DruryA.SheilaP.Anne-MarieB. (2023). Adapting the pillar integration process for theory development: The theoretical model of healthcare factors influencing quality of life in cancer survivorship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221134730
2.
Haynes-BrownT. K. (2023). Using theoretical models in mixed methods research: An example from an explanatory sequential mixed methods study exploring teachers’ beliefs and use of technology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221094970
3.
Molina-AzorinJ. F.GuettermanT. C. (2023). Special issues on mixed methods research: Expanding the use of mixed methods in disciplines. Editorial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231183257
4.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.
5.
ProudfootK. (2023). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
6.
QuinnC. R. (2023). Media review: Secondary data in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 327–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231162761
7.
SakataN. (2023). Embracing the messiness in mixed methods research: The craft attitude.Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221108545
8.
SanscartierM. D. (2020). The craft attitude: Navigating mess in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818816248
9.
WatkinsD. C. (2022). Secondary data in mixed methods research. Sage.
