gerontologist, 61(7), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa164
31.
IlişanuG.AndreiV. (2018). Age stereotypes and ageism at the workplace. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 9(2), 23–33.
32.
JonesR. L. (2006). ‘Older people’ talking as if they are not older people: Positioning theory as an explanation. Journal of Aging Studies, 20(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.12.003
33.
KrekulaC.NikanderP.WilińskaM. (2018). Multiple marginalizations based on age: Gendered ageism and beyond. In AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 33–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_3
34.
LeeK.KimY.-M.BronsteinL.FoxV. (2021). Older adult volunteers in intergenerational programs in educational settings across the globe. Educational Gerontology, 47(6), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2021.1915943
35.
LevyB. R.SladeM. D.ChangE.-S.KannothS.WangS.-Y. (2020). Ageism amplifies the cost and prevalence of health conditions. The Gerontologist, 60(1), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny131
36.
LevyB. R.SladeM. D.KunkelS. R.KaslS. V. (2002). Longevity is increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261
37.
LevyS. R.MacdonaldJ. L. (2016). Progress on understanding ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 72(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12153
38.
LudemaJ. D.CooperriderD. L.BarrettF. J. (2006). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 189–199). Sage.
39.
McHugh PowerJ. E.HanniganC.CarneyS.LawlorB. A. (2017). Exploring the meaning of loneliness among socially isolated older adults in rural Ireland: A qualitative investigation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(4), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1329363
40.
McNameeS. (2010). Research as social construction: Transformative inquiry. Saúde & Transformação Social/Health & Social Change, 1(1), 9–19.
41.
McVittieC.McKinlayA.WiddicombeS. (2008). Passive and active non-employment: Age, employment and the identities of older non-working people. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(3), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2007.04.003
42.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
MertensD. M. (2024). Mixed methods research for social betterment and a more just world. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241256834
45.
Molina-LuqueF.StončikaitėI.Torres-GonzálezT.Sanvicen-TornéP. (2022). Prefiguration active aging, and creativity: Keys for quality of life and overcoming ageism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031564
46.
Morrow-HowellN.GonzalesE. (2023). Explicating ageism in the productive aging framework. The Gerontologist, 64(7), gnad156. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnad156
47.
NenciniA.RomaioliD.MeneghiniA. M. (2016). Volunteer motivation and organizational climate: Factors that promote satisfaction and sustained volunteerism in NPOs. VOLUNTAS, 27(2), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9593-z
48.
NikanderP. (2000). “Old” versus “little girl” a discursive approach to age categorization and morality. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(4), 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80001-8
49.
NorthM. S.FiskeS. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982–997. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027843
50.
OfficerA.De La Fuente-NúñezV. (2018). A global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96(4), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.202424
PalmoreE. B. (2015). Ageism comes of age. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(6), 873–875. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv079
54.
PhelanA. (2018). Researching ageism through discourse. In AyalonL.Tesch-RömerC.DiA. c. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageism (pp. 549–564). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_31
55.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage.
56.
PowerS. A.ZittounT.AkkermanS.WagonerB.CabraM.CornishF.HawlinaH.HeasmanB.MahendranK.PsaltisC.RajalaA.VealeA.GillespieA. (2023). Social psychology of and for world-making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221145756
57.
PrevitaliF.KeskinenK.NiskaM.NikanderP. (2022). Ageism in working life: A scoping review on discursive approaches. The Gerontologist, 62(2), e97–e111. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa119
58.
PrevitaliF.NikanderP.RuusuvuoriJ. (2023). Ageism in job interviews: Discreet ways of building co-membership through age categorisation. Discourse Studies, 25(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221118770
59.
RomaioliD. (2022). A generative sequential mixed methods approach. Using quantitative measures to enhance social constructionist inquiry. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820986273
60.
RomaioliD. (2023). Framing the tendency to betray one's good intentions. Akrasia as a dialogical dynamic. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 53(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12375
61.
RomaioliD.ChiaraG.FaccioE.MigliettaR. (2023). Hearing voices as a form of inner dialogue. Using the dialogical self to turn a critical voice into an ally. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 36(3), 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2022.2105306
62.
RomaioliD.ContarelloA. (2017). Invecchiare bene in tempi di crisi: punti di vista euritmici attraverso i posizionamenti dell’Alter [Ageing well in times of crisis: Eurythmic perspectives through Alter’s positionings]. Psicologia Della Salute, 1, 27–47. https://doi.org/10.3280/PDS2017-001002
63.
RomaioliD.ContarelloA. (2019a). Redefining agency in late life: The concept of ‘disponibility. Ageing and Society, 39(1), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000897
64.
RomaioliD.ContarelloA. (2019b). “I am too old for…” looking into a self-sabotage rhetoric and its counter-narratives in an Italian setting. Journal of Aging Studies, 48, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.12.001
65.
RomaioliD.ContarelloA. (2021). Resisting ageism through lifelong learning. Mature students’ counter-narratives to the construction of aging as decline. Journal of Aging Studies, 57, Article 100934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100934
66.
RomaioliD.McNameeS. (2021). (Mis)constructing social construction: Answering the critiques. Theory & Psychology, 31(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320967757
67.
RomaioliD.NenciniA.MeneghiniA. M. (2016). How to foster commitment among volunteers: A social constructionist study in Italian nonprofit organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(5), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2016.1202880
68.
RoscignoV. J.MongS.ByronR.TesterG. (2007). Age discrimination, social closure, and employment. Social Forces, 86(1), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0109
69.
SchoonenboomJ. (2017). The realist survey: How respondents’ voices can be used to test and revise correlational models. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815610997
70.
SchoonenboomJ. (2019). A performative paradigm for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817722889
71.
ShuaybM. (2014). Appreciative Inquiry as a method for participatory change in secondary schools in Lebanon. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527876
72.
SkinnerM. W.JosephA. E.HanlonN.HalsethG.RyserL. (2014). Growing old in resource communities: Exploring the links among voluntarism, aging, and community development. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 58(4), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12087
73.
SpedaleS.CouplandC.TempestS. (2014). Gendered ageism and organizational routines at work: The case of day-parting in television broadcasting. Organization Studies, 35(11), 1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614550733
74.
StennerP.MarshallH. (1995). A Q methodological study of rebelliousness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(6), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250603
75.
StewardA. T.HascheL.LaserJ. A. (2022). Do internalized age stereotypes mediate the relationship between volunteering and social connectedness for adults 50+?Journal of Aging Studies, 61, Article 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101031
76.
StrongT.KnightS. (2012). Agency and dialogic tension in co-editing more preferred narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 22(1), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.1.13str
77.
Van der HaarD.HoskingD. M. (2004). Evaluating appreciative inquiry: A relational constructionist perspective. Human Relations, 57(8), 1017–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726704045839
78.
VitmanA.IecovichE.AlfasiN. (2014). Ageism and social integration of older adults in their neighborhoods in Israel, The Gerontologist, 54(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt008
79.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. WW Norton & Company.
YaoJ. J. (2020). “Elderly” seniors vs. “youthful” seniors: Attributions and reshaping of aging expectations. The Qualitative Report, 25(8), 3047–3066. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4095
