This research attempts to improve the procedure utilized by Schroder, Driver and Streufert (1967) for using multidimensional scaling in the measure of conceptual level. A series of monte carlo simulation runs and a laboratory experiment highlight potential incongruities related to the degree of error in the input data required by the Schroder et al. process. Accordingly, several methodological recommendations are made and briefly evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alawi, H.Cognitive task and organizational complexities in relation to information processing behavior of business managers . Ph.D. dissertation, G.S.B.A., USC, 1973.
2.
David, H.The Method of Paired Comparisons . Griffin's Statistical Monographs and Courses ( Hagner Publishing Company, 1963).
3.
Driver, M. J.Conceptual structure and group processes in an inter-nation simulation. Part one: the perception of simulated nations. Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin, RB 62-15, 1962.
4.
Driver, M. J. and Lintott, J. T.Managerial Decision Diagnostics, G.S.B.A., USC, 1972.
5.
Driver, M. J. and Mock, T. J.Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systems. The Accounting Review , July, 1975, 490-511.
6.
Driver, M. J. and Streufert, S.Integrative complexity: an approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, June, 1969, 280-288.
7.
Guetzkow, H. S.A use of simulation in the study of inter-nation relations. Behavioral Science, 4, 1959, 183-190.
8.
Hefner, R. A.Extension of the law of comparative judgment to discriminable and multidimensional stimuli. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 1958.
9.
Miller, H.Environmental complexity and financial reports. The Accounting Review, January, 1972 , 31-37.
10.
Pratt, J.Conceptual level: A domain-oriented measure of cognitive complexity. Working paper, University of Washington,1978.
11.
Revsine, L.Data expansion and conceptual structure. The Accounting Review, October, 1970, 704-711.
12.
San Miguel, J. G.Human information processing and its relevance to accounting: a laboratory study, Accounting, Organization and Society, 4, 1976 , pp. 357-373.
13.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., and Streufert, S.Human Information Processing, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.
14.
Streufert, S.Increasing failure and response rate in complex decision making. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology , 1969, 7, 125-143.
15.
Streufert, S.Complexity and complex decision making: conveyance between differentiation and integration approaches to the prediction of task performance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1970, 6, 494-509.
16.
Streufert, S.Success and response rate in complex decision making. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1972, 8, 389-403. (a)
Streufert, S. and Castore, C. H.Information search and the effects of failure: a test of complexity theory. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 1971, 7, 125-143.
19.
Streufert, S. and Fromkin, H. L.Complexity and social influence. In J. Tedeschi (2d.), Social influence processes. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1972.
20.
Torgerson, W. S.Theory and methods of scaling , New York: Wiley, 1958.
21.
Tuckman, B. W.Integrative complexity: its measurement and relation to creativity. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1966, 26-2, 369-382. (a)
22.
Tuckman, B. W.Interpersonal probing and revealing and systems of integrative complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 655-664. (b)
23.
Wilson, D. A.A note on environmental complexity and financial reports. The Accounting Review, July, 1973, 586-588.
