In this article, we propose an innovative mixed methods research (MMR) technique and discuss its theory and applications. The visual replay methodology (VRM) is a new graphic way to investigate the discourse patterns during software-aided small group discussions. A visually supported conversation is recorded through screen capturing and replayed to reconstruct how the discussion has unfolded. The VRM responds to the “integration challenge” that the MMR community is facing—by employing the power of visualization, data integration is leveraged to a new level, where visual synergy gains enable a “value-added” research outcome. By employing multigenre integration and a moderately pragmatic approach, the VRM reduces the researcher–subject power-relation gap and contributes to some long-standing MMR debates regarding reflexivity and participation.
ArchibaldM. (2015). Investigator triangulation a collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228-250. doi:10.1177/1558689815570092
2.
BalomenouN.GarrodB. (2015). A review of participant-generated image methods in the social sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689815581561
3.
BellE.WarrenS.SchroederJ. (2014). The Routledge companion to visual organization. London, England: Routledge.
4.
BergmanM. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
BergmannJ. (1985). Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit: Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie [Volatility and methodological adjustment of social reality: Records as interpretive sociology data]. In BonssW.HartmannH. (Eds.), Entzauberte Wissenschaft (pp. 299-320). Göttingen, Germany: Otto Schwarz.
6.
ClarkH.BrennanS. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL.LevineJ.TeasleyS. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
ClarkH.Wilkes-GibbsD. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
8.
ComiA.BischofN.EpplerM. (2014). Beyond projection: Using collaborative visualizations to conduct qualitative interviews. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 9, 110-133.
9.
CreswellJ. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108.
DeSanctisG.PooleM. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
15.
EtienneL.DevogeleT. (2010). Spatiotemporal trajectory analysis of mobile objects following the same itinerary. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(II), 86-91.
16.
EvertssonN. (2015). A nested analysis of electoral donations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689815585208
17.
EwensteinB.WhyteJ. (2007). Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies, 28, 689-708.
18.
FettersM.CurryL.CreswellJ. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt. 2), 2134-2156.
19.
FettersM.FreshwaterD. (2015). Editorial: The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115-117.
20.
FieldingN. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods designs data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 124-136.
21.
FreshwaterD. (2013). Taking the time and trouble with mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 299-301.
22.
GergleD.KrautR.FussellS. (2013). Using visual information for grounding and awareness in collaborative tasks. International Journal of HCI, 28, 1-39.
23.
HenryS.FettersM. (2012). Video elicitation interviews: A qualitative research method for investigating physician-patient interactions. Annals of Family Medicine, 10, 118-125.
24.
IsenbergP.ElmqvistN.ScholtzJ.CerneaD.MaK.HagenH. (2011). Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda. Information Visualization, 10, 310-326.
25.
IvankovaN. (2013). Implementing quality criteria in designing and conducting a sequential QUAN → QUAL mixed methods study of student engagement with learning applied research methods online. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 25-51.
26.
IvankovaN.CreswellJ.StickS. (2006). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory into practice. Field Methods, 18, 3-20.
27.
JasonL.GlenwickD. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
JermannP.DillenbourgP. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers & Education, 51, 279-296.
29.
JohnsonR.OnwuegbuzieA.TurnerL. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
30.
JonesK. (2015). Using a theory of practice to clarify epistemological challenges in mixed methods research: An example of theorizing, modeling, and mapping changing West African seed systems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1558689815614960
31.
KearneyK.HyleA. (2004). Drawing out emotions: The use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative enquiry. Qualitative Research, 4, 361-382.
32.
KnoblauchH.TumaR. (2011). Videography: An interpretative approach to video-recorded micro-social interaction. In MargolisE.PauwelsL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 414-430). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
LeechN.DellingerA.BrannaganK.TanakaH. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 17-31.
34.
LeechN.OnwuegbuzieA. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265-275.
35.
LeonardiP. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147-167.
36.
LimK.O’ConnorM.RemusW. (2005). The impact of presentation media on decision making: Does multimedia improve the effectiveness of feedback?Information & Management, 42, 305-316.
MartiT.MertensD. (2014). Mixed methods research with groups at risk new developments and key debates. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 207-211.
39.
MeyerR.HöllererM.DennisD.van LeeuwenT. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 489-555.
40.
MillerA. (2004). Video-cued recall: Its use in a work domain analysis. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 1643-1647.
41.
MinnemanS.HarrisonS. (1993). Where were we: Making and using near-synchronous, pre-narrative video. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 207-214). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
42.
MondadaL. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In KnoblauchH.RaabJ.SoeffnerH.SchnettlerB. (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51-68). Bern, Switzerland: Lang.
43.
NicoliniD.MengisJ.SwanJ. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23, 612-629.
44.
O’DonnellA.DansereauD.HallR. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 71-86.
45.
OslonG.MaloneT.SmithJ. (2001). Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
QuinlanE.QuinlanA. (2010). Representations of rape: Transcending methodological divides. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 127-143.
48.
RichardsonL. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
RobinsonS.MendelsonA. (2012). A qualitative experiment: Research on mediated meaning construction using a hybrid approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 332-347.
50.
RoehlH.KnuthM.MagnerC. (2008). Mapping dialogue: Essential tools for social change. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute.
51.
RoseG. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
SonalkarN.AbogunjeA.LeiferL. (2013). Developing a visual representation to characterize moment-to-moment concept generation in design teams. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1, 93-108.
53.
StewartD.StewartC. (2001). Group recall: The picture-superiority effect with shared and unshared information. Group Dynamics, 5, 48-56.
54.
StiglianiI.RavasiD. (2012). Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1232-1259.
55.
SullivanM.DerrettS.PaulC.BeaverC.StaceH. (2014). Using mixed methods to build research capacity within the spinal cord injured population of New Zealand. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 234-244.
56.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.
57.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
VrkljanB. (2009). Constructing a mixed methods design to explore the older driver–copilot relationship. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(4), 371-385.
60.
WallK.HigginsS.RemediosR.RaffertyV.TipladyL. (2013). Comparing analysis frames for visual data sets using pupil views templates to explore perspectives of learning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(1), 22-42.
61.
WheeldonJ. (2010). Mapping mixed methods research: Methods, measures, and meaning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 87-102.
62.
YakuraE. (2002). Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 956-970.
63.
ZengZ.PanticM.RoismanG.HuangT. (2009). A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(1), 39-58.
