Despite tremendous interest in social games and game studies, the potential of game heuristics for the field of mixed methods remains unknown. This article introduces game heuristics to mixed methods research, showing how it was used in a specific study on the survival probabilities on the Titanic. Specifically, we describe how game heuristics was used to create the explanandum, code and interpret the qualitative material, and set up and interpret the quantitative model. Furthermore, we show and explicate how game heuristics was used to construct seven types of meta-inferences. The Titanic data set is especially interesting, since it is routinely used for statistical mono-method teaching; however, it can be shown that a mixed methods approach leads to a better explanation.
BelloccoR.AlgeriS. (2013). Goodness-of-fit tests for categorical data. Stata Journal, 13, 356-365. doi:10.1177/1536867X1301300210
4.
BlumerH. (1998). What is wrong with social theory? In Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method (pp. 140-152). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1969)
5.
BranteT. (2001). Consequences of realism for sociological theory-building. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 167-195. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00153
6.
ColemanJ. S. (1969). Games as vehicles for social theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 1, 2-7. doi:10.1177/000276426901200602
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
CreamerE. (2018). An introduction to fully-integrated mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134-2156. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117
FreyB. S.SavageD. A.TorglerB. (2011). Who perished on theTitanic? The importance of social norms. Rationality & Society, 23, 35-49. doi:10.1177/1043463110396059
14.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
GleicherD.StevansL. K. (2004). Who survived theTitanic? A logistic regression analysis. International Review of Maritime History, 16(2), 61-94. doi:10.1177/084387140401600205
16.
GoffmanE. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Allen Lane.
17.
HallW. (1986). Social class and survival on theS.S. Titanic. Social Science & Medicine, 22, 687-690. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(86)90041-9
18.
HarrellF. (2015). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
19.
KelleU. (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). doi:10.17169/fqs-2.1.966
20.
KelleU. (2007). Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte [The integration of qualititative and quantitative methods in emperical social research: Theoretical foundations and methodological concepts]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
21.
KlabbersJ. H. G. (2018). On the architecture of game science. Simulation & Gaming, 49, 207-245.
22.
KohlerU.KreuterF. (2017). Datenanalyse mit Stata. Allgemeine Konzepte der Datenanalyse und ihre praktische Anwendung. 5. Auflage [Data analysis with stata: General concepts of data analysis and their practical application] . Munich, Germany: De Gruyter Oldenbourg,.
23.
LandauS.EverittB. S. (2004). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. London, England: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
24.
LordW. (2012). A night to remember. London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1956)
MaxwellJ. A. (2010). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 145-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
MorganD. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76. doi:10.1177/2345678906292462
28.
MertonR. K (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1949)
29.
RuffmanA. (2013). Titanic remembered: The unsinkable ship and Halifax. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Formac.
30.
SchoonenboomJ.JohnsonR. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69, 107-131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
31.
SchützA. (1954). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. Journal of Philosophy, 51, 257-273.
32.
StachuraM. (2017). Bewertungsspiele. Von der Handlungs: zur Koordinationstheorie [Evaluation games. From the theory of action to the theory of coordination]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(1), 1-26. doi:10.1007/s11577-016-0401-6
33.
StolzJ. (2016). Opening the black box. How the study of social mechanisms can benefit from the use of explanatory mixed methods. Analyse & Kritik, 38(1), 257-286.
34.
StolzJ.LindemannA.AntoniettiJ.-P. (2018). Sociological Explanation and mixed methods: the example of the Titanic. Quality and Quantity, 53(3), 1623-1643. doi: 10.1007/s11135-018-00830-0
35.
SwedbergR. (2001). Sociology and game theory: Contemporary and historical perspectives. Theory and Society, 30, 301-335. doi:10.1023/A:1017532512350
36.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
ThomasL.ReyesE. M. (2014). Tutorial: Survival estimation for Cox regression models with time-varying coefficients using SAS and R. Journal of Statistical Software, 61(1), 1-23. doi:10.18637/jss.v061.c01
38.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (2004). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1944)
39.
WittgensteinL. (2003). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Auf der Grundlage der Kritisch-genetischen Edition neu herausgegeben von Joachim Schulte [Philosophical investigations: Critical genetic edition Ed. v. Joachim Schulte and others]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
