Utilizing a Mixed Methods Approach for Conducting Interventional Evaluations

American Sociological Association. (n.d.). Research methods. https://www.asanet.org/topics/research-methods

American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271

Bryman A. (2007). The research question in social research: What is its role? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600655282

Catallo C. Jack S. M. Ciliska D. MacMillan H. L. (2012). Minimizing the risk of intrusion: A grounded theory of intimate partner violence disclosure in emergency departments. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(6), 1366-1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06128.x

Catallo C. Jack S. M. Ciliska D. MacMillan H. L. (2013). Mixing a grounded theory approach with a randomized controlled trial related to intimate partner violence: What challenges arise for mixed methods research? Nursing Research and Practice, 2013, Article 798213. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/798213

Center for Evidence-Based Management. (n.d.). What are the levels of evidence? https://www.cebma.org/faq/what-are-the-levels-of-evidence/

Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence hierarchy: What is it? https://www.gtil.cese.nsw.gov.au/how-we-use-evidence/what-is-it

Chapel T. (n.d.). Mixed methods in program evaluation [PowerPoint slides]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/program_eval/webinar4b/4B_with_notes.pptx

Connolly P. Keenan C. Urbanska K. (2018). The trials of evidence-based practice in education: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in education research 1980-2016. Educational Research, 60(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1493353

Craig P. Dieppe P. Macintyre S. Mitchie S. Nazareth I. Petticrew M. & Medical Research Council. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. Medical Research Council. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/

Creswell J. W. Fetters M. D. Plano Clark V. L. Morales A. (2009). Mixed methods intervention trials. In Andrew S. Halcomb E. J. (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences (pp. 161-180). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444316490

Creswell J. W. Klassen A. C. Plano Clark V. L. Smith K. C. & Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://obssr.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf

Creswell J. W. Plano Clark V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Creswell J. W. Poth C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Drabble S. J. O’Cathain A. (2015). Moving from randomized controlled trials to mixed methods intervention evaluations. In Hesse-Biber S. Johnson R. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mixed and multi method research (pp. 406-425). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.001.0001

Food and Drug Administration. (2017). Patient-focused drug development public workshop on guidance I: Collecting comprehensive and representative input. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.fda.gov/media/109163/download

Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Patient-focused drug development: Methods to identify what is important to patients: Guidance for industry, food and drug administration staff, and other stakeholders. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.fda.gov/media/131230/download

Glenton C. Lewin S. Scheel I. B. (2011). Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers. Implementation Science, 6, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-53

Greenhalgh T. (1997). How to read a paper: Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). British Medical Journal, 315(7102), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7102.243

Greenhalgh T. Thorne S. Malterud K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), Article e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

Hawe P. (1999). Can it work? Does it work? Is it worth it? British Medical Journal, 319(7211), 652. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.652

Hesse-Biber S. (2012). Weaving a multimethodology and mixed methods praxis into randomized control trials to enhance credibility. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(10), 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412456964

Honeycutt S. Leeman J. McCarthy W. J. Bastani R. Carter-Edwards L. Clark H. Garney W. Gustat J. Hites L. Nothwehr F. Kegler M. (2015, October). Evaluating policy, systems, and environmental change interventions: Lessons learned from CDC’s Prevention Research Centers. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12, Article e174. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150281

Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Research. (2015). Mixed methods in education research: IES Technical Working Group meeting summary. https://ies.ed.gov/ncer/whatsnew/techworkinggroup/pdf/MixedMethodsTWG.pdf

Jansen Y. F. M. Foets M. M. E. de Bont A. A. (2010). The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: A review. European Journal of Public Health, 20(2), 220-226. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp085

Johnson R. B. Schoonenboom J. (2016). Adding qualitative and mixed methods research to health intervention studies: Interacting with differences. Qualitative Health Research, 26(5), 587-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617479

Levati S. Campbell P. Frost R. Dougall N. Wells M. Donaldson C. Hagen S. (2016). Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomized controlled trial: A scoping review of strategies used. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 2, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-016-0058-y

Lewin S. Glenton C. Oxman A. D. (2009). Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: Methodological study. British Medical Journal, 339(7723), Article b3496. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3496

Linnan L. Steckler A. (2002). Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: An overview. In Steckler A. Linnan L. (Eds.), Process evaluation for public health interventions and research (1st ed., pp. 1-23). Jossey-Bass.

Loudon K. Treweek S. Sullivan F. Donnan P. Thorpe K. E. Zwarenstein M. (2015). The PRECIS-2 tool: Designing trials that are fit for purpose. British Medical Journal, 350, Article h2147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2147

MacMillan H. L. Wathen C. N. Jamieson E. Boyle M. Shannon H. S. Ford-Gilboe Worster, A. Lent B. Coben J. H. Campbell J. C. McNutt L. A. & McMaster Violence Against Women Research Group. (2009). Screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: A randomized trial. JAMA Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(5), 493-501. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1089

Medical Research Council. (2000). A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/rcts-for-complex-interventions-to-improve-health/

Mixed Methods International Research Association. (n.d). Mixed Methods International Research Association. https://mmira.wildapricot.org/

Mowat R. Subramanian S. V. Kawachi I. (2018, August). Randomized controlled trials and evidence-based policy: A multidisciplinary dialogue. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.003

National Health Service Education for Scotland. (n.d.). The matrix evidence tables and how to use them. https://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/media/3325318/matrix_-_part_2.pdf

NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences. (2018). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences (2nd ed.). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.obssr.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Best-Practices-for-Mixed-Methods-Research-in-the-Health-Sciences-2018-01-25.pdf

Oakley A. Strange V. Bonell C. Allen E. Stephenson J. (2006). Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal, 332(7538), 413. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413

O’Cathain A. (2018). A practical guide to using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials. Oxford University Press.

O’Cathain A. Goode J. Drabble S. H. Thomas K. J. Rudolph A. Hewison J. (2014). Getting added value from using qualitative research with randomized controlled trials: A qualitative interview study. Trials, 15, Article 215. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-215

O’Cathain A. Thomas K. J. Drabble S. J. Rudolph A. Goode J. Hewison J. (2014). Maximising the value of combining qualitative research and randomized controlled trials in health research: The QUALitative Research in Trials (QUART) study—A mixed methods study. Health Technology Assessment, 18, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18380

O’Cathain A. Thomas K. J. Drabble S. Rudolph A. Hewison J. (2013). What can qualitative research do for randomized controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. British Medical Journal Open, 3(6), Article e002889. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (n.d.). PCORI methodology standards. https://www.pcori.org/research-results/about-our-research/research-methodology/pcori-methodology-standards

Penkunas M. J. Matchar D. B. Wong C. H. Liu C. Chan A. W. M. (2020). Using cost-effectiveness analysis in mixed methods research: An evaluation of an integrated care program for frequently hospitalized older adults in Singapore. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844838

Petticrew M. Roberts H. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(7), 527-529. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.7.527

Poth C. N. Fetters M. D. Molina-Azorin J. F. (2018). Distinct yet synergetic contributors to mixed methods research: Intersections for MMIRA and JMMR. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817743581

Richards D. A. Bazeley P. Borglin G. Craig P. Emsley R. Frost J. Hill J. Horwood J. Hutchings H. A. Jinks C. Montgomery A. Moore G. Plano Clark V. L. Tonkin-Crine S. Wade J. Warren F. C. Wyke S. Young B. O’Cathain A. (2019). Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal Open, 9(11), Article e032081. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032081

Rychetnik L. Frommer M. Hawe P. Shiell A. (2002). Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 56(2), 119-127. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.2.119

Sandelowski M. (1996). Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 19(4), 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199608)19:4<359::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H

Shaw E. K. Ohman-Strickland P. A. Piasecki A. Hudson S. V. Ferrante J. M. McDaniel R. R. Crabtree B. F. (2013). Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: A cluster randomized trial. Annals of Family Medicine, 11(3), 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1505

Song M. Sandelowski M. Happ M. B. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in conducting mixed method intervention studies in the health sciences. In Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 725-748). Sage.

Tashakkori A. Creswell J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906293042

University of Michigan Mixed Methods Program. (n.d.). Resources. http://www.mixedmethods.org/resources.html

Wisdom J. Creswell J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models (AHRQ Publication No. 13-0028-EF). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/MixedMethods_032513comp.pdf

Zarghi N. Khorasani S. D. (2018). Evidence-based social sciences: A new emerging field. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(2), 207-211. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v5i2.p207-211

Zwarenstein M. (2017). “Pragmatic” and “explanatory” attitudes to randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 110(5), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076817706303