A Qualitative Study Exploring the Process of Turning a Mixed Methods Doctoral Dissertation Into a Journal Article: Perspectives From Recent Doctorates in the United States

Abstract

Despite guidelines on mixed methods writing practices, the process of turning a mixed methods dissertation into a peer-reviewed publication is unknown, which may hinder scientific advancements and the use of mixed methods research across disciplines. This qualitative study explored recent doctorates’ experiences across three dimensions (i.e., critical decisions about the process, challenges, and recommendations for scholars) through nine semi-structured interviews. We identified themes under each dimension, respectively: (a) considerations for authorship decisions, disentangling the publication process, and the role of support systems; (b) challenges preparing a manuscript for submission and challenges with the journal review process; and (c) the value of time for publication process. This study contributes to the field of mixed methods research by offering empirical evidence and insights.

Keywords

current doctoral students mixed methods doctoral dissertation mixed methods writing practices peer-reviewed publication process recent doctorates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alise

M. A.

Teddlie

(2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805

American Psychological Association . (2020a). Journal article reporting standards. In Publication manual of the American psychological association (7th ed., pp. 71–108). American Psychological Association.

American Psychological Association . (2020b). Publication process. In Publication manual of the American psychological association (7th ed., pp. 371–395). American Psychological Association.

Anderson

P. A.

Boden

S. D.

(2008). Ethical considerations of authorship. SAS Journal, 2(3), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70034-3

Archibald

M. M.

Radil

A. I.

Zhang

Hanson

W. E.

(2015). Current mixed methods practices in qualitative research: A content analysis of leading journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(2), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691501400205

Bazeley

(2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.

Bishop

F. L.

Holmes

M. M.

(2013). Mixed methods in CAM research: A systematic review of studies published in 2012. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2013(1), Article 187365. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/187365

Braun

Clarke

(2012). Thematic analysis. In Cooper

Camic

P. M.

Long

D. L.

Panter

A. T.

Rindskopf

Sher

K. J.

(Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Cameron

(2011). Mixed methods research: The Five Ps framework. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(2), 96–108.

10.

Coffin

Hewings

(2003). Writing for different disciplines. In Coffin

Curry

M. J.

Goodman

Hewings

Lillis

Swann

(Eds.), Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education (pp. 45–72). Routledge.

11.

Committee on Publication Ethics Council . (2019). COPE discussion document: Authorship. Committee on Public Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.3

12.

Corr

Chudzik

J. R.

Love

H. R.

Snodgrass

M. R.

(2023). Mixed methods journal reviewing in early childhood special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 43(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231170587

13.

Corr

Love

Snodgrass

M. R.

Kern

J. L.

Chudzik

(2023). Methodological training in special education doctoral programs: A mixed-methods exploration. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 46(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221103902

14.

Costello

G. R.

Davis

K. R.

Crocco

O. S.

(2022). Learning by doing: Student & faculty reflections on a collaborative model for conducting and publishing mixed methods research in a graduate course. Innovative Higher Education, 47(6), 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09629-2

15.

Crawford

Tan

(2019). Responding to evidence-based practice: An examination of mixed methods research in teacher education. Australian Educational Researcher, 46(5), 775–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00310-w

16.

Creamer

E. G.

(2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Sage.

17.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

18.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

19.

Doyle

McCabe

Keogh

Brady

McCann

(2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

20.

Durani

(2006). Duplicate publications: Redundancy in plastic surgery literature. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 59(9), 975–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.039

21.

Fetters

M. D.

(2018). Six equations to help conceptualize the field of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818779433

22.

Fetters

M. D.

(2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.

23.

Fetters

M. D.

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

(2019). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819875832

24.

Garmire

L. X.

(2021). Mentorship is not co-authorship: A revisit to mentorship. Genome Biology, 22(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02226-6

25.

Guetterman

T. C.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

(2024). Terminology and mixed methods research: A persistent challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231217855

26.

Hennink

Kaiser

B. N.

(2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

27.

Hyland

(2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press.

28.

Jennings

M. M.

El-adaway

I. H.

(2012). Ethical issues in multiple-authored and mentor-supervised publications. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000087

29.

Jootun

McGhee

Marland

G. R.

(2009). Reflexivity: Promoting rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 23(23), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800

30.

Leech

N. L.

(2012). Writing mixed research reports. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(6), 866–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433800

31.

Leech

N. L.

Collins

K. M. T.

Jiao

Q. G.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2011). Mixed research in gifted education: A mixed research investigation of trends in the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(6), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211425095

32.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez-Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

33.

Lewis

K. B.

Graham

I. D.

Boland

Stacey

(2021). Writing a compelling integrated discussion: A guide for integrated discussions in article-based theses and dissertations. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 18(1), Article 20200057. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2020-0057

34.

Mackey

(2020). Navigating graduate school and academia: Key questions and answers. In Plonsky

(Ed.), Professional development in applied linguistics: A guide to success for graduate students and early career faculty (pp. 21–40). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

35.

McGrail

M. R.

Rickard

C. M.

Jones

(2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053

36.

McKim

C. A.

(2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096

37.

Molina-Azorín

J. F.

López-Gamero

M. D.

(2016). Mixed methods studies in environmental management research: Prevalence, purposes and designs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1862

38.

Murray

(2011). How to write a thesis: Develop good writing habits, overcome writer’s block, understand the assessment process, get the most from your supervisor (3rd ed.). Open Univ. Press.

39.

Padmalochanan

(2019). Academics and the field of academic publishing: Challenges and approaches. Publishing Research Quarterly, 35(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-09628-2

40.

Pickering

Byrne

(2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651

41.

Ross

A. A.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2010). Mixed methods research design: A comparison of prevalence in JRME and AERJ. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.233

42.

Sandelowski

(2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 321–350). Sage.

43.

Sandelowski

(2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362

44.

Snodgrass

M. R.

Love

H. R.

Roberts

C. A.

Gilson

C. B.

Yang

Badgett

N. M.

(2023). Is mixed methods bridging educational research divides? Using prevalence as an indicator of change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231184663

45.

Stange

K. C.

(2006). Publishing multimethod research. The Annals of Family Medicine, 4(4), 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.615

46.

Stockman

(2015). Achieving a doctorate through mixed methods research. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 13(2), 74–84.

47.

Tashakkori

Johnson

R. B.

Teddlie

(2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.

48.

Thomas

Skinner

(2012). Dissertation to journal article: A systematic approach. Education Research International, 2012, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/862135

49.

Toraman

(2021). How recent doctorates learned about mixed methods research through sources: A mixed methods social network analysis study [doctoral dissertation, university of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1637150105919799

50.

Toraman

Cox

Plano Clark

V. L.

Dariotis

J. K.

(2020). Graduate students’ current practices for writing a mixed methods research study abstract: An examination of doctoral dissertation and master’s thesis abstracts in the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global^TM database. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1a4

51.

VERBI Software . (2021). MAXQDA 2020. VERBI Software. [Computer software]. https://www.maxqda.com/

52.

Wisdom

J. P.

Cavaleri

M. A.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Green

C. A.

(2012). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47(2), 721–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01344.x