In This Issue: Special Issues,Theoretical Models,Dealing With Messiness,and Integration in Mixed Methods Research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Drury

Sheila

Anne-Marie

(2023). Adapting the pillar integration process for theory development: The theoretical model of healthcare factors influencing quality of life in cancer survivorship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221134730

Haynes-Brown

T. K.

(2023). Using theoretical models in mixed methods research: An example from an explanatory sequential mixed methods study exploring teachers’ beliefs and use of technology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221094970

Molina-Azorin

J. F.

Guetterman

T. C.

(2023). Special issues on mixed methods research: Expanding the use of mixed methods in disciplines. Editorial. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231183257

Plano Clark

V. L.

Ivankova

N. V.

(2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.

Proudfoot

(2023). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816

Quinn

C. R.

(2023). Media review: Secondary data in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 327–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898231162761

Sakata

(2023). Embracing the messiness in mixed methods research: The craft attitude. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221108545

Sanscartier

M. D.

(2020). The craft attitude: Navigating mess in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818816248

Watkins

D. C.

(2022). Secondary data in mixed methods research. Sage.