BergmanM. M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811433236
2.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
3.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
4.
DejonckheereM.Lindquist-GrantzR.ToramanS.HaddadK.VaughnL. M. (2019). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: A methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818778469
5.
FàbreguesS.Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2021). Editorial: Virtual special issue on “quality in mixed methods research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211001974
6.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: The mixed methods research integration trilogy and its dimensions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817714066
7.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2021). Special issue on COVID-2019 and novel mixed methods methodological approaches during catastrophic social changes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211029100
8.
FettersM. D.WuJ. P.Paul ChandanabhummaP. (2021). Words matter: Calling on the community of research to recognize, react to, and remove racializing research rhetoric. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820977233
GuettermanT. C.Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2020). Editorial: Virtual special issue on “integration in mixed methods research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820956401
11.
HallB.HowardK. (2008). A synergistic approach: Conducting mixed methods research with typological and systemic design considerations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 248–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808314622
12.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (2013). Coming at things differently: Future directions of possible engagement with mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813483987
13.
KallemeynL. M.HallJ. N.GatesE. (2020). Exploring the relevance of complexity theory for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819872423
14.
LealI.EngebretsonJ.CohenL.Fernandez-EsquerM. E.LopezG.WangyalT.ChaoulA. (2018). An exploration of the effects of Tibetan yoga on patients’ psychological well-being and experience of lymphoma: An experimental embedded mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816645005
15.
MartelR.ShepherdM.Goodyear-SmithF. (2022). He awa whiria—a “Braided River”: An indigenous Māori approach to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820984028
16.
MaxwellJ.LoomisD. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 241–272). Sage.
17.
MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future: Implications of the mixed methods international research association’s task force report on the future of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816649719
NeMoyerA.AlvarezK.MukthineniR.TendulkarS.AlegríaM. (2021). Addressing youth-focused research questions in a community context: Collecting and integrating mixed methods data at multiple ecological levels with the photostories project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820972916
20.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2005). Taking the ‘‘Q’’ out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0
21.
PothC. (2018). Innovation in mixed methods research: A practical guide to integrative thinking with complexity. Sage.
22.
PothC.BulutO.AquilinaA.OttoS. J. G. (2021). Using data mining for rapid complex case study descriptions: Examples of public health briefings during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(3), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211013925
23.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonR. B.TeddlieC. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.
24.
ZhouY.WuM. L. (2022). Reported methodological challenges in empirical mixed methods articles: A review on JMMR and IJMRA. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820980212