Prevalence studies have been conducted to assess the adoption of mixed methods research (MMR) across contexts. A limitation of these studies for understanding MMR adoption is their reliance on dichotomous operationalization or focus on one MMR practice. This study employed an item response theory model to examine the measurement of MMR adoption with reported MMR elements as indicators. Results indicate that MMR studies can be differentiated on their degree of MMR adoption and that elements such as Integration techniques, Sequence, and Qualitative and Quantitative Methods have a pronounced ability to differentiate MMR studies on the degree they adopted MMR practices. This study contributes to the field of MMR by offering a novel approach to operationalizing the degree of MMR adoption.
AliseM.TeddlieC. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805
2.
BazeleyP. (2015). Adoption of mixed methods approaches to research by management researchers. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference On Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (Ecrm 2015), Valletta, Malta, 11–12 June 2015, pp. 34–40.
3.
BazeleyP. (2016). Mixed or merged? Integration as the real challenge for mixed methods. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2016-1373
4.
BazeleyP. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Sage.
5.
BelcherW. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Sage.
CoatesA. (2021). The prevalence of philosophical assumptions described in mixed methods research in education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820958210
8.
CoyleC. E.Schulman-GreenD.FederS.ToramanS.PrustM. L.Plano ClarkV. L.CurryL. (2018). Federal funding for mixed methods research in the health sciences in the United States: Recent trends. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(3), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816662578
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research [Editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808330883
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (1st ed.). Sage.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
12.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
13.
de AyalaR. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. The Guilford Press.
14.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.SchutzP. A. (2017). Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Sage.
15.
DenscombeM. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808316807
16.
FàbreguesS.Mumbardó-AdamC.Escalante-BarriosE. L.HongQ. N.EdelsteinD.VanderbollK.FettersM. D. (2022). Mixed methods intervention studies in children and adolescents with emotional and behavioral disorders: A methodological review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 126, 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104239
17.
FettersM. D. (2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Sage.
18.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.llll/1475-6773.12117
19.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article [Editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815594687
20.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Perspectives of past editors on the current state of the field and future directions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(4), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817729476
21.
FujimuraJ. (1996). Crafting science: A socio-history of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Harvard University Press.
22.
FujimuraJ. H. (1988). The molecular biological bandwagon in cancer research: Where social worlds meet. Social Problems, 35(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/800622
23.
GranikovV.HongQ. N.CristE.PluyeP. (2020). Mixed methods research in library and information science: A methodological review. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 101003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101003
24.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Wiley.
25.
Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press.
26.
Howell SmithM. C.Shanahan BazisP. (2021). Conducting mixed methods research systematic methodological reviews: A review of practice and recommendations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 546–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820967626
27.
IvankovaN. V.KawamuraY. (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581–611). Sage.
28.
JohnsonB.GrayR. (2010). A history of the philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 69–94). Sage.
29.
MaxwellJ. A. (2016). Expanding the history and range of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815571132
30.
McKimC. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607096
31.
MertensD. M.BazeleyP.BowlegL.FieldingN.MaxwellJ.Molina-AzorinJ. F.NiglasK. (2016). Expanding thinking through a kaleidoscopic look into the future implications of the mixed methods international research association’s task force report on the future of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816649719
32.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.FettersM. D. (2016). Mixed methods research prevalence studies: Field-specific studies on the state of the art of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816636707
33.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
34.
MorganD. L. (2022). Who is on the bandwagon? Core and periphery in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221096319
35.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of ‘‘yield’’ from mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094
36.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074
37.
Plano ClarkV. L. (2010). The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. Trends in federally funded health-related research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364609
38.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.
39.
PluyeP.HongQ. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: Mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440
40.
R Development Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
41.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
42.
RossA.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). Mixed methods research design: A comparison of prevalence in JRME and AERJ. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2010.4.3.233
43.
TashakkoriA.JohnsonR. B.TeddlieC. (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Sage.
44.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (1st ed.). Sage.
45.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), (2010a). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.
46.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2010b). Epilogue: Current developments and emerging trends in integrated research methodology. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 803–826). Sage.
47.
ToramanS. (2021). How recent doctorates learned about mixed methods research through sources: A mixed methods social network analysis study. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. https://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1637150105919799
48.
ToramanS.CoxK.Plano ClarkV. L.DariotisJ. K. (2020). Graduate students’ current practices for writing a mixed methods research study abstract: An examination of doctoral dissertation and master’s thesis abstracts in the ProQuest Dissertations and Theses GlobalTM database. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 12(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v12n1a4
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
