*BashK. L.Howell SmithM. C.TranthamP. S. (2021). A systematic methodological review of hierarchical linear modeling in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820937882
2.
*Bridwell-MitchellE. N. (2012). The rationalizing logics of public school reform: How cultural institutions matter for classroom instruction. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812468792
3.
*BueddefeldJ.MurphyM.OstremJ.HalpennyE. (2021). Methodological bricolage and COVID-19: An illustration from innovative, novel, and adaptive environmental behavior change research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211019496
4.
CollinsH.EvansR. (2017). Probes, surveys, and the ontology of the social. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815619825
5.
CurryL. A.O’CathainA.Plano ClarkV. L.AroniR.FettersM.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811416941
6.
*Dencer-BrownA. M.JarvisR. M.AlfaroA. C.MilneS. (2022). The mixed methods practical sustainability research framework: An illustration from research on the creeping problem of coastal complexity and mangrove management. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211014422
7.
GreeneJ. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
8.
*HeadleyM. G.Plano ClarkV. L. (2020). Multilevel mixed methods research designs: Advancing a refined definition. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844417
9.
*KallemeynL. M.HallJ. N.GatesE. (2020). Exploring the relevance of complexity theory for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872423
10.
*Kieber-EmmonsA. M.MillerW. L.RubinsteinE. B.HowardJ.TsuiJ.RankinJ. L.CrabtreeB. F. (2022). A novel mixed methods approach combining geospatial mapping and qualitative inquiry to identify multilevel policy targets: The Focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP) applied to cancer survivorship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820984273
11.
*KoopmansM. (2017). Mixed methods in search of a problem: Perspectives from complexity theory. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816676662
*MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future: Implications of the Mixed Methods International Research Association’s task force report on the future of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816649719
14.
*NeMoyerA.AlvarezK.MukthineniR.TendulkarS.AlegríaM. (2021). Addressing youth-focused research questions in a community context: Collecting and integrating mixed methods data at multiple ecological levels with the PhotoStories project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820972916
15.
*PothC.BulutO.AquilinaA. M.OttoS. J. G. (2021). Using data mining for rapid complex case study descriptions: Example of public health briefings during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211013925
16.
*PothC. N.WongvorachanT.BulutO.OttoS. J. G. (2024). Adaptive case study-mixed methods design practices for researchers studying complex phenomena. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241250217
17.
*SakataN. (2023). Embracing the messiness in mixed methods research: The craft attitude. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221108545
18.
*SanscartierM. D. (2020). The craft attitude: Navigating mess in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818816248
19.
*SmithS. S. (2016). A three-step approach to exploring ambiguous networks. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575855
20.
*Weaver-HightowerM. B. (2014). A mixed methods approach for identifying influence on public policy. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813490996