*AlexanderE.EpplerM. J.ComiA. (2021). Data integration: A real-time, participant-driven, and visually supported method. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820902294
3.
*ArchibaldM. (2016). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092
4.
ArchibaldM. (2023). Opportunities and challenges for a transdisciplinary mixed methods research future. In PothC. (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods research designs. SAGE.
5.
ArchibaldM.AmbagtsheerR.LawlessM. T.ThompsonM. O.ShultzT.ChehadeM. J.WhitewayL.SheppardA.PlazaM. P.KitsonA. L. (2021). Co-designing evidence- based videos in health care: A case exemplar of developing creative knowledge translation “evidence-experience” resources. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211019623
6.
ArchibaldM.LawlessM.Pinero de PlazaM.KitsonA. (2023). How transdisciplinary research teams learn to do knowledge translation (KT), and kow KT in turn, impacts transdisciplinary research: A realist evaluation and longitudinal case study. Accepted to Health Research Policy and Systems.
7.
*ChilisaB.TshekoG. N. (2014). Mixed methods in indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878
8.
*CurryL. A.O’CathainA.Plano ClarkV. L.AroniR.FettersM.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811416941
9.
*DeJonckheereM.Lindquist-GrantzR.ToramanS.HaddadK.VaughnL. M. (2019). Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: A methodological review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818778469
10.
*DionA.Carini-GutierrezA.JimenezV.Ben AmeurA.RobertE.JosephL.AnderssonN. (2022). Weight of evidence: Participatory methods and bayesian updating to contextualize evidence synthesis in stakeholders’ knowledge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898211037412
11.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
12.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2018). A call for expanding philosophical perspectives to create a more ‘‘worldly’’ field of mixed methods: The example of Yinyang philosophy. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689818816886
13.
*FlechaR. (2014). Using mixed methods from a communicative orientation: Researching with Grassroots Roma. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527945
14.
*Goodyear-SmithF.‘OfanoaM. (2022). Fa’afaletui: A Pacific research framework. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820985948
15.
GreeneJ. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Wiley
16.
*HemmingsA.BeckettG.KennerlyS.YapT. (2013). Building a community of research practice: Intragroup team social dynamics in interdisciplinary mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813478468
17.
IsraelB. A.EngE.SchulzA. J.ParkerE. A. (2013). Methods for community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass.
18.
JohnsonB. R.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
*LuceroJ.WallersteinN.DuranB.AlegriaM.Greene-MotonE.IsraelB.KastelicS.MagaratiM.OetzelJ.PearsonC.SchulzA.VillegasM.White HatE. R. (2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309
21.
*LundeÅ.HeggenK.StrandR. (2013). Knowledge and power: Exploring unproductive interplay between quantitative and qualitative researchers. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812471087
22.
*MannellJ.DavisK.AkterK.JenningsH.MorrisonJ.KuddusA.FottrellE. (2021). Visual participatory analysis: A qualitative method for engaging participants in interpreting the results of randomized controlled trials of health interventions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820914806
23.
*MartelR.ShepherdM.Goodyear-SmithF. (2022). He awa whiria—a “Braided River”: An Indigenous Māori approach to mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 16(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820984028
24.
*NeMoyerA.AlvarezK.MukthineniR.TendulkarS.AlegríaM. (2021). Addressing youth- focused research questions in a community context: Collecting and integrating mixed methods data at multiple ecological levels with the PhotoStories Project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820972916
25.
*PintoR. M.WallM. M.SpectorA. Y. (2014). Modeling the structure of partnership between researchers and front-line service providers: Strengthening collaborative public health research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813490835
26.
PothC.(2018). Innovation in mixed methods research: Guiding practices for integrative thinking with complexity. Sage.
27.
RosenfieldP. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science and Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R
28.
*SchieberA. C.Kelly-IrvingM.GénoliniJ.-P.MembradoM.TanguyL.FabreC.MarchandP.LangT. (2017). Integrating multidisciplinary results to produce new knowledge about the physician–patient relationship: A methodology applied to the INTERMEDE project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815588643
29.
*SullivanM.DerrettS.PaulC.BeaverC.StaceH. (2014). Using mixed methods to build research capacity within the spinal cord injured population of New Zealand. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527942
30.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 1–8.
31.
*ZeaM. C.Aguilar-PardoM.BetancourtF.ReisenC. A.GonzalesF. (2014). Mixed methods research with internally displaced Colombian gay and bisexual men and transwomen. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527941