AhmedS. (2017). Media review: Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 415–416.
2.
ArchibaldM. M. (2016). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228-250.
3.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 19-32.
4.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
5.
BazeleyP. (2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In BuberR.GadnerJ.RichardsL. (Eds.), Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research (pp. 141-156). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BazeleyP. (2012). Integrative analysis strategies for mixed data sources. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 814-828.
7.
BazeleyP.KempL. (2012). Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 55-72.
8.
BrownT. T.WoodJ. D.GriffithD. A. (2017). Using spatial autocorrelation analysis to guide mixed methods survey sample design decisions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 394–414.
9.
BrymanA. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done. Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113.
10.
CollinsH.EvansR. (2017). Probes, surveys, and the ontology of the social. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 328–341.
11.
CollinsK. M.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuttonI. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed-methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
12.
CreamerE. G. (2018). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitaitve, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
CreswellJ. W.KlassenA. C.Plano ClarkV. L.SmithK. C. (2011). Beyond the R series: High-quality mixed methods activities in successful fellowship, career, training, and center grant applications. In Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences (2nd ed., pp. 27-30). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf
16.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
CurryL.Nunez-SmithM. (2014). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
CurryL. A.O’CathainA. O.Plano ClarkV. L.AroniR.FettersM. D.BergD. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5-20.
19.
CurryL. A.SpatzE.CherlinE.ThompsonJ. W.BergD.TingH. H.… BradleyE. H. (2011). What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 154, 384-390.
20.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48, 2134-2156.
21.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015a). Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203-213.
22.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015b). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115-117.
23.
FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F. (2017). TheJournal of Mixed Methods Researchstarts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 3-10.
24.
FettersM. D.YoshiokaT.GreenbergG. M.GorenfloD. W.YeoS. (2007). Advance consent in Japanese during prenatal care for epidural anesthesia during childbirth. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 333-365.
25.
FrantzenK. K.FettersM. D. (2016). Meta-integration for synthesizing data in a systematic mixed studies review: Insights from research on autism spectrum disorder. Quality & Quantity, 50, 2251-2277.
26.
GlanzK.BishopD. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 399-418.
27.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
GreeneJ. C. (2015). Preserving distinctions within the multimethod and mixed methods merger. In Hesse-BiberS. N.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 606-615). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J. (2003). Making paradigmatic sense of mixed methods practice. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 91-110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
31.
GreeneJ. C.HallJ. N. (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 119-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
GuettermanT. C.CreswellJ. W.DeutschC.GalloJ. J. (2016). Process evaluation of a retreat for scholars in the first cohort: The NIH mixed methods research training program for the health sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689816674564
33.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13, 554-561.
34.
Hesse-BiberS. (2016). Gender differences in psychosocial and medical outcomes stemming from testing positive for the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation for breast cancer: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689816655257
35.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
HeyvaertM.HammesK.OnghenaP. (2016). Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
HigginsJ.GreenS. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 5.1.0. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org
38.
HouS.-I. (2005). Stage of adoption and impact of direct-mail communications with and without phone intervention on Chinese women’s cervical smear screening behavior. Preventive Medicine, 41, 749-756.
39.
HouS.-I.FernandezM. E.BaumlerE.ParcelG. S. (2002). Effectiveness of an intervention to increase Pap test screening among Chinese women in Taiwan. Journal of Community Health, 27, 277-290.
40.
JacksonE. A. (2017). Media review: Practical research methods: A user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3). 417–418.
JonesK. (2017). Using a theory of practice to clarify epistemological challenges in mixed methods research: An example of theorizing, modeling, and mapping changing West African seed systems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 355–373.
44.
KronF. W.FettersM. D.ScerboM. W.WhiteC. B.LypsonM. L.PadillaM. A.… WallaceA. M. (2017). Using a computer simulation for teaching communication skills: A blinded multisite mixed methods randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 748-759.
45.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275.
46.
MaxwellJ. A.LoomisD. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 241-272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
MaxwellJ.ChmielM.RogersS. E. (2015). Designing integration in multimethod and mixed methods research. In Hesse-BiberS.JohnsonB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 223-239). New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
McKimC. A. (2017). The value of mixed methods research: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 202-222.
49.
MertensD. M. (2008). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
50.
MertensD. M. (2012). Transformative mixed methods: Addressing inequities. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 802-813.
51.
MoffattS.WhiteM.MackintoshJ.HowelD. (2006). Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research: What happens when mixed methods findings conflict?BMC Health Services Research, 6, 28. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-28
52.
MorseJ. M.NiehausL. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
53.
MoseholmE.Rydahl-HansenS.LindhardtB.FettersM. D. (2017). Health-related quality of life in patients with serious non-specific symptoms undergoing evaluation for possible cancer and their experience during the process: A mixed methods study. Quality of Life Research, 26, 993-1006. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1423-2
54.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H. (2015). Mixed methods research and culture-specific interventions: Program design and evaluation (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2008). Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or dysfunctional? Team working in mixed-methods research. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 1574-1585.
56.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ. (2010). Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. British Medical Journal, 341, c4587.
57.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JohnsonR. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13, 48-63.
58.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures 1. Qualitative Report, 11, 474-498.
59.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.SlateJ. R.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. (2007). Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 4-17.
60.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.SlateJ. R.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. (2009). Mixed data analysis: Advanced integration techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 13-33.
61.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.TeddlieC. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
Plano ClarkV. L.IvankovaN. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
PluyeP.GradR. M.LevineA.NicolauB. (2009). Understanding divergence of quantitative and qualitative data (or results) in mixed methods studies. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 58-72.
64.
PreissleJ.Glover-KudonR. M.RohanE. A.BoehmJ. E.DeGroffA. (2015). Putting ethics on the mixed methods map. In Hesse-BiberS. N.JohnsonR. B. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 144-163). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
65.
SandelowskiM.DochertyS.EmdenC. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 365-372.
66.
SchoonenboomJ. (2017). The realist survey: How respondents’ voices can be used to test and revise correlational models. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 308–327.
67.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.LevitonL. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
ShellD. F.BrooksD. W.TraininG.WilsonK. M.KauffmanD. F.HerrL. M. (2010). The unified learning model: How motivational, cognitive, and neurobiological sciences inform best teaching practices. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
69.
ShultzC. G.ChuM. S.YajimaA.SkyeE. P.SanoK.InoueM.… FettersM. D. (2015). The cultural context of teaching and learning sexual health care examinations in Japan: A mixed methods case study assessing the use of standardized patient instructors among Japanese family physician trainees of the Shizuoka Family Medicine Program. Asia Pacific Family Medicine, 14, 8.
70.
SilkaL. (2009). Partnership ethics. In MertensD. M.GinsbergP. E. (Eds.), Handbook of social research ethics (pp. 337-352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
SpectorA. Y.PintoR. M. (2017). Partnership matters in health services research: A mixed methods study of practitioners’ involvement in research and subsequent use of evidence-based interventions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 374–393.
72.
StangeK. C.CrabtreeB. F.MillerW. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292-294.
73.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
UprichardE.DawneyL. (2016). Data diffraction: Challenging data integration in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689816674650
75.
Van NessP. H.MurphyT. E.AliA. (2017). Attention to individuals: Mixed methods for n-of-1 health care interventions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(3), 342–353.
76.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.