FettersM.Molina-AzorinJ. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816682092
3.
GuettermanT.FabreguesS.SakakibaraR. (2021). Visuals in joint displays to represent integration in mixed methods research: A methodological review. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100080
4.
GuettermanT.FettersM.CreswellJ., (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554-561, https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
5.
MaxwellJ. (2022). Response to Morgan on triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, forthcoming.
6.
MorganD. (2022). Who is on the bandwagon? Core and periphery in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Online before publication.
7.
TrendM. (1979). On the reconciliation of qualitative and quantitative analyses: A case study. In CookT. D.ReichardtC. S. (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in program evaluation (pp. 68-86). Sage.